From Hinduism, then Atheism to Islam (Answering Dawahmotivation)

In perusing Islamic blogs, I came across Dawahmotivation a blog devoted to encouraging Muslims who are motivated in inviting people to Islam (dawah). I’ll go as far to say that due to the teachings of Islam Muslims are highly motivated in sharing their faith. Christians should be just as if not more motivated because we have a message no one else has. That salvation is given through the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ to those who believe.

Muslims on the other hand don’t share their faith because they care about people they do it because they’re trying to do good deeds in order to earn Jannah. This is highly important! In Christianity, the teaching of doing good deeds is absolutely part of the faith, but we’re not trying to earn our way to Heaven. On account that Christ has already done the perfect work for us leaves us free to genuinely share the message of salvation through love.

In the original article From Hinduism, then Atheism to Islam a girl went from Hinduism to Atheist then Islam because of conversations between herself and a Muslima. Truthfully speaking she left Hinduism and ended up back in Hinduism, how you may be thinking? Well Islam is not different from Hinduism, in the Qur’ān the largest chapter is devoted to the Cow called Surah Al-Baqarah (The Cow).

In the Cow chapter, there’s a verse in which Allah said to hit a dead man with a piece of beef and he will come back from the dead.

This is why Surah Al-Baqarah (The Cow) is called the Hindu chapter. Muslims have no guarantee of salvation, ask if they’ll make it to Jannah If they’re honest they’ll answer they don’t know?

Fortunately for anyone who has Jesus Christ as their Lord and Saviour is guaranteed salvation, we read it in multiple places all throughout the Bible. Therefore, we don’t need to guess we know that we have salvation (1 John 5:13).[1] Here are the words of Jesus Christ who promises Eternal Life to those who are His.

John 10:25-30

Of course, Abdools claim the Bible has been “corrupted” even though the Qur’ān makes no mention of the Torah or Injil being corrupted. Additionally, it cannot be corrupted as Muhammad told people to read it (Surah 5:68; 10:94) and we have manuscripts proving that the Bible of Muhammad’s day was the same as the one we have today?

5:68 Al-Ma’idah
10:94 Yunus

Let’s go with the Muslim argument that the Bible is “corrupted”, this would prove that Allah is a false god who cannot protect his books. It would also mean that Muhammad is a false prophet as he directed people to read the Torah and Injil. And if they want to claim the Torah and Injil are different from the one we have today, the burden of proof is on them to prove this to be the case.

Back to the issue at hand, this poor girl went from Hinduism and became an Atheist and lastly she was deceived into the cult of Islam. Apparently, they had conversations about being covered (Hijab).

I met her 2 years back during my 12th-grade exams. She was my exam partner and she disliked the way I dressed as I was a fully covered Hijabi. She started the conversation by asking if I was forced to be dressed this way and I explained to her why I was willingly covering myself in a certain way and since then she wanted to change the way I was thinking of this and wanted to show me that this is clear oppression for females and I was just being brainwashed by different people around me. We used to have small conversations now and then and slowly I diverted the topic of hijab to God’s existence and Oneness and Alhamdulillah after 1 and a half year-long conversations… She was finally convinced and she called me at night and said she didn’t want to wait anymore and that she wanted to embrace Islam! Alhamdulillah, she took her Shahadah last night

From Hinduism, then Atheism to Islam

To answer the question if women in Islam are forced to wear Hijab the short answer is yes. We don’t say anything here without providing references, here we go:

33:59 Al-Ahzab

Here we have the Qur’ān saying that women are to cover themselves so that they will not be abused. I wonder if the Muslima can explain why she would be abused if she didn’t wear a Hijab? She then mentions that she changed the topic to talk about the Oneness of Allah.

Allah himself doesn’t agree with this as he says he’s the best of the creators, saying there are other creators besides himself. This is found in 23:14 Al-Mu’minun.

23:14 Al-Mu’minun

Allah also said that if he wanted to have children he would take a wife from Us Surah Al-Anbya verse 17. This is a confession from Allah that there are others like him, he’s not the only one as Muslims claim there’s nothing comparable to Allah. But in this verse, Allah is saying he would take a wife from the houris or angels.

21:17 Al-Anbya

This means Allah is not unique and whether Allah has taken a wife or not is not the question, what is the question is he’s saying it’s possible for him to have a son but he would need a wife first. And the “Us” spoken of here are the angels. Let’s confirm this from their own scholars.

21:17 Tafsir al-Jalalayn

Even their scholars agree that Allah is not unique as he could take a wife from the beautiful-eyed houris. This Allah cannot be god because he has limitations, therefore, he cannot be almighty. To prove this point that he’s limited we turn to Surah Al-An’am verse 101.

6:101 Al-An’am

Allah according to his own words is like any human who needs a partner in order to have children, that means he has limitations just like any human.

Conclusion

What have we learned from this, well this girl who left Hinduism only turn to a cult that also practises the same as the Hindus as Allah said to hit a dead man with beef (heifer) to bring them back to life [2:73]. Christians who are saved by trusting in Jesus Christ are guaranteed salvation [1 John 5:13], unlike Islam where they cannot know if they will make it to Jannah. The Qur’ān confirms the Bible and therefore, the narrative that’s it’s “corrupted” is false [5:68, 10:94]. Women in Islam are forced to wear a Hijab so they are not abused [33:59], and lastly, Allah is not unique as he needs a woman to have children [23:14, 21:17, 6:101].

Once again we don’t hate Muslims, we are here to tell the truth so that Muslims can have their eyes opened to the truth. That Jesus Christ is God and He wants them to be saved by trusting in Him by accepting the historical Crucifixion and Resurrection [2] of Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour. I would love to hear from Dawahmotivation on these very important issues. Let’s see if they will respond to the points made in this post?

Let’s continue to pray for our Muslim friends that they will be saved by trusting in Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of their sins.

Footnotes

[1] 1 John 5:13 These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God. biblegateway.com. 1 John 5:13. Retrieved from https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+John+5%3A13&version=KJV

[2] “How do critical scholars recognize and treat these historical data that clearly favor the Christian tradition as compared to the data that are possessed by the other religious traditions? Some even quite skeptical scholars somewhat surprisingly acknowledge the situation, or at least various aspects of it.” Gary Habermas and Benjamin C. F. Shaw (2020, March 6). Every religion claims to be historical (but only Christianity is). Retrieved from https://equip.sbts.edu/article/every-religion-claims-historical-christianity/

Religion’s importance in an Muslima’s life

Religion is one who’s trying to merit God’s favour or salvation, the problem with this is that no one can bribe God with good deeds. Such religions like Buddhism, Hinduism and Islam teach their adherents they must be self-righteous or a “good person” in order to make reach Enlightenment, Swah and Jannah.

Let me preface by stating that not every Muslim is deeply aware of the many teachings of Islam. There are people who have been born into the religion and are nice people, which I’m sure is the case with Sadje who seems like a nice lady. You can read her post Religion’s importance in my life, sadly I don’t know if she was raised Muslim or “reverted” to Islam but I do believe she’s been lied to by the Imam’s and dawahgandist.

The intention of this article is to shine some light on what Islam teaches from their own Islamic sources. We shouldn’t learn Islam from Muslims, we should learn Islam from the source which is their prophet Muhammad who claims to have brought “the final message” from Allah. With that said let’s get into it.

Slaves of Muhammad?

Religion is the most important aspect of my life. From very early on in my life, we were given a sound foundation about our religion, Islam. I am a Muslim, Islam is my religion. Since most people aren’t aware of our practices, I want to briefly explain what we do. Islam starts with faith in one God.

Religion’s importance in my life

It’s true that “most people aren’t aware” what Islam teaches, this includes many Muslims as well. It’s good that Sadje believes having a dialogue about one’s beliefs is important, as a Christian I too believe the same. First, the comment was made that “Islam starts with faith in one God.” This is incorrect as Allah said he’s “the best of Creators”, in order to be the best of something a comparison must be made of two of the same sort.

In other words we compare apples to apples, not apples to oranges, in this case Allah to other gods as found in Surah 23:12-14 we read:

Surah Al-Mu’minun 23:14

How is it Muslims tell us their faith is in one god, when their god Allah essentially says there’s more than one god in Islam? Who’s correct the Muslim or Allah?

I don’t agree that “Religion is the most important aspect of my life”, what I do believe is that having a loving relationship with God is of the utmost importance something that’s lacking in Islam as Muslims don’t have a relationship with Allah.

Surah Az-Zumar 39:53

The deceptive translation of the Qur’an by translators such as Yusuf Ali translated ( يَـٰعِبَادِىَ ) as “servants”, this is the deceptive trick of Muslim translation. If you look up the provided Arabic word in a dictionary it will say, slave.

Another problem with this verse is the Arabic says Muslims are “in fact the slaves of Muhammad”. For whatever reason, this verse was changed from the direct speech of Allah to a command to Muhammad in order for him to speak these words. Putting the word “Qul” before it, i.e., “Say (O Muhammad, the following words)”. If this is so then this verse promotes shirk, as Muslims are supposed to be slaves of Allah not Muhammad their prophet.

Galatians 3:26

The relationship between Allah and a Muslim is one of Master to slave. They’re called slaves (Abdullah) of Allah, in comparison, Christians are called children of God. Our relationship to God is of Father to child (son, daughter).[1] (Matthew 5:9; Luke 20:36; John 11:52; Romans 8:16, 21; Romans 9:8; Galatians 3:26; 1 John 3:10; 1 John 5:2).

Supremacy of Almighty Allah?

We believe in supremacy of Almighty Allah in each and every aspect of our lives.

Religion’s importance in my life

In order for God to be Almighty, the understanding is that he’s capable of anything, meaning he has no limitations. That’s the definition of being an Almighty God, but when we read the Qur’an we find out that Allah has many limitations. One of those limitations is Allah needs a girlfriend in order to have a son.[2]

Surah Al-An’am 6:101

Allah says that if he desired to have a son he would have taken a wife from us? A confession from their god is made that there are others like him, a man and woman come together to make an offspring.

Surah Al-Anbya 21:17

Here we have Allah saying he would take a wife from us. Who’s the us spoken here if Allah is one, is he referring to the angels? Additionally, Sadje is not kidding when she says Muslims believe in “Allah in each and every aspect of our lives”.

Allah Wants People to Sin?

Allah takes so much interest that he causes people to commit sins, and if they don’t want to sin then Allah says he will destroy them and create people who would sin and ask Allah for forgiveness.

Sahih Muslim 2749 Sins Are Erased By Praying For Forgiveness And Repenting

I wonder if Sadje is aware of this Sahih (authentic) Hadith, and if not how does it make her feel. If she is aware of it how does she explain how Allah is causing people to sin so that they can ask for his forgiveness, is Allah some sort of puppet master manipulating people?

Let’s follow the logic Allah created mankind and CAUSED them, in other words Allah is making people sin so that he can forgive them and thereby be merciful?[3] Let’s not forget that Muslims believe nothing happens without Allah willing it to happen, so it’s Allah’s will that people sin.

Five pillars of Islam

The five pillars of Islam are the very foundational teachings of the religion. We’ve already given evidence in the Qur’an that Allah says he’s not the only god saying “he’s the best of creators” (23:14) one of other gods.

There are five pillars of Islam;

  1. Tawheed; There’s no God but Allah and Muhammad (PBUH) is his last prophet
  2. 5 obligatory prayers (namaz) every day
  3. Fasting in the month of Ramadan
  4. Giving Zakat (alms); 2.5% of all the savings per year to deserving people
  5. Performing hajj; the ritualistic visit to Makkah in the month of Zilhaj.

Tawheed: The word Tawheed is not found in the Qur’an and in actuality the meaning of Tawheed means unification. It doesn’t mean oneness as Muslims have been lied to by their Imams. The question then becomes unification of what? Let’s not forget that Muhammad is from the Arab tribe of the Quraysh, they practised paganism and worshipped idols.

Namaz (Salah): Are the 5 daily prayers, Islam is not spiritual but ritual Muslims must pray during certain times of the day (Fajr (early morning), Zuhr (mid-day), ‘Asr (mid-afternoon), Maghrib (after sunset) and ‘Isha (night). They must say their prayer in Arabic otherwise it’s not accepted by Allah. And they all must say the same words as Islam is a works-based religion.

Ramadan: Is the month in which Muslims fast, in actuality Ramadan is when Muslims eat the most, they don’t eat in the daytime and during the night they gorge themselves. The most lucrative time for those selling food in Muslim majority countries is during Ramadan. It’s known that Muslims put on weight during this time.

Zakat: Muhammad is called to fight everyone until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is his messenger, and until people say their prayers, and pay the zakat tax. Under those conditions, the people attacked will be safe from Muhammad.

Sahih Muslim 22 The command to fight the people until they say “La ilaha illallah Muhammad Rasul-Allah”, and establish Salat, and pay the Zakat, and believe in everything that the prophet (saws) brought.

Hajj: Muslims are told they have to visit Mecca at least once in their life if able to. While there they walk around the Kaaba which is a pagan shrine in which the Quraysh worshipped while they had a multitude of idols there. Muslims kiss the black stone which is shaped like a woman’s vagina, believing it will remove their sins (Islam is ultimately a sex cult). They also toss rocks at 3 stone pillars as they believe these pillars are 3 Shaitan’s (devils). They also run back and forth between Safa and Marwa believing that it’s where Hagar ran when looking for water for her son Ishmael.

Women rarely do it?

… People go to mosques to pray but not everyone does that and women rarely do it.

Religion’s importance in my life

Sadje said women rarely go to the mosque to pray, the reason for that is because Islam teaches women are unclean during their menses (monthly period). Muhammad looked at women as lesser than men, in-fact their monthly period according to their prophet is a deficiency and Muhammad linked it to their intelligence saying they were stupid (half brained) because of it.

Sahih al-Bukhari 304 A menstruating women should leave observing Saum (fasting)

If women are deficient in their minds because of their menses (which I disagree), then does that mean Allah created women wrong with this deficiency? What “prophet” of god would disrespect women in such a manner?

The true God Yahweh loves His creation, in contrast let’s see how the Bible commands Christian men to view women. The Bible tells Christian men to “love their wives” (Ephesians 5:25; Colossians 3:19) just like they would “their own bodies” and to be joined unto his wife like one flesh (Genesis 2:24; Matthew 19:5). Not to be bitter against their wives. And that a “virtuous woman” is far more precious than rubies she’s “his crown”, that a godly woman is trusted by her husband and “shall be praised” (Proverbs 12:4; Proverbs 31:10).

Ephesians 5:25-33

Alright for Muslims to leave Islam?

Not all of us siblings stuck to the teachings of Islam. My brothers chose their path and it’s fine with the rest of the family. Lucky for me that I was able to stay on the path my father showed me. I guess I always had it in me and my faith strengthened with time and age.

Religion’s importance in my life

I wonder if Sadje is familiar with her prophet commanding that any Muslim who leaves Islam is to be killed? It’s wonderful that her family has better morals than her prophet and wouldn’t want her brothers to be hurt, but that’s not what her prophet teaches.

Sunan an-Nasa’i 4059 The Ruling on Apostates

It is “lucky” that she stayed on the path otherwise she might come across Muslims who don’t share the same view. It’s a well known fact that those who leave Islam often lose their families, friends and are at times killed under a Sharia Law just as their prophet taught.[4]

Conclusion

According to Islam’s most trusted sources we’ve learned that Muslims are slaves of Allah and apparently Muhammad as well. Allah is not almighty as he lacks the ability to have a son without procreating with a woman. Their god causes people to sin and will destroy them if they don’t, and women are deficient and apostates are to be killed for leaving Islam.

We pray for Muslims like Sadje to come to Jesus for everlasting life. She (like many others) have been fed lies of what Islam really teaches, we’ve haven’t scratch the surface of all the disturbing teachings of Muhammad. We love Muslims and want them to come into the loving arms of the Saviour of sinners Christ Jesus, that they can come home to the true Creator who loves them.

Footnotes

[1] “The structure of Gal 3:26-29 is fairly complex. First there is what appears to be a “sayings” statement regarding the status of “all” believers as being “sons of God” because they are “in Christ” (v26); then there is what is probably a confessional portion used in support of that statement and highlighting the new relationships that exist “in Christ” (vv27-28)” Longenecker, R. N. (1990). Galatians (Ser. Word biblical commentary, v. 41). Word Books.

[2] “And it is the Son that most distinguishes the Christian God from the Muslim God. We need to learn about him not only in light of the Trinity but also in light of his life on earth. Now that we understand the doctrine of the Trinity, that the one God subsists as three persons, we will better understand what Christians mean when they say that the second of the three persons entered into this world as a human named Jesus.” Qureshi, N. (2016). No god but one : Allah or jesus? (with bonus content) : a former muslim investigates the evidence for islam and christianity. Zondervan.

