We always hear from Muslims how Christians and Muhammadans worship the same God. I thought to compare some teachings between the two and see how they compare. This article touches upon how the Bible teaches believers
Christianity
The Bible explains that we are not to run to commit sin, we shouldn’t allow others to entice us to sin. In the Old Testament God (Yahweh) says the penalty for killing another man is capital death (stoning), therefore, if someone committed such an act has forfeited their own life (Genesis 4:15; Exodus 21:12; Exodus 21:14-15; Exodus 21:20; Exodus 21:22; Exodus 21:23-25).
In the book of Proverbs written by Solomon, we’re told in the first chapter, not to allow sinners to entice us to commit sins. The verses in the following colour are commands from God for us to obey. And the other colour is what sinners say to entice others to partake in evil deeds.
Notice the sinner invites the person saying “come with us” and they thirst to shed blood “let us lay wait for blood.” They do this in the darkness to conceal their wickedness saying “let us lurk privily for the innocent without cause.” These murderous people want to “swallow them up alive as the grave,” their greed is all that matters to these killers “we shall find all precious substance, we shall fill our houses with spoil.” They entice to “cast in thy lot among us” it’s all about the money for them.[1]
God says do not follow the path they are going down, to “refrain thy foot,” for Christians the Bible instructs us to not do such evil things. But this is not the same when we go to the Qur’an.
Islam
In comparison, Muslims are commanded to kill in the Qur’an. They are told to wait, ambush and slaughter non-Muslims, how can Muhammad be a “mercy” for mankind and he’s commanding people to murder? The ayat (verse) we’re referring to is found in Surat al-Tawbah.
Notice Muhammad says he will let them live if these people who are being hunted and killed by the Muslims “repent,” they are then forced to pay “zakah”[2] alms (money). Comparing these two passages exposes Muhammad as a false prophet.
Going deeper into their own sources such as Ibn Kathir one of Islam’s biggest scholars. Here’s what he has to say about this particular verse.
(So when the Sacred Months have passed…), meaning, `Upon the end of the four months during which We prohibited you from fighting the idolators, and which is the grace period We gave them, then fight and kill the idolators wherever you may find them.’ Allah’s statement next, (then fight the Mushrikin wherever you find them), means, on the earth in general, except for the Sacred Area, for Allah said, (And fight not with them at Al-Masjid Al-Haram, unless they fight you there. But if they attack you, then fight them. )﴿2:191﴾ Allah said here, (and capture them), executing some and keeping some as prisoners, (and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush), do not wait until you find them. Rather, seek and besiege them in their areas and forts, gather intelligence about them in the various roads and fairways so that what is made wide looks ever smaller to them. This way, they will have no choice, but to die or embrace Islam,
This clearly is not a message from the true God (Yahweh) found in the Bible, He doesn’t command for believers to hunt down unbelievers and kill them. We know that Muslims will cite passages in the Old Testament when God commanded them to go into the land and kill the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites etc (Numbers 21:2-3; Deuteronomy 20:17; Joshua 6:17, 21).
God in the Bible always had specific reasons for His commands to the Israelites, it was not random. In Numbers 21:1 we read that the Canaanites took some of the Israelites as prisoners. In response to king of Arad attacking Israel God delivered the Canaanites into the hands of Israel as a judgement against them.[3]
As for the Qur’anic verse above 9:5, the non-believers aren’t attacking the Muslims, taking a good look you will be hard-pressed to find the same situation. In fact, it’s the opposite, there was a treaty made with the polytheists. They (polytheists) were given 4 months to freely travel in the land and once the treaty is over Allah wants the Muslims to kill the polytheists. There are the proceeding verses leading up to the slaughter of unbelievers in 9:5.
Let’s make a few points with the above passage, please notice how Muhammad places himself on the same level as Allah saying “disassociation, from Allah and His Messenger.”
It’s simple to see that Allah is a demonic false god, actually Satan in disguise. Satan hates humanity and wants the human race to destroy itself and he will not stop until he accomplishes this goal.
Conclusion
How vastly different Yahweh and Allah are, in the Bible we read that God is love (1 John 4:8; 1 John 4:16). He is the source of love and, therefore, Christians are commanded to love our enemies (Matthew 5:44; Luke 6:27; Luke 6:35). In the Qur’an you will not find any passage that says Allah loves, or where Muhammad said to love your enemy; Islam is devoid of love because the false god of Islam is a god of hatred not love.
Allah spreads hatred and enmity “We have put enmity and hatred among them till the day of resurrection”[5:64]. In the Qur’an Allah also calls Christians and Jews (People of the book) the worst of creatures “They are the worst of creatures.”[98:6] and turned people into “apes and pigs”[5:60]. A quick study shows they are not the same. A challenge to all Muslims prove us wrong we are waiting.
Footnote
[1] Their cruelty. They thirst after blood, and hate those that are innocent and never gave them any provocation, because by their honesty and industry they shame and condemn them: “Let us therefore lay wait for their blood, and lurk privily for them; they are conscious to themselves of no crime and consequently apprehensive of no danger, but travel unarmed; therefore we shall make the more easy prey of them. And, O how sweet it will be to swallow them up alive!” v. 12. These bloody men would do this as greedily as the hungry lion devours the lamb. If it be objected, “The remains of the murdered will betray the murderers;” they answer, “No danger of that; we will swallow them whole as those that are buried.” Who could imagine that human nature should degenerate so far that it should ever be a pleasure to one man to destroy another! Matthew Henry: Commentary on Proverbs 1
[2] Zakat (zakaat, zakah), or almsgiving, is one of the five pillars of Islam. This means that Zakat is mandatory for Muslims, along with the other four sacred pillars of prayer (salah), fasting (sawm), pilgrimage (Hajj) and belief in Allah and His Messenger, Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) (shahadah). For every sane, adult Muslim who owns wealth over a certain amount – known as the Nisab – he or she must pay 2.5% of that wealth as Zakat. Islamic Relief (Worldwide) (2019) APA citation. Zakat. Retrieved from https://islamic-relief.org/zakat/
[3] The name Hormah is explained by means of the term ‘put under the ban’ (RSV ‘utterly destroy’; Hebrew root hrm); at one time Israel carried out the ‘ban’ in the region of Hormah with regard to the ‘cities’ that were there and their inhabitants, i,e. by killing and destroying they handed everything over to Yahweh as the real victor and owner of the booty of war (there is a similar aetiology of the name Hormah, but set in a quite different historical context, in Judg. 1.I7). Noth, Martin, and נות’, מרטין. Numbers: A Commentary. Westminster Press, 1968. p154
Is the Qur’an is perfectly preserved as the follower of Islam claims? Is every letter perfectly preserved? I’m here to exhibit this cannot be the case according to the Qur’an itself.[1]
The personal name of the god of Islam is Allah (highlighted in both the Arabic and English text), the name Allah is composed of an Alif (ا) the 1st letter of the two-syllable word, a Double Lam (ﻝﻝ), He (ه), and a small diacritical mark above the double lam called a ‘shadda together we get الله.
This name Allah is specifically used only for the god of Islam, Islamicity expresses this in the following quote.
The word God in English is not a name of the one God like Allah or YHVH. It is the generic term used for any and every deity, … When Muslims use the word Allah they mean the one God they worship and adore; … This Allah is the same Allah that the holy Qur’an refers to. Neither Jews nor Christians connect to God in this very universal way.
Make no mistake Allah الله is a name, according to Islamic sites such as getquranic.com states is this way confirming Allah is a name, not a title.
According to Muslim scholars and theologians, the name Allah is better defined as “the proper name of the One who is necessarily existent in himself and who deserves all praises.” This dense definition encapsulates several of the most important attributes of the Creator and nuances the term to mean so much more than just ‘god.’ Furthermore, it appears that the name has its root in Semitic languages, with variations on the divine name for god being il, el, or eloah.
We’ve established Allah is a name now to simplify this concept, let’s use the name, Muhammad. Removing a letter from this name would alter it. Here’s a simple illustration.
Does Muhammad = Uhammad?
Would Muslims agree Uhammad still means Muhammad? No! They would not if they were honest, can you see the problem? In the following verse 1:2 Allah’s name is missing a letter, notice the missing alif (ا).[2]
Yet they still render it, Allah, as if there hasn’t been a change, this is the level of deception we face with Islam. This is not the only verse where their god’s name is missing a letter, go to an online Qur’an and type in Arabic ( لِلَّهِ) and see how many verses in which the Arabic text has a missing alif.[3]
Conclusion
Let’s not forget that this problem in the Qur’an is not the same as taking a word(s) from one language and translating them, neither is this a case of bad transliteration. We’re still in the original text (Arabic) and the name Allah is missing a letter altering the name of thier god.
Muslims need to answer why letters are dropping out of the name of their god? If their Qur’an is preserved as claimed then why are they translating changed names in the Arabic text the same?
Footnotes
[1] However, it should be clear from the discussion above that while the Tanakh and the New Testament (hence the entire Bible) have a dubious history, the same cannot be said about the Quran. The preservation of the latter is a fact of history, and was a fulfillment of Allah’s promise: The Quran and Bible Blog (2014, February 9). The History of the Bible and the Quran [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://quranandbibleblog.com/2014/02/09/the-history-of-the-bible-and-the-quran/
[2] Al-Azami asserts that this convention is one of shorthand abbreviation, believing there to have been an accompanying oral tradition to clarify the correct pronunciation and grammar. He states that the alifs were originally present, then dropped for abbreviation, and then reinstated in the reforms of Ubaydullāh b. Ziyād in the time of al-Ḥajjāj, circa the eighth/late first century. Noja-Noseda also suggests omitting alifs may represent an example of abbreviation to save space on an expensive piece of parchment. Intentional abbreviation of an understood pronunciation is a valid hypothesis for the omission, but there are some issues that need to be explored. First, there is no written evidence of a more fully written prior text that was then abbreviated. Instead, the earliest available manuscripts have the alifs missing. It seems a simpler explanation that omitting the alif was a normal convention within a flexible orthography that was later standardized, than that there was a fixed longer text that was abbreviated for economic or practical reasons. Small, Keith E.. Textual Criticism and Qur’an Manuscripts, Lexington Books/Fortress Academic, 2011. pg42
How many times have Muslims claimed “Jesus is a Muslim”, the argument is that Christ supposedly lived His life as a Muslim. Let’s be clear from the beginning, Christians disagree, and we proclaim that Jesus Christ is NOT Isa who’s found in the Qur’an.
I find it telling that Muslims try their hardest to somehow link the Biblical Jesus Christ with the Qur’an. Like a parasite, Islam feeds off of its host (Christianity), and Islam tries to validate itself in this way. Shabir Ally a Canadian Muslim preacher and Imam said:
The early Jesus sounds a lot like a Muslim prophet, a human being, and a messenger of God, like the prophets of the Old Testament. Of course, that does not mean that in all respects, we can reconstruct the history and know that Jesus was like a Muslim, but this is close enough. It is definitely closer than some of the theologies that are out there that present Jesus as God himself or a second person of the Holy Trinity. In the end, I think I can confidently assert that Jesus was a Muslim.
All Muslims must agree that Muhammad is the perfect example of what a Muslim aspires to be. How is it Muhammad was so obsessed with doing things in threes, he would also make the same statement 3 times.
How to Perform Wudu Three Times
Wudu is the Islamic act of making oneself purified before prayer. There are specific steps a person must perform but we’re not concerned with the steps, what we want to know is why Muhammad washed each limb three times (ثَلاَثًا ثَلاَثًا)?
In the following Sahih Hadith from al-Tirmidhi we have the Chapter: What Has Been Related About Wudu Three times (For Each Limb).
