Allah Causes People to Commit Adultery?

In Islam adultery is haram looked upon as a major sin, on the popular Islamqa.info website which is run by Muslims we read the following on the about page “Islam Q&A is an academic, educational, da‘wah website which aims to offer advice and academic answers based on evidence from religious texts in an adequate and easy-to-understand manner. These answers are supervised by Shaykh Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid (may Allah preserve him).” A Muslima contacted Islamqa.info who suspected her husband of committing adultery she said:

My husband has been having an affair for approximately 1 year and the other woman is now pregnant. I am also pregnant. should I forgive him or should I leave him? If I stay should he take custody of the child as the other woman is a drug addict and should I bring the child up?

Here’s their response: Praise be to Allah. Firstly: It is well known in Islam that zina (unlawful sexual relationship) is haraam and is a major sin. The one who has fallen into this sin has to repent to Allah, may He be exalted, before it is too late. The prohibition of this evil deed is more emphatic in the case of a married man, hence the punishment for it is stoning to death. See the answer to question no. 97884 If it is proven to you that your husband is committing adultery, either because he has admitted it to you or there is shar‘i evidence to that effect, then advise him to fear Allah, immediately end his sinful relationship with that woman, do a lot of righteous deeds, and seek good company who will encourage him to do good and obey Allah and to avoid evil and sin.

According to Muslims zina (unlawful sexual relationship) is haram and needs to be repented of to Allah. Here’s the problem in the Hadith of Sahih Muslim we’re told Allah determines how much adultery a person will commit.

Now the question is how can Allah punish anyone if they are only doing the very thing Allah has commanded for that person to indulge in? On the Islamiq.info site, they said a person must: “do a lot of righteous deeds, and seek good company who will encourage him to do good and obey Allah and to avoid evil and sin.

But the person who has committed adultery is already obeying Allah because Allah made him/her do it. This brings us to the belief of determinism in Islam, that Allah determines everything to happen. Therefore, according to the teachings of the Qur’an adultery, abortion, rape, thief and anything else comes from Allah determining it to happen.

To substantiate our claim that Islam teaches determinism, we’ll look at another Hadith, concerning an argument between Adam and Moses.

In this Sahih Hadith, we have Moses blaming Adam for them being kicked out of paradise (Jannah). Moses blames Adam but what really happened is that Allah made (determined) that Adam would commit sin by eating from the tree and thereby getting kicked out of paradise. Adam tells Moses that Allah decreed that Adam would sin 40 years before Adam was created.

If Allah made Adam eat from the tree then why is Adam being blamed for obeying Allah’s command? There you go folks, Islam the most ridiculous religion, if Allah causes people sin how can Allah be justified in punishing them for what he has decreed for them to do? This makes Allah an unjust god and is further proof that Allah is not the true God (Yahweh) of the Bible.

Was Islam’s Prophet Muhammad a white man?

Muslims are taught early from birth to be prideful in their religion, they take much stock in their prophet who according to Muslims was a Middle Eastern man. In the West, Muslims have used dawah to deceive blacks into thinking Islam is a religion for black people. Yet these Muslim missionaries keep from them that Muhammad was depicted as a white man according to their own books?

So why does it come as a shock to Muslims when they’re told that Muhammad was a white man? It’s because Muslims are taught not to question anything but to follow blindly what their scholars and Imam’s tell them. Let’s dig into the Islamic sources for ourselves to see if Muhammad was considered white or not. Everything we claim here must be backed up with sources and that’s what we’re going to do.

The Hadith’s say that Muhammad was a white man

These following Hadith’s might come to shock those who became Muslim because they thought Islam was a “black religion”. In the following Hadith by Sahih Muslim, we’re told that “Allah’s Messenger” had a white handsome face.

In this Hadith we have the story of a man who came on a camel looking for Muhammad. The Hadith by Sahih al-Bukhari says that Muhammad was a white man sitting (reclining) with his companions.

There are even Hadith’s which go into the white complexion of Muhammad, I’m not really sure why Muhammad felt the need to convey over and over again that he’s white? There is more information which we’ll provide that answers this question, we’ll reserve it to the end.

This Hadith explains that Muhammad only raised his hands for Istisqa and they saw the whiteness of Muhammad’s armpits. I mean these Hadith’s are silly to say the least how is this supposed to be of any importance for spirituality?

The following Hadith contradicts the previous one in which it says Muhammad raised his arms only during the invocation of Istisqa. Here in Sahih Muslim it says he prostrated and spread out his arms revealing the whiteness of his armpits.

Again we’re introduced to the whiteness of his armpits. At this point, it’s safe to say that Muhammad was obsessed with being white but as promised there’s an explanation which we’ll mention at the end.

Again the whiteness of his armpits, they’re so white you can see them from behind when he would prostrate.

Here the Hadith focuses on the legs of Muhammad, his slave Bilal came with Wudu water in which they wiped themselves with. Muhammad came out of his tent wearing a red dress and they saw the whiteness of his shins.

Last but not least Sahih al-Bukhari tells us that “he was white” with a black beard which had some white hair. Remember that when sharing these Hadith’s with Muslims they will try to deny anything that is embarrassing. They will claim it’s Diaf (weak) but this Hadith, as well as others, are Sahih (authentic). Therefore, they cannot run away for these are the saying of Muhammad the Sunnah.

Now to bring forth the reason why Muhammad was so engrossed with proclaiming that he’s white. It’s well known that Muhammad was racist selling and owning black slaves. Here’s a Hadith which proves that Muhammad was against blacks.

What kind of “prophet of God” would do such a thing? This is the behaviour of an ungodly man who enslaved blacks. Under Sharia Law (The Judgement of the Shari’a regarding someone who curses or disparages the Prophet) you cannot call Muhammad black otherwise you can be killed, this is according to the Muslim sources.

Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman, the companion of Sahnun, said, “Anyone who says that the Prophet was black should be killed.”

Now you can see why Muhammad was so adamant in proclaiming his whiteness because he saw blacks as inferior. Muhammad is a satanic prophet and Islam is a religion of the devil, come out of Islam and come to the Holy One of Israel the Lord Jesus Christ for salvation.

Hadith “Bell is a musical instrument from Satan”

The Hadith’s are the saying’s of Muhammad called Sunnah, the Hadith are second only to the Qur’ān in authority followed and practiced by Muslims. A Muslim must believe in the Hadith in order to be a considered a Muslim.

In the following Hadith by Sahih Muslim we read that “The bell is the musical instrument of the Satan” Why is a bell claimed to be an instrument of Satan is beyond me and makes no sense but that’s what their own books say.

According to the Sahih Muslim 2114 the bell is from Satan this is interesting because there’s another Hadith which says Muhammad received Qur’ān as the sound of a bell. This Hadith is also found in Sahih Muslim it tells us that Muhammad receives “wahi (inspiration)” and that “At times it comes to me like the ringing of a bell”.

Putting the two Hadith’s together it’s not hard to figure out that if bells are from Satan and Muhammad received Qur’ān in the sound of bells logically speaking can only mean he’s receiving satanic inspiration in the form of Qur’ān. This makes sense taking into account the Qur’ān says Satan puts words into the mouth of Muhammad which made its way into the Qur’ān. We can find it in Qur’ān 22 verse 52

We also have the account from Ibn Hisham which speaks about Muhammad once delivering revelation promoting polytheism. Muhammad claimed that Satan tricked him into delivering the “Satanic Verses”. Here’s the story, according to Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah (the earliest biography on Muhammad). I’ll also include the link for your own reading.

Now the apostle was anxious for the welfare of his people, wishing to attract them as far as he could. . . . When the apostle saw that his people turned their backs on him and he was pained by their estrangement from what he brought them from God he longed that there should come to him from God a message that would reconcile his people to him. Because of his love for his people and his anxiety over them it would delight him if the obstacle that made his task so difficult could be removed. . . . Then God sent down “By the star when it sets your comrade errs not and is not deceived, he speaks not from his own desire,” and when he reached His words “Have you thought of al-Lat and al-Uzza and Manat the third, the other”, Satan, when he was meditating upon it, and desiring to bring it to his people, put upon his tongue “these are the exalted Gharaniq [Numidian cranes] whose intercession is approved.” When the Quraysh heard that, they were delighted and greatly pleased at the way in which he spoke of their gods and they listened to him; while the believers were holding that what their prophet brought them from their Lord was true, not suspecting a mistake or a vain desire or a slip, and when he reached the prostration and the end of the Sura in which he prostrated himself the Muslims prostrated themselves when their prophet prostrated confirming what he brought and obeying his command, and the polytheists of Quraysh and others who were in the mosque prostrated when they heard the mention of their gods, so that everyone in the mosque believer and unbeliever prostrated . . . Then the people dispersed and the Quraysh went out, delighted at what had been said about their gods, saying, “Muhammad has spoken of our gods in splendid fashion. He alleged in what he read that they are the exalted Gharaniq whose intercession is approved.”