[3] “.. And the meaning of the hadeeth is not that Allah loves that His servants commit offenses and sins, for Allah All-Mighty does not love kufr and is not pleased with it and does not love sins, however He does love those servants of His who seek His repentance if they commit offenses and sins. This is the meaning of the hadeeth.” Bassam Zawadi (2017, January 25) APA citation. Does Allah Desire That People Sin? A Clarification of an Important Hadith. Retrieved from https://www.call-to-monotheism.com/does_allah_desire_that_people_sin__a_clarification_of_an_important_hadith

[4] “Why did they have to take this extraordinary precaution? Because, as we have seen, intraditional Islamic law, when a Muslim converts to another faith, it can bring a death sentence. This is not, mind you, “extremist” Islam. It is the Islamic mainstream, based on a statement of Muhammad: “Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.” ‘It’s also based on a statement of the Qur’an: “But whoever of you recants and dies an unbeliever, his works shall come to nothing in this world and the next,and they are the companions of the fire forever” (Qur’an2:217). This has been widely interpreted by traditional Muslim commentators as giving sanction to the death penalty for apostates—which they derive from the verse’s assertion that the apostate’s work will” come to nothing in this world” as well as the next.” Spencer, R. (2005). The politically incorrect guide to islam (and the crusades) (Ser. Politically incorrect guide). Regnery Pub.

Jesus is God According to Qur’ān

The teachings of Islam reject the idea that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, Muslims say Jesus is only a man and not God. If we’re to follow the path that leads to the truth we must scrutinize all until we can come to a conclusion.

Does the Qur’ān and Hadith reject the idea that Jesus is God? All Sunni Muslims accept both the Qur’ān and Sunnah of Muhammad. The following passages oppose the Islamic idea of who Jesus Christ is.

Jesus is Holy (Pure)

There’s not a single person on earth who is Holy, the Arabic says that Allah would give a pure son (لَكِ غُلَـٰمًۭا زَكِيًّۭا). God is the only one who can be pure and holy, we all are sinners and are in need of God. Here Jesus is called Holy and Pure,1 if He’s only a man like us all how can he be free from sin? Unlike Muhammad who is called a sinner in Qur’ān 47:19; 48:2.

Jesus is a Creator

In Islam one of the five pillars is that there’s only one God, this is also known as the Shahada.

The belief in one Allah is the central tenet of the Islamic faith, around which all else revolves. Muslims are continuously reminded of this foundational belief, in the recital of the Shahada (shahadah) during each of the five daily prayers, as well as many more pivotal moments of a Muslim’s life.

SHAHADA (SHAHADAH) – A PROFESSION OF FAITH

The problem is that God should be the only Creator, yet in the Qur’ān we read that Jesus is also a Creator even if Allah granted it to him. In Qur’ān 23:12-14 Allah confirms this saying he’s “the best of the creators” meaning he’s not the only creator. This is problematic because Allah is causing people to believe that Jesus is God as he can create life from nothing, only something God can do.

3:49  “… I design for you from clay [that which is] like the form of a bird, then I breathe into it and it becomes a bird by permission of Allah. And I cure the blind and the leper, and I give life to the dead … And I inform you of what you eat and what you store in your houses. …”

Notice Jesus says “I” (personal pronoun) will design a bird from clay and he breathed life into the bird, not only that but he has the ability to cure blindness, lepers and raise the dead back to life. He also knows what you have in your homes and can tell you what you eat without being there. That’s called being omniscient which is the state of knowing everything, only God can know everything.2

According to merriam-webster.com the definition of omniscient: 

1) having infinite awareness, understanding, and insight

2) possessed of universal or complete knowledge

Dajjal Compared to Messiah

For Muslim’s Allah alone is their Lord but here in the Hadith we have Muhammad warning Muslims of the Dajjal who is the false messiah. Muhammad goes on to describe him and compares him to the real Messiah (Isa) and making the distinction that the Dajjal has one eye while the true Messiah has more than one eye.

This is the only difference between the two, this is why Muhammad says “if you are confused about him” this is how you can distinguish between the two by their eyes. The problem is Muhammad says the Muslims Lord is not one eyed.3

If Allah is not a man then why does Muhammad compare him to the Dajjal? This can only mean he’s calling Isa the messiah God as only God is Lord.

Conclusion

Even in their own Islamic books we have evidence of the deity of Christ, the Qur’ān says he’s pure, can heal sickness and create life. And last but not least is called Lord in their Hadith. In contrast Muhammad who Muslims claim is the seal/greatest of the prophets is never called pure, has no miracles and cannot create life like Jesus can. It’s obvious that the truth of Jesus cannot be kepted from going forth, even when it comes to a satanic religion like Islam.

We love Muslims and want them to come to know the real Jesus Christ of the Bible. He offers eternal life to anyone who’s willing to humble themselves, may their eyes be opened to the truth.

Footnotes

1 “A second account of the Annunciation also can be found in sura 3:37– 47: “Recall when the angel said, ‘Oh Mary, God has chosen you and purified you, and chosen you above the women of the world.’” And “Oh Mary, be obedient to your Lord, prostrate yourself, and bow to those who bow.” And a little later in sura 3: “Remember when the angel said, ‘God gave you tidings of a word from himself whose name is Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, a famous one in this world and the next. One of those brought near to God.’” In the same sura, there are a number of other verses related to Mary and Jesus: “And he will speak to the people in the cradle, and as a grown man. One of the righteous shall he be.”” Vicchio, S., & Birch, B. C. (2008). Biblical figures in the islamic faith. Wipf & Stock Pub. p. 133

2 “Then Jesus turned twelve. The first miracle of his witnessed by people occurred when his mother was staying at the home of an Egyptian dignitary. A treasure was stolen from him while only poor people were living in his house, yet he did not accuse them. Mary was saddened by that dignitary’s misfortune. When Jesus noticed his mother’s sadness at the misfortune of their host, he asked her, ‘Oh mother, would you like me to guide him to his property?’ She said, ‘Yes, my son.’ He then said, ‘Tell him to assemble the poor men of his home;’ whereupon Mary told the dignitary, and he assembled them. When they were assembled, Jesus approached two of them, one blind, the other crippled. He put the cripple on the shoulder of the blind man and said to him, ‘Stand up with him.’ The blind man said, ‘I am too weak.’ Jesus replied, ‘How then were you able to do that yesterday?’ When they heard his words, they forced the blind man to get up with the cripple. When he stood up carrying the other, the cripple plunged to the window of the treasury. Jesus said, ‘This is how they cheated the landlord yesterday; the blind man used his strength, and the cripple his eyes.’ The cripple and the blind said, ‘He is right.’ And they returned the property to the dignitary.” Barker, G. A., & Gregg, S. E. (2010). Jesus beyond Christianity: the classic texts. Oxford University Press. pp. 104, 105

3 This is what the Muslims believe about the Messiah ‘Eesa ibn Maryam (peace be upon him). Al-Bukhaari (3435) and Muslim (28) narrated from ‘Ubaadah (may Allaah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever bears witness that there is no god but Allaah alone, with no partner or associate, and that Muhammad is His slave and Messenger, and that ‘Eesa is His slave and Messenger, a word which Allaah bestowed upon Maryam and a spirit created by Him, and that Paradise is real, and Hell is real, Allaah will admit him through whichever of the eight gates of Paradise he wishes.” islamqa.info (2003, May 24) APA citation. The Muslims’ Beliefs Concerning the Messiah ‘Eesa ibn Maryam. Retrieved from https://islamqa.info/en/answers/43148/the-muslims-beliefs-concerning-the-messiah-eesa-ibn-maryam

Angel Jibril is Allah in Islam

If you ask a Muslim who is the Holy Spirit (Ruh al-Qudus), they would reply emphatically angel Jibril.1 They claim that the words “Our Spirit” found in Surah Al-Anbya 21:91 in reference to Isa being created in Mary’s womb means Jibril. That’s fine we’ll go with this Muslim belief.

Jibril Created Adam?

Muslims say Allah created Adam, they enjoy bringing this up when we ask about Allah creating Isa (Jesus), they claim both were created exactly the same. This is not true as Adam was created by clay while Isa was not! In Surah Sad 38:72 Allah says:

Sad 38:72

Notice Allah breathed into him (Adam) of “My spirit” if Muslims want to interpret “spirit” as in this is Jibril does this mean angel Jibril created Adam also? Going to the Tafsir to see what their scholars say about this ayat is paramount.

Tafsir Sad 38:72

Ibn Abbas says Allah placed in Adam “My spirit” is Jibril inside of Adam,2 I thought Muslims said he’s an angel? By saying the spirit is Jibril they are making him more than an angel, according to this ayat Jibril entered Adam and gave him life. I guess Allah was right when he said there’s more than one creator [23:14]. Allah is not the only one that can give life, Muslims are also attributing the creation of Adam to Jibril.

Let’s examine another scholar’s interpretation, Ibn Kathir. He confirms this is about the creation of Adam when Allah told the angels he would create a human. Allah commands the angels to prostrate to Adam thereby committing shirk,3 you can read a past article on this topic (Mushrik Allah the First One to Commit Shirk)

Jibril Created Isa?

Surah Al-Anbya 21:91

The story here is of Allah creating Isa, the issue is Muslims need to make up their mind was it Allah who breathed into Mary’s vagina (فَرْجَهَا, farjaha) yes you read correctly, the Arabic word provided placed in Google Translate will translate “her vagina.” Provided is screenshot of the Arabic translation, try it for yourself copy the highlighted Arabic text on quran.com (a site made by Muslims not Christians).

Note the deceptive translation of “guarded her chastity” these words don’t appear in the Arabic text as you can see from Google Translate (pbuh). So Allah blew into Mary’s vagina according to the Qur’ān and thereby created Isa (“Jesus”). Hold on but Muslims say the holy spirit is Jibril who in this verse is the “spirit” blown into Mary?

Some questions Muslims need to answer (1) was it Allah who blew into Mary or Jibril? (2) If the spirit is blown into Mary is Jibril inside of her [38:72]? (3) Who did the actual creating of Isa was it Allah or Jibril? (4) If it’s Allah who did the creating then who is “our spirit” in this verse? (5) If Jibril did the creating this would mean he has the same abilities as Allah and therefore if Allah gave him this power that would make Jibril god in Islam.

Allah Accuses the Angels to be Untruthful?

Lastly, in Surah Al-Baqarah there’s the account of Allah telling the angels he’s going to make Adam (mankind). The angels responded, “are you going to make someone who will cause mischief and bloodshed.” This statement is important as we’ll see later proves Allah cannot be god.

Surah Al-Baqarah 2:30-31

Allah accuses the angels saying “Tell Me the names of these if you are truthful” here we have the god of Islam accusing the angels of not being truthful. The angels said Adam will cause bloodshed and mischief. The angels were right because Adam (mankind) did sin, even the Qur’ān tells us this as Adam was kicked out of Jannah for what he has done. Let us not forget Allah decreed (caused) Adam to sin, you can read about it in this past article Allah Causes People to Commit Adultery?

Therefore, the angels knew more than Allah because he accused the angels of not being truthful. Yet the angels were correct and knew something Allah didn’t know, even though Allah decreed for Adam to sin, but he busted himself as Allah couldn’t remember what he decreed.

Surah Al-Baqarah 2:35-36

The ayat [2:35] says Adam and his wife were in Paradise, this of course is taken from Genesis in the Bible. You can read the actual story from the Bible also known as Genesis 3 The Fall of Man. In the Qur’ān Shaitan causes them to be kicked out of Paradise and Allah tells them “Get you down” and they are banished from Paradise.

Here’s another contradiction Iblis (Satan) was kicked out of Paradise before Adam and his wife (Eve), how is it Satan is now in Paradise again causing them to sin? Even though the Qur’ān is a jumbled mess of stories we’re told in Qur’ān 38:71—78 that Allah said he was going to create man from clay. Then the angels prostrated themselves before Adam (by the command of Allah) committing shirk, except Iblis (Satan).

Allah asked him “What prevents you from prostrating yourself to one whom I have created with Both My Hands” and Satan responds “I am better than he. You created me from fire, and You created him from clay” Allah then says “Then get out from here; for verily you are outcast And verily My Curse is on you till the Day of Recompense” he (Satan) was kicked out of Jannah.

Here is the contradiction how can Satan cause Adam to sin while Adam was in Paradise when Satan was already kicked out of Paradise? Remember Allah has created stars to shoot at the Jinn who are trying to get close and hear what’s happening in heaven.

Sunan Ibn Majah 194

How then can Satan who is a Jinn come back to heaven in order to cause Adam to sin? This is a contradiction because this means Allah was not capable of keeping Satan out of heaven with his shooting stars. It’s sad that there are people who can believe this rubbish.

Conclusion

In this article, we presented the fact that Jibril has been given the ability to create according to Muslims, which means there’s more than 1 god in Islam. Even the Qur’ān says Allah is the Best of the creators [23:14] meaning there’s more than 1 creator according to Qur’ān. This is further proof Islam is not a monotheistic religion as Muslims tell us.

Christians only believe in 1 God [Deuteronomy 6:4] we have a future article coming out that will speak about this Lord willing. As we reach out to Muslims in love calling them to come to the Messiah the Lord Jesus Christ who created all things [John 1:1-3, Colossians 1:16, Hebrews 1:10]. We ask the Muslims to bring their arguments and let us reason together, that you may come to know the Lord Jesus and be saved. God bless.

Footnotes

1 “The majority of scholars said that this refers to Jibril (peace be upon him), and that Allah called him al-Ruh al-Ameen, Ruh al-Qudus and Jibril.” (Daqaiq al-Tafsir, part 1, p. 310)

2 Tafsir Ibn Abbas Surah 38. Sad Ayah 71 https://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=38&tAyahNo=72&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

3 Tafsir Ibn Kathir Surah 38. Sad Ayah 71 https://www.alim.org/quran/tafsir/ibn-kathir/surah/38/71

Sheikh Uthman Ibn Farooq Get’s Busted

If you’re familiar with Muslim Dawah, there’s a Muslim Missionary in Balboa Park in San Diego by the name of Ibn Farooq. He has set up a booth and challenges Christians and others trying to prove that Islam is true. He brings out a marked/tabbed Bible which he uses to try to convince Christians of supposed “contradictions.”

If a Christian makes the claim that Allah doesn’t exist, Muslims say that Allah is mentioned in the Arabic Bible. If Allah of the Qur’ān is the same God of the Bible then we should be able to compare them both and come to the conclusion that they are the same God. But are they?

In this article we’ll do just that, we’re going to look at both the Bible and Qur’ān to see if Allah and Yahweh are the same?

Surah An-Nisa 4:82

The Son of God (Bible VS Qur’ān)

It’s a well-known fact that Christians worship Jesus Christ as the Son of God, He’s the eternal Son who is God. The Bible mentions this in multiple places (Daniel 3:25, Matthew 4:3, 6, Matthew 14:33, Matthew 26:63, Matthew 27:40, 43, 54, Mark 1:1, Mark 3:11, Mark 15:39, Luke 1:35, Luke 3:38, Luke 4:3, 9, 41, Luke 22:70, John 1:34, 49, John 5:25, John 9:35, John 10:36, John 11:4, 27, John 19:7, John 20:31, Acts 8:37, Acts 9:20, Romans 1:4, 2 Corinthians 1:19, Galatians 2:20, Ephesians 4:13, Hebrews 4:14, Hebrews 6:6, Hebrews 7:3, Hebrews 10:29, 1 John 3:8, 1 John 4:15, 1 John 5:5, 10, 12-13, 20, Revelation 2:18).

In the Arabic Bible, we have verses such as John 9:35 where the Lord Jesus asked the blind man He healed if he now believes in the Son of God.

John 9:35

In the Arabic Bible, the words are (أَتُؤْمِنُ بِابْنِ اللَّهِ؟) translated “Do you believe in the Son of God?”

What about the most well known Bible verse in the world John 3:16? The God of the Bible has a Son, Jesus Christ. In the Arabic Bible, the words (بَذَلَ ابْنَهُ الْوَ) are translated “gave his Son”.1 That means Muslims agree that Allah has a Son since they want to use the Arabic Bible to prove Allah exists.

John 3:16

If Muslims appeal to the Bible claiming the word Allah used in the Bible means the same God then Muslims must also accept Jesus Christ as the Son of God, and thereby they refute their own Qur’ān.

Here’s where the Qur’ān contradicts the Bible, it’s well known that Muslims don’t believe Jesus is the Son of God as the Qur’ān says. The Qur’ān says Allah doesn’t beget nor was He begotten.

Surah Al-Isra 17:43

I would like to see how Muslims reconcile this? You cannot appeal to the Bible claiming we worship the same God and at the same time reject it because remember Sheikh Uthman Ibn Farooq claims they are the same. And the Muslims love Uthman, will they continue to agree with Sheikh Uthman Ibn Farooq?

The Trinity (Bible VS Qur’ān)

Muslims love asking Christians “where in the Bible does it say, Trinity?” This is a valid question and honestly speaking the word Trinity doesn’t appear in the Bible, another word does and that’s Godhead.

Additionally, we have multiple verses which teach the concept of the Trinity.