Let’s also point out the deceptive translations also, how is it possible that we have 1 sentence in English and look at the Arabic text. There’s a whole paragraph where’s all of that text?! It’s a mystery all of that text has vanished into thin air! 😂
The question is why does Muhammad feel the need to wash each limb 3 times, why not 4 times, why not 2 times, why not 10 times? It’s funny that he feels the need to do it 3 times. And we’ll provide the proof that Muslims do the same every time they prepare themselves to pray. The highlighted Arabic portion of the text says (سلم تَوَضَّأَ ثَلاَثًا ثَلاَثًا)“He performed ablution three by three.”
Muhammad gave the story of Adam and Moses who argued with one another, arguing that Moses accused Adam for mankind being kicked out of Jannah (Paradise).
According to Bukhari Muhammad says three times“So Adam confuted Moses, Adam confuted Moses” Muhammad loves the Trinity to the point that he needs to repeat a statement three times. Again why not two times or twenty times, why must he say it three times? More proof that Muhammad loves the Trinity and, therefore, he needs to make a statement three times.
Here’s another Hadith in which Muhammad repeated himself three times (ثَلاَثَ مَرَّاتٍ) once again Muhammad shows his love for the Trinity. Once again notice the discrepancy in the length of text between both English and Arabic, why are they afraid of translating.
Gulping Drinks Three Times
Muhammad is overtaken by the Trinity breathing three times while taking three gulps when he drinks.[1] It’s funny that Islam teaches against the Trinity “say not Three” [4:171] [5:73].
How hypocritical that Muhammad felt the need to tell Muslims how he does everything in threes, Muhammad is a closet case, Christian.
Call To Prayer Three Times
Adhan is the Islamic call to public prayer prescribed at certain times of the day.[2] Notice the obsession even between the call to prayer Muhammad felt the need to say things three times.
Muhammad said if a Muslim asks Allah for paradise three times, he/she will be permitted into paradise. They can also seek refuge from being condemned to Hellfire by asking Allah to save them.
If Muslims are against the Trinity how is it that their prophet was constantly doing things in threes? Islam contradicts itself everywhere and shows that it’s a man-made religion.
Conclusion
Anyone who is honestly looking for truth by opening up Islamic sources such as Sunnah.com, just enter the words “three times” in the search. You’ll see how many things Muhammad did in threes, why not five times or two times? this shows the hypocrisy of Islam, their prophet secretly loves the Trinity but unfortunately, he had no idea what the Trinity is. You can read about that in the previous article Allah Is Wrong About The Trinity [4:171, 5:17].
This false god Allah has no idea what he’s talking about, he doesn’t know what the Trinity is and his “prophet” Muhammad is obsessed with the Trinity. For a religion that is so against the Trinity, why do they do all these rituals in three’s (Trinity)? Islam is a silly religion in which its followers are completely fooled by a crazy man called Muhammad.
Footnotes
[1] Anas (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) used to breathe three times in the course of a drink (he used to drink in three gulps). [Al-Bukhari and Muslim]. [Riyad as-Salihin 756]
[2] The adhan is the call given to announce that it is time for a particular obligatory Salah (ritual Prayer). Five times a day the adhan is raised from mosques throughout the world. It is a Sunnah (optional duty) that brings its own reward from Allah (God). islamonline.net (2022). The Adhan (The Call to Prayer). Retrieved from https://islamonline.net/en/the-adhan-the-call-to-prayer/
Muslims are very proud when a person takes the Shahada, they love when someone becomes Muslim especially if they think that individual claimed to be Christian beforehand saying they were “born a Christian”, the issue with this statement is unlike Islam.
Noone can be “born a Christian”! That’s a fact, the only way a person can become a Christian is by accepting they are a sinner and placing their faith in Jesus Christ for eternal life.[1] The Bible never teaches a person is born a Christian, the only way to be Christian is to be born again.
In Islam, a person can be born into the religion and are automatically Muslim or they can “revert” meaning they converted to Islam became a Muslim. Today’s article is to answer the challenge put forth by their so called god, Allah.
According to this Surah Allah tells us that Muhammad gets help from his god to conquer Mecca, and after doing so an abundance (crowds) of people will revert and become Muslim. This means those people who are now Muslim are worshipping Allah and believe what Muhammad believes. To confirm this let’s look to the tafsir to get the Muslims interpretation so that they don’t say “you’re a Christian and do not know what the Qur’an says”.
On this blog we use their own sources to prove Islam is false, this is what al-Jalalayn has to say about this Surah.
When the help of God for His Prophet s against his enemies comes together with victory the victory over Mecca
When Muhammad had victory over Mecca people became Muslims, all of those people jumped on the Islam band wagon.[2] That’s what the text plainly says, now with that let’s go to another Surah, it’s the one right before this one. Surah is al-Kāfirūn Muslims loving going to this passage when they don’t have an answer when someone challenges their belief.
And here’s the contradiction, before in Surah 110 we’re told that many crowds became Muslims, and in doing so they would come to believe in the same religion Muhammad believes. They would also worship the same god of Muhammad, Allah, but this is in clear contradiction to the Surah before it.
In Surah 109 Muhammad is saying to the same people that he (Muhammad) will not worship what these people worship. And Muhammad says the people will not worship what Muhammad worships, and Muhammad shall not worship what these people are worshipping. And he repeats the same statement over again, then says you have your religion and I have mine.
This is a false prophecy from Muhammad! If Muhammad is telling these people you will never worship the god I worship then in the next Surah the people are worshipping Allah. That means Muhammad gave a false prophecy because all of these people became Muslims, the same religion of Muhammad.
Conclusion
What did we learn, well what we’ve known from the beginning, Muhammad is a false prophet because he said the people will not worship or believe what he does. And the people became Muslims and believed in what Muhammad believed. A challenge to any Muslim to prove otherwise. May the scales fall from your eyes and you come to the Creator of the universe the Lord Jesus Christ, only He can save you from your sins.
Footnotes
[1] John 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
[2] It does mean at all to seek forgiveness for the prophet himself but for the Muslims who enter in the Religion of Allah for their past sins. Sayyed Mohammad Al-Musawi (2 years ago). If Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was sinless, why did Allah command him to do Tawbah in Surah Nasr?. Retrieved from https://www.al-islam.org/ask/topics/13996/questions-about-Surat-al-Nasr
The Qur’an is very confused when it comes to the Trinity, Allah doesn’t understand what the Trinity is and we are going to prove it today. First let’s define what the Bible teaches and what Christians believe in regards to the Trinity.[1]
We believe: There’s one God (Deuteronomy 6:4), who exists as three co-equal, co-eternal and consubstantial divine persons – Father, Son and Holy Spirit God (Matthew 28:19) is sovereign and self-existent (Exodus 3:14), and is perfectly omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient, immutable (Genesis 17:1), holy, righteous and loving (Judges 13:18).
With that definition known let’s turn to the Qur’an and see if Allah understands the Trinity. According to Sūrah al-Nisāa Allah is trying to refute the idea of the Trinity “Say not Three (Trinity)”.
Allah is saying there’s 3 in the Trinity Say not: “Three (trinity)!” is that correct? Let’s make sure by going to the Islamic scholars this is fro mthe tafsir of Ibn Kathir:
(Say not: “Three!”) do not elevate `Isa and his mother to be gods with Allah. Allah is far holier than what they attribute to Him. In Surat Al-Ma’idah (chapter 5), Allah said,
Ibn Kathir says Christians are elevating Isa (Jesus) and his mother (Mary) to be gods along with Allah. Mistake number 1, Christians do not believe Mary is part of the Trinity. That’s just false, meaning Allah left out the Holy Spirit and inserted Mary by mistake. Even though they are wrong about Mary, at least in this verse they are saying Christians believe in 3 Persons as 1 God.
Here comes the big contradiction within the Qur’an. According to Sūrah al-Māidah 5:17 there’s a person missing in the Trinity. Reading the verse carefully the Qur’an says that Christians says Allah is Christ. In other words the Qur’an is saying Christians believe Jesus is the Father. That means the Qur’an left out a person and is saying there are only two people in the Trinity Jesus and Mary.
Are you getting it? This verse says the Messiah is Allah that makes 1 person, and Muslims believe Allah and Jesus are 2 different individuals. So if Jesus is Allah that’s 1 Person and the second Person is Mary so who’s the third person of the Trinity?
This contradiction proves the Qur’an has mistakes, no Christian believes Mary is part of the Trinity, and if Jesus is Allah then that only leaves 2 people. The 3rd person is missing from the Trinity. How can Allah be god and yet doesn’t know these fundamental beliefs. All Christians believe the Trinity is 3 distinct Persons who are co-equal in essence as the 1 God.
Muslims need to wake up and see that they have been lied to, their god has no undertsanding of the Trinity and the Qur’an is filled with mistakes. The Saviour of the world Jesus Christ is waiting for you to confess with your mouth that He is Lord.[2]
Footnotes
[1] The Trinity is the Christian doctrine that deals with and describes the nature of God. Theopidia. Trinity. Retrieved from https://www.theopedia.com/trinity
[2]Romans 10:9-10 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Here we are once again with another poo poo from Muhammad which clearly shows that Islam has so many contradictions it’s any wonder how someone can believe in this religion?! The Qur’an in ayat 87:6 also known as Sūrat al-Aʿlā, Allah says that Muhammad will not forget when he recites the Qur’an.
And what do you know in their Hadith from Sunan Abi Dawud, which is a Hasan grade meaning good Hadith. We’re told that a man named al-Miswar prayed with Muhammad as he (Muhammad) recited the Qur’an al-Miswar noticed that Muhammad left out words. They confronted Muhammad saying “you omitted such and such verse”, Muhammad then replied, “Why did you not remind me of it.”
This is clearly a contradiction between the Qur’an and Hadith, if Muslims want to reject their Hadith they have the right to do so. But how foolish that makes Muslims look because they are the same ones who graded this Hadith as “good” (Hasan). What a silly religion to follow, there are too many contradictions within the Qur’an and comparing it against the Hadith.
Conclusion
It looks like Allah failed again, Muhammad was told by Allah that he would not forget, then in their own Muslim sources Muhammad forgot verses of the Qur’an. How can any Muslim know that what they are reading is the correct revelation from Allah? This book was not preserved as a goat ate verses about adult breastfeeding[1] which is not found in the Qur’an according to the Hadith. Obviously, it was lost and, therefore, the Qur’an was not preserved.
Footnotes
[1] It was narrated that ‘Aishah said: “The Verse of stoning and of breastfeeding an adult ten times was revealed, and the paper was with me under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were preoccupied with his death, and a tame sheep came in and ate it.”These verses were abrogated in recitation but not ruling. Other ahadith establish the number for fosterage to be 5.
If you’d ask a Muslim what is the word Marriage in Arabic, you may get the response “the word for marriage is Nikah” but is this true? Or have our Muslim friends been feed lies from their scholars once again? There’s a verse in the Qur’an which says that if any Muslima (any believing woman) wants to give herself to Muhammad she can do so.
The words of interest here are “offers herself to the Prophet” this phrase means a woman that’s willing to have sexual intercourse with Muhammad. This is a privilege given only to Muhammad according to Qur’an, all cult leaders have the same desires. They want to build a following, receive money from their members and take all the pretty women for themself. This is nothing new when it comes to cults, a quick research into this would prove this to be true.
More text to take notice of, the women spoken of in this verse are Muslim women. Yusuf Ali renders the ayat “any believing woman” this means any Muslim woman even if she has a husband. Because if the eyes of Muhammad falls on a woman, meaning if Muhammad falls in love with a woman and has a husband, she has to divorce her husband so that Muhammad can have sex with her.