The news reached the prophet’s companions who were in Abyssinia, it being reported that Quraysh had accepted Islam, so some men started to return while others remained behind. Then Gabriel came to the apostle and said, “What have you done, Muhammad? You have read to these people something I did not bring you from God and you have said what He did not say to you.” The apostle was bitterly grieved and was greatly in fear of God. So God sent down (a revelation), for He was merciful to him, comforting him and making light of the affair and telling him that every prophet and apostle before him desired as he desired and wanted what he wanted and Satan interjected something into his desires as he had on his tongue. So God annulled what Satan had suggested and God established His verses, i.e. you are just like the prophets and apostles. Then God sent down: “We have not sent a prophet or apostle before you but when he longed Satan cast suggestions in his longing. But God will annul what Satan has suggested. Then God will establish his verses, God being knowing and wise.” (Ibn Ishaq, pp. 165-166)

After reading this what’s the take-home? (1) Muhammad desired to reconcile his people bringing them together. (2) Satan took advantage of Muhammad desires and put demonic revelation into the mouth of Muhammad. (3) Muhammad didn’t recognise this was from Satan and delivered the Satanic verses. (4) The Quraysh was happy that Muhammad was promoting polytheism Ibn Hisham says “When the Quraysh heard that, they were delighted and greatly pleased at the way in which he spoke of their gods and they listened to him” (5) Muhammad along with the Muslims and the Quraysh prostrated together in worship. (6) Jibril (angel Gabriel) comes to Muhammad telling him what he recited was not from Allah but Satan.

Here’s the question how can Muslims believe in a satanic prophet who couldn’t recognise the difference between revelation from Allah or Shaitan? If it’s so easy for Satan to put into Muhammad’s mouth demonic revelation how much more of the Qur’ān is from Satan? It’s safe to say all of it is from Satan remember the Hadith “The bell is the musical instrument of the Satan” and Muhammad receives “wahi (inspiration)” and that “At times it comes to me like the ringing of a bell”. Just from this evidence alone can we conclude that Allah is Satan, this is why Muhammad couldn’t tell the difference between the two.

Lastly, the Qur’ān says if Muhammad is a slave of Allah then Satan wouldn’t have authority over Muhammad. But we clearly see that Satan did have authority over him putting into his mouth satanic verses. We’ll end with the Qur’ānic verse proving Muhammad is a false prophet from Satan.

The Qur’ānic verse is saying only those who don’t belong to Allah are deviators, this would mean Muhammad is a deviator according to their own book. Muslims leave Islam and come into the arms of Jesus Christ, He’s waiting to forgive you all your sins.

Mushrik Allah the First One to Commit Shirk

The 5 pillars of Islam are foundational to the religion, which are the Shahada (Faith) The confession of faith in one god (Allah) and his messenger Muhammad. Salah (Prayer) The 5 ritual prayers each day. Zakat (Almsgiving) giving a portion of a Muslim’s wealth to those in need. Sawm (Fasting) fasting during Ramadan. Hajj (Pilgrimage) The pilgrimage to Mecca required of every Muslim at least once in their lifetime.

What if I said the first one to commit shirk in Islam was their own god Allah? We’re going to touch upon the first pillar, providing proof from their own Qur’an that Islam doesn’t teach monotheism but in fact teaches polytheism. We’ll prove everything we have to say with the Muslims own sources.

According to the Qur’an Allah commanded the angels to prostrate (bow down in worship) Adam. For the angles to prostrate to Adam is an act of worship. Notice the only one who refused to bow down to Adam was Iblees (Satan).

In Surah 2:34 Satan refused to commit shirk but Allah was telling the angels to commit shirk by bowing down to Adam. It’s crazy to say but Satan according to Qur’an was doing the right thing by not bowing down to Adam (creature) while Allah wanted the angels to commit shirk.

Surah 7:11 we have angels prostrating to Adam again. Multiple times in the Qur’an we have Allah being a Mushrik this means the Muslims follow a god of idolatry and polytheism.

Surah 15:30 Allah commands the angels to worship Adam, to prostrate in adoration to a creature in this case Adam by the command of the Mushrik Allah.

Surah 17:61 all of these ayats prove that Islam is a religion of polytheism for even the angels commit shirk along with Allah. The only one we are to prostrate before is God alone, Christians only worship Yahweh we’re not told to bow down to creatures like the Muslims.

In the above Surah the Muslim translation is wrong, they are trying to hide the fact that the Arabic says (قُلْنَا) which is “We said”. But look at the deception, the translation says “when I said” they changed it.

We said to the angels, “Bow down to Adam”… In Surah 18:50 Allah uses the word “we” but Muslims say Allah is one, then why is Allah saying “we” shouldn’t he say I to avoid any confusion?

They tried correcting this with the English translation. Muslims always tend to reject the English translations and say only the Arabic is the Qur’an. Well they have a problem because the Arabic says “we” not “I”. Why would Allah want his angels to bow down to one of his creations and commit shirk? Read on to the end because the best part is saved for last.

The translations which use “I” are from the Abridged Explanation of the Quran, but if you compare this translation to the others like Yusuf Ali, Pickthall or Saheeh International you’ll notice they translated it as “We” which is correct if you go by the Arabic. This is a tactic Muslims have been using to deceive people into thinking Islam is a monotheistic.

Who can believe in such nonsense, here we supposedly have “god” commanding his angles to worship Adam saying, ‘Prostrate yourselves before Adam,’… Surah 20:116

By this point I think it’s clear that Islam is not a monotheistic religion. But it gets worse! Remember when I said wait until the end? Well the first pillar of Islam if you recall if the confession of faith. That is for a Muslim to believe in one god (Allah) and his messenger Muhammad.

It’s the second part which is a huge problem. Muslims are putting Muhammad on the same level as Allah committing shirk. Here we have a man who Muslims must confess in order for them to become Muslim? Have you ever thought why Muslims cannot just believe in Allah alone? That’s because the real god of Islam is Muhammad, he made up his own religion and in doing so committed shirk associating himself with Allah.

The Shahada is taking Muhammad and making him equal to Allah, because a person can only become Muslim by taking both Allah and Muhammad together; the entire faith is based upon a foundation of shirk.

Muhammad Was Possessed With Devils

In the Qur’an Allah says that Satan has no authority over those who belong to him (Allah), only those who are not followers of God does Satan have authority over. This is according to the Qur’an 15:42.

In the our last article we read how Muhammad was bewitched in other words he was affected by black magic (Sahih al-Bukhari 3175). We’ll continue to dive into this subject because if Muhammad is supposed to be a prophet of Allah, why is it that none of the prophets of God (Moses, Isaiah, Amos etc.) were under black magic like Muhammad was?

If only “deviators” (disbelievers) are fair game for Satan to have authority over this would explain why Muhammad gave Satanic verses, if you would like to read about the Satanic Verses here’s the article Muhammad and The Satanic Verses.

Because Satan was able to throw satanic verses into the Qur’an means Muhammad was a satanic prophet, even Muhammad didn’t know that Satan gave him revelations. This means Satan has authority over Muhammad and proves he cannot be a prophet of God according to the Qur’an 15:42 above.

Additionally, in the Hadith we’re told that the bell is an instrument of Satan found in Sahih Muslim 2114.

The Arabic it says that the bell is the psalms of Satan ( الْجَرَسُ مَزَامِيرُ الشَّيْطَانِ). In another Hadith we’re told the bell is a wooden instrument of Satan according to Sunan Abi Dawud 2556. Muslims will try to deny their own books if something ambrassing exposes the false prophet of Islam, but these Hadith’s are graded Sahih (حكم صحيح الألباني) authentic by Muslims.

At this point we’ve established the fact that the bell is a instrument of Satan, now what will Muslims say when we prove that Muhammad received revelation from Allah as sounding bells?

Conclusion

Let’s bring it all together we’ve proven from the Islamic sources that Muhammad was bewitched (under the influence of black magic) (Sahih al-Bukhari 3175), Satan doesn’t have any authority over those who are servants of Allah (Qur’an 15:42).

Yet Satan had authority over Muhammad and was able to put satanic verses in the mouth of Muhammad (Qur’an 22:52) making him a satanic prophet. And lastly, the bell is the instrument of Satan (Sahih Muslim 2114, Sunan Abi Dawud 2556) and Muhammad received inspiration like the ringing of a bell (Sahih Muslim 2333b).

It’s plain to see that all of this means Muhammad was a satanic prophet and Allah is Satan because Allah sent revelation to Muhammad.