Matthew 3:16-17 we have a clear view of the Trinity, the Lord Jesus goes to John the Baptist and gets baptised. When this happens the heavens were opened and the Spirit of God came down upon Christ. Lastly, there’s a voice from heaven saying this is my beloved Son, in one moment you have all 3 Persons of the Trinity.

Matthew 3:16-17

But just as our Muslim friends ask to see the word Trinity in the Bible, can they show us the word Tawheed in the Qur’ān? It doesn’t exist. The word Tawheed means unification NOT oneness as Muslims like to believe.

Even though our friends still say Yahweh is Allah this cannot be true. The God of the Bible is Triune, Allah is not and therefore they cannot be the same.

Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:73

This Qur’ān verse 5:73 contradicts another verse in the Qur’ān which proves the Trinity, which you’ll see further down (remember Qur’ān 4:82 at the beginning of this article). If these are supposed to be the words of god why are we finding all of these contradictions? The challenge made by Allah falls flat.

Jesus Christ is God (Bible VS Qur’ān)

Colossians 2:9

This is a problematic verse for Muslims because the context is speaking of Jesus Christ as God. We’re told that believers (Christians) in Christ “are And ye are complete in him,” and that Jesus is “the head of all principality and power:”

“Paul here asserts that “all the πληρωμα of the Godhead,” not just certain aspects, dwells in Christ and in bodily form (σωματικως, late and rare adverb, in Plutarch, inscription, here only in N.T.), dwells now in Christ in his glorified humanity (Php 2:9-11 ), “the body of his glory” (τω σωματ της δοξης). The fulness of the God-head was in Christ before the Incarnation (Joh 1:1,18; Php 2:6 ), during the Incarnation (Joh 1:14,18; 1Jo 1:1-3 ). It was the Son of God who came in the likeness of men (Php 2:7 ). Paul here disposes of the Docetic theory that Jesus had no human body as well as the Cerinthian separation between the man Jesus and the aeon Christ. He asserts plainly the deity and the humanity of Jesus Christ in corporeal form. Col 2:10” New Testament Greek scholar AT Robertson in his book Word Pictures In The New Testament.2

Godhead

The Inflected Greek word is θεότητος (theótitos) stemming from the Root word θεότης (theotēs) and the Root Word of θεότης is θεός (theós).

θεότης theótēs, theh-ot’-ace; divinity (abstractly):—godhead. Biblical Usage (deity, the state of being God, Godhead)

The Qur’ān also proves the Trinity and that Jesus is God and Muslims are unaware of this fact in [4:171], we’re here to bust Muhammad and his lying ways. “Christ Jesus” otherwise known as Isa according to Muslims was (1) a messenger of Allah which means he’s a man (2) His Word or the Word of Allah which means uncreated because Muslims believe Allah’s word is eternal (3) and a spirit proceeding from Him this means a spirit proceeding from Allah.

Surah An-Nisa 4:171

This verse in the Qur’ān is trying to disprove the Trinity but in actuality confirms it. As Isa (“Jesus”) himself is 3, a messenger, His Word and a spirit proceeding from Allah. And since Allah’s Word is not created and he said “Be” (Allah created everything by saying Be) and it was as Muslims believe. That means Isa is not created and Allah created everything through Jesus, and Jesus is a spirit coming from Allah.3 Unless Muslims disagree and want to say Allah’s word is created but they won’t dare to say that.

Jesus is wakalimatuhu 

(إِنَّمَا الْمَسِيحُ عِيسَى ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ وَكَلِمَتُهُ)

Conclusion

In this article, we proved that Jesus is the Son of God from the Arabic Bible, that the Trinity is found in the Qur’ān and that Jesus is God. It’s very easy to prove Islam is false and bust Abdools from their own books. We pray for their souls to be saved by coming to Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of their sins. Leave Islam before it’s too late, the only True God is found in the Bible come to Jesus Christ for everlasting life.

Footnotes

1 International Biblical Association Word Project John 3:16 Retrieved from https://www.wordproject.org/bibles/ar/43/3.htm#0

2 New Testament Greek scholar AT Robertson in his book Word Pictures In The New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library 1993., p. 1558).

3 All of the attributes of Allah, may He be exalted, are uncreated; they are eternal, with no beginning. The words of Allah are among these attributes, and that includes the Qur’ān. Therefore the scholars said that the Qur’ān is not created, because it is the words of Allah, and that is one of His attributes. – Islamqa.info (2015, July 20). The Qur’an is the word of Allah, may He be exalted, and is not created Retrieved from https://islamqa.info/en/answers/227441/the-quran-is-the-word-of-allah-may-he-be-exalted-and-is-not-created

Can Muslims be “Friends” with Non-Muslims?

Our Muslim friends are at it again, we enjoy showing them the truth time and time again perhaps one day they’ll learn that they don’t know as much as they think they do. Either way, we love Muslims and pray for their salvation. And that brings up something quite hilarious.

On their blog, it reads “A Quiet Place in Cyberspace Dedicated to the Search for Truth and Salvation”, this word comes from the Bible as Christians use it to explain the redemption Christ Jesus has procured for us. Why are Muslims using Christian terminology?

Salvation in Arabic is (خلاص), this word was placed in Google translate, note on the bottom left. It mentions that Christians believe in salvation through faith in Christ. In the Qur’ān the word salvation is not used, you’ll find words like successful, attainment, victory etc. Yusuf Ali primarily had translated words like (الْمُفْلِحِينَ) which means “prosperous” into “salvation”, this is a deceptive translation.

Also provided is the Arabic dictionary as you can see the word (خلاص) and its definition. Therefore, we highly recommend that qnBb changes its title to reflect what Islam teaches.

Don’t expect them to change it because they dabble in deception and want people to think there’s salvation in Islam when in reality there’s none. Even Muhammad didn’t know if he would make it to Jannah, but I digress that this is a topic for another time.

The “Evidence” 2 John 9–11 (Surah Ali ‘Imran 3:28)

This will turn out bad for the Abdools, I hope they’re prepared. In their weak attempt to attack Christianity Muslims grossly misinterpret scriptures in hopes to get people to believe in their false religion. The ignorance of Abdools is on another level!

The unknown author of this letter did not mince words regarding associating with unbelievers. A Christian was forbidden to greet such a person or to let him in his house.

Can Christians be “Friends” with Non-Christians?

Internal evidence for the authorship of 1 John:

Incorrect, we do know who wrote 2 John. It was the Apostle John the same one who wrote John and 1 John said:

John 13:23

During the last supper in the upper room before Judas Iscariot would leave the company to betray Jesus to the Pharisees, John was sitting close to Christ, he was an eyewitness of all that Jesus Christ did which leads to 1 John 1:1.

1 John 1:1

The disciple John was part of the inner circle along with Peter and James. The 3 were privy to when Christ revealed His glory on the top of the Mount of Transfiguration. John would have touched, heard, and seen the miracles of Christ personally.

Keywords (emphasis ours): “That which was from the beginning, … we have heard,seen with our eyes, … we have looked upon,our hands have handled, of the Word of life;”.

A clear reading of the Gospel of John along with 1st, 2nd 3rd John and Revelation, John provides evidence that the one named the beloved disciple, also known as the disciple whom Jesus loved, is also the author of the named books.

This known phrase “the disciple whom Jesus loved” materialises a total of 5 times in the Gospel of John. This disciple has a prominent role to the extent that Simon Peter asked “Lord, and what shall this man do?” in reference to the beloved disciple’s ministry in John chapter 21.

External evidence for the authorship of 1 John:

Quotes from the Epistle as being authored by John the Apostle are Irenaeus 1 in his work against Heresies mentions John by name stating that he taught certain principles namely Jesus as the only begotten Son of God, in which the Father created all things.

Other notable mentions are Clement of Alexandria,2 Tertullian, Origen and his pupil Dionysius who argued for the authorship of Johannine works.

If they understood the background of 2 John they wouldn’t make this grave mistake. The background of 2 John is a continuation of 1 John. The context is Christians who were travelling from house to house, in which Christians would gather for worship and fellowship before the construction of Church buildings. The Apostle John was writing to warn of false teachers who were masquerading as Christians and bringing into the congregation erroneous doctrine.

This is the background of 2 John, with that context in view we can now turn to the passage qnBb brought into question.

2 John 9-11

2 John 9-11 explains how if an individual comes and teaches false doctrine (like Muhammad) is not welcomed. These false teachers don’t “abide in the doctrine of Christ”, and what is that doctrine? It’s that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, God in the flesh, that He died for our sins and rose from the dead for our justification. That we can have salvation through the atoning death of the Lamb of God.

As well as the doctrine of the Trinity (Abdool trigger!), hence John writes stating whoever denies the fact that the Father and the Son collectively are the One True God. We are to not allow them to spread their cancerous doctrine in the assembly.3 Nowhere does it speak about not being friends with non-Christians. The Lord Jesus is called a friend of sinners (Matthew 11:19; Luke 7:34) as followers of Christ we are called to imitate Him.

If someone posing as a Muslim at a Masjid was spreading teachings contrary to Islam they wouldn’t be welcomed. This is the context of 2 John, he’s not telling Christians they cannot be friends with non-Christians. Now let’s bring this into the Qur’ān where Muslims are told not to be friends with non-Muslims. In Surah Al-Ma’idah the words from their god Allah says:

Surah Ali ‘Imran 3:28

Believers are discouraged in Islam from taking unbelievers as friends, if they do Allah will not help them. And it gets worse. Allah commands Muslims to not be friends with people who don’t believe in Allah.

Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:51

According to their Qur’ān Muslims are not allowed to take Jews or Christians as friends. It’s plain and simple, they try to add the word “war” etc. This verse mentions nothing about war, it has to do with a person’s BELIEF because they are not a Muslim, therefore, it’s not allowed to be friends with them.4 This is why the Qur’ān says if you do then you are one of them, in other words no longer a Muslim.

Here’s the Tafsir (emphasis ours):

(Let not the believers take) the believers ought not to take [the hypocrites:] ‘Abdullah Ibn Ubayy and his companions [and] (disbelievers) the Jews (for their friends) so as to become mighty and honourable (in preference to believers) who are sincere. (Whoso doeth that) seeking might and honour [by taking the hypocrites and disbelievers as friends] (hath no connection with Allah) has no honour, mercy or protection from Allah (unless (it be) that ye but guard yourselves against them) save yourselves from them, (taking (as it were) security) saving yourselves from them by speaking in a friendly way towards them with, while your hearts dislikes this. (Allah bideth you beware (only) of Himself) regarding the shunning of unlawful killing, unlawful sex, unlawful property, consuming intoxicants, false testimony and associating partners with Allah. (Unto Allah is the journeying) the return after death.5

Tafsir Ibn ‘Abbas

The donkeys at qnBb are unaware the homes spoken of by John are house churches. Christians gathered in different homes to worship and learn doctrine spoken of by the Lord Jesus passed on to His Apostles, and to the disciples. The 2nd Epistle of John is a letter warning the believers of the Gnostics who claimed “secret knowledge”, John was against their false teachings as they denied Christ came in the flesh.

The muta’h boys are arguing for heretical teaching. The Gnostics taught Jesus didn’t come in the flesh, that’s a direct rejection of the Qur’ān as this would deny that Isa came in the flesh. It’s hilarious they quote the church fathers as if they’re saying Christians cannot be friends with non-Christians.

The context is not to fellowship with those who teach erroneous doctrines masquerading as a Christian when they’re anything but. Cults such as Arianism, and Sabellianism are against orthodox Christianity.

It’s in this context the church fathers are read, when done so it’s clear to see they’re against cult teachings not people. Looking at the quotes in light of people like Jehovah’s Witnesses who teach Jesus is not God (Arianism), Oneness Pentecostals who say Jesus and the Father are the same Person (Sabellianism) or Mormons who teach Christ is one of many gods (polytheism).6

  1. Tertullian: “Although we ought to be seeking at all times, where ought we to seek? Among the heretics, where all is foreign and opposed to our truth, with whom we are forbidden to associate?”
  2. Ambrose of Milan: “Since it is written that we should avoid such people, how can we not assume that someone who associates with Arians is also an exponent of their heresy?”
  3. Hilary of Arles: “Here you see an example of excommunication in the New Testament, both from table fellowship at home and from table fellowship in church.”
  4. Irenaeus of Lyons: “By wishing that we do not even give them a welcome, John, the Lord’s disciple, made their condemnation even stronger.”
  5. Clement of Alexandria: “John forbids us to greet such people or to offer them hospitality, which in the circumstances is not at all unkind. But he also warns us not to argue or dispute with people who are unable to handle the things of God, lest we should be taken away from the true doctrine by clever arguments which have the appearance of truth. Furthermore, I think that it is wrong to pray with such people, because during times of prayer there is a moment for greeting and sharing the peace.”
  6. Didymus the Blind: “Anyone who dwells in the doctrine of the gospel and who acts according to its teaching will separate himself from those who think and act differently.”

The Abdools then said:

“… we saved the best for last. Basil “The Great” plainly stated that Christians cannot be “friends” with non-Christians. …”

Can Christians be “Friends” with Non-Christians?

Let’s be clear Christians follow Jesus Christ, not the church fathers or anyone else, qnBb mentions Basil “The Great” (emphasis ours):

It is obvious that those who make friends of people who SPEAK FALSELY about God and who even eat with them do not love the Lord who made them and who feeds them. Instead of being content with that food they are led away into blasphemy against the one who feeds them.”

Basil “The Great”

I guess qnBb likes people speaking falsely about Allah their god. Perhaps they can take a few non-Muslims out to dinner who speak against Islam unless qnBb are hypocrites and won’t prove otherwise?

The “Evidence” 1 Corinthians 5:9–11

Thank you muta’h boys for a good laugh, it was fun! Muslim ignorance rears its ugly head again, 1 Corinthians 5:9–11 is speaking about someone who’s in fellowship in a local assembly. In other words, a Christian who is going around practising sin, as Christians we cannot tolerate sin among the fellowship of believers and the offending party is to be put out of assembly fellowship.

By doing so these sinful practices will not spread to the rest of the believers. As it’s said leaven corrupts and spreads like yeast in bread. The Lord Jesus said, “Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod” (Mark 8:15).

And in keeping in context with 1 Corinthians Paul the apostle said: “Your glorying [is] not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us: Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened [bread] of sincerity and truth.” (1 Corinthians 5:6-8).

Garland, D. E. (2003). 1 Corinthians (Ser. Baker exegetical commentary on the new testament). Baker Academic. p. 184-185

Garland in his exegetical commentary on the New Testament draws from the text, that the Corinthians had a problem in the church. There was an incident of an individual who committed incest with his father’s wife, this sin was unacceptable but the believers in the Corinthian church didn’t confront the man, thereby being complacent. Paul rebukes them saying this should not have happened.7

Muhammad on the other hand committed all sorts of sexual sins, he had sex with a minor as a child paedophile (Sahih al-Bukhari 5133), any believing woman can give herself to the prophet for sex (Quran 33:50).

Muhammad contradicted himself because he said in the book of Jame’ Alsag’er (Imam Al-Soiuty), Hadith 2994: “Any woman, [if] she gives herself to a man to marry him without her father’s, or man of the house’s permission, she is a whore”

Jame’ Alsag’er (Imam Al-Soiuty), Hadith 2994

Comparing this to 33:50 we have to ask the question, how can the woman, who gives herself to marry a man be a whore, but the woman who gives herself to Muhammad be a good/pious woman? Challenge give one woman’s name who became a wife to Muhammad by giving herself to him. None of his wives gave herself to him as there’s no such thing as marriage in Islam. Proof Muhammad was a sexually immoral man.

Conclusion

The truth is that Muslims worship an immoral man called Muhammad which means “the praised one”, how can a sinful man be praised? As a Christian, the only One who gets praised is God alone. The black stone smoochers love sin and are hypocritical, these are traits from Satan himself because that’s who Allah is. We can only continue to provide evidence from their own sources, showing them how sinful their prophet is, a man who allowed sexual immorality, lying, killing, extortion and a whole slew of other sinful practices.

We’ll close out this article with the words of their “god” Allah, notice how Allah wants to spread terror into the hearts of unbelievers. That’s not all he wants Muslims to smite people on the neck and cut off their fingertips.

Surah Al-Anfal 8:12

What god commands such wickedness? Allah must love chicken fingers, maybe we should get him a bucket of KFC? Come to Christ our Muslim friends, the Lord Jesus knocks will you invite Him in? (Revelation 3:20)

And Allah (Shameful and Perish He’ll be) doesn’t know best!

Footnotes

1 “Further, they teach that John, the disciple of the Lord, indicated the first Ogdoad, expressing themselves in these words: John, the disciple of the Lord, wishing to set forth the origin of all things, so as to explain how the Father produced the whole, lays down a certain principle,—that, namely, which was first-begotten by God, which Being he has termed both the only-begotten Son and God, in whom the Father, after a seminal manner, brought forth all things.” Irenaeus of Lyons, “Irenæus against Heresies, 1.8.5.” in The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus, ed. Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson, and A. Cleveland Coxe, vol. 1, The Ante-Nicene Fathers (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Company, 1885), 328.