Let’s prove the point further, now Muslims always say the Arabic takes precedence over the English translation. The highlighted Arabic word is nafsahā.
If you take this word you’ll see what the verse is truly saying and I think you’ll be shocked! Copy and paste this word into Google Translate and here’s what you’ll get. Let me first preface and apologise for the wording that will follow, unfortunately when speaking about Satan’s religion called Islam we’re going to run into distasteful language at times.
Therefore, continue on at your own risk, I took certain steps to try to “clean up” the language a bit. My apologies, but when dealing with Islam this is what we get when we look at Muslim sources. The highlighted word (يَسْتَنْكِحَهَا) yastankiḥahā literally means…
Yes, you read that right it’s the F Word, it doesn’t mean marriage at all. This is the deception of Islam they hide words in the English Translation from what the Arabic actually says. There are thousands of Muslims who will say the word means marriage, that’s a complete farce!
The following quote was pulled from Al-Islam.org an Islamic website[1] So let it be known that this is not from a Christian website.
In Islam, marriage is not restricted to a platonic relationship between husband and wife, nor is it solely for procreation. The Islamic term for marriage, “nikah” literally means sexual intercourse.
Islam is a filthy religion when you don’t listen to the lies of Muslims but dig into the Islamic sources you’ll come up with a bunch of rubbish and filth. Why are the Muslim translators burying the true meaning of the Arabic words, it’s because they know if they tell the truth then many people would leave Islam. They don’t want Muslims to ask questions if you start asking questions it starts to fall apart.[2]
Muhammad gave himself the privilege to take any woman he wants, he took his adopted son’s wife. You can read about that in a previous post Muhammad’s Flirts with his Daughter In Law Zaynab Bint Jahsh. If Muhammad is a prophet of god what does his sexual relationships have to do with god? Allah seems to be there to only serve Muhammad’s sexual desires, Aisha his child bride even mentions this.[3]
Footnotes
[1]“Welcome to Al-Islam.org. We invite you to begin a journey of clicks to explore this site thoroughly. We hope that this journey is a source of education and enlightenment. If you are not a Muslim, then let this site serve as a means of introducing Islam to you, and provide you with options for exploring the beauty of this religion further. If you are a Muslim, then let this site serve as a repository for advancing your knowledge about Islam further.” Al-Islam.org (1995-2023). About Us. Retrieved from https://www.al-islam.org/about-us
[2][5:101]O ye who believe! Ask not questions about things which, if made plain to you, may cause you trouble. But if ye ask about things when the Qur’an is being revealed, they will be made plain to you, Allah will forgive those: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Forbearing.
[3] ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: I felt jealous of the women who offered themselves to Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) and said: Then when Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, revealed this:” You may defer any one of them you wish, and take to yourself any you wish; and if you desire any you have set aside (no sin is chargeable to you)” (xxxiii. 51), I (‘A’isha.) said: It seems to me that your Lord hastens to satisfy your desire. [Sahih Muslim 1464a]
According to Islam Allah sent 124,000 prophets, we do not know who these prophets are because the Qur’an only mentions those which are mentioned in the Bible. The Qur’an says each prophet came with the same message in the language of his (the particular prophet) language.
And here’s the interpretation from the Islamic scholar al-Jalalayn who agrees with the above statement.
And We have not sent any Messenger except with the tongue with the language of his people that he might make the Message clear to them that he might make them understand what he brings to them; God then sends astray whomever He will and He guides whomever He will; and He is the Mighty in His kingdom the Wise in His actions.
These are not Christian interpretations this is straight from Muslim sources, we’re building our case for the main topic at hand. Here’s another interpretation from Ibn-Abbas the cousin of Muhammad, if anyone would understand the Qur’an he certainly should be qualified to give the interpretation. It’s funny because if the Qur’an is “clear” or “easy to understand”[1][54:17]why do they have all these interpretations?
(And We never sent a messenger save with the language of his folk, that he might make (the message) clear for them) in their own language what they have been commanded with and prohibited from; it is also said that this means: in a language through which it is possible for them to learn. (Then Allah sendeth whom He will astray) from His religion, (and guideth) to His religion (whom He will) whoever deserves to be guided. (He is the Mighty) in His kingdom and sovereignty; it is also said that this means: the Mighty in His retribution against those who do not believe, (the Wise) in His command and decree; it is also said that this means: the Wise in guiding some and misguiding others.
Isa the prophet of Allah was given the Injil, follow the logic here. Isa was sent to the children of Israel.[2] Then why did Allah give Isa the wrong book as the word Injil derives from the Greek language? Shouldn’t Allah have given Isa a book that was in the language of the Jews, namely Hebrew or Aramaic for the time of Jesus?
This means the Injil is a Greek book, which Allah gave Isa to take to the Jews. Arthur Jeffery holds a theological degree from the University of Melbourne and advanced degrees from the University of Edinburgh. He chaired the Department of Near and Middle East Languages at Columbia and contributed to the field of Qurānic studies. In his book The Foreign Vocabulary of the Qur’ān he says:
“Gospel. It is used always of the Christian revelation, is particularly associated with Jesus, and occurs only in Madinan passages. Some of the early authorities tried to find an Arabic origin for it, making it a form, but this theory is rejected with some contempt by the commentators Zam. and Baid. both on general grounds, and because of al-Hasan’s reading, which clearly is not an Arabic form. So also the Lexicons LA , xiv, 171; TA , viii, 128; and al-Jawālīqī, 17 (al-Khafājī, 11), give it as a foreign word derived from either Hebrew or Syriac (cf. Ibn al-Athīr, Nihāya , iv, 136). Obviously, it is the Gk. ἐυαγγέλιον, and both Marracci and Fraenkel have thought that it came directly into Arabic from the Greek.”
Jeffery, Arthur. The Foreign Vocabulary of the Qur’ān, BRILL, 2007
If Allah gave Isa a Greek book to bring to guide the Jews this would mean Allah cannot be God, he should have known that the language of the Jews was Hebrew or Aramaic, not Greek! Injil or Injeel has Greek etymological roots.[3]
“The word Injil is generally held by non-Muslim historians to be an abbreviation of the Greek word Ευαγγέλιον”
Notice T.M. Guiapar just as most Muslims, even if you provide solid evidence which goes against the Islamic belief they will deflect and change the topic. In the green, he resorts to “do you know Arabic” as if he does which he doesn’t, and then he says the Injil was written in Arabic without a lick of evidence.
Highlighted words in red is where he deflects and instead of giving evidence that the Injil was written in Arabic, he asks if Jesus preached from the Gospels of the New Testament. The Gospels were written after the Lord Jesus Christ entered heaven, so this wouldn’t make sense. The Gospel writers are telling us about Jesus Christ and what He has spoken, Christians never claimed Jesus had a book given to Him, that’s an Islamic belief and has no roots in Christianity.
To answer the Abdoools question did Jesus Christ and His disciples know Greek, the answer is an emphatic yes! The Jews in Jerusalem were submerged in a multilingual culture, there were Romans, Greeks and Jews living in close quarters. Christ spoke with Greeks as they came to see Him (John 12:20). Many verses recorded that Christ spoke with Pontius Pilate, a Roman and Pilot who spoke to a crowd of Jews (Matthew 27:13, Matthew 27:17, 22).
We also know there were 3 languages written on the cross of Jesus Christ, Hebrew, Latin and Greek (Luke 23:38, John 19:20). This signifies that people in Jerusalem spoke different languages proving they were able to communicate with each other. To think Jesus only spoke Aramaic is absurd!
Conclusion
It’s painfully obvious that Allah gave the Islamic Jesus (Isa) the wrong book to bring to the Jews, just as the Qur’an says in 14:4 that each prophet would come in the language of the people so that they would be able to easily understand the message. Muslims run away fast from the false prophet Muhammad who’s leading them down the wrong path to hell. There’s no hope in Islam, without lies Islam dies and that’s a fact!
Footnotes
[1]54:17And We have indeed made the Quran easy to understand and remember, then is there any that will remember (or receive admonition)?
[2] ‘Isa ibn Maryam is the slave of Allah and His messenger. Allah sent him to guide the Children of Israel and to call them to worship Allah Alone, as Allah says to the Jews and Christians IsalamQA (2001, February 22). Jesus in Islam. Retrieved from https://islamqa.info/en/answers/10277/jesus-in-islam
[3] Etymology Definition: the history of a linguistic form (such as a word) shown by tracing its development since its earliest recorded occurrence in the language where it is found, by tracing its transmission from one language to another, by analyzing it into its component parts, by identifying its cognates in other languages, or by tracing it and its cognates to a common ancestral form in an ancestral language “Etymology.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/etymology
The Islamic thought is that Islam will dominate the world, so it’s no surprise that Muslims are very zealous in spreading the teaching of Islam. We know of these individuals who want to give dawah in different ways, some engage in giving dawah through debates, blogs, news, fake reaction videos, street booths etc.
There’s a group called Dawahpedia Projects in Canada that will target nominal Christians[1] on the street corner and seek to convert them to Islam. It’s unfortunate because this nominal Christianity is what’s put forth in the public sphere, and sadly the world would think that’s Christianity. Wolves in sheep’s clothing have taken root preaching a false Gospel which has laid hold on helpless souls and we pray that the LORD of Host opens their eyes to the truth.
When they (Muslims) are faced with a born-again believer in the Lord Jesus who’s familiar with Islam’s deceptive tactics, these Muslims become flustered and do not know how to respond because they cannot control the conversation. Case in point wit the following comment from Dawahpedia Projects.
According to this Abdoool Dawahpedia, claims that Jesus is not the Word “OF” Allah, but the verse says Jesus is “His Word.” This Muslim is going against his own Qur’an. I want him to show anyone else called the “Word of Allah” or “His Word” etc. Any language similar to this of any one else besides Jesus.
Islam teaches that the word of Allah is eternal now this Abdoool has a choice he can either agree that Allah’s word is eternal, but he doesn’t want to admit that because that means Jesus would be eternal. The other option he has is to say Allah’s word is not eternal but created meaning the Qur’an is created and not eternal. Do you see the dilemma Muslims face when asked this question?
According to their own sources, the word of Allah is “Kalimatu minhu” (a Word from him) and wakalimatuhu (his Word) in referring to Jesus both have the same meaning saying Jesus came from Allah as his Word. This title is only given to Jesus, no other prophet bears the same title as Jesus including Muhammad.
Muslims try their best to downplay this unique title only given to Jesus, they will try to say that this refers to when Allah created Isa by saying “Be (kun fa-yakūnu) and it is.” The problem is that when you check out the word-for-word breakdown of the Arabic wakalimatuhu is a 3rd person masculine singular possessive pronoun, with special emphasis on the word possessive.
Possession would be in the genitive case translated “of” if we were studying the Greek New Testament in the Bible that would correlate to “the Son of God” indicating possession. We can confirm this when diving into how the word is used throughout the Qur’an by clicking on the link (wakalimatuhu) you’ll be directed to another page which displays every occurrence of the word.
Virgin birth -The Qur’an gives an account of the birth of Jesus in chapter 3. Mary is described as being a virgin, chosen by God, and considered with great honor. “Behold! the angels said: O Mary! Allah gives you glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary.” [Qur’an 3:45] . Verse 47 relates the response of and to Mary, “She said: O my Lord! How shall I have a son when no man has touched me? He said: ‘Even so: Allah creates what He wills: When He has decreed a plan, He merely says to it, ‘Be,’ and it is!” The Qur’an thus affirms and Muslims believe that Jesus was born of the virgin Mary. The birth is seen as a sign (ayah) of Allah’s power and as a miraculous event. And Muslims have a high regard also for Mary. However, the Qur’an presents Jesus as the son of Mary and not as the Son of God, a significant point particularly emphasized.