Eating 7 dates (Ajwa) Protects Muslims from Magic and Poison?

Any one who claimed to be a prophet of God in the Bible brought a message which would be accurate and come to pass. Otherwise if the message didn’t come to pass as was said that person would be called a false prophet. Additionally, anyone who worships another “god” other than Yahweh would also be false.

In this article we’re going to put one of Muhammad’s prophecies to test and see if it is from God? According to the Sunnah (sayings of the prophet) Muhammad taught that if Muslims ate 7 dates (Ajwa), they would be protected from magic or poison.

The above Hadith is Sahih meaning it’s authentic, here Muhammad claims by eating dates a person will not be effected by magic of poison. One can only imagine that for Muhammad to teach this means he himself keeps this practice, otherwise he would be teaching something that he himself is not willing to practice.

As we’ve stated earlier in order for a person to be a prophet of God their teaching must be without any error. But there’s a problem because Muhammad was effected by black magic, we find this in Sahih al-Bukhari 3175

Muhammad had to be suffering from delusions, there are even other hadith’s which elaborate on this one saying that Muhammad thought he had sexual intercourse with his wives, but it was not true as he only imagined it.

If Muhammad thought he had sexual intercourse with his wives but in-fact he didn’t (he was living in a fantasy world), what kind of black magic was he under for him for him to think he had intercourse when he really didn’t? How can any Muslim be confident in the Qur’an coming from a delusional man. Additionally, Muhammad was under the influence of black magic for a long period of 6 months possibly 1 year.

In Fatwa Number: 65087 which speaks about Muhammad under the influence of black magic reads: It has been proven in the two Sahihs and others that the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, bewitched Labid bin Al-A’sam from the Jews of Zuraiq, and the period during which the magic struck him was forty days. In some accounts, it is six months. Some scholars combined the two accounts that the duration of the operation from its beginning to its end was six months; But its direct impact on him, may God bless him and grant him peace, was only forty days. Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar reported in Al-Fath on the authority of Ibn Sa’d that he said: When the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, returned from Al-Hudaybiyah in Dhu Al-Hijjah and entered Muharram in the year seven, the chiefs of the Jews came to Labid bin Al-A’sam, who was an ally in Bani Zuraiq and was a magician. We bewitched, and we bewitched Muhammad, and we did nothing, and we make for you that you bewitch him for us to bewitch him, so they made him three dinars, so he stayed forty nights..and in a narration…six months, and it can be combined that the six months from the beginning of his change of mood, and the forty days from its firmness. This text shows the year in which the magic took place, as well as its duration, and that it is forty days, or six months, and we did not find a statement that exceeds six months, which indicates that the saying of a full year is incorrect.

فقد ثبت في الصحيحين وغيرهما أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم سحره لبيد بن الأعصم من يهود زريق، وكانت ا التيفقد ثبت في الصحيحين وغيرهما أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم سحره لبيد بن الأعصم من يهود زريق، وكانت المدة التي أصابه فيها السحر أربعين يوما. وفي بعض الروايات أنها ستة أشهر. وجمع بعض أهل العلم بين الروايتين بأن مدة العملية من بدايتها إلى نهايتها كانت ستة أشهر؛ لكن تأثيرها المباشر عليه صلى الله عليه وسلم كانت مدته أربعين يوما فقط. ونقل الحافظ ابن حجر في الفتح عن ابن سعد قال: لما رجع رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم من الحديبية في ذي الحجة ودخل المحرم من سنة سبع جاءت رؤساء اليهود إلى لبيد بن الأعصم، وكان حليفا في بني زريق وكان ساحرا فقالوا يا أبا الأعصم: أنت أسحرنا وقد سحرنا محمدا فلم نصنع شيئا ونحن نجعل لك جعلا على أن تسحره لنا سحرا ينكؤه، فجعلوا له ثلاثة دنانير، فأقام أربعين ليلة.. وفي رواية … ستة أشهر، ويمكن الجمع بأن تكون الستة أشهر من ابتداء تغير مزاجه، والأربعين يوما من استحكامه. فهذا النص يبين السنة التي وقع فيها السحر كما يبين مدته، وأنه أربعين يوما، أو ستة أشهر، ولم نقف على قول يزيد على ستة أشهر مما يدل على أن القول بمدة عام كامل غير صحيح.

You can read the Fatwa by Muslims for yourself at the following link https://www.islamweb.net/ar/fatwa/65087/

In the above Hadith we ‘re told that Muhammad suffered from being poisoned and died because of such the food he ate at Khaibar which was supplied by a Jewish woman.

Conclusion

Certain questions are raised if Muhammad is a prophet of god and taught that eating 7 dates would protect from black magic and poison, then why was he under black magic and poisoned to death? If Muslims want to say Muhammad didn’t eat dates the days in which he was effected means Muhammad is not following his Sunnah. Therefore, he would be a hypocrite for teaching others to follow his teachings yet he doesn’t follow it himself.

Islam has to be the most illogical belief ever, Muslims claim Muhammad is the best of the prophets, they even go as far to say he’s the best of Allah’s creation. Yet Muhammad died like a false prophet according to the Qur’an. Allah said if Muhammad were to give any false sayings he (Allah) would cut Muhammad’s aorta.

And in the above Hadith (Sahih al-Bukhari 4428) that speaks of Muhammad’s death by poison and he (Muhammad) said he feels like his aorta is being cut from the poison. Lastly, why did Allah allow for Muhammad to die in this way, Islam teaches that Allah decrees how a person will die which means Allah choose for Muhammad to die like a false prophet.

And if Muhammad is the greatest of the prophets why didn’t Allah save Muhammad just as he saved Isa according to the Qur’an, doesn’t this mean that Isa (fake Jesus) is greater than Muhammad?

Is Alcohol from Allah or Satan?

In Islam Muslims are taught certain things are allowed (halal) while others are forbidden (haram). Muhammad had stoled this from Judaism in which Hebrews eat kosher foods. On islamqa.info the question was asked from a Muslim: “Why does islam prohibit drinking alcohol even in small amounts? And what does Koran say about it?”

Here’s the response they gave concerning alcohol: “No doubt alcohol is intoxicating, and contains this substance that makes people lose their minds. It says in the hadeeth, “Every intoxicant is khamr, and every khamr is haraam (forbidden).” If this is the case, then alcohol is considered to be forbidden and to come under the heading of “khamr”(wine, etc.) which people drink for relaxation or enjoyment. Allaah has forbidden it and stated that it is a sin, as He says (interpretation of the meaning):”

Let’s see what the Qur’an says where alcohol came from, in the following ayat we read that strong drink otherwise known as alcohol is the handiwork of Shaytaan.

O ye who believe! Strong drink and games of chance and idols and divining arrows are only an infamy of Satan’s handiwork. Leave it aside in order that ye may succeed. — S 5:90 (Pickthall)

Now if we look at another ayat in the Qur’an which says that alcohol was created by Allah as a sign for the people, good provision and for those who have wisdom.

And from the fruits of date-palms and grapes, you derive strong drink (this was before the order of the prohibition of the alcoholic drinks) and a goodly provision. Verily, therein is indeed a sign for people who have wisdom.  — S 16:67 (Mohsin Khan)

If we then take these 2 verses together then we must reach the conclusion that Allah and Satan are the same. If alcohol is Satan’s handiwork and Allah made alcohol as a sign for the Muslims this means Allah is Satan. Going into the Tafsir for further explanation we read from Ibn Kathir.

Tafsir of Ibn-Kathir: Prohibiting Khamr (Intoxicants) and Maysir (Gambling) Allah forbids His believing servants from consuming Khamr and Maysir which is gambling. Ibn Abi Hatim recorded that `Ali bin Abi Talib, the Leader of the Faithful, said that chess is a type of gambling. Ibn Abi Hatim recorded that `Ata’, Mujahid and Tawus, or , two of them, said that every type of gambling, including children’s playing with (a certain type of) nuts, is Maysir. Ibn `Umar said that Al-Maysir means gambling, and this is the same statement that Ad-Dahhak reported from Ibn `Abbas, who added, “They used to gamble during the time of Jahiliyyah, until Islam came. Allah then forbade them from this evil behavior.”

According to Ibn Kathir alcohol is Shaytan’s evil handiwork, and that in alcohol is great sin which is prohibited for Muslims. The Definition of prohibited is not permitted, forbidden by authority so how can it have “some benefit for men?” It’s abundantly clear that Islam is a religion from the father of lies Satan, many of these Muslims are confused because they don’t even know their own religion. May there eyes be open to the falsehood of Muhammad.

The Qur’ān Proves Jesus Christ is God

Qur’ān 19:15 starts with Allah saying “peace be upon him the day he was born”, who is the “he” spoken of in this verse that Allah is blessing? We’ll get into that shortly.