2 ”Peter having preached the word publicly at Rome, and by the Spirit proclaimed the Gospel, those who were present, who were numerous, entreated Mark, inasmuch as he had attended him from an early period, and remembered what had been said, to write down what had been spoken. On his composing the Gospel, he handed it to those who had made the request to him; which coming to Peter’s knowledge, he neither hindered nor encouraged. But John, the last of all, seeing that what was corporeal was set forth in the Gospels, on the entreaty of his intimate friends, and inspired by the Spirit, composed a spiritual Gospel.” Clement of Alexandria, “Fragments of Clemens Alexandrinus,” in Fathers of the Second Century: Hermas, Tatian, Athenagoras, Theophilus, and Clement of Alexandria (Entire), ed. Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson, and A. Cleveland Coxe, trans. William Wilson, vol. 2, The Ante-Nicene Fathers (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Company, 1885), 580.

3 “Such hospitality was open to easy abuse, however. There was the false teacher, on the one hand, who yet posed as a Christian: should hospitality be extended to him? And there was the more obvious mountebank, the false prophet with false credentials, who was dominated less by the creed he had to offer than by the material profit and free board and lodging he hoped to gain. It is against this background that we must read the Second and Third Epistles of John, for in them the Elder issues instructions concerning whom to welcome and whom to refuse, and why. Genuine Christian missionaries, he writes, maybe recognized both by the message they bring and by the motive which inspires them. If they faithfully proclaim the doctrine of Christ (cf. 2 Jn. 7), and if they have set out not for filthy lucre but for the sake of His name (3 Jn. 7), then they should both be received and helped forward on their journey ‘as befits God’s service (3 Jn. 6, RSV)” Stott JRW. The Letters of John: An Introduction and Commentary. 2nd ed. (Leicester, England: Inter-Varsity Press; 1988), p. 199

4 “Taking them as friends in general terms, taking them as helpers and supporters, and throwing in one’s lot with them. Allaah forbids all this, as He says (interpretation of the meaning): “O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as awliya’ (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but awliya’ to one another…” [al-Maa’idah 5:51].” Islamqa.info (1998, September 10) APA citation. Clarification of the important rule: it is haraam to take kaafirs as close friends and protectors. Retrieved from https://islamqa.info/en/answers/2179/clarification-of-the-important-rule-it-is-haraam-to-take-kaafirs-as-close-friends-and-protectors

5 altafsir.com (2021) APA citation. Tafsir Ibn ‘Abbas. Retrieved from https://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=3&tAyahNo=28&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

6 Gerald Bray., & Thomas C. Oden (2020). Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture: James, 1-2 Peter, 1-3 John, Jude, Volume XI (Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 2000).

7 Garland, D. E. (2003). 1 Corinthians (Ser. Baker exegetical commentary on the new testament). Baker Academic. p. 184-185

Response The Sinless Savior: Why the Biblical Jesus Was Sinless

Abdools claim that Jesus is not sinless, by doing so deny their retarded book Qur’ān as their own book says Jesus is Holy. It’s wonderful Muhammadans are rejecting Qur’ān through their lack of understanding their own beliefs. We could choose to end the article here as it already refutes the entire article from quranandBibleblog titled: The Sinful Savior: Why the Biblical Jesus Was Not “Sinless”

The 5 Abdools at quranandBibleblog are so desperate to go against Christianity they toss their own Qur’ān in the garbage proving Muhammad is a false prophet and Allah a false god.

In Isaiah 53:11 we have αναφερω for bearing sins, but αιρω properly means to lift up and carry away [John 2:16].[1] Muslims would agree that only God could take away sins, and I want to thank them for opening with this verse which refutes their entire article.

In Sunan Abi Dawud 3092 it says Allah removes the sins of Muslims for his illness. This alone proves Jesus is God, the power of God displayed in fullness as Christ has the power to take away sins.

When the Muta’h gang tries to prove that Christ was anything but sinless they undermine their own Qur’ān, the scribes also made this grave mistake. In Mark 2:1-12 the story of the healed paralytic says Christ came to Capernaum many people gathered to hear him preach the word to them. A group brought a person sick of the palsy, there were so many people it was hard for them to get close to Christ. But they persevered going onto the roof of the house and lowering the man into the house before the Lord Jesus.

When Jesus saw their faith He said unto the man sick of the palsy “Son, thy sins be forgiven thee.” Jesus directly forgave the man of his sins something only God can do. The scribes made a profound statement saying “Why doth this man thus speak blasphemies? who can forgive sins but God only?”

This is the same statement made by Muslims when they claim Christians commit shirk by worshipping Jesus Christ. Muslims believe Jesus performed miracles such as creating life when he made birds, healing the blind, raising the dead etc. Jesus in the Qur’ān can even tell you what you eat and knows what’s in your house.

Here’s the hypocrisy of Muslims, on the very article which we’re refuting today on quranandBibleblog a muta’h boy named mr.heathcliff made this comment, proving he doesn’t know his Qur’ān, he said:

how about the story about jesus touching the leper? jesus clearly breaks the law by touching leprous person and telling him to keep the healing a secret. Why would he tell the man to keep it a secret about the touching and healing? Did jesus realise that his act of touching broke the law? … Jesus knew up front that he was touching a leper. Law broke. Furthermore, he attempted to keep it a secret. Law broke. And the text goes on to tell us that Jesus was punished by being banished from the town. Why? Because he broke the Law.

The Sinful Savior: Why the Biblical Jesus Was Not “Sinless”

He then quotes Leviticus 13:45-46 which speaks about the uncleanness of leprosy, but wait, if you read Qur’ān 3:49 it clearly says Jesus (Isa) healed the lepers. Therefore, Isa broke the law according to mr.heathcliff because it’s in the Qur’ān. It gets worse! It was by Allah’s leave or permission! So Allah broke his own law by mr.heathcliff’s standard.

Let’s educate the Abdools, according to Qur’ān Allah gave Jesus the power to create which makes Jesus another Creator besides Allah by Allah’s leave [23:12-14]. This means in the Qur’ān Jesus is God having the same power as Allah. If anyone touched a person who had leprosy they would be infected with leprosy as well. Jesus Christ as God, leprosy has no effect on Him, in-fact anyone who touched Jesus their disease of leprosy was immediately be cured. Only God has this power.

Ibn Kathir agrees that Isa created life by making birds from clay as Allah gave him the power to do so making him God. Kathir also says Isa healed lepers “a known disease.”

Thank you mr.heathcliff for proving Jesus is God, you’re helping more people to leave Islam.

Destroying private property and committing animal abuse? – Matthew 8:28–34 (Q71:25, Sahih al-Bukhari 5590)

This is an interesting story. On the one hand, Jesus’ power as an exorcist was displayed when he forced a group of demons, called “Legion” (Mark 5:9), to stop oppressing two men. On the other hand, he then let the demons possess a herd of pigs, without asking for permission from the owner. As a result, the pigs were possessed and drowned in a lake. Thus, the Biblical Jesus committed two sins: the destruction of property and cruelty to animals. There is no indication that Jesus compensated the owner of the pigs (he must have been a Gentile), a violation of Exodus 22, which requires compensation for the theft and deaths of animals, though of course, the law did not include pigs since Jews could not own such animals.

The Sinful Savior: Why the Biblical Jesus Was Not “Sinless”

In their feeble attempt at discrediting the Bible, they chose another passage proving Christ Jesus is the Almighty God. Jesus heals two demon-possessed men.

Only God can do what Jesus Christ did, it was the finger of God which-casted out those demons [Luke 11:20]. Notice Abdools are more concerned with material possessions instead of caring for humanity placing humans on the same level as animals. That’s no surprise as according to Muslims Allah said Jews were made into monkeys [al-Baqarah 2:65-66].

According to Sahih al-Bukhari 5590 Allah will destroy them letting mountains fall on them, and transform the rest of the people into monkeys and pigs, so why are Muslims so worried about the pigs mentioned in Matthew 8? According to Islam pigs are unclean animals, way are the Muslims getting their panties in a bunch? Looks like pork is halal for the sons of muta’h.

Jesus Christ actually helped the man to not be possessed, while Allah sinned turning Jews into apes the Arabic text reads (فَقُلْنَا لَهُمْ كُونُوا۟ قِرَدَةً خَـٰسِـِٔينَ). Allah allowed his prophet Muhammad to be bewitched and possessed as Muhammad said he has a jinn which commands him to do good, this contradicts the Qur’ān in Surah Al-Falaq which is supposed to be a protection against magic (those who practise secret arts). Yet Muhammad was bewitched and had a jinn and poisoned which proves Allah is powerless and cannot protect Muhammad.

The potatoes said in referring to Jesus “the destruction of property and cruelty to animals”, was this the case?

“Strangely enough Jesus granted their request. But why should the Sovereign Lord accede to the request of demons? To understand His action, we must remember two facts. First, demons shun the disembodied state; they want to indwell human beings, or, if that is not possible, animals or other creatures. Secondly, the purpose of demons is without exception to destroy. If Jesus had simply cast them out of the maniacs, the demons would have been a menace to the other people of the area. By allowing them to go into the swine, He prevented their entering men and women and confined their destructive power to animals. It was not yet time for their final destruction by the Lord. As soon as the transfer took place, the swine ran violently down the steep place into the sea and drowned. This incident demonstrates that the ultimate aim of demons is to destroy, and underlines the terrifying possibility that two men can be indwelt by the number of demons it takes to destroy two thousand swine (Mark 5:13)”[2]

William MacDonald Believer’s Bible Commentary Second Edition (Thomas Nelson, 2016), p. 1147

Jesus Christ protected the people from the demons, not only are humans above animals we’re told in the book of Genesis that man was given the rule over all animals, to do whatever he deemed necessary “Dress it and to keep it.”

If the muta’h boys are claiming that “the destruction of property and cruelty to animals”, is sin in their eyes then what about their god Allah? Was he responsible of “the destruction of property and cruelty to animals” in the flood [Sura 71]?

Allah destroyed property and animals all over the world which means according to quranandBibleblog Allah destroyed private property and committed animal abuse, those are their words. There’s no indication Allah compensated the people for their loss yet Muslims try to blame Jesus Christ for helping those who were possessed by demons, Allah was not helping anyone.

Ibn Kathir in his Tafsir explains that Allah drowned the people and made them enter the fire because drowning them was not enough for Allah. What a bunch of hypocrites!

Kathir says Allah destroyed them from the face of the earth, Allah even destroyed Nuh’s (Noah) biological son, what kind of sadistic pagan god do Muslims worship?

Disrespecting his mother? – John 2:1–5 (Muhammad called his pagan parent najas نجس)

Muslims are choosing verses which prove, Jesus is God, in the twisted corrupt mind of Muhammadans they believe Jesus disrespected his mother, that means they contradicted the Qur’ān which says Jesus is a righteous son [19:19]. On the contrary, Mary in the Bible had faith knowing Christ was fully capable of performing miracles. Asking Him to turn the water into wine, did Jesus refuse and not perform the miracle? No! In fact, He honoured His mother and did as she asked.

The tomato boys think because Jesus said “Woman, what have I to do with thee?” means He somehow “disrespected” her, they are showing their amazing ignorance. First, Christ came with one purpose that was to make certain He accomplished what He was sent to do, and that was to save sinners. This was the purpose for Him to do things in secret, not because He was hiding something shameful. Because if all the people would have taken Him and made Him King at that time “they would not have crucified the Lord of glory”[3]

Second, Christ called His mother-woman, as He is her Creator and is addressing her as such.[4] Mary understood this and uttered these wonderful words “Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it.” Something Muslims don’t do as Islam is an antichrist religion from Satan himself.

Unfortunately for Muhammadan the parents of their prophet are polythiest, and called najas (نجس) in Qur’ān. The word najas (نجس) translated means impure, unclean, defiled, filthy, abomination, impurity etc. If Muslims don’t believe me all they need to do is open an Arabic dictionary and see for themselves.

Here’s the hard facts, Muhammad (who’s real name is Qathem) according to Muslims was born in Mecca in the year of the Elephant (570 AD). He proclaimed his mission at the age of 40 (610 AD), therefore, when he was 40 years old, it’s not possible his parents were Muslims because they were already dead.

Additionally, Muhammad didn’t know who his father was as he died 4 years BEFORE Muhammad’s birth. The Islamic story is that Muhammad’s father was Abdullah. The question is how can Muhammad’s birth come 4 years after his father’s death? The answer is that in reality he was not his father, in-fact his mother slept with groups of men. Before in Islam there was something called Zawaj Al Rahe’t which really means group “marriage” but really is sex.

The woman in this case the prophet’s mother would sleep with multiple men 5, 7, 12 or more it makes no difference. This sex practice was accepted by the Arab society, the mother after given birth then choose the father from among those men she slept with. The real name of his (Muhammad’s) father was Abd Allat, meaning slave of Allat (1 of the 3 daughters of Allah the pagan deity found in Surah An-Najm 53:19-21).

Muhammad’s mother had many children, she didn’t only bear Muhammad. If she was only with Muhammad’s father how did she give birth to so many children? In Imam Al Suoty the Al Kasa’s Al-Kubra V1 p. 132-135 his mother said: I was pregnant with him, and it was the easiest one of my pregnancies.

Sahih Muslim 203 someone asked Muhammad where is his father? And Muhammad replied that his father is in Fire (hell), Muhammad concludes his statement and says “my father and your father are in the Fire.” Muhammad admits his own father is in hell as his parents were unbelievers. Talk about disprespecting ones parents!

Sunan Ibn Majah 1572 Muhammad was weeping as he visited his mother’s grave, he then makes mention that he asked Allah permission to seek forgiveness for his mother, and Allah denies Muhammad.

It is not permissible to offer the funeral prayer for a polytheist, a disbeliever or a hypocrite who is guilty of major hypocrisy. If a person is aware of somebody’s hypocrisy or disbelief, it is prohibited for him to offer the funeral prayer for him or to pray for forgiveness for him after his death, regardless of whether or not he was a relative of his.

(Source: https://islamqa.info/en/answers/246744/it-is-not-permissible-to-offer-the-funeral-prayer-for-a-mushrik-who-committed-major-shirk)

Not only was his parents pagans considered filthy by Allah, Muhammad contradicts himself as his intercession for his mother was not accepted by Allah. Yet the prophet says that he’s “pre-eminent” and the “first intercessor and the first whose intercession will be accepted by Allah” and it was not accepted.

What kind of god doesn’t want a person to be saved? Allah has no love, therefore, he cannot be god, he definitely is not “the most merciful” how is that showing mercy if he doesn’t want all to be saved?

Muhammad was unable to do anything, as he prayed for his dead mother she was rotting in the grave, his prayer fell on deaf ears. But Jesus Christ was able to raise the dead [John 11:1, 11, 14, 43, 44] He was even able to raise Himself from the dead [John 2:19-22], and do many more miracles but Muhammad has no miracles.

According to al-Jalalayn pagans will not escape Allah and he will punish and humiliate them and sending them to the fire. Don’t forget Muhammad said his father is in the fire in Sahih Muslim 203 that’s because his parents died as pagans because they were worshipping idols.

According to [9:3] Allah is unforgiving and has no grace, instead he’s a sadistic god who gets off on punishing and dishing out painful torment to disbelievers, in reality this is Muhammad talking as Allah doesn’t exist. To contrast this verse the true God Yahweh says He’s “not willing that any should perish” [2 Peter 3:9], the problem is Muslims don’t want to be saved by Jesus, therefore, they have no hope of salvation.

Muhammad’s parents never became Muslim, they died as idolaters according to Allah, Muhammad and thier sunni donkey scholars al-Jalalayn unless they want to lie and say al-Jalalayn is a Christian now.

Lying to his brothers – John 7:1–10 Muhammad lying to his wives (Jami ‘at-Tirmidhi 1939)

The context of John 7:8 is that Jesus’ brothers don’t believe in Him, Jesus being God is fully aware of this. His brothers command that He go to the festival and openly saying “For there is no man that doeth any thing in secret, and he himself seeketh to be known openly. If thou do these things, shew thyself to the world.”

His brothers wanted Him to make a huge spectacle of Himself, but since they didn’t believe in Him their request was hypocritical as they were trying to make it seem as though they did believe. Besides it would also be prideful to blatantly make a show, this is what Satan wanted Jesus to do [Matthew 4:1–11].

Abdools in their quest to show that they “love Jesus” openly try to besmirch the name of Christ because they are following an antichrist. In the OT God would not go up with those who are committing sin. The LORD told Moses “I will not go up in the midst of thee; for thou art a stiffnecked people” [Exodus 33:1-3]. The same is true of Christ, since Jesus is God we can expect the same reaction to those who are not walking orderly.