Like Adam (pbuh) -Though the unique birth of Jesus with one parent is no indication of divinity just as Adam’s creation was without any parentage [Qur’an 3:59] .
The above quote from Islamicity.org speaks of the Islamic teaching that Adam and Isa (Jesus) were created in the same manner. Comparing the 2 they claim since Jesus had a mother and no father that’s not proof of diety because Adam had no father or mother. The problem with this comparison is that mankind had a beginning, therefore, of course, Adam didn’t have parents. But this doesn’t make him the same as Jesus, as this still doesn’t change the fact that Jesus is called the Word of Allah and a Spirit from Allah while Adam is not.
Also, the concept that Allah says “Be and it is” is not true. Allah created Adam using his hands from mud (clay)[2] and then blew his spirit into him. Did Allah say “Be” before he used his hands to mould Adam or afterwards? If before then what’s the purpose of saying “Be” that’s like building a car and once you’re finished saying “Be” that makes no sense! You still used your hands to make the car the same as Allah made Adam.
If he said “Be” after moulding the clay with his hands makes no sense Allah still used mud and his hands to create Adam and THEN said “Be” after the fact? If we look into the account of how Isa (non-biblical Jesus) was created we see that he was not made with mud or clay, and Allah didn’t use his hands.
The creation of Isa involved Jibril blowing into Islamic Mary’s vagina found in the Surat l-anbiyāa (The Prophets). This is completely different from how Adam was created! The relevant verse is provided below, bear in mind the different translations and how they render the verse, keep in mind that words in the brackets [] are not found in the Arabic.
Look at some of the rediculous and deceptive ways Muslims translate the verse. Halali & Khan says “We breathed into (the sleeves of ) her (shirt or garment)” since when do babies come from the sleeves of woman? Pickthall says “We breathed into (something)” so Allah doesn’t know what that “something” is? Saheeh International translates it as “We breathed into [garment]” again is Allah saying babies come from clothing, the god of Islam is in the dry cleaning business?
The Arabic is clear it says Jibril breathed into Mary’s vagina (فَرْجَهَا, farjaha) and Muslims claim they hold Mary in the highest honour, put the word in Google Translate and you’ll get “her vagina.”
Here’s a screenshot of the Arabic in Google Translate, try it for yourself.
There’s no way around it when we look directly at the sources of Islam instead of taking what Muslims tell us at face value we see they are not telling the truth. And that’s how these Muslim missionaries like Dawahpedia lie to people to deceive them into a false religious sex cult.
Conclusion
What have we learnt today? Well that Jesus is called “the Word of Allah and a spirit from Allah” this is a possessive noun in the genitive case. No other person in the Qur’an has this title, it belongs solely to Jesus. Adam and Jesus were not created the same, Allah used his hands in creating Adam, and Jibril blew into the false Mary’s vagina making her pregnant with Isa (fake Jesus). And this can be confirmed by copying the Arabic text and translating it through Google Translate.
Remember here we do not hate Muslims, we love them and want them to come to Jesus Christ for eternal life. Jesus Christ said He’s the only way to the Father, in other words unless you believe in the real Jesus who’s the Son of God who died on the cross and rose from the dead on the 3rd day. Then you’ll cannot have eternal life. Make a choice Muslims what’s it going to be Muhammad and the Qur’an or Jesus Christ and the Holy Bible?
Footnotes
[1] What is nominal Christianity? Nominalism can be understood as possessing a name, title, or label that is ultimately meaningless due to its empty formality. Thus, a nominal Christian is simply a “Christian” in name only. Though they may attend church services or may believe some of the basic doctrines of the Christian faith, they lack a true relationship with Christ and have failed to surrender the entirety of their lives to Him as their Lord and Savior by way of genuine faith and repentance. The church of Sardis is a prime example of nominal Christianity. Revelation 3:1 states, “And to the angel of the church in Sardis write…’I know your works, that you have a name of being alive, but you are dead.’” Though many in the church of Sardis claimed Christianity and performed many of the common church functions, Jesus boldly declared that their name was baseless, and they were spiritually dead. Though it may seem harsh or unloving, Jesus had compassion on these nominal Christians and was wanting to make them aware of the reality of their spiritual condition before it was too late. Zach Bollman (2021, January 20). How and when to reference. Retrieved from https://www.fellowshipinchrist.org/nominal-christianity/
[2]15:26 Surely We created man of a clay of mudmoulded,
In everyday conversations between Abdools and Christians, you find all sorts of lies and deception from Muslims if they think you know nothing about Islam. This particular son of mutah was obsessed with skin colour, claiming Christians are “white supremacists.” In other words, he thinks we proclaim Jesus Christ is blonde with blue eyes 🤣
You can’t blame Muslims for being confused, they have fallen for the lies propagated in the world, and to be honest, it’s partly our fault. As Christians we need to teach the public through our life’s personal testimony, some of these things shouldn’t have to be mentioned. Unfortunately, we’ve had people out there who misrepresent what Christianity is, the likes of Joel Olsteen etc.
But that’s not what we talk about here, let’s focus on getting this Muslim busted. Dumber Everyday aka “Smarter Everyday” claims that Muhammad is not a white man.[1]
Mr. “Smarter Everyday” is either ignorant of his own Hadith’s or he’s lying, we’ll give him the benefit of the doubt and say it’s the latter. I would like for Smarter Everday to tell us why his prophet is described as a white man?[2] This Sahih Hadith tells us a man came on a camel looking for Muhammad in the Masjid.
In answering his question about John 17:3, Muslims always quote half the verse to try to disprove the deity of Christ, but the Lord Jesus is not excluding Himself as God by calling His Father the only true God. Muslims continue to misrepresent what Christians believe, the Trinity as found in the Bible is that God is 1 in being (what) and the one being of God consists of 3 distinct Persons (who) who collectively are co-eternal are the 1 God.
The Greek has a copulative kai meaning that the Father and Jesus Christ are the One true God in this verse. But for our purposes the English translation will suffice.
The man asked Muhammad’s companions which of them is Muhammad? They replied, “This white man who is reclining.” Why is Dumber Everyday claiming Muhammad’s not a white man when his own Islamic sources say that he is white?[3]
And we always give references here so that you can go and look these things up yourselves, Christians learn these sources so that you can answer Muslims from their own text. don’t allow yourself to be deceived by their Dawah. Let’s provide one more proof that Muhammad was a white man[4] who was obsessed with telling everyone his colour.
This particular Hadith says `Ali bin Abi Talib is describing Muhammad saying he has a white complexion. Either Smarter Everyday believes his Hadith in which he needs to confess that Muhammad is a white man.[5] Otherwise, he’s saying that Muslims put out a bunch of lies in their Islamic text, it’s his choice. To end this article we’ll show how Muhammad is racist against blacks.
The following Hadith describes how Allah created Adam, Allah struck his right shoulder and out came white offspring. Allah then struck his left shoulder and out came black offspring. These 2 offsprings are mankind coming from Adam, to the white offspring Allah says they go to Paradise, and to the black offspring Allah sends them to hell.
How racist is this cult! Why was their colour mentioned and depending on if they are white or black determines if they go to paradise or hell? This is why someone like “Smarter Everyday” is also obsessed with skin colour, Islam is riddled with this sort of racist text.
Conclusion
Today we learned that Muhammad according to their Sahih Hadith’s is a white man (not that it matters to us) but to a racist cult like Islam it does. And that Allah sends black people to hell while he sends white people to paradise. I wonder how all those Muslims in African countries feel about this? Can any Muslim comment on why their fellow Muhammadan is fabricating his own form of Islam saying Muhammad is not a white man when the Hadith explicitly says that he is?
Footnotes
[1] The narrator Anas added that the Prophet (ﷺ) raised his hands (during the invocation) to such an extent that the whiteness of his armpits was visible. Sahih al-Bukhari 1030
[2] Abu Juhaifa reported: I saw Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) that he had white complexion and had some white hair, and Hasan b. ‘Ali resembled him. Sahih Muslim 2343a
[3] Sa’id al-Jariri quoted Abu al-Tufail as saying: I saw the Messenger of Allah(ﷺ). I asked: How did you see him? He said: He was white, good-looking, and when he walked, it looked as if he was descending to a low ground. Sunan Abi Dawud 4864 Grade: Sahih (Al-Albani)
[4] It was narrated that ‘Abdullah said: “The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) used to say the salam to his right so that the whiteness of his cheek could be seen, and to his left so that the whiteness of his cheek could be seen.” Sunan an-Nasa’i 1323 Grade: Sahih (Darussalam)
[5] Narrated `Abdul `Aziz: Anas said, ‘When Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) invaded Khaibar, we offered the Fajr prayer there (early in the morning) when it was still dark. The Prophet (ﷺ) rode and Abu Talha rode too and I was riding behind Abu Talha. The Prophet (ﷺ) passed through the lane of Khaibar quickly and my knee was touching the thigh of the Prophet (ﷺ) . He uncovered his thigh and I saw the whiteness of the thigh of the Prophet. … Sahih al-Bukhari 371
All cult leaders share in their desires and that’s money and women. In 1993 David Koresh ran his cult, the followers were called Davidians, he (Koresh) used the Bible as his authority to keep his followers in check. Another cult leader by the name of Michael Travesser founded his group in New Mexico, the community known as Strong City (Travesser) just like his predecessors took advantage of sleeping with the wives of other members and claimed that he was the son of God. Whether the cult leader is Jim Jones or Charles Manson they all have the same commonality they are charismatic and command their followers to obey them without question.
The cult of Islam is no different, Muhammad demands the same of Muslims, they must follow Muhammad in order to believe in Allah. Muhammad gave himself titles which belong only to God for instance his name means “the praised one.” He also gave himself special privileges no one else had like he alone could sleep with as many women and any woman he wants. And apparently his god Allah had an interest in pleasing Muhammad to the point that Islam teaches everything was made for Muhammad. Islam truly is an anti-christ religion for we know that Jesus Christ is the Creator who created all things (John 1:3).
The religion of Islam exists only to oppose the Lord Jesus Christ, and Muhammad wanted to take the place of Christ, therefore, he made his own religion causing many gullible people to follow him.
Muhammad’s Sexual Desire Granted By Allah?
The following verse was made by Muhammad giving him special privileges[1] look at his far-reaching authority over his followers. Muhammad could sleep with his multiple wives, slaves who he possesses, nieces of aunts and uncles, and any believing woman who wants to offer herself to Muhammad.
The following are the commentaries (Tafsir) from the early Muslim scholars concerning 33:50. Both Ibn Abbas (the cousin of Muhammad) and al-Jalalayn say that only Muhammad was given the privilege to have any woman he wants.
Al-Jalalayn uses the word nikāh for marriage, in truth there’s no such thing as marriage in Islam. The word nikāh is actually a filthy word meaning the F word, I’ll just leave it as that.
Ibn Kathir in his Tafsir also comments on this verse, notice how the believing woman is passed around like a peice of meat. If Muhammad doesn’t want her then another man will take her for himself.
(and a believing woman if she offers herself to the Prophet, and the Prophet wishes to marry her — a privilege for you only,) means, `also lawful for you, O Prophet, is a believing woman if she offers herself to you, to marry her without a dowery, if you wish to do so.’ This Ayah includes two conditions. Imam Ahmad recorded from Sahl bin Sa`d As-Sa`idi that a woman came to the Messenger of Allah and said, “O Messenger of Allah, verily, I offer myself to you (for marriage).” She stood there for a long time, then a man stood up and said, “O Messenger of Allah, marry her to me if you do not want to marry her.’‘ The Messenger of Allah said:
What do Muhammad’s sex organs have to do with worshipping God? Nothing at all! It only serves for his own sexual desires and that’s why he created the Qur’an, to manipulate and control the people. Muhammad was busted by his child bride Aisha, at some point she saw through his lies saying, I see your god hastens to satisfy your desire found in Sahih Muslim 1464a.