The goal of this article is to prove the Qur’ān confirms the deity of Christ. It sounds strange to use the Qur’ān to prove Jesus Christ is God, but in dealing with Muslims it’s vital to provide evidence from their own book. Since Muslims reject the Bible it makes no sense proving the deity of Jesus Christ from the Bible with them in the beginning.

Once a Muslim’s realises the falsehood of the Qur’ān it’s then the door is wide open to share the Gospel with them, this is important when using polemics. To begin we’ll start with the above verse sūrat maryam ayat 15. Allah bestows peace to the individual spoken of, the following verses afterwards gives us insight its Yahya (John the Baptist). To prove this is speaking of John we need only to read the proceeding verses most notably ayat 12.

To further confirm we read in the Tafsir al-Jalalayn which says Allah was speaking about John (Yahya) the Baptist who we know according to the Bible is the cousin of Jesus found in the Gospel of Luke 1:13-1:80. Other Islamic scholars who agree are Ibn ‘Abbas as well as Ibn Kathir.

If Allah says “Peace be upon him” referring to Yahya, and if Allah is the only one who can say “Peace be upon him”, then how do Muslims explain the following verse? If Allah alone can bestow peace upon others, there are no prophets including Muhammad who can bestow peace upon someone else what will Muslims do when Isa (Jesus) does?

According to Surah 19 ayat 33 Isa (Jesus) is saying “Peace be upon me”, this is not Allah bestowing peace on Jesus, no! This is Jesus is bestowing peace upon Himself, therefore, if God can only bestow peace upon others this would mean by Jesus saying “Peace be upon me” this is proof that He’s God.

We can also confirm once again through the Tafsir that this verse is speaking of Jesus. According to Ibn Kathir in the following ayats which leads up to 19:33, Kathir says…

Apparently Isa (Jesus) according to the Islamic narrative spoke from his cradle. This is not an original writing from the Qur’ān, in actuality Muhammad got this from from The Syriac Infancy Gospel known as the Arabic Infancy Gospel. It’s a New Testament apocryphal writing about the infancy of Jesus. Here’s the passage in the Infancy Gospel in which Muhammad stoled and placed in the Qur’ān 19:29.

“… Jesus spake when he was in the cradle, and said to his mother: “Mary, I am Jesus the Son of God, the Word, which thou didst bring forth according to the declaration of the angel Gabriel, and My Father hath sent me for the salvation of the world.””

The Islamic scholar Ibn Kathir tells us that Isa was breastfeeding and upon hearing Mary’s accusers claiming she was guilty of sexual immorality stopped breastfeeding and answered them saying “peace be upon me the day I was born, and the day I die, and the day I shall be raised alive!” in Surah 19:33.

If Jesus is not God how can He speak from the cradle as an infant? Christians do not believe this is inspired writing from God but Muhammad clearly plagiarised this from the Infancy Gospel as it was written to prove Jesus was more than a Man. How do Muslims explain this blatant act of thief from their prophet?

How do they explain Isa speaking to them from the cradle as an infant, none of the prophets according to Islam done such a thing. This is not a normal event.

Lastly, we see that the Qur’ān confirms the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ in which we find in Matthew 17:22-23, Mark 9:31, Luke 9:44. The Qur’an says that Isa (fake Jesus) will die and be raised alive, but this also contradicts Surah 4:157 which says Jesus didn’t die. If Jesus is not dead then He’s God because a mere man cannot live for over 2000+ years.

A mere man can only live at most a little over 100 years, the average life expectancy is anywhere between 75-82 years. And as mentioned if a person is fortunate to live 100 years he will die. Now Isa is according to Islam over 2000+ years old how can this be if Jesus is only a man? It would be impossible unless Isa (fake Jesus) is more than a man.

The Hadith says Dajjal is a man compared to Allah

When referencing the Qur’ān’s teaching of Allah’s face or any other mentioned part the typical Muslim response is “There is nothing like unto Him.” ayah 42:11. Indeed Allah has a face in which Muslims are to pray towards, one of the top Islamic scholars al-Jalalayn comments in the Tafsir.

We’ll look to answer this mystery more sufficiently as we take a closer look at the similarities of Allah and the Dajjal.

Islam teaches there’s a coming day in which the Dajjal will come to deceive people into thinking he’s the Messiah. Muhammad burrowed this doctrine from such Biblical text such as Matthew 24:23, Mark 13:21, 1 John 2:18 and Revelation 13:1 to name a few.

The Dajjal in Islam

The above Hadith is graded Sahih (authentic) in case Muslims claim it’s a weak (Da’if) Hadith, this Hadith is accepted by Muslim scholars. Notice the description of the Dajjal as being short in stature, hen-toed, woolly-haired and one-eyed, these descriptions denotes he has a physical body. It’s important to keep in mind that Muhammad is assuring Muslims that their Lord is not one-eyed. Therefore we can gather that Allah looks identical to the Dajjal except for the distinguishing feature that Allah is not one-eyed.

According to the Islamic narrative the Dajjal is an evil individual in Islamic eschatology who’ll claim he’s the awaited Messiah but in fact he’s the false Messiah, arriving on the scene before the Day of Resurrection. This is important later we’ll see how this comes into play. Also there’s no such thing as the “Antichrist” in Islam the actual terminology is Al-Masih ad-Dajjal (the false Messiah).

Continuing to prove the Dajjal looks like Allah we will read other Hadith’s which exposes Allah as having a shape, 2 right hands, a foot and so on.

The above Hadith Sunan an-Nasa’i describes Allah as having two right hands

This Hadith from Sahih al-Bukhari says Allah will come in a shape the Muslims won’t recognise, they’ll essentially reject Allah. Allah will then change his shape only then will the Muslims recognise him and will follow Allah.

Sahih al-Bukhari describes Allah as having a foot and he will his foot over hell and say “Qati! Qati!” (enough enough) stoping additional people from being tossed into hell. These are all descriptions of body parts Allah has. Just as we read earlier the Dajjal has one eye and Muhammad is telling Muslims not to be confused Allah doesn’t have 1 eye.

If Allah is nothing like his creation why are we being given vivid descriptions of body parts? If we learned that Allah has eyes, shape, hands and a foot how can Muslims reject the Christian belief that God became a Man in the Person of Jesus Christ?

How will Muslims Recognise Allah?

The Qur’ān says that Allah will uncover his shin on the Day of Resurrection Surah 68:42. The Arabic actually says “the leg”, again the question has to be raised if Allah is not a man how can he have legs?

We come to the conclusion that the god of Islam is made up of body parts just like any human. The Islamic sources tell us he has eyes, hands, feet and a shape. The Qur’ān says Allah has a face, yet Muslims profess that Allah is nothing like his creation, but the Qur’ān and Hadith are using terms which are found in creation.

If Dajjal is claiming to be the Messiah how is he claiming to be god? Muhammad said he’s afraid because Muslims will mistake him the Dajjal for their “Lord” otherwise known as Allah.

Christians believe Jesus Christ is the Messiah, our God became a real Man. The Islamic sources also have this concept because Muhammad tried to take the teachings from the Bible without understanding them making many mistakes and contradictions in the Qur’ān and Hadith.

Muhammad and The Satanic Verses

In Islam Muslims are taught that Muhammad was the greatest of all the prophets, and that he was the greatest man who ever lived. Sadly their desire to shower their prophet with praise has led to utter exaggeration of who and what Muhammad brought to the Muslim people.

In this article we’re going to look at the infamous Satanic revelations Muhammad recited to his followers and the pagans.

The Biography Of Muhammad

We read in the book The Life of Muhammad by Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul Allah, pp. 165-166:

Have you thought of al-Lat and al-Uzza and Manat, the third, the other Satan when he was meditating upon it, and desiring to bring it (reconciliation) to his people, put upon his tongue “these are the exalted Gharaniq whose intercession is approved.” When Quraysh heard that, they were delighted and greatly pleased at the way in which he spoke of their gods and they listened to him; while the believers were holding that what their prophet brought them from their Lord was true, not suspecting a mistake or a vain desire or a slip, and when he reached the prostration and the end of the Sura in which he prostrated himself the Muslims prostrated themselves when their prophet prostrated confirming what he brought and obeying his command, and the polytheists of Quraysh and others who were in the mosque prostrated when they heard the mention of their gods, so that everyone in the mosque believer and unbeliever prostrated, except al-Walid b. al-Mughira who was an old man who could not do so, 80 he took a handful of dirt from the valley and bent over it. Then the people dispersed and Quraysh went out, delighted at what had been said about their gods, saying, ‘Muhammad has spoken of our gods in splendid fashion. He alleged in what he read that they are the exalted Ghariniq whose intercession is approved.