In examining the text of this passage one might ask did Jesus lie as our Muslim friends contend. Greek scholar Bill Mounce weighs in giving insight to this passage stating “The more complete answer is supplied by the condition, “my time has not yet fully come.””[5]

Let us go with the abdools argument. If the word yet was not originally found in the mss and was inserted by a scribe that’s still not an issue and doesn’t make Jesus a liar, it’s what’s meant in the message John was conveying. It can also be elliptical language[6] used in John 7:8 the omission of certain words can still provide the necessary context to understand what’s going on in the passage.

His brothers say, to Jesus, you should go and make a public spectacle of yourself in front of your disciples and show everyone who you really are. 

John mentions, they didn’t really believe in Him. Jesus says, No, it isn’t time for me to do that, therefore, under those conditions, I’m not going. Jesus wanted to go with His identity concealed, and He couldn’t go with them as they intended to make a big exhibition of Himself. And that’s the reason why He didn’t go with them. But did so afterwards in secretly. Lastly, in v9 it says He stood in Galilee and we’re not told how much time elapsed, one thing we can understand He didn’t go immediately afterwards as the context shows.

Let’s see what the prophet of Islam taught, Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1939 Muhammad says it’s halal to lie in 3 cases (1) to your wife, (2) in war and (3) to bring peace between the people.

(Source: https://sunnah.com/tirmidhi:1939)

How evil is this?! Muslim men are taught to lie to their wives according to their prophet.[7] Additionally, how can lies bring peace at all, that means everything taught in Islam is a farce. If Muhammad teaches you can lie this makes sense because he obviously lied about everything creating his cult religion Islam.

Committing petty theft – Matthew 21:1–7 Muhammad stoled Women’s Underwear (Sunan Abi Dawud 3971)

(Source: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+21%3A1%E2%80%937&version=KJV)

Besides the absurdity of having Jesus sit on two donkeys (that would be very uncomfortable), the Gospel of Matthew indicates that Jesus sent his disciples to bring two donkeys from a village to him. These donkeys belonged to someone since they were tied. Jesus did not tell his disciples to find the owner and ask for his permission before taking the donkeys, but he did tell them what to say if someone saw them. They were to simply say “The Lord needs them”! Imagine if someone tried stealing your property and you caught them in the act, and their excuse was “God needs them”. Who would buy that excuse without any evidence?

The Sinful Savior: Why the Biblical Jesus Was Not “Sinless”

Notice how the black stone worshippers assume Jesus didn’t ask permission from the owner. If you read the text it says “any man” that includes the owner also, therefore, there’s no reason to assume Christ didn’t inform the owner. We’ll prove how easy it is to bust the abdools, in there desperation to try to slander (slander is from Satan) Christ and by doing so embarrass themselves.

In the Synoptic Gospels, we’re aware that the writers give an account of the same event, some highlight specific details more than another writer. The answer is found in the Gospel of Luke 19.

Luke 19:33 tells us that the owners asked them what are they doing and the disciples told them “The Lord hath need of him.” in the next verse. As mentioned we get the Abdools busted showing how silly their arguments are. This proves Jesus didn’t “commit petty theft” as quranandBibleblog mentioned. I wonder if they will admit they’re wrong and apologise for lying about Jesus Christ?

The one who committed petty theft is their prophet stealing women’s red underwear found in Sunan Abi Dawud 3971. What exactly did Muhammad want with women’s underwear?

(Sorce: https://sunnah.com/abudawud:3971)

The fact that Muhammad was a cross-dresser is very concerning, there’s proof of him being a homosexual[8] you can read about that here Was Muhammad a bisexual pervert? from their Islamic sources. Let’s not forget Muhammad plagiarized a multitude of passages from the Bible, Jesus Christ came and established Christianity 600 years before Islam. We’ll take a look at some of those passages Muhammad committed petty theft in a future article, Lord willing.

Conclusion

There you go another Abdool spanking, it’s getting embarrassing for the muta’h boys at quranandBibleblog. When it comes to comparing the Lord Jesus against the false prophet Muhammad, Christ will always be superior by leaps and bounds above Muhammad. Even the Islamic teaching is that Jesus is alive with Allah, while Muhammad rots in the grave.

We would like to thank our Muslim friends at quranandBibleblog for once again exposing Muhammad for being a destructive individual, disrespectful, liar and petty theft. Of course, we already knew he was all of this and more. We invite all Muslims to come to know Jesus Christ as their personal Lord and Saviour, the Lord Jesus is the only One who can save you and desires to do so because He loves you.

Abandon the false pagan religion of Islam as there is no hope for you in it, only Jesus Christ can give you everlasting life. May we pray for these lost souls that they come to faith in Christ for salvation.

References

[1] A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 2011), p. 1954.

[2] William MacDonald Believer’s Bible Commentary Second Edition (Thomas Nelson, 2016), p. 1147

[3] 1 Corinthians 2:8 Which none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known [it], they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+2%3A8&version=KJV

[4] “The reply of the Lord to His mother seems cold and distant. But it is not as strong a rebuke as would seem to us. The word woman used here is a title of respect, similar to the word “lady.” When the Lord asked, “Woman, what does your concern have to do with Me?” He indicated that in the performance of His divine mission, He was not subject to instructions from His mother, but acted entirely in obedience to the will of His Father in heaven. Mary wanted to see Jesus glorified, But He must remind her that the time for this had not yet come. Before He would appear to the world as the all-conquering Christ, He must first ascend the altar of sacrifice, and this He did at the cross of Calvary.” William MacDonald Believer’s Bible Commentary Second Edition (Thomas Nelson, 2016), p. 1429-1430

[5] This is certainly what gave rise to the alternate reading, “I am not yet (οὔπω replacing οὐκ) going up.” The external evidence for οὔπω is actually quite strong (P66, 75, Vaticanus, but not Sinaiticus), but internally it is inconceivable that a scribe would have changed οὔπω to οὐκ and introduce the issue of Jesus’ honesty. οὐκ is preferred in all major translations (except the KJV following the MT). Notice also that the explicitly continuous translation “I am not going up” (ἀναβαίνω) favored by most translations at least paves the way for the reader to hear “not yet.” The more complete answer is supplied by the condition, “my time has not yet fully come.” As Carson argues, Jesus’ “itinerary is regulated by the Father” and hence the time is not yet right. But he would go when instructed to do so by his Father. – Bill Mounce (2022, November 29). Did Jesus Lie? (John 7:8) [Blog post] Retrieved from https://www.billmounce.com/monday-with-mounce/did-jesus-lie-john-7-8

[6] The beauty of elliptical language is not in the words a sentence contains, but in the words it does not. In English language prose and poetry, elliptical construction involves the omission of a word or words, while elliptical storytelling involves artfully obtuse language to dance around certain subjects. To understand what an elliptical construction looks like, just look at the first sentence of this paragraph. Its second clause omits use of the verb “contain,” but the verb is nonetheless implied by the first part of the sentence. This arguably makes the sentence more elegant than it would be with a second instance of “contain.” – MasterClass (2021, September 13). How to Write an Elliptical Sentence: Improve Your Writing Retrieved from https://www.masterclass.com/articles/how-to-write-an-elliptical-sentence

[7] Imam Ahmad (26731) narrated that Umm Kalthoom bint ‘Uqbah said: I never heard the Messenger of Allah grant a concession allowing any kind of lying except in three cases: a man who says something intending thereby to bring about reconciliation; a man who says something at the time of war; and a man talking to his wife or a woman talking to her husband. Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in as-Saheehah, 545 – Islamqa.info (2012, May 5). Is it permissible to lie to kaafirs? Retrieved from https://islamqa.info/en/answers/175632/is-it-permissible-to-lie-to-kaafirs

[8] Islambag (2016, July 8). Was Muhammad a bisexual pervert? [Blog post] Retrieved from https://www.islamicbag.com/quran-hadith/mohammed/item/1706-en-mohammadbisexual

The Sinful Prophet: The Qur’ānic Muhammad Was Not “Sinless” but a Madman

At Whatsoeverthingsaretrue we love the Muslims, and pray for their salvation, may their eyes be opened to the truth. They need Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of their sins just like everyone else. They will worship Him as God and their Lord and Saviour as many Muslims are leaving Islam and now following Jesus Christ.

Forwarning this won’t be the usual article, it’ll be disturbing and gross as we look into the Life of prophet Muhammad the sinner. To those in Islam who blaspheme Christ, we forgive you as our Lord commands us to do [Matthew 12:31-32] even the most hateful person can be forgiven.[1]

As a Christian, my Lord tells me to love, forgive and pray for my enemies [Matthew 5:44, Luke 6:27, 35] those who would blaspheme against Christ.[2] It’s not my place to condemn anyone, that judgment is for God alone to make. But that doesn’t mean I’ll refrain from speaking the truth for I must speak the truth, with that said let’s get into it!

Muhammad The Sinner According to Qur’ān

Muslims are taught that Muhammad is perfect, the greatest of the prophets and an example for all mankind. Sadly, worship of their prophet has led to enormous lies compelling Muslims to assert that Muhammad was sinless. In truth, Muhammad sinned night and day. From having sex with a 9-year-old girl, breaking his oath to his wives, torturing a man for money etc. We’re going to look at their trusted sources, Qur’ān and Hadith proving Muhammad was a sinner.

In Surah Muhammad 47:19 Allah orders Muhammad to “ask forgiveness for your sin” (ٱسْتَغْفِرْ لِذَنۢبِكَ) and tells him that he would “forgive you your sins of the past and the future” [47:19; 48:2]

The following Arabic words from 47:19 (ٱسْتَغْفِرْ لِذَنۢبِكَ) if entered into Google Translate, will render what’s shown below.

Abdools can’t reject this fact it’s from Qur’ān saying Muhammad was a sinner. If not he wouldn’t have anything to ask forgiveness for, a challenge to Muslims to show in their Qur’ān Jesus Christ asking for forgiveness. In Qur’ān Christ is a Pure Boy [19:19], therefore, they’re denying Qur’ān and calling Allah and Muhammad liars if they claim Jesus is anything but sinless. Here’s one such denial from quranandbibleblog: The Sinful Savior: Why the Biblical Jesus Was Not “Sinless” They deny their own prophet proving Islam is a false religion, we must thank them for all thier help.

Allah tells Muhammad “that Allah may forgive thee of thy sin past and that to come.” If this is Allah talking who’s Allah talking to saying “that Allah may forgive thee.” He should say “that I may forgive” so who is Allah referring to another Allah? Secondly, Allah doesn’t know if Muhammad’s sins will be forgiven, why is Allah saying “that Allah may forgive” is he not sure? To sin means to miss the mark, in Muhammad’s case he didn’t even know where the mark was.

The Arabic in [48:2] is provided (لِّيَغْفِرَ لَكَ ٱللَّهُ مَا تَقَدَّمَ مِن ذَنۢبِكَ), I’d love to hear the excuse for these ayats. Bring any ayat from Qur’ān saying Muhammad never sinned if they can? That’s right they cannot because it doesn’t exist.

In Sahih Al-Bukhari 6307, Muhammad begs Allah, who in their right mind can say this man Muhammad is not sinful? “turn to him in repentance for more than seventy times a day” he sins so much that he’s repenting 70 times a day, he spent the entire day repenting because that’s how much he’s been sinning.

In Sunan Ibn Majah 3815 mirrors the hadith above, of course, Abdools will deny it till the cows come home, all they can do is try to run away from the madness of Muhammad.

Muhammad the dirty Prophet

It might come as a surprise to hear that their prophet took baths with dead dogs and women’s blood from periods. Here’s the Hadith from their own books saying Muhammad was swimming in water which had faeces, I couldn’t imagine how bad he smelled! Merriam Webster definition excrement: waste matter discharged from the body especially: FECES[3]

According to Sunan Abi Dawud 67, Muhammad would perform wudu (ablution) in filthy water which had dead dogs, women’s blood from their monthly period and excrement. Yet Muslims claim he’s holy?[4]

Imagine Muhammad washing his face, rinsing his mouth and nose with faeces. Washing his arms, wiping his head, ears and feet up to the ankles. The well of Buda’ah would make him dirtier unpure/unholy. In Islam, if a woman having her period cannot enter the Masjid and she must wait until she’s pure?[5]

Muhammad the hypocrite doesn’t follow Qur’ān, he’s bathing in women’s period blood before praying. In Islam, the man is to stay away from women during their menses and here’s Muhammad swimming in it before praying. This means Muhammad was constantly in a filthy state and unfit to pray by Islamic standards.

The following is a plethora of Hadith’s which speak of Muhammad being covered in semen. Don’t lose sight that these are Sahih, therefore, they are accepted by their scholars and not daif (weak) even though all of Islam is daif.

Aisha scraped semen off of Muhammad’s clothes with her fingernails poor Aisha not only was she the victim of child paedophilia but she also had to scrape semen off Muhammad Sahih al-Bukhari 232.

“I (‘Aisha) used to scrape it (the semen) off his garment with my nails while it was dry.” Bulugh al-Maram 28. Muhammad must have been cheap and only owned one garment.

How repulsive where’s all this semen coming from? Muhammad must have had a medical problem. “I remember when I found it (semen) on the garment of the Messenger of Allah and I scratched it off.” Sunan Ibn Majah 539.

“Aishah said: “I often scraped it (semen) from the garment of the Messenger of Allah with my hand.” Sunan Ibn Majah 537.

“Aisha: I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet (ﷺ) and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).” Sahih al-Bukhari 229.

The Paedophile Prophet

What follows is an insane amount of citations from the Hadith and Tafsir confirming Muhammad’s prepubescent sexual intercourse with Aisha and Allah’s approval of it for all believing men as well. We’ll define puberty first from the Islamic sources, and then address the latter. There we will also address the “women” in [65:4] which some Muslims claim is only used for adult women.

“Attaining of puberty” and “start of menses” are used synonymously (باب بُلُوغِ الصِّبْيَانِ وَشَهَادَتِهِمْ) the Arabic translated is “Children’s Puberty and Their Testimony” (Sahih al-Bukhari 3:52 Chapter 18)[6]

“Al-Mughira” (evidently a boy) attained puberty at the age of 12 in Bukhari 3:52 chapter 18. This is page 486 of vol 3 of Khan’s translation. The chapter introductions are usually left untranslated online. Image of the relevant part of the page is included here for your perusal and refutes the “early puberty” theory that Muslims claim.

Sahih al-Bukhari 5133 “the Prophet (ﷺ) married her [Aisha] when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old….”

The chapter heading for the hadith just cited is telling. It comes from Khan’s translation, volume 7, page 57, and is included here for your convenience.

Sahih Muslim 1422 c “…married her when she was seven years old, and she was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her.”

Sahih al-Bukhari 6130 “(The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.)”

Sunan Abi Dawud 4931 I used to play with dolls. Sometimes the Messenger of Allah (May peace be upon him) entered upon me when the girls were with me. When he came in, they went out, and when he went out, they came in.”

Sahih al-Bukhari 2637 Aisha is a young girl who sleeps a lot.

Sunan Abi Dawud 4935 Aisha was playing on a swing set when they came to get her, this Hadith is Sahih in chain.

Sahih a;-Bukhari 5081 Abu Bakr apparently objects to the young marriage: “The Prophet (ﷺ) asked Abu Bakr for `Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said “But I am your brother.”…”

Sahih al-Bukhari 5236 “… So you may deduce from this event how a little girl (who has not reached the age of puberty) who is eager to enjoy amusement should be treated in this respect.”

Sahih al-Bukhari 5190 “… So you may estimate of what age a little girl may listen to amusement.” Note: “Aisha was fifteen years old then.”

[65:4] “And if you are in doubt about those of your women who have despaired of menstruation, (you should know that) their waiting period is three months, and the same applies to those who have not menstruated as yet…” 

[33:49] “O believers! If you marry believing women and divorce them before the marriage is consummated, you are not required to observe the Iddah (waiting period)…”

Tafsir Ibn Kathir “This is a command on which the scholars are agreed, that if a woman is divorced before the marriage is consummated, she does not have to observe the `Iddah (prescribed period for divorce) and she may go and get married immediately to whomever she wishes.”

Allah the Exalted clarifies the waiting period of the woman in menopause. And that is the one whose menstruation has stopped due to her older age. Her `Iddah is three months instead of the three monthly cycles for those who menstruate, which is based upon the Ayah in (Surat) Al-Baqarah. ﴿see 2:228﴾ The same for the young, who have not reached the years of menstruation. Their `Iddah is three months like those in menopause… Tafsir Ibn Kathir on 65:4

Maududi “Therefore, making mention of the waiting-period for the girls who have not yet menstruated, clearly proves that it is not only permissible to give away the girl in marriage at this age but it is also permissible for the husband to consummate marriage with her. Now, obviously, no Muslim has the right to forbid a thing which the Qur’ān has held as permissible.”

Tafsir al-Jalalayn “those who have not yet menstruated because of their young age their period shall also be three months”

Asbab Al-Nuzul by Al-Wahidi “He said: ‘Those who are too young [such that they have not started menstruating yet]…And so this verse (And for such of your women as despair of menstruation…) was revealed.”

Tafsir Ibn ‘Abbas “O Messenger of Allah! What about the waiting period of those who do not have menstruation because they are too young?”