Aisha knew that these “revelations” Muhammad claimed to have were lies, they were only Muhammad’s way of having sex with any woman he wants. And Aisha busted him to his face. Muhammad then had all sorts of women coming to sleep with him, including women he thought were not attractive. Muhammad couldn’t have this and came up with another “revelation” from Allah.
Muhammad’s Lust For Pretty Women
It’s funny Muhammad in his haste wanted all the attractive women for himself and came up with 33:50 Surat al-aḥzāb and in doing so he also had unattractive women wanting to sleep with him, and Muhammad didn’t like that. Muhammad had Allah “send” another “revelation” saying it was ok if he chose to say no to a woman he didn’t like.
This verse was made for Muhammad so that he could pick and choose which woman he wanted to have sexual intercourse with. A prophet shouldn’t be concerned with sleeping with women, a true prophet is concerned with delivering the message God has given them for the people.
Women who are in this religion are looked down upon as a 2nd class citizens, they have no rights, the only right they have in Islam is to be baby-making machines. Men can beat their wives, lie to them, divorce them for any reason, and have multiple wives. It’s really sick! In the Bible, we see that women are equal to men, and husbands are commanded to love their wives and cherish her just as Jesus Christ loves the church.
If you truly want love come to the One who sacrificed His own self so that you could have eternal life! The Son of God went to the cross bearing your sins in His own body and suffered the wrath you and I deserve as sinners. But He (Jesus Christ) is perfect He never sinned but out of love knew that the Romans would crucify Him and ridicule Him.
Footnotes
[1]Definition of special privilege: a privilege granted (as by a law or constitution) to an individual or group to the exclusion of others and in derogation of common right “Special privilege.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com. Accessed 6 Nov. 2022.
Forcing anyone to engage in sexual activity is sinful and can be viewed as rape, no one should feel compelled to be intimate with anyone. If someone tricks, threatens or manipulates causing the person into sexual activity, these traits are not one which stems from love. Many Muslim women say the religion of Islam has “empowered women” and has “given them rights.” If we explore the Qur’ān will we find this to be true? There’s only one way to find out, let’s take a deep dive as Yasir Qadhi would say.
Here’s the definition of sexual coercion defined by OASH (Office on Women’s Health):
Sexual coercion is unwanted sexual activity that happens when you are pressured, tricked, threatened, or forced in a nonphysical way. Coercion can make you think you owe sex to someone. It might be from someone who has power over you, like a teacher, landlord, or a boss. No person is ever required to have sex with someone else.
In Surah al-baqarah (The Cow) also known as the Hindu chapter, the longest in the Qur’ān with 286 ayats. In ayat 223 reads that a man can go into his wife as he pleases as he would till a field.
Other renderings of the same verse by their Muslim scholars.
[Sahih International:] Your wives are a place of sowing of seed for you, so come to your place of cultivation however you wish and put forth [righteousness] for yourselves. And fear Allah and know that you will meet Him. And give good tidings to the believers.
Surah al-baqarah (The Cow)
[Muhammad Sarwar:] Your wives are as fields for you. You may enter your fields from any place you want. Reserve something good for your souls (for the life hereafter). Have fear of God and know that you are going to meet Him. (Muhammad) give the glad news to the believers.
Surah al-baqarah (The Cow)
In Islam men can abuse women in whatever way he pleases according to the Qur’ān, to substantiate this fact we go to the scholars and the Tafsir for the interpretation. Let’s see if you’ve ever read a more unloving and deplorable description of what Islam teaches. I apologise in advance for what you’ll read but if we’re to be truthful as Christians we must expose darkness with light. Continue at your own risk!
Islam is really a sex cult, why the graphic detail and the teachings of abusing women? In contrast to the Qur’ān we read in the Bible men are to love their wives as Christ loved us.
Other verses teaching husbands to love thier wifes are (Eph 5:28-29, 33, Col 3:19). Women should be treated with gentleness, kindness and love, they’re to be cherished and protected not abused as sexual objects.
Angels Will Curse Her For Not Having Sex?
This Hadith which is the saying of Muhammad (Sunnah) uses threats towards women to scare them into having sex.[1] Why in the world would angels care about the sexual relationship of a husband and wife to the point of cursing the woman? This was how Muhammad manipulated religion so men could have their way with women, below is the Sahih (Authentic) Hadith in question.
Muslim women do not have the right to deny their husband sex, otherwise, the angels according to this Hadith will curse her all night until morning. It’s things like this in Islam which causes women to feel trapped, this is not love but lust! Women are completely degraded by the false prophet Muhammad, why there are women caught up in this chauvinistic[2] man made religion?
They’re afraid to leave for fear of being ostracised by their families, friends and community. A quick search will bring up plenty of stories of women who have doubts and are trying to escape from Islam. One Muslima wrote an article asking questions, she prefaced the piece by saying her faith is “strong” and that “islamophobes will extrapolate what could be considered useful for their agenda.” Instead of being real and saying she doesn’t like certain things Islam teaches, this is the brainwashing effect Islam has on women.
Questions she asked were:
(1) “Why can a man marry a non-Muslim, or rather why can’t women too?…Why does the divine command not extend to women?” (2) “Why can’t I divorce my husband? … Why do I not have the same authority as a man in my relationship when it comes to authorising a divorce?” (3) “Why do women only get half the inheritance?” (4) “Traveling by myself as a Muslim woman” (5) “Why can I not beautify myself…for myself?” (6) “Why can’t I pray and fast during my period? … the wide-reaching repercussions of being exempt from certain times of worship, for example, hajj, umrah, and not attending virtuous nights in the mosque, leads me to can’t help but feel I am being denied by Allah” (7) “Why I can’t attend a burial?” (8) “Why is a women’s testimony not enough on her own?” (9) “Why are the only Prophets mentioned men?” (10) “Why can’t I lead prayer?” (11) “Why do I have to cover my hair while men are not obliged?” (12) “Hoor Al-Ayn – Need I say more? … I feel objectified as a woman, that we, of all species, are objects for the pleasure of men. ”
Does this sound like a religion that values women or degrades them, treating them as sex objects, even saying they’re less intelligent than men?! There are cases of Muslim women who want to get out of abusive relationships but are not allowed to, they are being denied and controlled by their Imams.[3]
Let’s answer some of these questions above for her using her own Islamic sources.
Why Can A Man Marry A Non-Muslim, Or Rather Why Can’t Women Too?
According to Islam, only Muslim men can marry outside of Islam, more specifically they’re allowed to marry Jewish or Christian women. But it’s not allowed for them to marry Hindu’s or Buddhist. Muslim women are not permitted under any circumstance to marry any non-Muslim. The teaching in Islam is that men are allowed to marry women who are Jewish or Christian due to this verse in Surah al-Maidah 5:5.
Surah al-māidah gives Muslim men permission to marry non-Muslim women, but there’s a contradiction because Muslims claim that Christians are mushriks meaning they call us idol-worshippers because we worship the Lord Jesus Christ. This exposes the hypocrisy of Islam in Surah al-Baqarah 2:221 they’re prohibited from marrying idol-worshippers.
All Christian women worship Jesus Christ, and Muslims claim that’s idolatry yet Surah al-maidah contradicts this verse saying men can marry Christian women. On Islam Q&A someone asked “What is the difference between mushrikeen and kuffaar? Are the Jews and Christians mushrikeen or kuffaar?” here’s their answer:
The kaafir is the one who denies and conceals the truth. The basic meaning of the word kufr in Arabic is concealment. Shirk means devoting worship to anyone or anything other than Allaah. Kufr may take the form of denying and rejecting, but the mushrik may also believe in Allaah. This is the difference between the mushrik and the kaafir. Each word may also carry the meaning of the other, so the word kufr may be used in the sense of shirk, and the word shirk may be used in the sense of kufr. Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: Kufr and shirk may carry the same meaning, which is disbelief in Allaah, may He be exalted, or they may be used separately, whereby shirk refers to the worship of idols and other created beings, whilst also acknowledging Allaah, as the kuffaar of Quraysh did, and kufr may have a more general meaning than shirk. End quote.
So how can these men marry women who are considered an idolatress (mushrik) and is accused of committing the unforgivable sin shirk? Then when it comes to women Islam Q&A said: “It is not permissible for a Muslim woman to marry a non-Muslim man from any other religion, whether from among the Jews or Christians, or any other kafir religion. It is not permissible for her to marry a Jew, a Christian, a Magian, a communist, an idol-worshipper, etc.” this is found in the same verse 2:221.
Why Can’t I Divorce My Husband?
The Bible gives 2 allowances for divorce, but for Christians, divorce is the absolute last resort as the God of the Bible (Yahweh) hates divorce. If a spouse commits adultery or is abusive to their spouse divorce is possible. But look at what Islam teaches if a woman wants to divorce, this following quote is from Islam Q&A.
A woman does not have the power to divorce (talaaq) her husband; rather divorce is in the hand of the man, because the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “(The right of divorce) belongs to the one who takes hold of the calf [i.e., her husband].” Classed as hasan by al-Albaani in Saheeh Ibn Maajah
In addition, the man can have multiple wives, up to 4 at a time, but the wife cannot have multiple husbands and she cannot divorce. This is just all around wrong how is it Islam gives women more rights?
Islam puts the blame on the woman and never the man it seems, here’s another quote from an article on the website Al-Islam. Ayatullah Ibrahim Amini try to detect where he seems to be putting the blame should a husband divorce his wife.
One influential factor for divorce is the disheartenment of a husband for his legitimate wife and his fondness and affection towards non-mahram women. The chief instrument for this is lack of adequate Hijab among women and leering in men. When a man looks upon a woman who is more beautiful and attractive than his own wife he may become infatuated with her and become disheartened with his wife. Little by little he makes familial life bitter by finding faults, seeking excuses, and picking quarrels, which might ultimately lead to divorce.
Here a perfect example of abuse in Islamic marriages, a woman who was married to a man who was beating her left bruises on her. She went to Aisha for help in which they came before Muhammad asking for help. Aisha complained saying the lady’s skin was green from all the beatings she received. The lady told Muhammad that her husband `AbdurRahman was not able to perform in bed, `AbdurRahman accused her of lying. Muhammad then tells the woman if she wants to leave `AbdurRahman and go back to her previous husband Rifa`a she must let `AbdurRahman have sex with her. Another Hadith says that she must let him taste her juices. The pimp prophet Muhammad is advocating for wife swapping, how can this be a messenger of God?!
Islam teaches women are not intelligent enough to testify on their own, this is the reason another woman is needed to make up for her deficiency (stupidity). Women are stupid according to Islam, we challenge any Muslim to point to any text in the Bible which says anything remotely close to this. You won’t find anything in our scriptures which degrades women.
Conclusion
It’s fair to say after going through the Qur’ān and Hadith that women in Islam are not valued. In the Bible women are equal to men, husbands are encouraged to love their wives. In fact in the book of Proverbs chapter 31:10-12 states that a virtuous woman has more worth far above rubies. Christians certainly do not believe women are less than men, we believe women are equal to men the only difference is that men and women have different roles.
Women are just as intelligent than men, and her testimony is good on her own. Christian women are not cursed by angels for not being in the mood to be sexually intimate with their husband, lastly they are not sex objects to be used and abused. If you’re a Muslim woman know that in Islam you’re looked down upon for be created as a woman. How is it Allah is against women yet he supposedly created you? That makes no sense!