Muhammad wanted to bring the Muslim people and the tribe of Quraysh together, Satan took the opportunity to put into Muhammad’s mouth the satanic verses and promoted polytheism. The tribe of Quraysh worshipped multiple gods one of those gods being Allah, notice the Muslims and people of Quraysh prostrated worshipping false gods.

Jibril’s Response to Muhammad

Then Gabriel (Jibril) came to the apostle and said, ‘What have you done, Muhammad You have read to these people something I did not bring you from God and you have said what He did not say to you. The apostle was bitterly grieved and was greatly in fear of God. p. 166:

According to the Sira, Muhammad couldn’t even tell what was Qur’an or not. When Muslims bring the challenge to bring a Surah like the Qur’an they don’t realise that Satan already brought revelation like the Qur’an.

From the Hadith Sources

The following Hadith agrees with the Sira, in the following Hadith we’re told that Muslims, pagans and Jinns prostrated (worshipped) together according to al-Bukhari.

Narrated Ibn Abbas: The Prophet performed a prostration when he finished reciting Surat-an-Najm, and all the Muslims and pagans and Jinns and human beings prostrated along with him. — Sahih al-Bukhari 4862

According to al-Tabari

When the Messenger of God saw how his tribe turned their backs on him and was grieved to see them shunning the message he had brought to them from God, he longed in his soul that something would come to him from God which would reconcile him with his tribe. With his love for his tribe and his eagerness for their welfare it would have delighted him if some of the difficulties which they made for him could have been smoothed out, and he debated with himself and fervently desired such an outcome. Then God revealed: “By the Star when it sets, “, and when he came to the words: “Have you considered El-Lat and El-‘Uzza and Manat the third, the other?”, Satan cast onto his tongue, because of his inner debates, and what he desired to bring to his people, the words, “Those are the high-flying cranes; verily their intercession is accepted with approval”, Then Gabriel came to the Messenger of God and said, “Muhammad, what have you done? You have recited to the people that which I did not bring you from God, and you have said that which was not said to you.” Then the Messenger of God was much grieved and feared God greatly, but God sent down a revelation to him (Qur’an 22:52), for He was merciful to him, (The History of al-Tabari vol. 6, page 108, 109)

According to The Qur’an

The following ayat provides information that a follower of Allah is protected, whoever doesn’t follow Allah is not protected. Muhammad was under the control and authority of Satan, because Allah was unable to protect Muhammad as Satan was able to put satanic revelations in Muhammad’s mouth.

“Certainly, you shall have no authority over My slaves, except those who follow you of the Ghawin (Mushrikun and those who go astray, criminals, polytheists, and evil-doers, etc.). — Surah 15:42

According to the Qur’an Muhammad was a Mushrikun.

Never have We sent a single prophet or apostle before you with whose wishes Satan did not tamper. But God abrogates the interjections of Satan and confirms His own revelations. — Surah 22:52

If Allah needs to cancel what Satan threw into the revelation, this means Satan was successful in putting false revelation in the Qur’an. On the other hand when we look in the Bible none of the prophets had gave satanic verses. A challenge to any Muslim is to bring evidence of Moses, Isaiah, Jeremiah any prophet of their choosing, prove that they brought satanic revelations. Only Muhammad was given false revelations from Satan because Muhammad is a false prophet.

Conclusion

From reading just a small amount of the Islamic sources we can come to the conclusion that Muhammad was controlled by Satan to the extent that he gave false revelations. If this is the case what else is false in the Qur’an and how can we know if anything in the Qur’an is true? Muhammad was subjected to the will of Satan as he had authority over Muhammad even though the Qur’an says Satan has no authority over the slave of Allah.

Lastly, no other prophet ever delivered satanic verses in the Bible, therefore, we can safely say that Muhammad was not a prophet from God. In fact he was a false prophet from Satan.

Human Reproduction in the Qur’ān (Surah 86:5-7)

We hear from Muslims how the Qur’ān must be from God because it has so many scientific miracles, that Muhammad couldn’t have known all of these amazing things without Allah revealing it to him. Today we’re going to take a deep dive into one of the “scientific proofs” Muslims use to lure unsuspecting people into Islam.

The Qur’ān puts forth the challenge “Then do they not reflect upon the Qur’an? If it had been from [any] other than Allah, they would have found within it much contradiction.” — Surah 4:82 Let’s find out if the Qur’ān has any scientific miracles?

Muslims will point to Surah 86:5-7 as one of the proofs that Islam must be true, this particular ayat is speaking about how the male and female body functions in regard baby conception.

The origin of sperm

“Now let man but think from what he is created! He is created from a drop emitted-Proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs:” — Surah 86:5-7

If Allah is supposed is God he would know how the human body works as the Creator, but here we see that the Qur’ān is saying that man is created from a drop (sperm) proceeding or coming from between the backbone and ribs. The problem is this ayat is saying both men and women produce sperm, even more scary is the ayat says that women produce sperm from their breast.

It’s well known that females do not produce sperm only male’s have the ability to produce sperm. Let’s get more clarification from Islam’s trusted scholars let’s look at what al-Jalalayn says.

Tafsir al-Jalalayn: “So let man consider by way of reflection from what he was created from what thing the response is He was created from a gushing fluid gushing forth from the man and the woman into the womb issuing from between the loins of the man and the breast-bones of the woman.”

Tafsir Ibn-Kathir: “(He is created from a water gushing forth.) meaning, the sexual fluid that comes out bursting forth from the man and the woman. Thus, the child is produced from both of them by the permission of Allah. (Proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs.) meaning, the backbone (or loins) of the man and the ribs of the woman, which is referring to her chest.”

After reading the Tafsir how unscientific is this? Never in the entire history of mankind has a woman ever produced sexual fluid from her chest. No medical professional would agree with this claim from the Qur’ān. We also know that men produce sperm in the lower part of the body namely the testicles, never does sperm come from the backbone.

What determines the gender of the baby?

Let’s see what Muhammad in the Hadith’s say about this?

It was narrated that Anas said: “The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: ‘The man’s water is thick and white, and the woman’s water is thin and yellow. Whichever of them comes first, the child will resemble (that parent).'” — Grade: Sahih (Darussalam) Book 1, Hadith 201

Notice that Muhammad in the Sunnah is saying the water (sperm) of the man is thick and white, while the water of the woman is thin and yellow. Looking again at what the Qur’ān said this “water” is sexual fluid. And when a man and woman come together which ever of them climaxes first that “sexual fluid” determines if the baby resembles the father or mother.

How long does sperm live?

Lastly, medically we can know that when sperm is inserted into a woman there’s an expected lifespan for the sperm to live as it has to travel through the woman as it meets the egg for fertilization. The woman’s immune system will begin killing off the millions of sperm deposited reducing them until only 1 get’s to fertilize the egg.

How The Human Being Is Created, In His Mother’s Womb, And His Provision, Lifespan And Deeds Are Written Down, And His Misery and Happiness Hudhaifa b. Usaid reported directly from Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) that he said: When the drop of (semen) remains in the womb for forty or forty five nights, the angel comes and says: My Lord, will he be good or evil? And both these things would be written. Then the angel says: My Lord, would he be male or female? And both these things are written. And his deeds and actions, his death, his livelihood; these are also recorded. Then his document of destiny is rolled and there is no addition to nor subtraction from it. — Sahih Muslim 2644

Here Muhammad says that sperm lives inside the womb for 40 days, the medical field disagrees with this here are 2 quotes from medical sites.

“After ejaculation, sperm can live inside the female body for around 5 days. The fluid in a woman’s reproductive tract has all of the nutrients that sperm need for their survival during that time.” — medicalnewstoday.com

“Ejaculated sperm remain viable for several days within the female reproductive tract. Fertilization is possible as long as the sperm remain alive — up to five days.” — mayoclinic.org 

Conclusion

There are just too many errors for in the Qur’ān for this book to be from God. We know that women do not produce sperm nonetheless coming from the breast, neither does the man produce sperm in the backbone or that the baby’s gender is determined from the climax of the parent and lastly that sperm lives for 40 days in the womb.

Arabic Contradictions in the Qur’ān (15:8) Hafs Vs Qaloon

The “perfect preservation” of the Qur’ān is falling apart, no more will Muslims be able to say there’s only one Qur’ān perfectly preserved in which not one word has been changed.

Another contradiction found in the Hafs and Qaloon Qur’ān, our Muslim friends must figure out which Arabic Qur’ān is on the eternal tablets with Allah in Jannah? This is a profound question because if there are 37-40 different Arabic Qur’ān’s then which one is going to intercede for Muslims on the day of judgement?