Homosexual acts he was sexually intimate with his Uncle

[93:6] Did He not find you (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) an orphan and gave you a refuge?

In regards to Surah Ad-Dhuha 93:6 Imam Fakhr Al Din Al Razi in his tafseer says The story goes that when Muhammad’s mother was pregnant his father Abdul Allah ben Abdul Motalib died. After he was born he was passed on to his grandfather Abdul Motalib at the age of 2 years old. When he reached the age of 8 years old his grandfather died and Muhammad but before Abdul Motlib death he asked Muhammad’s uncle to take care of him.

Muhammad’s uncle (Abu Talib) was intimate with him telling Muhammad “One night I ordered him to take off his clothing and sleep with me, so I saw resentment on his face and but hate to show disobedience” Muhammad responds “Oh uncle put your face away until I take off my clothing as no one should see my naked body” his uncle thinks “And then I found that he is too soft and smells so good as if he is soaked in cents, so I kept trying hard to stare at his body.”

Here’s the same account in Arabic with Google Translation, feel free to copy the text and translate it yourself.

وَلَا أَأْتَمِنُ عَلَيْهِ أَحَدًا حَتَّى أَنِّي كُنْتُ أُنَوِّمُهُ فِي فِرَاشِي ، فَأَمَرْتُهُ لَيْلَةً أَنْ يَخْلَعَ ثِيَابَهُ وَيَنَامَ مَعِي ، فَرَأَيْتُ الْكَرَاهَةَ فِي وَجْهِهِ لَكِنَّهُ كَرِهَ أَنْ يُخَالِفَنِي،

Muhammad was raped by his cousin

Muhammad claimed that he was raped by his cousin Abu Soffian Ibn Harith ben Abdel Motalib.

Al Sirah Al Nabawiah Sirah Ibn Hisham

Reported by Ibn Ishaq: And it was that Abu Soffian Ibn Harith ben Abdel Motalib and Abdul Allah ben Obay Omiah Ben Al Moghirah had met prophet of Allah (pbuh) at a place called “Naik Al Okab” between Mecca and Madina, so they wanted to enter in his presence, so Om Sallamah talked to him about that saying: Oh prophet of Allah, it is your cousin from your uncle and your other cousin from you aunt and your kinsman. So he (Muhammad) answered: “I have nothing to do with those 2, in regards to my cousin he raped me, and in regards to the other cousin he said what he said to me in Mecca”. So when it came to them what the prophet said and with Abu Soffian was one of his own siblings, abu Soffian responded back saying: “Swearing by Allah he must allow me in or I will take this kid with my hand and wonder in the land until we die of hunger and thirst!”, so when Rassoul Allah heard that he softened to them and accept them in and then they entered and accepted Islam

Sexual Encounters with the Sahaba!

In Al Sunan Al Kobra Reported by Abu Ali Al Ruzbarri, from Abu Bakr ben Dassah, Thana Abu Dawood, Thana Obed Allah ben Moaz, Thana Abi, Thana Kahmas, from Siar ben Nasour – reported: A man from Banni Fazazah from a woman called Bahisah about her father said: My father (Abu Bahisah) took permission from the prophet (pbuh) and he entered between him and his shirt and began to kiss him and embrace him,

Reference for the previous 3 segments provided below where you can read all of the details, plus additional information such as Muhammad getting his chest rubbed and kissed from Abu Bahisah, and fantasizing about other men, threesomes with his Sahaba and wives. Naked people riding Muhammad like a donkey[7]

Muhammad The Liar

Muhammad taught it’s halal to lie, what kind of prophet teaches lying is ok? Only a satanic prophet. This man says it’s ok to lie to your wife, how evil is this?! The Bible says that all liars will have their part in the lake of fire [Revelation 21:8]. Muhammad is definitely in hell and will be tossed into the Lake of Fire by Jesus Christ.

Muhammad The Adulterer

The Qur’ān says this marriage in [33:36] was arranged by Muhammad and “Allah” (truth is Allah doesn’t exist it’s Muhammad making things up) making the decision to take Zayd and Zaynab. Muhammad took his own adopted son’s wife from him causing a divorce.

Conclusion

While we’ll commence the article here, as there’s just too much dirt on Muhammad, like a long laundry list. But not to worry we’ll keep on posting about the wonderful life of Muhammad because the muta’h boys love it. Just to summarise what we’ve learned today, (1) Muhammad was a sinner who begged Allah to forgive him, (2) he was a dirty man bathing in excrement, dead dogs and period water, (3) Aisha scraped semen off the prophet, (4) he was a child paedophile, (5) a raging homosexual, (6) and a liar to boot, (7) and last but not least an adulterer. The Dawahgandist have no chance defending their sinful prophet, we’re having fun here making BBQ Muhammad. How Muslims are so lost to the point that they worship this man is beyond me, but it shows the low moral standards in Islam. If Muhammad is the best example for mankind then the world is in grave trouble.

May the eyes, hearts and minds of Muslims wake up from following this evil cult and come into the wonderful grace of the Lord Jesus Christ for eternal life.

Further Reading

Islamic Apologetics: Jesus’ Crucifixion and Islam’s Catch 22 Problem

Q65.4: The verse of child marriage

References

[1] Matthew Henry, Matthew Henry’s complete unabridged commentaries, Commentary on Matthew 12 “Here is a gracious assurance of the pardon of all sin upon gospel terms: this Christ says to us, and it is a comfortable saying, that the greatness of sin shall be no bar to our acceptance with God, if we truly repent and believe the gospel: All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men. Though the sin has been as scarlet and crimson (Isa. 1:18), though ever so heinous in its nature, ever so much aggravated by its circumstances, and ever so often repeated, though it reach up to the heavens, yet with the Lord there is mercy, that reacheth beyond the heavens; mercy will be extended even to blasphemy, a sin immediately touching God’s name and honour. Paul obtained mercy, who had been a blasphemer, 1 Tim. 1:13. Well may we say, Who is a God like unto thee, pardoning iniquity? Micah 7:18. Even words spoken against the Son of man shall be forgiven; as theirs were who reviled him at his death, many of whom repented and found mercy. Christ herein has set an example to all the sons of men, to be ready to forgive words spoken against them: I, as a deaf man, heard not. Observe, They shall be forgiven unto men, not to devils; this is love to the whole world of mankind, above the world of fallen angels, that all sin is pardonable to them.”

[2] A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament “Love of enemies is in the O.T., but Jesus ennobles the word, αγαπαω, and uses it of love for one’s enemies.” (Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 2011), p. 373.

[3] Merriam Webster def excrement: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/excrement

[4] What Has Been Narrated Concerning The Well Of Buda’ah (Sunan Abi Dawud 67) https://sunnah.com/abudawud:67

[5] “keep away from women during menses and go not unto them till they are purified” “With regard to the Sunnah, Muslim (302) narrated from Anas that the Jews, if any of their women was menstruating, would not eat with them or meet with them in their houses. The companions of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) asked the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) about that, then Allaah revealed the verse (interpretation of the meaning):” “They ask you concerning menstruation. Say: that is an Adha (a harmful thing for a husband to have a sexual intercourse with his wife while she is having her menses), therefore, keep away from women during menses and go not unto them till they are purified (from menses and have taken a bath). And when they have purified themselves, then go in unto them as Allaah has ordained for you (go in unto them in any manner as long as it is in their vagina). Truly, Allaah loves those who turn unto Him in repentance and loves those who purify themselves” [al-Baqarah 2:222] https://islamqa.info/en/answers/36722/intimacy-with-ones-wife-when-she-is-menstruating-or-in-nifaas

[6] Chapter: The boys attaining the age of puberty and their witness https://sunnah.com/bukhari/52

[7] Was Muhammad a bisexual pervert? https://www.islamicbag.com/quran-hadith/mohammed/item/1706-en-mohammadbisexual

Jibril was not revealed to Muhammad (Sura 96:1-5) Khadijah told Muhammad he saw an angel

The start of Islam began when Muhammad received Qur’ān in the cave Hira, the traditional Islamic sources tell us that it was an angel who visited Muhammad and delivered the verses of Qur’ān. But did the “angel” ever reveal himself as such?

Certainly, if we apply the same stipulation when it comes to the Bible we’re told that the angel (ἄγγελος) Gabriel (Γαβριὴλ) came to Mary announcing Mary would give birth to Jesus. Therefore we can be certain who this angel was that appeared to Mary.

Notice the scripture says the angel Gabriel was sent from God (θεοῦ), Mary who is the virgin visited by the angel is then greeted by him as he said, Hail (Χαῖρε). Looking at the Greek confirms what we have in our Bible.

In the Qur’ān, we find the same story in Surah Maryam with the exclusion of the angel identifying himself to her. He tells her that she will have a pure boy, this is of course Isa (the Islamic version of Jesus).

Even Mary gets more respect than Muhammad, this angel who Muslims agree it’s Jibril (Gabriel) didn’t squeeze Mary the way Muhammad was pressed like a grapefruit. In Surah 96:1-5 we have the story of “Jibril” coming to Muhammad and violently pressing or squeezing him 3 times.

The Islamic scholar Ibn Kathir in his tafsir tells us that Muhammad could no longer bear it being squeezed by this angel who never said who he was, if the angel never said he was Jibril then how can Muslims tell us it was Jibril?

Kathir tells us that Muhammad would go to cave Hira to worship, this brings up a good question if Muhammad didn’t receive Qur’ān at this point who was Muhammad worshipping? He couldn’t have known who Allah was, this confirms that Muhammad was a pagan just as Shaykh Uthman ibn Farooq said: Muhammed didn’t come from an Abrahamic faith but was a pagan who didn’t know Jibril.

According to Kathir, the revelation came to Muhammad suddenly in cave Hira, the angel said “Read” seizing Muhammad and pressed him multiple times until he could no longer bear it. Afterwards, Muhammad was afraid and ran to his wife Khadijah. In the following explanation from Kathir we’re told that Khadijah took Muhammad to see her cousin Waraqah bin Nawfal who according to Islamic tradition was a Christian, truth is he was not a Christian he was a Nasara. and it was these two who convinced Muhammad that the angel was Jibril.

Neither Khadijah or Waraqah bin Nawfal were there with Muhammad in the cave, how can they with surety say this was an angel and not a demon. Kathir then tells us about the mental state of Muhammad, when Waraqah bin Nawfal died and the “revelations” stopped Muhammad became depressed and tried killing himself multiple times by tossing himself off a mountain.

Confirming what Kathir tells us in the tafsir we will now turn to an authentic Hadith from Sahih al-Bukhari which corroborates this story.

Sahih al-Bukhari 3392 states the prophet returned to his wife Khadija in fear of what he just experienced. Khadija takes Muhammad to visit her cousin Waraqa bin Naufal and he tells Muhammad that what he experienced was an angel. As we see here it was Waraqa who claimed Muhammad saw an angel. No account in the Qur’ān ever mentions this was an angel from Allah.

Additionally, we also have the account of Khadija giving Muhammad a lap dance found in The Life of Muhammad by Ibn Isḥāq on page 107. Here she puts the “Jibril” to a test asking the prophet to sit on her lap asking Muhammad if he still sees him, in-which Muhammad responds by saying yes. Once she gets undressed this entity departs and Khadija then tells Muhammad this is an angel of God.

Muhammad’s entire prophethood rest on top of these 2 people Waraqa bin Naufal and his wife Khadija. When Muhammad was in the cave this being never revealed himself stating that he was Jibril. Where do Muslims get this fabricated idea from because it’s not in the Qur’ān? As we saw in this article Muhammad had no witnesses to his experience in the cave, the “angel” never gave Muhammad a name and lastly Muhammad didn’t know he was a prophet, it was Waraqa and Khadija who claimed Muhammad was a prophet.

It’s not difficult to see that Muhammad never received revelations from God, all of the Qur’ān is made up of fabricated stories from a man who’s mentally ill.

The Qur’ān is Not Preserved According To The Qur’ān!

Islam prides itself on a few claims, the first claim is Muslims say Islam is pure monotheism in which they worship only 1 god (Allah). The second claim is Muslims profess that Muhammad is the last and greatest prophet (the seal of the prophets). The third claim is that the Qur’ān is perfectly preserved and never changed, each letter, sound, dot has been preserved. They get this from the following ayat in Surah Al-Hijr.

In this article we’re going to put the 3rd claim to the test, is the Qur’ān perfectly preserved? That’s what we’ll look to find out. In the history of how the Qur’ān was revealed to Muhammad, we’re told that Allah revealed the Qur’ān to Muhammad by angel Jibril (Gabriel) over the course of 23 years starting in the month of Ramadan when Muhammad was 40yrs old.

The traditional Islamic story is that Muhammad received the first revelation of the Qur’ān in Cave Hira during an isolated retreat to the mountains. At the time he was praying and Jibril appeared to him and began to squeeze Muhammad saying Iqra (ٱقْرَأْ) which means read. Are Muslims saying that Allah failed? Because if Allah can make anything happen by saying “Be” and it is, how come Allah was not able to do the same with Muhammad and make him read? It took multiple times to get Muhammad to read, that’s a failure on the part of Allah.

Muslims claim that Muhammad was incapable of reading as he was illiterate, this claim is untrue their prophet got them busted as Muhammad was able to read and write according to their own Hadith’s.

According to Sahih al-Bukhari Muhammad was on his deathbed (he died from poison), he calls some men who were in the house saying “Come near, I will write for you something after which you will not go astray.” Here we have their prophet saying he will write for them, the men were divided and started disputing between themselves. Ibn Abbas the cousin of Muhammad said it was unfortunate as their dispute prevented Muhammad from writing because of their differences and noise. Notice what the Hadith doesn’t say, it doesn’t say anything about Muhammad being illiterate and unable to read or write.

Continuing on the first revelation given to Muhammad according to Islamic tradition is found in Surah Al-‘Alaq, this is the verse in which Jibril told Muhammad Iqra (read). The problem is if the Qur’ān is perfectly preserved how is it this chapter is not found in the beginning but towards the end of the Qur’ān if this is the first revelation given? It would make sense for this Surah to be first if this is the first revelation from Allah to Muhammad but it’s not it’s at the end of the book.

Another problem the Qur’ān is faced with is verse 3 in Surah Al-Ma’idah. In this ayat we have Allah saying “This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islām as religion.” This ayat is found towards the beginning of the Qur’ān, in chapter 5 to be exact.

How can something be perfected (completed) if there are many more Surah’s which haven’t been revealed yet? The only way this can make sense is if this was the last verse revealed in the Qur’ān only then can Allah say he perfected the religion of Islam. It makes no sense to have this Surah in the beginning of the Qur’ān.

The Islamic tradition is that the Qur’ān was revealed over a 23yr period. The Qur’ān Muslims recite today is ordered differently from the Qur’ān revealed to Muhammad by Allah. This proves corruption in the Qur’ān, if Allah revealed Surah 96 first and it was moved towards the end of the Qur’ān and Surah 5 is moved toward the beginning this means the context of the Qur’ān makes no sense and the Qur’ān cannot be preserved.

Besides those issues the Qur’ān has other problems such as a goat eating Surah’s which are not found in the Qur’ān (stoning and breastfeding an adult ten times).

So who took the liberty to order these Surahs? The Islamic sources say Uthman ordered the Qur’ān Muslims read today. Who gave Uthman the authority to change the order of the Qur’ān, was Uthman a prophet as well that he could decide to move verses around whichever way he chooses?

There’s a Muslim site called tanzil.net an international project by Muslims in order to create verified Unicode for Qur’ān text in the development and standardization of Qur’ānic websites and applications. Tanzil has provided a chart which provides the chronological order of Surah’s revealed to Muhammad.

What does all of this tell us? It’s quite obvious that claim of perfect Qur’ānic preservation is a fabrication Muslims use in order to get individuals to become Muslim. If the time is taken to dig deeper and study some of these claims by Islam we find they fall flat. We challenge Muslims to provide proof for their claims, otherwise they need to admit the Qur’ān they have has been changed. Muslims come to Jesus Christ who is the true eternal Word of God perfectly preserved.

Muhammad’s Flirts with his Daughter In Law Zaynab Bint Jahsh

One of the most ungodly events in the prophet of Islam’s life was his affair with his adopted son’s wife, Zaynab bint Jash. Zaynab was married to Zayd, whom Muhammad adopted as his own son. Why is this sickening? Well, it’s because Muhammad destroyed his son’s relationship causing them to divorce so that Muhammad could have Zaynab for himself.

The Qur’ān says this marriage in Surah 33:36 was arranged by Muhammad and “Allah” (truth is Allah doesn’t exist it’s Muhammad making this up as he goes) making the decision to “marry” Zayd and Zaynab.

This is an extremely important point notice how the god of Islam didn’t make the decision alone it was Allah and his messenger (Muhammad). This further indicates that Muhammad made himself Allah in Islam in order to get whatever he wanted. It’s reminiscent of other verses in the Qur’ān where Muhammad is on the same level as Allah, for instance in order for a Muslim to obey Allah they must first obey Muhammad (Surah 4:80).