In the Bible both male and female have been created in the image of God, therefore, you have immense value. I would implore you to come to Jesus Christ for salvation and start living a meaningful life for the true God who loves you and gave Himself on the cross for you for you to have salvation.
Footnotes
[1] Anyone, including friends, co-workers, bosses, landlords, dates, partners, family members, and strangers, can use coercion. Sexual coercion is most likely to happen with someone you already have some type of relationship with. Sexual activity should always happen with your consent. If you are being pressured or coerced into sexual activity, that may be a type of sexual assault and it may be against the law. Office on Women’s Health (2021, February 15). Sexual coercion. Retrieved from https://www.womenshealth.gov/relationships-and-safety/other-types/sexual-coercion
[2]Definition of chauvinism: an attitude of superiority toward members of the opposite sex male chauvinism also: behavior expressive of such an attitude “Chauvinism.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/chauvinism. Accessed 4 Nov. 2022.
One of the polemic arguments Muslims pose to Christians is that Jesus Christ “prayed like a Muslim” if you’ve never heard this assertion you might become confused. Well, fret not because we’re going to prove without a shadow of a doubt that the Lord Jesus Christ was not a Muslim.
The 1st argument is that Jesus Christ while praying fell on His face, Muslims believe this is evidence that Christ is a Muslim. They read the words “fell on his face” and automatically believe Jesus Christ and others found in the Bible prayed like Muslims.[1]
A few things to point out in this verse, when the Bible speaks of falling on their face it refers to a person laying face down on their stomach, not praying in the same prostration Muslims perform. Another point is in Matthew 26:39 and other verses Jesus Christ is calling God His Father, while Muslims are not allowed to call Allah father. Here are some verses in the Qur’ān which prove that Allah is father to no one.
When Christians pray we call God Father because through the new birth according to the Lord Jesus we’re made children of God (Matthew 5:9, Luke 20:36, John 11:52). The apostle Paul following in the steps of Christ also said we’re the children of God (Romans 8:16, Romans 8:21, Galatians 3:26), additionally, the apostle John also proclaimed that believers in Christ Jesus are children of God (1 John 3:10, 1 John 5:2).
Christians also pray in many ways, we also fall on our face (lay face down), get on our knees, look up to heaven and even pray sitting down. The importance is not on how you pray but just that you do pray. The fact that we call God Father distinguishes us from Muslims.
2nd point is Jesus Christ prayed “looking up to heaven” this destroys the claim that Christ was a Muslim as there are Hadiths which say your eyes will be snatched out if we look toward the sky during prayer.
If this Hadith is authentic, why weren’t the eyes of Jesus Christ snatched away when He prayed looking up to heaven? Many Christians including myself have on multiple occasions looked up to heaven while praying, and what do you know we still have our eyes.
Here we have 3 verses which speak of the Lord Jesus Christ looking up to heaven while He’s praying, Muslims don’t look to heaven when praying. This is solid evidence that Jesus was not a Muslim.
Conclusion
When we examine the Muslim claim against what the Bible says we see that all the lies of Islam die, without lies Islam dies. Jesus Christ called God Father, and the Qur’ān prohibits anyone from calling Allah, father. The Lord Jesus also gazed heavenward while praying this is something Muslims do not do while praying.
Footnotes
[1] The remainder of this article will examine passages from various books of the Bible and compare them to the way Muslims pray. The most recognisable posture in the Muslim prayer is touching the forehead to the ground. It is the apex of a person’s prayer and it is mentioned in the authentic traditions of Prophet Muhammad as the position in which a believer is as close to God as it is possible to be. “The nearest one comes to his Lord is when he is kowtowing.” Consider the following verses from the Bible. “And he (Jesus) went a little further, and fell on his face, and prayed…” (Matthew 26:39) Aisha Stacey (2014, September 15). MUSLIM PRAYER POSTURES FOUND IN THE BIBLE. Retrieved from https://www.islamreligion.com/
The majority of human civilisation agrees that a 54-year-old man shouldn’t have sexual relations with minors. Most countries have strict laws against child paedophilia and surprisingly there are countries which have no laws against child paedophilia.[1]
Ever wondered what certain groups thought of when it came to adults having intimate relations with young children? What would you think if there were a religion which believed child paedophilia was proper? Even more so, how would you perceive this “religion” if their “Holy Book” actually taught such practices?
Well, my friend, it might shock you, but Islam is the second-largest religion in the world behind Christianity. And their Qur’an teaches paedophilia [2] don’t believe me? No problem, We’ll provide the references for you to go research yourself, if you have an Imam perhaps you can ask him to explain these verses in the Qur’an?
The first verse we’ll look at is Surah 65 sūrat l-ṭalāq (The Divorce) in this verse there are 3 types of females in view, (1) women who are experiencing menopause, therefore, they no longer expect menstruation (2)those who have not menstruated this group 2 will be the main focus, and (3) those who are pregnant.
Another rendition of this same ayat (verse/sign) by Yusuf Ali reads:
[Yusuf Ali] Such of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the prescribed period, if ye have any doubts, is three months, and for those who have no courses (it is the same): for those who carry (life within their wombs), their period is until they deliver their burdens: and for those who fear Allah, He will make their path easy.
Surah 65:4
It goes without saying that if a woman is menopausal then it’s safe to say she’s experienced menstruation before, even though she no longer receives her monthly period. As for the women who are pregnant it’s obvious they’ve had that time of the month otherwise they wouldn’t be pregnant. The second group is surprising as this group never had any menstruation before and the chapter this verse is found in is called “The Divorce” which means this group was married.
This is the Surah which teaches Muslim men what they’re to do if they are looking to divorce their wife(s) but have to wait for a 3-month period in order to make sure the wife is not pregnant. In Islam, this is called the Iddah, known as the waiting period.
Muslim websites such as Islam.QA agrees when it comes to the waiting period between a Muslim man and a woman to make certain she’s pregnant or not is 3 months. I’ve extrapolated the most relevant portion, I’ve provided a link to the article as they went into multiple waiting periods.
According to Surat l-aḥzāb (The Combined Forces) 33:49, it states that if a man divorces his wife before having sexual intimacy with her then there’s no waiting period, in other words, there’s no Iddah. This agrees with the above quote from Islam.QA.
33:49 … you have no period to reckon against them; …
In the word-for-word Arabic grammar and syntax for this verse, the word ʿiddatin (عِدَّةٍ) translates to “waiting period.”
Now here’s the shocker! Early Muslim scholars that lived closer to the time of Muhammad would know how these verses are to be understood. What’s their interpretation for verse 65:4 in regards to the second group who never had menstruation, in verse 65:4? Well, their scholars tell us about this group (please remember this is from the official website of the kingdom of Jordan; this is a Muslim site). You can read the interpretations for yourself below, links are provided if you want to visit the site.
Both Ibn Abbas and al-Jalalayn said this group cannot have menstruation because of their young age. Those who are young are to also observe the 3-month waiting period, which means the Muslim man had sex with this young girl and must wait to see if she’s pregnant. This is what Islam teaches child paedophilia.
According to their own laws in Sharia known as Fiqh we have the general consensus or ruling on men having sexual intercourse with young girls. Once again this is an Islamic website here’s what they say.
If we’re to judge Islam it’s only fair to judge from the source, which would be their own prophet who according to the Sunnah (sayings of the prophet) married a 6-year-old Aisha and consummated the marriage when she was 9 years old. Also, note how the Muslims try to hide this fact, look at how they worded it above in the blue text, they never mention the words “consummated the marriage.”
“Second: From the Sunnah on the authority of Aisha, may God be pleased with her: ((The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, married her when she was a girl of six years, and she was married to him when she was the daughter of nine, and she stayed with him for nine years.))”
No matter how hard Muslims try to hide these disgusting facts concerning their prophet, the truth will come out exposing Muhammad and his ungodly teachings. Light and darkness cannot exist in the same place, light always shines out the darkness. If you’re a Muslim reading this for the first time we would love for you to leave a comment. Have you heard of this before, does your Imam hide this from you, have you asked your Imam questions about this? If not I would encourage you to look into this for yourself, this concerns your own eternity.
The Lord Jesus Christ is always willing to receive you as He loves you and offers the free gift of eternal life to you. Come to trust in the Son of God who was crucified, buried and rose from the dead. He’s alive and seated at the right hand of the Father. Believe in Christ Jesus the Saviour of sinners.
Footnotes
[1] Daily Star Online can reveal perverts can legally have sex with children as young as 12 in the likes of the Philippines and Mexico. But deliberately vague laws in other countries – such as Saudi Arabia and Yemen – put children of ANY AGE at risk of rape. Dailystar (20, July 2019). REVEALED: Shocking list of countries where child sex is legal. Retrieved from https://www.dailystar.co.uk/
[2] Moroccan activist Najia Adib has made a controversial claim, arguing that pedophilia and the sexual abuse of children are more “prevalent in Arab and Muslim countries” than others. During her participation in a recent Hespress seminar on “pedophilia and the enforcement of the death penalty,” Adib defended calls for the death penalty as punishment for perpetrators of sexual assault against children. The news outlet held a seminar to discuss the issue of pedophilia following the murder and rape of Adnane Bouchouf, an 11-year-old boy from Tangier. On September 11, Moroccan police found the remains of Adnane, who had been missing since September 7. A 24-year-old man murdered Adnane in cold blood after kidnapping and raping him in his apartment, not far from the victim’s home. Safaa Kasraoui (2020, September 14). Moroccan Activist Claims Pedophilia More Prevalent in Muslim Countries. Retrieved from https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/
A Muslim site called “Calling Christians” is maintained by an Abdoool by the name of Ijaz Ahmed. Like all Muslims, he tries his best to attack the Bible and destroys Islam in the process. We’ll go through some of his quotes and answer them.
If God is love (1 John 4:8), why are babies sent to burn in hell forever if they’re not baptised? How is this ‘loving’?
In summary, Pharoah instructed Shiphrah and Puah to murder newborn Hebrew male babies. They did not follow through with the order as they feared God. They let the boys live. The Phraoah found out that they did not complete their task and summoned them to answer for their failure. They feigned innocence and ignorance by deceiving the king that they could not reach the women on time when they gave birth. Their lives were clearly spared by their deception and God rewarded them for their deed without reproaching their lie in any way. Is this not a clear example of dissimulation?
According to Surah 18:74, a story in the Qur’ān, Musa (Moses) is sent to learn from a man called al-Khidr. They come across a little boy who al-Khidr killed by cutting the little boy’s throat and smashing his head against a wall. Moses exclaimed he (al-Khidr) killed an innocent soul and accused him of doing an extremely evil thing.
The reason the boy was killed was due to fear of him becoming an “unbeliever.” This means the boy did nothing wrong, yet was killed on the assumption he would become an apostate. The gruesome details explain how this boy was killed, his throat was cut, and his head was torn off and smashed against a wall? Moses had enough sense to say you’ve killed an innocent soul (in this instance a young child).
Here’s the tafsir confirming that this little boy didn’t practice rebellion, it’s not like he was disobedient and was killed because of it (even though that would be evil as well). No! He was already destined to become an apostate. How can Allah be the most merciful but decree for a boy to be killed who committed no wrong yet? Both al-Jalalayn and Ibn Abbas are provided to prove the point that this was an evil unjust act.
The Tafsir of al-Jalalayn and Ibn-Abbas state that if this boy were to have had the opportunity to become an apostate, he would have negatively impacted the rest of the Muslims. And this was the “justification” for killing the boy, Allah is insecure in that he has a man to kill an innocent boy because he thinks this boy will cause others to leave Islam.