Hafs Qur’ān

Hafs Qur’ān: nunazzelu “we (do not) send down”

We do not send down the angels except with truth; and the disbelievers would not then be reprieved — Surah 15:8

Qaloon Qur’ān

Qaloon Qur’ān: tanazzalu “The angels (do not) descend”

The Angels do not descend except with truth; and the disbelievers would not then be reprieved. — Surah 15:8

Conclusion

Question is Allah commanding the angels by sending them down, or do the angels on their own accord descend? The primary action can only be by Allah or the angels Which of these two Qur’ān‘s are correct, is the Qaloon or the Hafs Qur’ān is correct?

Arabic Contradictions in the Qur’ān (13:42) Hafs Vs Ibn Jamaz

Continuing on with the variant readings from different Arabic Qur’ān’s we’re proving the SIN (standard Islamic narrative) is not true. The Arabic text found in the following versions of the Qur’ān contradicts each other. The following reading we have a singular word against a plural word.

Hafs Qur’ān

Hafs Qur’ān: al kuffaar “The unbelievers”

And those before them did indeed make plans, but all planning is Allah’s; He knows what every soul earns, and the unbelievers shall come to know for whom is the (better) issue of the abode. — Surah 13:42

Ibn Jamaz Qur’ān

Ibn Jamaz Qur’ān: al kaafir “The unbeliever”

And those before them did indeed make plans, but all planning is Allah’s; He knows what every soul earns, and the unbeliever shall come to know for whom is the (better) issue of the abode. — Surah 13:42

Conclusion

How can the Qur’ān be from God? God doesn’t contradict His own word, the Qur’ān has errors historically, topographically, orthographically and theologically. If God doesn’t make mistakes and if the Qur’ān was from God it would have no mistakes at all. Muslims claim there’s only 1 Qur’ān then how can 1 Qur’ān say two different things in the same ayat?

By looking at the 2 words closely we see they are different which 2 different meanings. The rasm is not the same and the diacritical marks are different.

Arabic Contradictions in the Qur’ān (66:12) Hafs Vs Warsh

According to the SIN (standard Islamic narrative) we’re told that there’s only one Qur’ān revealed from Allah, given to Jibrel (Gabriel) and given to Muhammad. We have been told that the Qur’ān is the same all around the world. And that the words of the Qur’ān are the same not one word has been changed.

We’re going to look at Surah 66:12 sūrat l-taḥrīm (“The Prohibition”), let’s take a closer look at this ayat to see if the Hafs and Warsh Qur’ān are the same.

Hafs Qur’ān

And Mary daughter of Imran, who kept safe her private parts, so We breathed in it of Our Spirit, and she testified to the Words of her Lord, and HIS BOOKS; and she was one of the devout.

The word in the Hafs Qur’ān: wa kutubihi means “his books”, notice this is a plural word.

Warsh Qur’ān

And Mary daughter of Imran, who kept safe her private parts, so We breathed in it of Our Spirit, and she testified to the Words of her Lord, and HIS BOOK; and she was one of the devout.

The word in the Warsh Qur’ān: wa kitaabihi which means “His book”, notice this is a singular word.

Conclusion

If you take a close look at both the Hafs and Warsh Arabic shown above you’ll notice the underlined word has different diacritical marks changing the meaning of the word. The one found in Hafs is a plural word “books” while Warsh is singular “book”.

Therefore, does Allah have many revelations which he gave, or just one? This is extremely important, since if it is one book, then Mary only testifies to the Bible, and not the Quran. Perhaps our Muslim friends who can explain will come and answer this?

Arabic Contradictions in the Qur’ān (3:146) Hafs Vs Warsh

Continuing on with our series variant readings from different Arabic Qur’ān’s we’re going to look at the differences between the Hafs version compared with the Warsh recitation. Below is the English translation of the ayat.

The Hafs

How many of the prophets fought (قَاتَلَ) (in Allah’s way), and with them (fought) Large bands of godly men? but they never lost heart if they met with disaster in Allah’s way, nor did they weaken (in will) nor give in. And Allah Loves those who are firm and steadfast.

Here is the Arabic of Hafs focus on the bold word:

وَكَأَيِّنْ مِنْ نَبِيٍّ قَاتَلَ مَعَهُ رِبِّيُّونَ كَثِيرٌ فَمَا وَهَنُوا لِمَا أَصَابَهُمْ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ وَمَا ضَعُفُوا وَمَا اسْتَكَانُوا ۗ وَاللَّهُ يُحِبُّ الصَّابِرِينَ

The Warsh

Let’s compare what we’ve read thus far in the Hafs Qur’ān and compare it with the Warsh version of the Qur’ān.

Here is the Arabic of Warsh notice the bolded Arabic letter has different markings than the one above.

وَكَأَيِّنْ مِنْ نَبِيٍّ قٌَتِلَ مَعَهُ رِبِّيُّونَ كَثِيرٌ فَمَا وَهَنُوا لِمَا أَصَابَهُمْ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ وَمَا ضَعُفُوا وَمَا اسْتَكَانُوا وَاللَّهُ يُحِبُّ الصَّابِرِينَ

Note the Warsh version has the word (قٌَتِلَ) which changes the meaning of the ayat. This word found in Warsh has different diacritical marks than the one in Hafs. The variant in the Warsh reads:

And how many a prophet were killed (قٌَتِلَ) and with him fought many religious scholars. But they never lost assurance due to what afflicted them in the cause of Allah , nor did they weaken or submit. And Allah loves the steadfast.

Question

If one version says the prophets fought and the other says they were killed the significance of that statement between the two are vastly different. If someone fought in a war that doesn’t necessary mean they were killed. But if the statement is made that someone was killed then we realise that person is no longer alive.

Conclusion

Muslims claim there’s only 1 Qur’ān, translators will try to conceal certain words from the Arabic when translating into English. This is the deception of Islam, without lies Islam dies. These lies which Muslims using Dawah deceive many people into thinking there’s only 1 Qur’ān when in reality there are 37-40 different Arabic Qur’ān’s with different words.

An argument made against the Bible by Muslims is “there’s many Bible versions”, this argument is incorrect. There are many English translations of the Bible (KJV, ESV, NASB etc.), the same as there are many English translations of the Qur’ān (Yusuf Ali, Pickthall, Arberry etc.). Does this mean there are also many different Qur’ān’s?

Yes there are because in this article we’re speaking of different Arabic versions, not English translations. Unlike the Qur’ān the Bible is originally written in Hebrew and Greek, therefore, for Muslims to point at English translations and claim there’s many Bible versions is untrue. There’s only 1 Bible in Hebrew and Greek, in speaking of the Qur’ān there’s the Hafs, Warsh, Doori, Al-Susi, Qaloon, Abi Jafar, al-Bazzi and many more.

We would like to take the time to invite Muslims to come to the better and bigger book the Bible and learn about the Saviour of the world, the Lord Jesus Christ that they might have salvation.

Arabic Contradictions in the Qur’ān (2:184) Hafs Vs Heshaam ibn Ammar

Muslims continue to deny the insurmountable evidence that the Qur’ān has not been preserved and is riddled with errors and contradictions. Different diacritical marks which changes the meaning of the word. How can anyone believe in a book which has multiple readings according to the original language (Arabic)?

At some point Lord willing, we’ll also take a “Deep Dive” into the rasm which is the consonantal skeletal text of the Qur’ān. Showing the variants between the Islamic manuscripts.

Hafs Qur’ān Vs. Heshaam ibn Ammar Qur’ān

Most Muslims are familiar reading the Hafs Qur’ān and are completely unaware of all the other versions out there. Therefore, being a kind individual I think the right thing to do is to inform our Muslim friends so that they are not ignorant of their existence.

Hafs Qur’ān Arabic Text

Here’s the Arabic text from the Hafs, if you notice above the yellow line we have the word Miskeenen. By taking a good look at the word and comparing it with the following text provided we can see that they are not the same word, Miskeenen is a singular word.

Hafs Qur’ān: Miskeenen

… And as for those who can fast with difficulty, may effect a redemption by feeding A POOR PERSON

Heshaam ibn Ammar Qur’ān Arabic Text

Here we have the text from Heshaam ibn Ammar, once again observing the word above the yellow line we can see this is a completely different word from the Hafs. Masaakeena is a plural word and is written differently.

Heshaam ibn Ammar Qur’ān: Masaakeena

… And as for those who can fast with difficulty, may effect a redemption by feeding POOR MEN

Conclusion

Muslims have a dilemma if the Qur’ān commands them to perform a certain deed how can they be sure they are doing what’s expected of them? For those who are unable to fast, can they feed just one poor man, or are they required to feed many poor men?