To substantiate our claim further we’ll quote Islam’s own sources, the following is from the official government website of Jordan (Royal Aal al-Bayt Institute for Islamic Thought, Amman, Jordan). The cousin of Muhammad Ibn-Abbas says in the Tafsir this was a decision between Allah and Muhammad for Zayd and Zaynab to marry.

Ibn-Abbas confirms Muhammad’s wish was to bring Zayd and Zaynab together, and he also elaborates on how Muhammad caused Zayd to divorce Zaynab in order for Muhammad to take her. Whatever Muhammad chose for them (Zayd and Zaynab) had no choice in the matter. What kind of messenger of god causes divorce and then takes another man’s wife to have sex with her? Only a satanic prophet.

The following is from The History of al-Tabari Vol VIII The Victory of Islam pages 2-3, Al-Tabari describes how one day Mohammed realised how beautiful Zaynab was and fell in love with her.

The story of how Muhammad flirted with his adopted son’s wife is laid out here. Muhammad adopted Zayd as his own son, and he went to visit Zayd at his home but he was not there, Zaynab answers informing Muhammad Zayd is not home. Zaynab tells Muhammad to enter as she saw him as dear to her as a father.

Muhammad refused to enter, Zaynab then rushes to get dressed as she was not appropriately dressed and Muhammad was standing in the doorway. The prophet sneaks a peek at Zaynab and falls head over heels with her and says in a low voice “Glory be to god the Almighty! Glory be to god who causes hearts to turn!”, Muhammad leaves and when Zayd returns she tells him the Messenger was here. Zayd asked her if he said anything and she repeats that Muhammad said “Glory be to god the Almighty! Glory be to god who causes hearts to turn!

Zayd realises Muhammad is in love with his wife and decides to divorce her telling Muhammad “I will separate myself from her”, then the hypocrite prophet said “keep your wife for yourself”. al-Tabari goes on to tell us that “Zayd could find no possible way to approach her after that day”. Muhammad causes them to divorce. Then the deranged prophet of Islam is one day talking to his child-wife A’ishah and faints once he’s fine he then smiles and says that Allah has married him to Zaynab.

A’ishah also says that she became uneasy because of Zaynab’s beauty she must have known that this was only going to cause a problem among the many wives of Muhammad. After the fainting spell Muhammad gave Qur’ān saying Allah told him to take Zaynab for himself.

How convenient that this ayat would come at this time for Muhammad to take Zaynab for himself, it’s obvious that Muhammad pretended to receive revelations from Allah. Aisha his child bride busted Muhammad saying she realises that “Allah” rushes to Muhammad’s desires.

Of course, we don’t say anything here without proof, we prove all things. Below is the Hadith in which Aisha busted Muhammad for having Allah catering to Muhammad’s lustful desires.

The prophet of Islam was just making up things as he went along, if he desired a woman of another man he conveniently “receives a revelation from Allah” stating it was ok for the prophet of Islam to do. All cults have this in common, the cult leader will have special privileges others do not have. This is why Muslim men can only marry up to 4 wives in Islam (An-Nisa 4:3), yet Muhammad can have as many women as he wanted. The following tafsir is from al-Jalalayn.

The ungodly actions of Muhammad are far from what a prophet of God should exude, al-Jalalayn in the tafsir tells us Zayd was a prisoner of war and Muhammad bought him and adopted him as his son. After Muhammad flirts with his wife Zaynab, Muhammad tells Zayd to keep Zaynab but Muhammad hid what was in his heart, that he had lusted after another man’s wife; in this case his own adopted son’s. Allah then says not to worry about the people saying “he has married his son’s wife“ because Allah is worthier and you should fear him.

Allah continues to say do not be concerned with what the people are saying, Zayd divorces her and Allah (really Muhammad) is now joined to Zaynab and had sex with her. If Muhammad is the best example to humanity as Muslims claim then a Muslim men shouldn’t get upset if another man takes his wife away because he’s only following the prophet of Islam.

The last tafsir is from Ibn-Abbas Muhammad’s cousin surely he would be able to explain Qur’ān being he was the nearest to the prophet.

It’s so easy to get these abdools busted just by reading their own sources. Abbas tells us that Zayd was no longer with Zaynab because of what Muhammad caused by lusting after his own son’s wife. Zayd left Zaynab and she had to wait a certain period. This means when Zayd left her she needed to wait 3 months to see if she was pregnant, we find this in the at-Talaq 65:4 (the divorce) also known as the child molestation verse because it says a man can marry girls who didn’t have their period yet (we’ll discuss this in a coming article).

According to the Qur’ān when a man divorces his wife she must wait 3 months to see if she’s pregnant before leaving. After the waiting period was over Muhammad then took her for himself. I have a question for Muslim men, if you found out your father came to your house and flirted with your wife would you be fine with that? This is what your prophet did to Zayd, make no mistake Muhammad was not a prophet of God, he was a false prophet from Iblis (satan).

The Practice of Mut’a in Islam

One of the better known Muslim sites islamqa.info had this to say in the case of Mut’a “Whatever the case, marrying with the intention of getting divorced is haraam, and it may be either invalid in and of itself like mut’ah, or haraam because of the deceit and betrayal involved.” How can Sunni Muslims say Mut’a is haram when Allah prescribed it for them? This is found in the Qur’an itself.

In Surah 4:24 Allah gave Muslims the right to practise Mut’a, Sunni Muslims would deny this but Shia Muslims still have this as a practice today. Does anyone including a messenger of God have the right to change a command from God if God never gave a command to change it? This is what Muhammad did, he deliberately changed it saying not to practice Mut’a in the following Hadith.

In Sunan an-Nasa’i Muhammad forbids “temporary marriage” (there’s no such thing as marriage in Islam to prove this read the article Does The Word Nikah Mean Marriage In Islam?) otherwise known as Mut’a. How is it that the god of Islam gives the command for Muslims to indulge in prostitution yet Muhammad is able to abrogate a command from god? Who’s the real god in Islam? How can man abrogate the command of god unless Muhammad is secretly Allah? This is further proof that the Qur’an is a man-made book from a deranged man called Muhammad.

Again the false translation from Muslims anytime you see words in brackets that means those words are not found in Arabic. They are trying to deceive people into thinking marriage is practised in Islam but Nikah doesn’t mean marriage. Again read the above-suggested article for more information on the word Nikah. Notice Muhammad says “their marriage should last for 3 nights, and if they like to continue”, what kind of marriage is this?

This is more proof that Mut’a was practised as seen in Sahih al-Bukhari 5119.

Lastly, in Sahih Muslim 1406d we read that this “marriage” is a “temporary marriage” meaning a Muslim man is allowed to do Mut’a and pay a Muslim woman for sex. In this same Hadith Muhammad says Allah forbids Mut’a, but the Qur’an says nothing about Allah forbidding the practice, there’s no verse that tells Muslim they cannot do Mut’a anymore.

How can Muhammad cancel Qur’an if Allah never gave a verse to Muhammad saying to stop Mut’a? As you can see Islam doesn’t have any concept of marriage only paying for sex is allowed. This is why any Muslim who rejects it is going against their own Qur’an.

The Fabrication Of The Two Seas Miracle Muslims Believe (2 Seas don’t mix)

If there’s only 1 Qur’an how is it in Surah 25 ayat 53 we have different words, one says “barrier”, another says “bar”, likewise the word “water” is used as well as “seas”. If Muslims want to continue to claim Christians have so many Bibles pointing to the English translation (KJV, NKJV, ESV, NLT etc.) Then according to their own logic this proves there’s not 1 Qur’an but many as they have English translations (Sahih International, Pickthall, Yusuf Ali, Shakir, Muhammad Sarwar, Mohsin Khan, Arberry).

It’s only fair to point that out but when we do they quickly say those are English translations. The same is true for the Bible the King James Version and so forth are English translations as well. But Muslims also have different Arabic versions of the Qur’an which we’ve taken a look at in previous articles. That’s for another day today we’re going to look at the two seas “miracle” in the Qur’an.

Muslims who do dawah use this as a way to prove the Qur’an is from God. They lure people into Islam with these so-called miracles but here we take these claims and make mashpotato proving Islam to be a false cult.

Pickthall translates 25:53  as “And He it is Who hath given independence to the two seas (though they meet); one palatable, sweet, and the other saltish, bitter; and hath set a bar and a forbidding ban between them.”

Notice between the brackets the false interpretation “though they meet” these words do not appear in the Qur’an. Anything in brackets are interpretations from Muslims and in this case it’s insinuating that the 2 seas do indeed meet or come together but are some how prevented from mixing.

In other words the salt water and fresh water spoken of in this verse don’t mix. Another version of this verse from the clear Quran speaks more plainly about the non-mixing of these two bodies of water.

The issue is the Arabic word (birzakhā) found in this verse is not talking about 2 bodies of water not mixing, it’s actually talking about dry land which serves as a barrier preventing the 2 bodies of water never meet because of the land which lies between them. Here’s the tafsir of their own scholar Ibn-Kathir exposing this Muslim lie.

Notice that Kathir explains and says the seas that are known such as the Atlantic Ocean, Red Sea, Arabian sea etc. None of these mentioned are fresh water, all rivers and streams flow into the sea and do indeed mix.

The Arabic word birzakhā (barrier) means dry land, not that there’s some invisible barrier which stops the water from mixing. This is how Muslims fool people into believing the Qur’an is from god. By digging deeper we find out that the Qur’an is riddled with contradictions and errors proving it cannot be from God. Even their own scholar exposes thier lies by saying the barrier mentioned in ayat 25:53 is dry land.

So why are Muslism lying? It’s because the only way to get people to believe in such a rubbish book as the Qur’an they have to fabricate lies to deceive people into believing this garbage. It’s our intention to continue to expose these lies Lord willing, that more Muslims would see the Light of Jesus Christ and come out of the darkness of Islam.

Muslims are in love with the Jews? (Surah 5:64)

Muslim: “I don’t know wether rabbi Singer is aware that the muslims love him.”

Continuing on from the last (Tovia Singer Afraid to tell Muslims Jesus is Not The Messiah) article in which we read about how Tovia Singer and Muslims are in love with each other. Muslims if you’re so in love with the Jews how is it that the Jews said Allah is powerless, the Jews would never say that about Yahweh.

This shows that the Jews do not believe Allah is the same God as Yahweh which the Jews and Christians worship. The proof is found in Surah 5 verse 64, it says:

The Jews say: “Allah’s hand is tied up.” how can Muslims claim the Jews worship the same god of Islam? If the Jews are saying Allah’s hands are tied or chained they are saying that the god of Islam has no power to do anything.

Ibn-Kathir Al-Qur’an Tafsir The Jews Say That Allah’s Hand is Tied up! Allah states that the Jews, may Allah’s continuous curses descend on them until the Day of Resurrection, describe Him as a miser. Allah is far holier than what they attribute to Him. The Jews also claim that Allah is poor, while they are rich.

The god of Islam doesn’t get any respect from the Jews, yet Muslims are professing their love and devotion to Tovia Singer a Jew who doesn’t believe in Allah. Isn’t it in the Hadith that says the stones will tell Muslims to kill Jews hiding behind them?

Are Muslims of today lying when they say they love the Jews because Muhammad is saying that the rocks will tell Muslims to kill Jews in this authentic hadith from Bukhari, or are Muslims correct thereby, saying Muhammad is wrong in telling Muslims to kill Jews? Either, followers of Islam are calling their prophet a liar or they themselves are lying, which one is it?

Muhammad who really is Allah says don’t take Jews or Christians as friends, Muslims who are saying they love Tovia Singer are hypocrites, pretending or ignorant of what their Qur’an says. Here’s proof from their own Qur’an.

What kind of god spreads hatred among people? It makes no sense that God would tell others to hate His people Israel. This is why Allah cannot be Yahweh since Allah hates the Jews that could only make Allah Satan.

Allah doesn’t know what he created first (Quran contradictions)

Muslims insist the Quran is perfect—completely free from error contradiction. In reality the Qur’an contradicts itself on almost every topic. What did Allah create first, heaven or earth? According to Surah 41:9, the earth was created first, then the heavens. And according to Surah 79:27-30, the heavens were created first, then the earth.

Does Allah not know which he created first, If Allah was god then he would certainly know which he created first right? Let’s look at the Qur’an and laugh at how ridiculous Muhammad and his god are.

Sūrat fuṣṣilat 

41:9  “He who created the earth in two days” here Allah started creating the Earth.

41:10 “And He placed on the earth firmly set mountains over its surface,” Allah created mountains on the surface of the Earth.

41:11 THEN He directed Himself to the heaven while it was smoke”  It’s important to notice the word then, meaning “afterwards” signifying that once the Earth was created Allah created heaven.

41:12 “And He completed them as seven heavens within two days and inspired in each heaven its command. And We adorned the nearest heaven with lamps and as protection.”  Lastly Allah makes stars or lamps as the last thing he creates.

In sūrat fuṣṣilat the order of creation is (1) Earth (2) mountains (3) heaven (4) lamps. In the following surah we don’t have the same order it’s completely different.

Sūrat l-nāziʿāt

79:27 “Are you a more difficult creation or is the heaven? Allah constructed it.” Here Allah starts creating heaven first not the Earth.

79:28 “He raised its ceiling and proportioned it. he’s still creating heaven by raising it etc.

79:29 “And He darkened its night and extracted its brightness. Allah creates darkness (night) and brightness or light.

79:30 “And after that He spread the earth. again important to notice the words “after that” meaning after heaven he now working on creating Earth spreading it.

79:31 “He extracted from it its water and its pasture,” water and pasture.

79:32  “And the mountains He set firmly” and lastly he creates the mountains.

Are there any Abdools who can explain why there god has Alzheimer’s disease? Allah doesn’t know if he created the Earth first or the heavens. Qur’an cannot be from God because God would never make such a blunder.

Ibn-Kathir Tafsir

Let’s go to their scholars for the passage above. Muslims these are your books not ours (Christians).

“Here Allah denounces the idolators who worship other gods apart from Him although He is the Creator, Subduer and Controller of all things. He says: … (Who created the heavens and the earth in Six Days) (7:54). is explained in more detail; the creation of the earth and the creation of the heaven are discussed separately. Allah says that He created the earth first, because it is the foundation, and the foundation should be built first, then the roof. Allah says elsewhere: (He it is Who created for you all that is on the earth. Then He rose over (Istawa ila) the heaven and made them seven heavens) (2:29). With regard to the Ayat: (Are you more difficult to create or is the heaven that He constructed He raised its height, and has perfected it. Its night He covers with darkness and its forenoon He brings out (with light). And after that He spread the earth, And brought forth therefrom its water and its pasture. And the mountains He has fixed firmly, (to be) a provision and benefit for you and your cattle.) (79:27-33) This Ayah states that the spreading out of the earth came after the creation of the heavens, but the earth itself was created before the heavens according to some texts.

Notice the lies in order to cover up the error of Muhammad Ibn Kathir is saying the “spreading of the Earth” is not the same as creating the Earth, Muslims provide a verse in the Qur’an that states spreading out the Earth is not referring to creation. I thought the Qur’an was sufficient to explain itself according to Qur’an “explained in detail” (6,114; 7,52; 41,3 & 7,174)?

Tovia Singer Afraid to tell Muslims Jesus is Not The Messiah

Muslim: “Rabbi, as a Muslim, I value you knowledge and wisdom and consider you one of the greatest asset to all children of Ibrahim, the worshippers of ONE G-d. …I would not think that it was possible for a religious Muslim to praise a Jew, let alone, a Rabbi in such a high regards. That is the bridge that our sweet Rabbi has built and a million thanks to Youtube, the crowed on the bridge is ever increasing. Rabbi, Can’t thank you enough for your hard work.”

Muslim: “I honestly find it inspiring that Muslims and Jews can come together on the doctrine of the Unity of the Godhead in opposition to the logically absurd doctrine of the Trinity that Christian theologians developed long after Jesus was gone. If Judaism and Islam both increased while Christianity diminished, that would be fine by me.”

Muslim: “I’m muslim in Indonesia and I love Rabbi Tovia Singer.”

These are some comments from Muslims to Tovia Singer, why are Muslims in love with a Jewish Rabbi when Islam teaches hatred toward Jews? It’s simple both Judaism and Islam teach hate towards Jesus Christ and His followers.

Muslims are so desperate they are now turning to atheists like Bart Ehrman and now Tovia Singer, just as long as the individual is an enemy of Christianity the Muslims love them. They share a common hatred towards our Lord and Saviour. In this article, we’ll quickly expose both Islam and Judaism for the hypocrisy they share.

Tovia was asked the question “Is Jesus the Messiah” but he won’t answer because he knows that he (Tovia) rejects Jesus Christ as the Messiah which basically means Tovia Singer is saying Muhammad is a false prophet and the Qur’an is a false book. Because Islam teaches that Isa (Islamic Jesus) is the Messiah. The following verses from the Qur’an prove that Muslims in their hatred towards Christianity are rejecting their own Islamic beliefs just to attack Christians. Look at the hypocrisy.