What’s more shocking is that Islam teaches determinism, in other words, Allah is the one who determined for this little boy to become an apostate! That’s how satanic the god of Islam is, let’s provide evidence from their sources.
If Allah decrees (fix) a man to commit adultery then why wouldn’t Allah also decree for this boy to become an apostate in order to have him killed? This is the evil of Islam, an unjust god who creates a person to be disobedient and then wants that individual killed for disobeying Allah when in reality they’re obeying Allah. This is ludicrous and completely illogical. Read the ramblings of Shaykh Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid when he was asked the question:
Is it correct for a sinner to excuse his falling into sin by saying that this is what Allaah has decreed for him?
In other words, the individual is unaware that Allah decreed for him to sin, therefore, this is proof of a person’s will? Regardless if this is unseen or not Allah loves sin and causes them to do so.
There’s no teaching in the Bible which says babies go to hell because they are sinners,[1] babies because of the fall when Adam sinned are not sinless they inherited a sinful nature from birth. But they have not personally committed any sins to be accounted guilty of before God.
In Islam, Allah kills little children who haven’t sinned! Islam is a nonsensical religion for those who have no functioning brain cells. Here’s a hadith from Sahih Muslim which goes against the claim that Islam doesn’t teach babies are punished for sin and sent to hell.
Aisha said to Muhammad there’s happiness for the child, which is a bird in paradise, as this baby didn’t commit sin. Muhammad tells her that this is not the case, babies are made for paradise and hell before they are born still being in the father’s loins.
Let us not forget Ijaz Ahmed said “If God is love (1 John 4:8), why are babies sent to burn in hell forever if they’re not baptised? How is this ‘loving’?” The Bible never says people (in this case babies) go to hell because they are not baptised. I wonder if he will change his mind and recant what he said, or will he continue to spout his nonsense and remain a massive hypocrite?
Conclusion
Muslims like Ijaz Ahmed are no different from the rest who try with their deceptive dawah to trick people into believing the nonsense in the Qur’ān. When we challenge their claims it’s abundantly clear all of the arguments they bring hold no weight, not only do they hold no weight but you find the hypocrisy in their beliefs. They say you believe a man is God yet Allah has body parts like a man and will come to Muslims in a shape they will recognise, massive hypocrisy! This is only part one stick around for part two to experience the comedy of the religion of Islam. And as always we don’t hate Muslims, we are only here to share the truth with them so that they may have their eyes open and come to Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour for eternal life (John 3:16).
Footnotes
[1] One of the questions people ask before they read my book is this: “If infants are not guilty of sin, then why do some infants die? Isn’t death a result, or wage, of sin?” That is a great question. Death is a result or wage of sin. And some infants die. But it does not follow that their deaths are a result of either personal or inherited guilt. Instead, death is the result of God’s universal judgment against sin. Even infants can be caught up in the horrible effects of living in a fallen world. Consider one example of the death of an infant in Scripture: David’s first son. Second Samuel 11 details the awful events of David’s adultery with Bathsheba. David’s cover-up ended in the death of her husband, Uriah. In chapter 12, the prophet Nathan confronted the king with a story that ended with the accusation, “You are the man!” Struck by that truth, David admitted his sin. God forgave David but announced that there would be severe consequences for his actions. One of those consequences was that the child in Bathsheba’s womb would die (12:14). Scripture tells us that the child was born and became sick. David fasted and begged God to spare his son’s life. But the infant died. Question: What sinful action did the infant commit in order to earn the punishment of death? The answer (of course): Nothing. The infant had done nothing wrong. The child didn’t die because of Adam’s sin. The text is clear that the child didn’t die because of his own sin. The child died as a direct result of David’s sin. Our sins can have horrible consequences for other people, including infants. Harwood, Adam. The Spiritual Condition of Infants : A Biblical-Historical Survey and Systematic Proposal. Wipf & Stock, 2011.
Have you ever heard Muslims say that Islam is a religion of peace? There are 2 types of Muslims the first one is fully aware that Islam teaches war against unbelievers, and that Muslims are not to take Kufir as friends. I’ve experienced this firsthand and these are followers of Muhammad who are staying true to what Islam teaches.
Groups such as ISIS are practising the true Islam as found in the Qur’ān and taught Muhammad the most obvious false prophet in history. The second group are Muslims who are genuinely sincere but are ignorant of the teachings of Islam, especially reverts who never looked into Islam for themselves.
While speaking with Abdoools they may quote Sūrat 5:32 sūrat l-māidah to prove Islam is a religion of peace, they might be as mentioned ignorant or purposefully trying to deceive people.
Sūrah 5:32 Prescribed For The Jews
Notice the first initial words at the start of verse 5:32 “For that cause We ordained for the Children of Israel”, so this verse is prescribed to the Jews, not Muslims. Continuing on the verse says “whosoever killeth a human being for other than manslaughter or corruption in the earth, it shall be as if he had killed all mankind”.
I see why Muslims run to this verse to prove Islam is peaceful, the problem is this is not a command to the Muslims this was commanded for the Jews. Now, this verse was taken from the Mishnah, therefore, how can this be from Allah when the Mishnah is not from the Torah or the Injil?
This is only found in the Bible, yet why are Muslims using this verse claiming Islam is about peace when it’s talking to the children of Israel? Muslims are not children of Israel, and again this is prescribed to the Jews according to the Qur’ān not the Muslims.
Islam is not an Abrahamic faith, only Judaism and Christianity are Abrahamic, Christianity started with Jews as the first believers in Jesus Christ were Jewish. Remember Muslims claim they are from Ishmael which also is not true according to Genesis 25:1-6, Arabs are actually descendants from Keturah.
Listen to what Muslims are supposed to do to those who are against Allah and Muhammad? “they will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land.”, do these words sound peaceful? Cutting off limbs and crucifying people is the complete opposite of peace.
Conclusion
Why do Muslims claim Islam is a religion of peace and try to pass off a verse commanded to the Jews and show people who are ignorant of what Islam teaches? It’s either out of pure ignorance or to be deceitful. In the West, most people are extremely ignorant of Islam, but sites like these are here to speak the truth about Islam, that it would be exposed for what it is, that it’s a demonic religion.
Footnotes
[1] Meanwhile, Muslim crowds worldwide were hardly condemning the attacks. Besides the now-infamous Palestinians dancing in the streets for CNN’s cameramen at the news that the World Trade Center towers had collapsed, demonstrators around the world chanted their approval. These people were not all Wahhabis or uneducated mobs. “Reporters from Arab shores,” according to Johns Hopkins University professor Fouad Ajami, “tell us of affluent men and women, some with years of education in American universities behind them, celebrating the cruel deed of Muhammad Atta and his hijackers.” A Libyan told the New York Times: “September 11 was the happiest day of my life.” As crowds chanted their approval of bin Laden’s terrorism, even imams who condemned the terrorist attacks declined opportunities to condemn also the imams who approved of the attacks— a fact with enormous significance for the Bush/Blair attempts to portray the terrorists as a fringe group within Islam. Soon after September 11 , for example, Jake Tapper of the Internet magazine Salon tried to get the communications director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an American Muslim named Ibrahim Hooper, to speak out against Osama bin Laden. Hooper ducked: “We condemn terrorism, we condemn the attack on the buildings,” Hooper said. But why not condemn bin Laden by name, especially after President Bush has now stated that he was clearly responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks? “If Osama bin Laden was behind it, we condemn him by name,” Hooper said. But why the “if ” why qualify the response? Hooper said he resented the question. And what about prior acts of terror linked to bin Laden? Or that bin Laden has urged Muslims to kill Americans? Again, Hooper demurred, saying only that he condemns acts of terror. Both groups [CAIR and the American Muslim Council] also refuse to outright condemn Islamic terrorist groups Hamas and Hezbollah. Spencer, Robert. Islam Unveiled : Disturbing Questions about the Worlds Fastest-Growing Faith, Encounter Books, 2003. (pp 16, 17).
One thing I appreciate about Muslims is the overabundance of comedy they provide, you can find an endless array of articles showing a lack of knowledge on their part. The strawman arguments and nonsensical rhetoric are astounding! Nonetheless, we care about Muslims and are taking every single argument captive and making it subject to Christ.
This Abdoool by the name of Dr. Haque who runs the site Always Truth! wrote an atrocious article on the Apostle Paul, let’s go through all of his claims to see if they hold up to scrutiny?
So called “Saint” Paul had been the bitterest enemy of Jesus throughout the life of Jesus according to Encyclopedia Brittanica! After Jesus (PBUH) temporarily left this world his enmity to Jesus continued and also against his true followers and his message; only it took a more clever, more shrewd turn; to kill Jesus teachings & message through inventing Jesus worship.
It’s true that Paul was a bitter enemy of Christ here we would agree, even Paul admits he went around killing Christians as Saul (Act 22:4, 26:11, 1 Corinthians 15:9, Galatians 1:13, 1:23). What this Abdoool won’t mention is how Paul was converted when he encountered the Risen Christ on the road to Damascus.
This Abdool (Dr. Haque) tries to deny Paul but let’s get him busted quickly from his Qur’ān. According to sūrat yā sīn 36:13-17 we’re told that 3 Messengers in total were sent to the city of Antioch.
The first two messengers that were sent are Sham`un (Peter) and Yuhanna (John), the people denied them and a 3rd messenger was sent. The name of the 3rd is Bulus (Paul) according to their own scholars. We’ll provide the tafsir from Ibn Kathir who says Paul was this 3rd messenger.
Dr. Haque doesn’t know his own Qur’ān as Kathir says Paul was a messenger of God. He also claims Paul “invented” worship of Jesus Christ. Let’s put that argument to rest as well. In John’s Gospel which was written before Paul’s letters we read how the disciples worshipped Jesus Christ and called Him God. One of the more known passages is doubting Thomas (John 20:28).
The context: Christ was crucified and buried the disciples were hiding from the Romans and Jewish leaders. Christ appeared to the first time but Thomas was not present. The disciples told him that Jesus appeared to them, but Thomas didn’t believe and said unless he saw the holes in Jesus’ hands and feet he wouldn’t believe.
The doors were shut as they stood in one of the disciple’s home (John 20:19) Jesus Christ appeared to them a second time, this time Thomas was present.
Thomas called Jesus his God! In Greek the wording is even more powerful Thomas says ὁ κύριός μου καὶ ὁ θεός μου (The Lord of me and the God of me) is the literal meaning in Greek. A challenge to the Abdoool Dr. to refute what the Bible says here. Even the Qur’ān shows that Jesus is God as he is called the word of Allah [4:171].
Barnabas companion of Paul brought him to James and Peter
… The closest despises like St. Barnabas and James strongly rejected Paul’s claims of divinity of Jesus and also his fabrication of original sin and Jesus being died for our sins.
The Abdoool Dr claims Barnabas and James rejected Paul. Notice how no references are given, Paul in the book of Acts which is written by Luke the physician says that they (Peter, James and John) sent Paul and Barnabas as beloved brothers.
Both Paul and Barnabas were representatives of the teachings of the apostles, therefore, they were all in agreement and taught the same doctrine. They gave Paul the right hand of fellowship found in the book of Galatians.
See how the Muslim argument cannot stand against the truth, they can lie as much as they like, like their prophet but it will not benefit them as we continue to demolish the lies of Islam.
Called Christians first in Antioch
The people who did not buy Paul’s claims were called Unitarians. The word Christianity was not there yet! Rabbi Paul did not try Jews to convert to his faith, rather his all efforts were to lure Non Jews wrongly called Gentiles which in Hebrew means bastard!