Arabic Contradictions in the Qur’ān (20:80) Hafs Vs Ibn Jafar

We’re introducing variant readings from different Arabic Qur’ān’s providing evidence that the standard Islamic narrative of there being only one Qur’ān is completely untrue. But don’t take my word for it, we’re providing the Arabic text which has different diacritical marks which changes the meaning of the ayat (sign).

Hafs Qur’ān Vs. Ibn Jafar Qur’ān

Hafs Qur’ān Arabic Text

Hafs Qur’ān: waa’adnaadum “We made an appointment (date)”

O children of Israel, we delivered you from your enemy, and We made an appointment with you at the right side of the mount when We sent down to you manna and quails

Ibn Jafar Qur’ān Arabic Text

Ibn Jafar Qur’ān: wa’adnaakum “We promised you”

O children of Israel, we delivered you from your enemy, and We promised you at the right side of the mount when We sent down to you manna and quails

Conclusion

Question for Muslims: Did they make an appointment, or did they promise? Making an appointment is different than promising. Please note “you” in Ibn Jafar is plural, while Hafs is singular.

Arabic Contradictions in the Qur’ān (21:4) Hafs Vs Warsh

The standard Islamic Narrative when it comes to the Qur’ān is that there’s only one Qur’ān, but how true is this? Muslims when crazy 4 years ago when Jay Smith and Hatun Tash introduced 26 different Arabic Qur’ān’s at speaker’s corner. To date there are about 37-40 different Arabic Qur’ān’s which have variants, contradicting one another.

We’re going to introduce this series of variant readings of the different Qur’ān’s providing the Arabic for your viewing pleasure.

Hafs Qur’ān Vs. Warsh Qur’ān

The Hafs Qur’ān is being the most popular among Muslims today, the second most popular version is the Warsh Qur’ān mostly used in the following countries Algeria, Morocco, parts of Tunisia, West Africa and Sudan. Below is a reading of Surah 21:4 from both the Hafs and Warsh.

Hafs Qur’ān Arabic Text

Hafs Qur’ān: qaala “He said”

HE SAID: My Lord knows what is spoken in the heaven and the earth, and He is the Hearing, the Knowing.

Warsh Qur’ān Arabic Text

Warsh Qur’ān: qul “Say (imperative: God is speaking)”

SAY; My Lord knows whatever is said throughout the heaven and the earth, and He is the Hearing, the Knowing.

Conclusion

Question for Muslims: Is Muhammad the one speaking here, or is Allah commanding? Is this injunction coming from man or God?

Christadelphians “reject that the Holy Spirit is a person distinct from the Father” (4)

In this article we are going to prove that the Holy Spirit is indeed a Person distinct from the Father, contrary to the Christadelphian belief in which they reject the Personhood of the Spirit of God.

We reject the doctrine – that the Holy Spirit is a person distinct from the Father.

“God fills His creation. All of its activity is because of His wise and sustaining Spirit, the divine energy working out His gracious purpose. The Spirit is not a “separate” or “other” person. It is God’s own radiant power, ever outflowing from Him, by which His “everywhereness” is achieved. The Spirit is personal in that it is of God Himself: it is not personal in the sense of being some other person within the Godhead.” — christadelphia.org

The Christadelphians claim the Holy Spirit is not a Person, when the Lord Jesus was baptised we see something interesting. We have Christ in the water, the heavens were opened “the Spirit of God” came down upon Jesus and we have a voice from heaven saying “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” there’s no mistake that the voice from heaven was God the Father.

But we have a classic view of the Trinity in this passage (1) Jesus Christ in the water (2) The Holy Spirit coming down as a dove (3) A voice from heaven which is God the Father. 3 distinct Persons are involved in Matthew 3:16-17.

Matthew 3:16-17 And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him: And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.

The Christadephians would still reject this claiming this is not enough proof, ok let’s see if we have more evidence for the Personhood of the Holy Spirit? There are certain categories in which we can prove the Holy Spirit possesses Personhood.

Intelligence

The Holy Spirit shows the capability to know, think and understand, He searches all the deep things concerning God. The Holy Spirit is capable of knowing all the divine truth of the Godhead. This is a character trait of Personhood. Just as the Lord Jesus said that the Holy Spirit will teach us all things concerning Him (John 14:26).

1 Corinthians 2:10-11 But God hath revealed [them] unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.

Emotion

He has emotional capacity to feel and love. The Holy Spirit is capable of feeling grief which is an emotional trait, only a Person can feel grieved.

Ephesians 4:30 And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.

How can “energy” be grieved? It cannot because energy doesn’t have a capacity to feel emotions. Only a Person has the ability to be grieved, and if they experience grief they can also experience the capacity to love as well.

Will

Lastly, He has the ability to decide and act according to His will. According to this verse in Corinthians the Holy Spirit distributes spiritual gifts as He wills. Thereby, this shows the Spirit of God through His actions of giving is a Person.

1 Corinthians 12:11 But all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will.

Conclusion

These 3 passages show the Holy Spirit is possesses the ability of intelligence, the capacity of emotion feeling love and grief, and He can also give gifts according to His will. This are characteristics only a Person can have. The Holy Spirit is not some “force”, “energy” or power emanating from God.

7 “Christian Truths” Pt. II According to WMSCOG Member

“I am not an expert or a teacher, but I have been taught and do believe what the Word says. … I will include the link below where you can find some more specific answers, … At World Mission Society Church of God, it is a global church that is rapidly being built more all over the world. We practice everything in the bible, … the biblical Zion where He has chosen to dwell in order to restore the truth that has been distorted and corrupted over the past 1,600 years (Psalms 132:13-14). You will not find another church that teaches Gods mysteries, because only God Himself can reveal them. This has nothing to do with pride or arrogance about being the “best/right” church and has everything to do with what God already prophesied (Isaiah 2:3).”

1) God is weeding out His children from Satan’s children (Matthew 13)

Matthew 13

It’s ironic that Matthew 13 is mentioned because it concerns the Gospel message, something the WMSCOG doesn’t teach. The chapter concerns the parable of the sower and the different soils and their reaction to the Gospel message. In the case of Raven I wonder which of these soils she identifies herself as and why?

2) Everything on earth that is made, is made to teach us what is in heaven. It is a copy and shadow, heaven is the reality and earth is the shadow. (Like the family system on earth, consisting of a dad, mom and children teaching us that we have a spiritual family) (Heb 8:5, Rom 1:10)

Hebrews 8:5 and Romans 1:10

Hebrews 8:5 Who serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, [that] thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount.

Romans 1:10 Making request, if by any means now at length I might have a prosperous journey by the will of God to come unto you.

Hebrews 8:5 Talks about a better ministry which is in Christ, how He is our Great High Priest serving as our Mediator. In that the Old Testament priest who served in the temple was not perfect it was inferior compared to Jesus Christ and His ministry as our Mediator (1 Timothy 2:5), that’s the context of Hebrews 8:5

Hebrews 8:5 Who serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, [that] thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount.

The best practice is reading not only the highlighted verse but also the surrounding text to get a clear view of what’s being taught. And we see it certainly doesn’t refer to a “family system on earth” as Raven suggest. Here’s the following verse:

Hebrews 8:6 But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.

Notice these words “a more excellent ministry”, “mediator of a better covenant” and “better promises” this is what the context is speaking of, Jesus as the one who fulfills the role of our Mediator.

Romans 1:10 is talking about how Paul brought the message of the Gospel, he was talking to believers in Christ. Paul was thankful for the believers in Rome and prayed that he might visit them again in the near future and wanted his journey to be according to the will of God. That’s all the verse is speaking about.

3) The old covenant was written to teach us, all the stories are prophecy about us spiritually. We are living in the New testament times. Revelation isn’t the only book about us, the whole bible is. (Romans 15:4)

Romans 15:4

Romans 15:4 For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning, that we through patience and comfort of the scriptures might have hope.

Romans 15:4 is an Old Testament reference found in the Psalms, while they were not written directly to us, they hold vital lessons for us. When we go through problems no matter what they might be the Scriptures teach us to remain steadfast in our faith, and they give us comfort. That we have nothing to fear because the LORD will hold us up.

Psalm 119:50 This [is] my comfort in my affliction: for thy word hath quickened me.

But not all of the Bible is prophecy, much of it is also historical, poetical and doctrinal. The WMSCOG looks to spiritualize the entire Bible and in doing so has convoluted the message and clear teaching of the scriptures.

4) God speaks in parables, that only He allows His chosen to read with correct understanding, it is spiritually sealed. That is why there are 850+ denominations because only God can interpret His own salvation work, human minds can only try/attempt to know and teach the gospel but do not succeed. This is why God had to come again in the flesh, to correct what was ruined so that we could know the way to have salvation. (Isaiah 2:3, Matt 13:10, Rev 5:1-4)

Isaiah 2:3, Matthew 13:10, Revelation 5:1-4

Isaiah 2:3 And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem.