Muslims have chosen to side with Tovia Singer who doesn’t think Jesus is the Messiah and thereby is calling Islam a false religion. He rejects Muhammad but as mentioned earlier Muslims are desperate to attack Christians and will side with non-Muslims as long as they are enemies of Christianity.

In Surah 3 verse 45 (Aali ‘Imran) speaks about the virgin birth of Isa (Jesus) the Qur’an says Mary was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus, yet Tovia rejects this by saying the virgin birth is nothing new; that it’s been adopted from Greek Mythology.

Tovia says: “rituals like the mythical founder of Rome Romulus was said to be born of a virgin and God. Pythagoras the philosopher was said to be born of a virgin. Octavius Caesar Augustus the adopted son of Julius Caesar was said to have been was the son of God and then he was born. I mean this is Hercules was said to have been conceived by a relationship between Zeus and his mother so what happened is as Christianity was leaving Jerusalem and moving toward Athens it was adopting the ideas that had emerged from Greece rather than from Yeshuaian”.

This means Tovia is saying that Isa is not the Messiah and that the virgin birth which Muslims believe is nothing special because according to Singer it comes from Greek Mythology, which means Allah is wrong and Muhammad is a liar for bringing Qur’an which says Isa was born from a virgin and that he’s the Messiah. Yet Muslims are saying they love Tovia Singer.

As for Tovia Singer how can a Jew walk hand and hand with those who wish death to the Jews because of their Islamic beliefs? Here are verses from the Qur’an and Hadith which proves Muhammad hated the Jews. In Surah 9 ver 30 we read.

The Qur’an says that the Jews worship Ezra as the son of Allah, and that the Christians say the Messiah which is Jesus is the son of Allah. Then the verse goes on to say “Allah’s curse be on them”?! As a Jew how can Tovia take sides with Muslims whose own book curses the Jews?

I’m certain Tovia would deny this verse and in doing so is saying that Muhammad is a liar. Yet he would never admit to this because he’s a coward and wants money from Muslims as he knows it’s lucrative for him to be on the side of Muslims. But this is hypocrisy in the highest form. In the Hadith we have another hateful teaching towards the Jews and Christians.

Muhammad says in the above hadith which is Sahih (authentic) that he would expel all the Jews from the Arabian Peninsula. Tell me how can a Jew claim solidarity with Islam when it clearly teaches hatred towards Jews? The ignorance of Islam from Tovia Singer as well as his blind hatred shows he knows nothing, just because he’s against Christianity he willing to be in bed with Muslims even though their prophet hates Jews.

And the Muslims are either ignorant or lying when they say they love Tovia Singer. The hypocrisy from both sides is staggering. Muslims are willing to toss their beliefs under the bus in order to attack the Bible, but through it all Christians can stand firm on God’s word because we see how Satan is using these two against us. They will never be able to go against the Lord Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour.

Muhammad was exposed by his scribe Abdullah Ibn Sa’d as a false prophet

All the prophets of God received the direct word of God, from Moses to Isaiah and Malachi all of them delivered the word of God as God gave them the words to speak. In Islam this is not the case, we’re told that an angel Jibril (supposedly Gabriel) visited Muhammad in a cave.

In actuality the prophet of Islam plagiarized many teachings from other religions, he even plagiarized words from his own scribe and passed it off as Qur’an. The Apostasy of Abdullah Ibn Sa’d Ibn Abi Sarh is a huge problem because it shows that Muhammad never received any inspiration from Allah.

Here’s the Surah in question:

Surah 23:12-14 Verily We created man from a product of wet earth; Then placed him as a drop (of seed) in a safe lodging; Then fashioned We the drop a clot, then fashioned We the clot a little lump, then fashioned We the little lump bones, then clothed the bones with flesh, and then produced it as another creation. So blessed be Allah, the Best of creators!

Tafsir Asbab Al-Nuzul by Al-Wahidi (Surah 6:93)

According to the Muslims own Tafsir Muhammad had his scribe write something for him. Muhammad dictated the verses regarding the believers to and Abd Allah was amazed by what he heard saying “So blessed be Allah, the Best of Creators!”. Muhammad the plagiarizer said that Allah revealed this to him also. Muhammad then tells Abdullah to put those words into Qur’an. The false prophet Muhammad took his scribe’s words and added them to his “revelations” this proves the Qur’an is man-made and not from God. What happens next? Abdullah figured out that Muhammad was a false prophet and left Islam.

Abd Allah became an apostate and renounced Islam. He came to the realisation that Muhammad was not a prophet because Muhammad took Abdullah’s words and passed them off as inspiration from Allah. This means either Muhammad is a false prophet or Abdullah is also a prophet who received Qur’an from Allah.

Either way, this proves Muhammad never received Qur’an from Allah, it’s only a fictional book made by a mad man called Muhammad.

Was Islam’s Prophet Muhammad a white man?

Muslims are taught early from birth to be prideful in their religion, they take much stock in their prophet who according to Muslims was a Middle Eastern man. In the West, Muslims have used dawah to deceive blacks into thinking Islam is a religion for black people. Yet these Muslim missionaries keep from them that Muhammad was depicted as a white man according to their own books?

So why does it come as a shock to Muslims when they’re told that Muhammad was a white man? It’s because Muslims are taught not to question anything but to follow blindly what their scholars and Imam’s tell them. Let’s dig into the Islamic sources for ourselves to see if Muhammad was considered white or not. Everything we claim here must be backed up with sources and that’s what we’re going to do.

The Hadith’s say that Muhammad was a white man

These following Hadith’s might come to shock those who became Muslim because they thought Islam was a “black religion”. In the following Hadith by Sahih Muslim, we’re told that “Allah’s Messenger” had a white handsome face.

In this Hadith we have the story of a man who came on a camel looking for Muhammad. The Hadith by Sahih al-Bukhari says that Muhammad was a white man sitting (reclining) with his companions.

There are even Hadith’s which go into the white complexion of Muhammad, I’m not really sure why Muhammad felt the need to convey over and over again that he’s white? There is more information which we’ll provide that answers this question, we’ll reserve it to the end.

This Hadith explains that Muhammad only raised his hands for Istisqa and they saw the whiteness of Muhammad’s armpits. I mean these Hadith’s are silly to say the least how is this supposed to be of any importance for spirituality?

The following Hadith contradicts the previous one in which it says Muhammad raised his arms only during the invocation of Istisqa. Here in Sahih Muslim it says he prostrated and spread out his arms revealing the whiteness of his armpits.

Again we’re introduced to the whiteness of his armpits. At this point, it’s safe to say that Muhammad was obsessed with being white but as promised there’s an explanation which we’ll mention at the end.

Again the whiteness of his armpits, they’re so white you can see them from behind when he would prostrate.

Here the Hadith focuses on the legs of Muhammad, his slave Bilal came with Wudu water in which they wiped themselves with. Muhammad came out of his tent wearing a red dress and they saw the whiteness of his shins.

Last but not least Sahih al-Bukhari tells us that “he was white” with a black beard which had some white hair. Remember that when sharing these Hadith’s with Muslims they will try to deny anything that is embarrassing. They will claim it’s Diaf (weak) but this Hadith, as well as others, are Sahih (authentic). Therefore, they cannot run away for these are the saying of Muhammad the Sunnah.

Now to bring forth the reason why Muhammad was so engrossed with proclaiming that he’s white. It’s well known that Muhammad was racist selling and owning black slaves. Here’s a Hadith which proves that Muhammad was against blacks.

What kind of “prophet of God” would do such a thing? This is the behaviour of an ungodly man who enslaved blacks. Under Sharia Law (The Judgement of the Shari’a regarding someone who curses or disparages the Prophet) you cannot call Muhammad black otherwise you can be killed, this is according to the Muslim sources.

Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman, the companion of Sahnun, said, “Anyone who says that the Prophet was black should be killed.”

Now you can see why Muhammad was so adamant in proclaiming his whiteness because he saw blacks as inferior. Muhammad is a satanic prophet and Islam is a religion of the devil, come out of Islam and come to the Holy One of Israel the Lord Jesus Christ for salvation.

Hadith “Bell is a musical instrument from Satan”

The Hadith’s are the saying’s of Muhammad called Sunnah, the Hadith are second only to the Qur’ān in authority followed and practiced by Muslims. A Muslim must believe in the Hadith in order to be a considered a Muslim.

In the following Hadith by Sahih Muslim we read that “The bell is the musical instrument of the Satan” Why is a bell claimed to be an instrument of Satan is beyond me and makes no sense but that’s what their own books say.

According to the Sahih Muslim 2114 the bell is from Satan this is interesting because there’s another Hadith which says Muhammad received Qur’ān as the sound of a bell. This Hadith is also found in Sahih Muslim it tells us that Muhammad receives “wahi (inspiration)” and that “At times it comes to me like the ringing of a bell”.

Putting the two Hadith’s together it’s not hard to figure out that if bells are from Satan and Muhammad received Qur’ān in the sound of bells logically speaking can only mean he’s receiving satanic inspiration in the form of Qur’ān. This makes sense taking into account the Qur’ān says Satan puts words into the mouth of Muhammad which made its way into the Qur’ān. We can find it in Qur’ān 22 verse 52

We also have the account from Ibn Hisham which speaks about Muhammad once delivering revelation promoting polytheism. Muhammad claimed that Satan tricked him into delivering the “Satanic Verses”. Here’s the story, according to Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah (the earliest biography on Muhammad). I’ll also include the link for your own reading.

Now the apostle was anxious for the welfare of his people, wishing to attract them as far as he could. . . . When the apostle saw that his people turned their backs on him and he was pained by their estrangement from what he brought them from God he longed that there should come to him from God a message that would reconcile his people to him. Because of his love for his people and his anxiety over them it would delight him if the obstacle that made his task so difficult could be removed. . . . Then God sent down “By the star when it sets your comrade errs not and is not deceived, he speaks not from his own desire,” and when he reached His words “Have you thought of al-Lat and al-Uzza and Manat the third, the other”, Satan, when he was meditating upon it, and desiring to bring it to his people, put upon his tongue “these are the exalted Gharaniq [Numidian cranes] whose intercession is approved.” When the Quraysh heard that, they were delighted and greatly pleased at the way in which he spoke of their gods and they listened to him; while the believers were holding that what their prophet brought them from their Lord was true, not suspecting a mistake or a vain desire or a slip, and when he reached the prostration and the end of the Sura in which he prostrated himself the Muslims prostrated themselves when their prophet prostrated confirming what he brought and obeying his command, and the polytheists of Quraysh and others who were in the mosque prostrated when they heard the mention of their gods, so that everyone in the mosque believer and unbeliever prostrated . . . Then the people dispersed and the Quraysh went out, delighted at what had been said about their gods, saying, “Muhammad has spoken of our gods in splendid fashion. He alleged in what he read that they are the exalted Gharaniq whose intercession is approved.”

The news reached the prophet’s companions who were in Abyssinia, it being reported that Quraysh had accepted Islam, so some men started to return while others remained behind. Then Gabriel came to the apostle and said, “What have you done, Muhammad? You have read to these people something I did not bring you from God and you have said what He did not say to you.” The apostle was bitterly grieved and was greatly in fear of God. So God sent down (a revelation), for He was merciful to him, comforting him and making light of the affair and telling him that every prophet and apostle before him desired as he desired and wanted what he wanted and Satan interjected something into his desires as he had on his tongue. So God annulled what Satan had suggested and God established His verses, i.e. you are just like the prophets and apostles. Then God sent down: “We have not sent a prophet or apostle before you but when he longed Satan cast suggestions in his longing. But God will annul what Satan has suggested. Then God will establish his verses, God being knowing and wise.” (Ibn Ishaq, pp. 165-166)

After reading this what’s the take-home? (1) Muhammad desired to reconcile his people bringing them together. (2) Satan took advantage of Muhammad desires and put demonic revelation into the mouth of Muhammad. (3) Muhammad didn’t recognise this was from Satan and delivered the Satanic verses. (4) The Quraysh was happy that Muhammad was promoting polytheism Ibn Hisham says “When the Quraysh heard that, they were delighted and greatly pleased at the way in which he spoke of their gods and they listened to him” (5) Muhammad along with the Muslims and the Quraysh prostrated together in worship. (6) Jibril (angel Gabriel) comes to Muhammad telling him what he recited was not from Allah but Satan.

Here’s the question how can Muslims believe in a satanic prophet who couldn’t recognise the difference between revelation from Allah or Shaitan? If it’s so easy for Satan to put into Muhammad’s mouth demonic revelation how much more of the Qur’ān is from Satan? It’s safe to say all of it is from Satan remember the Hadith “The bell is the musical instrument of the Satan” and Muhammad receives “wahi (inspiration)” and that “At times it comes to me like the ringing of a bell”. Just from this evidence alone can we conclude that Allah is Satan, this is why Muhammad couldn’t tell the difference between the two.

Lastly, the Qur’ān says if Muhammad is a slave of Allah then Satan wouldn’t have authority over Muhammad. But we clearly see that Satan did have authority over him putting into his mouth satanic verses. We’ll end with the Qur’ānic verse proving Muhammad is a false prophet from Satan.

The Qur’ānic verse is saying only those who don’t belong to Allah are deviators, this would mean Muhammad is a deviator according to their own book. Muslims leave Islam and come into the arms of Jesus Christ, He’s waiting to forgive you all your sins.

Mushrik Allah the First One to Commit Shirk

The 5 pillars of Islam are foundational to the religion, which are the Shahada (Faith) The confession of faith in one god (Allah) and his messenger Muhammad. Salah (Prayer) The 5 ritual prayers each day. Zakat (Almsgiving) giving a portion of a Muslim’s wealth to those in need. Sawm (Fasting) fasting during Ramadan. Hajj (Pilgrimage) The pilgrimage to Mecca required of every Muslim at least once in their lifetime.

What if I said the first one to commit shirk in Islam was their own god Allah? We’re going to touch upon the first pillar, providing proof from their own Qur’an that Islam doesn’t teach monotheism but in fact teaches polytheism. We’ll prove everything we have to say with the Muslims own sources.

According to the Qur’an Allah commanded the angels to prostrate (bow down in worship) Adam. For the angles to prostrate to Adam is an act of worship. Notice the only one who refused to bow down to Adam was Iblees (Satan).

In Surah 2:34 Satan refused to commit shirk but Allah was telling the angels to commit shirk by bowing down to Adam. It’s crazy to say but Satan according to Qur’an was doing the right thing by not bowing down to Adam (creature) while Allah wanted the angels to commit shirk.

Surah 7:11 we have angels prostrating to Adam again. Multiple times in the Qur’an we have Allah being a Mushrik this means the Muslims follow a god of idolatry and polytheism.

Surah 15:30 Allah commands the angels to worship Adam, to prostrate in adoration to a creature in this case Adam by the command of the Mushrik Allah.

Surah 17:61 all of these ayats prove that Islam is a religion of polytheism for even the angels commit shirk along with Allah. The only one we are to prostrate before is God alone, Christians only worship Yahweh we’re not told to bow down to creatures like the Muslims.

In the above Surah the Muslim translation is wrong, they are trying to hide the fact that the Arabic says (قُلْنَا) which is “We said”. But look at the deception, the translation says “when I said” they changed it.

We said to the angels, “Bow down to Adam”… In Surah 18:50 Allah uses the word “we” but Muslims say Allah is one, then why is Allah saying “we” shouldn’t he say I to avoid any confusion?

They tried correcting this with the English translation. Muslims always tend to reject the English translations and say only the Arabic is the Qur’an. Well they have a problem because the Arabic says “we” not “I”. Why would Allah want his angels to bow down to one of his creations and commit shirk? Read on to the end because the best part is saved for last.

The translations which use “I” are from the Abridged Explanation of the Quran, but if you compare this translation to the others like Yusuf Ali, Pickthall or Saheeh International you’ll notice they translated it as “We” which is correct if you go by the Arabic. This is a tactic Muslims have been using to deceive people into thinking Islam is a monotheistic.

Who can believe in such nonsense, here we supposedly have “god” commanding his angles to worship Adam saying, ‘Prostrate yourselves before Adam,’… Surah 20:116

By this point I think it’s clear that Islam is not a monotheistic religion. But it gets worse! Remember when I said wait until the end? Well the first pillar of Islam if you recall if the confession of faith. That is for a Muslim to believe in one god (Allah) and his messenger Muhammad.

It’s the second part which is a huge problem. Muslims are putting Muhammad on the same level as Allah committing shirk. Here we have a man who Muslims must confess in order for them to become Muslim? Have you ever thought why Muslims cannot just believe in Allah alone? That’s because the real god of Islam is Muhammad, he made up his own religion and in doing so committed shirk associating himself with Allah.

The Shahada is taking Muhammad and making him equal to Allah, because a person can only become Muslim by taking both Allah and Muhammad together; the entire faith is based upon a foundation of shirk.