Matthew 13:10 And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?

Revelation 5:1-4 And I saw in the right hand of him that sat on the throne a book written within and on the backside, sealed with seven seals. And I saw a strong angel proclaiming with a loud voice, Who is worthy to open the book, and to loose the seals thereof? And no man in heaven, nor in earth, neither under the earth, was able to open the book, neither to look thereon. And I wept much, because no man was found worthy to open and to read the book, neither to look thereon.

The Lord Jesus spoke in parables for a purpose, it was the plan of God because if the Jews would have accepted Christ as the Messiah in the beginning they wouldn’t have crucified Him which was necessary for our salvation. The crucifixion had to happen, it was the infinite wisdom of God to save us through the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ. That’s why Jesus spoke in parables.

Raven mentions denominations. While I do not subscribe to denominations what she doesn’t understand is any denomination which believes in the primary essential truths is what determines if a person is a Christian, which are (1) the Trinity (Father, Son, The Holy Spirit) (2) Jesus is God (3) Salvation is by grace alone, through faith in Christ alone (4) Believers baptism. If any denomination denies any of the foundational truths then they are heretical.

Secondary beliefs does not determine if someone is Christian, some secondary beliefs are (1) how someone is baptised (full immersion in water backwards or forwards) (2) the role of women in the church (3) how corporate worship is to be conducted (4) shall one pastor lead or a plurality of elders.

5) Women are supposed to wear veils during worship, so she can worship God directly and correctly (cancelling out her “head”, which is man (world system is Christ, man and then woman) (1 Corinthians 11:3-9)

1 Corinthians 11:3-9

1 Corinthians 11:3-9 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman [is] the man; and the head of Christ [is] God. Every man praying or prophesying, having [his] head covered, dishonoureth his head. But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with [her] head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. For a man indeed ought not to cover [his] head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man. For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.

The covering for woman is for a few reasons (1) Headship in the order of creation, man (Adam) was created first then woman (Eve). (2) Because of the angels “For this cause ought the woman to have power on [her] head because of the angels.” (1 Corinthians 11:10). (3) This is to be done during corporate worship, men pray uncovered and woman are to be covered.

The veil is not how women can directly worship God, women just like men can worship God directly through Christ, “the veil of the temple was rent in twain” giving all believers direct access to God (Matthew 27:51; Mark 15:38; Luke 23:45).

In the book of Hebrews we’re told how Christ paved the way for us to approach God (Hebrews 6:19). And we now have boldness when coming into the presence of God because Jesus Christ made the way for us through His blood.

Hebrews 4:16 Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.

Hebrews 10:19-20 Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus, By a new and living way, which he hath consecrated for us, through the veil, that is to say, his flesh;

6) New covenant does not mean we stop doing everything God commanded, the law was established through the old covenant, we still keep it even in this time of 2020, just in a different way (not animal sacrifices etc.) (Matt 5:17, Matt 19:17)

Matthew 5:17, 19:17

Matthew 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

Matthew 19:17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? [there is] none good but one, [that is], God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

Raven believes that because Christ said He came to fulfil the Law that we also must follow the Old Covenant, I’m wondering if she knows that the Bible says the Old Covenant is waxed old and vanishing away?

Hebrews 8:13 In that he saith, A new [covenant], he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old [is] ready to vanish away.

Why anyone would want to remain in the Old Covenant that’s old and vanishing away makes no sense whatsoever.

7) Tuesdays (Third day) and Saturdays (Sabbath) are the days God has appointed to cleanse our souls (Numbers 19:12, Exodus 19:15)

Numbers 19:12, Exodus 19:15

Numbers 19:12 He shall purify himself with it on the third day, and on the seventh day he shall be clean: but if he purify not himself the third day, then the seventh day he shall not be clean.

Exodus 19:15 And he said unto the people, Be ready against the third day: come not at [your] wives.

The ignorance of WMSCOG is that they don’t understand why Christians worship on Sunday. Immediately after Jesus victoriously rose from the dead, some Jewish converts were confused about certain practices such as circumcision, which day of worship to observe, and whether or not to observe the Jewish feasts. These issues were addressed by Paul in Colossians 2:14-17 and Galatians 5:6. Paul enters the Jewish synagogue on the Sabbath in order to preach the Gospel to the Jews (Acts 17:2, 18:4) and afterwards gathers with believers on Sunday (Acts 20:7).

Acts 20:7 And upon the first [day] of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul preached unto them, ready to depart on the morrow; and continued his speech until midnight.

Remember Saturday is not the first day of the week, it’s the 7th day of the week, but here we see on the first day of the week which is Sunday; the disciples came together.

It’s ver unfortunate that people like Raven and others are being mislead into thinking they are capable of keep the Law. We are not perfect and the reason why God gave the Law ultimately was to show us how incapable we are to keep it. The Old Testament Law is called a schoolmaster in the book of Galatians and Paul tells us what was the purpose of the schoolmaster.

Galatians 3:24-25 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.

The purpose of the Law was to show us how sinful we are so that we would run to Jesus Christ for salvation, it’s through our faith in Christ that we are justified and made right with God. It’s not by keeping certain days like the Sabbath.

Lastly, notice how Raven says “I am sorry if you are one of those people who have experienced church and it be a nightmare for you, or something unholy happened that broke your trust and faith.”

We should never judge God by what a group of men have done, we always look to God Himself to see who He is, there are people out there who claim to love God and would do a person wrong. But that’s man who messed up not God. The WMSCOG claims to be the “true church” they are not the only cult which claims this. Here are a few quotes from some other cults.

Notice the similarities between the WMSCOG and these other cults which claim their church is the only true church.

Watchtower Quotes (Jehovah Witnesses)

Jehovah Witnesses claim any group outside of their own are considered “False religions”, and the only way to understand the Bible is through them.

“False religious propaganda from any source should be avoided like poison! Really, since our Lord has used “the faithful and discreet slave” to convey to us “sayings of everlasting life,” why should we ever want to look anywhere else?” Watchtower 1987 Nov 1 p.20

“We cannot hope to acquire a good relationship with Jehovah if we ignore those whom Jesus has appointed to care for his belongings. Without the assistance of “the faithful and discreet slave,” we would neither understand the full import of what we read in God’s Word nor know how to apply it.” Watchtower 2010 Sept 15 p. 8-9

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Quotes (Mormons)

“It is our firm conviction that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is, as the revelations state, “the only true and living church upon the face of the whole earth.”” The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

“Because of this declaration of the Lord, we refer to this, His Church—our Church—as the “only true Church.”” The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

“So what does it mean that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the only true Church? Three features—(1) fulness of doctrine, (2) power of the priesthood, and (3) testimony of Jesus Christ—explain why God has declared and why we as His servants maintain that this is the only true and living Church upon the face of the whole earth.” The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

World Mission Society Church of God Quotes

“However, even though many churches keep Sunday, God’s true day of worship cannot be changed to Sunday—the day to worship the sun. God’s commandments must not be changed by man for any reason.” WATV.Org

“God came to this earth according to the prophecies of the Bible, and revealed the truth hidden in darkness to the whole world and let us know the true day of worship we should observe. The Sabbath that the Church of God keeps holy on Saturday, the seventh day, is the pure truth of the early Church which Christ restored at His second coming.” WATV.Org

Conclusion

If you remember what Raven said she mentioned “You will not find another church that teaches Gods mysteries” in other words in her mind only the WMSCOG alone is the “truth”. No. Only Jesus Christ alone is the Truth (John 14:6) and I hope that Raven and other WMSCOG members will come to know this for themselves, it’s not about a church; it’s about a Person and that’s Jesus Christ.

If you’re a current WMSCOG member this is not an article written to be a personal attack against you, but a wake up call. A call to you to be “noble and search the scriptures daily whether those things were so” (Acts 17:11), just like the Bereans we also need to dig into the scriptures and “prove all things” (1 Thessalonians 5:21).

Salvation is not found in WMSCOG or any other group, Eternal Life is only found in Jesus Christ. We must be sure that we are following the real Jesus Christ of the Bible, Jesus said that their will be many false Christ (Matthew 24:23-28; Mark 13:21-23). The WMSCOG preaches a false Christ but it’s up to you to look into the scriptures and sift through the evidence, I hope for your own sake that you’ll put your feelings to the side and see if these things are true.

A good source for learning more about the erroneous teachings of the WMSCOG from ex-members some of which were leaders in the group. Is a channel called Great Light Studios run by a believer named Jordan, he has current and ex-members come on and discuss teachings from the WMSCOG. Feel free to check them out.