Nowhere in any of the manuscripts will you find the word “Unitarian” this is a lie. But we can show you in the Bible the word Christian, also the word Gentile doesn’t mean bastard. These Muslims have no honor and will lie non-stop.
Here is one of 3 verses which mentions the word Christian(s) but this Abdoool would have people to believe otherwise.
Next are 2 definitions for the word Gentile in Hebrew and Greek, none of them mention anything about the word bastard.
Lexicon Strong’s gôyLexicon Strong’s ethnos
Do you see the deception dawah missionaries will try to get away with? This is Islam, lies and deception!
Paul Never Taught Christians To Commit Sin
Paul made his religion very delicious by saying Jesus paid for all your sins so feel free to commit these sins thus nullifying all the teachings of Jesus and all other true Prophets whose main purpose was to cleanse the society of crimes, sins, injustices, exploitation, oppression and suppression of common people! Paul also promoted the idea that kings and rulers are from God so don’t oppose them thus cementing king-clergy bond to exploits common people!
First look at the lie from this Abdoool, can you show us a reference Mr. Haque where Paul says Christians are allowed to commit sins? I would like a reference from the Bible otherwise you are lying.
The Lord Jesus was the first one to say He would give His life as a ransom paying for the sins of the world. And only those who accept the free gift of salvation will be saved. Those who reject it will only do so to their own detriment. Read the words of Christ.
On the other hand Paul gave clergies blackmailing power. After knowing the “sins” and crimes of common people the clergy were able to exploit the “sinners”. He even allowed adoption of pagan practices such as making pictures and statues in the Churches.
Another lie from the Muhammadian, a challenge to Dr. Abdoool to provide a reference that shows Paul said it’s ok to make pictures and statues. There are none! And he knows it, but his prophet indeed adopted pagan practices. Allah was worshipped by the pagan Arabs as one of many polytheistic gods found around the Kaaba.
Muhammad was french kissing stones, this is a practice from the pagan Arabs.
Verses in the Qur’ān provide proof the name Allah existed in pre-Islamic Arabia. Certain pagan tribes worshipped a god whom they called ‘Allah’ and whom attested to being the creator of heaven and earth, holding the highest position among the gods. The Quraish and other tribes believed in Allah, whom they believed as the “Lord of the House” (Kaaba). It’s clear that the Qur’ānic conception of Allah is not new.
Paul Taught The Same As Jesus’ To Love Our Enemies
This “sweet religion” later emerged as Christianity, in particular trinity type of Christianity. It attracted a lot of followers as it had backing of both kings and the corrupt, self serving immoral and unethical clergy. The Trinitarian Christian’s then started killing Unitarians who were actual true followers of Jesus. This topic is well covered by Ahmad Thompson in his book “Blood on the Cross”!
The same was taught by Paul the Apostle following in the footsteps of Christ, while there are many verses from the writings of Paul, we need only show a few to get the point across. Paul echos the words of Christ in Romans 12:14 telling believers to bless our enemies (εὐλογεῖτε τοὺς διώκοντας ὑμᾶς εὐλογεῖτε καὶ μὴ καταρᾶσθε)
Paul once again admonishes the believers in Rome telling them to feed and give drink to our enemies. These are the same teachings of Jesus Christ provided above in Matthew 5:44, as well as in Luke 6:27, 35.
Muhammad taught hatred and evil let’s show just a few examples found in the Islamic sources. First, let’s observe what the Qur’ān has to say about non-Muslims?
Muslims are forbidden to have non-Muslims as friends, we read this here in verse 3:28 and also in 5:51; 98:6 calling us “the worst of creatures”. Muhammad said he will expel the Jews and the Christians from the Arabian Peninsula.
Ibn Kathir in his Tafsir on verse 3:28 says Allah calls for the Muslims to curse non-Muslims in their hearts while pretending to be friends.
These are teachings of hate from Muhammad, there’s nothing Islam has to offer that is good. Even the verses which Muslims try to pass off as good are not verses speaking to the Muslims but to others. Paul was superior over Muhammad and taught love not hate.
Allah the Unjust god
Paul’s letters comprise about half of New Testament and his teachings more than half of all teachings of present day Christianity! His theories were ridiculous! Why the God, the King of kings can not forgive without sacrifice? Who can stop Him doing so? In Islam for example there is no concept of unforgiven original sin. Adam and Eve made mistake but they felt ashamed and the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful God forgave them when they repented. Every infant born is absolutely innocent and if a child dies he will go to paradise no matter in which religion he or she is born!
(1) “Why the God, the King of kings can not forgive without sacrifice?” God has prescribed the conditions on how mankind was to have atonement for sins.
This concept of sacrificing to God is not foreign to the Qur’ān as Abraham was given a sacrifice for his son (in the Qur’ān that being Ishmael instead of Isaac), we can find this in sūrat l-ṣāfāt.
Therefore, Muslims are completely unaware that this concept of sacrifices was taken from the Bible and used in the Qur’ān. We can find the actual story in Genesis 22, for our purposes we’ll show the relevant passage.
The angel of the LORD who’s known as God in the Old Testament is the one who called out to Abraham, the Qur’ān says “We” as in Allah called out to Abraham. Since the Qur’ān claims to confirm the scriptures before it namely the Torah and Injil, that means the Qur’ān is saying the angel of the LORD is God. As you very well see how the Qur’ān fails once you compare it to the word of God the Bible.
(2) “In Islam for example there is no concept of unforgiven original sin.” This is untrue, Adam and Moses debated on this subject in which Moses tried to blame Adam for getting humanity kicked out of Jannah. Adam said it was not his fault as Allah written his fate and it was something that had to happen as it was already decreed by Allah that Adam would sin and thereby get kicked out of Jannah.
(3) “Every infant born is absolutely innocent and if a child dies he will go to paradise no matter in which religion he or she is born!” Not according to their prophet who says children go to hell in Sahih Muslim 266c.
Paul degrades the God all Might when he preaches, god nurturing in a human’s womb, being persecuted and being hanging on a cross! Why the God all Mighty will inflict Himself with such insults and Misery! These theories do not make any sense at all and that’s the reason many by name Christians do not believe in these and many revert to Islam that gives very logical and true answers to all these questions and remove all confusions and shows the straight path of success in both worlds!
The reason why Muslims cannot understand Christianity is because in Islam there’s no concept of justice, atonement or love. Allah has no love, the Qur’ān teaches Allah only loves those he chooses to love and hates those he chooses to hate. It seems his love or hate is in response to human behavior.
Allah is a distant god who doesn’t desire a loving relationship with his creation, Allah is too proud to bring himself to our level. Allah is too proud to bring himself to our level.
Allah is limited in his abilities, he cannot enter his creation, have a son or become a man, therefore, he’s not almighty. The moment you say that God “cannot” or question his ability means he’s not almighty, Allah is incapable of having a son because he NEEDS a wife in order to procreate like all humans according to sūrat l-anʿām.
At. Barnabas had described in his gospel that it was not Jesus who was crucified but rather the traitor disciple who took bribe from the enemies of Jesus and brought Roman soldiers to arrest Jesus, his face was transformed to look like Jesus. This also explains ridiculous behavior while carrying cross and hanging on cross!
The God all Mighty the Creator and providers of all of the universe and whatever it contains and beyond not only protected and saved Jesus physically but also his message and life in the final divine book i.e.; Quran. Quran is thus the absolutely authentic place where one can visit Jesus, his virgin mother who never married or dated anyone, his grand mother and other relatives!
This Abdoool said Allah’s message was protected yet in the Hasan (good) Hadith Aisha said that the verse of breastfeeding an adult 10 times and stoning was revealed to Muhammad but a sheep ate those verses. We want to know where those verses ae if the Qur’ān is preserved, can they recite the verse of breastfeeding?
If they can recite it I challenge any Muslim to provide the recitation of these verses. I guarantee they not one single Muslim can recite these verses. This means the Qur’ān has not been preserved.
The Qur’ān’s Conflicting Views With Science
Quran is the living miracle as it is the only book in the world that is preserved and ever fresh in its original language over 1450 years. It’s absolutely immune to the effects of time. It’s dust and rust free, word by word from the God and no conflict with science because writer of Quran and Science is One and the Same! There are no 2 versions of Quran. You go to any country and any mosque you will find exactly the same Quran.
He says the Qur’ān is not against science, let’s check this claim to see if it’s true. The Qur’ān describes how procreation works between a man and woman in sūrat l-ṭāriq.
In this verse what is the “gushing fluid” spoken of here? According to their scholars, this is sperm which man is created from, this is how the Tafsir describes it. al-Jalalayn says in his Tafsir.
The gushing fluid spoken of here is sperm and this sperm is coming from the man AND the WOMAN. This is completely against modern science as women cannot produce the sperm needed to fertilize an egg.[1]
Ibn Kathir says in his Tafsir on Surah 86:6 that the sexual fluid bursting forth from BOTH the man AND the WOMAN creates a child, make note of the highlighted portions provided.
We’ve just read from a medical journal that women produce eggs not fluid which creates a child. It’s the egg of the woman and the sperm of a man that produces a baby. In Islam Allah is saying the white fluid from the man and the yellow fluid from the woman is what makes a baby. This is completely false! Are Abdoools saying that Allah doesn’t know how a baby is made?
That’s not all because Ibn Kathir also says that this sperm which comes from the woman is coming from her chest! Here’s another medical site which tells us that sperm cells are male gametes and function to find the female gamete in order to fuse together. This process happens when sperm enters the female sex organ through the male sex organ.
What Islam teaches is completely against science so how can this Abdoool say that science supports the Qur’ān?
Qur’ān Was Translated And Forgotten
For something to be accepted as authentic it must be in its original language word by word from the God in its original language! Translations can never be equal to original! Even one word and one paragraph could be translated in so many ways! Only and Quran fulfills this condition and therefore it makes a perfect sense that Quran is the final divine book who is also entirely memorized by heart by millions!
Being that Mr.Haque rejects translations I guess he has nothing because even the Arabic Qur’ān was forgotten. Sahih Muslim says they used to recite a Surah that resembled Bara’at, but it was forgotten. Reading the words “and I have forgotten it”, shows that they don’t have the Qur’ān.
In the second highlighted portion it says there was a surah that resembled Musabbihat and it was forgotten, only a small portion was remembered. Again how does this help the so-called “perfect preservation” of the Qur’ān? Muslims don’t have the Qur’ān, the majority of Muslims recite the Qur’ān according to Hafs an Asim not according to Muhammad.
Conclusion
As you can see this Abdoool was busted and has nothing, he tried to attack Paul the Apostle but in his own books it says Paul is a messenger of Allah, and he taught the same as Jesus Christ. Paul was accepted by the Apostles Peter, James and John and was commissioned to preach the Gospel by the Lord Jesus Himself. Unfortunately for Dr. Haque Muhammad was a pagan who kissed black stones and worships a false god called Allah. The Qur’ān is not preserved and Islam is completely removed from science as it claims women produce sperm.
Muslims come to Jesus Christ only He can save you, start reading a better book which is the Bible. By trusting in the true God of the Bible only then will you make it to paradise.
Footnotes
[1] Women don’t produce sperm because they do not have the Y chromosome, which possess a gene that tells the body to produce male features. Humans, like all mammals, have two separate sexes. Most animals have two different sized games, where one sex produces a few large egg and the other sex produces lots and lots of smaller sperm. The theory is that this is to maximize the nutrients the young start with, the large energy rich egg, and the likelihood that the egg will get fertilized, using lots of sperm to ensure one makes it. UCSB Science Line (2020). Why can’t women produce sperm? Retrieved from http://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=5532
The single most important doctrine of Islam is that Allah is one, he has no partners and, therefore, our Muslim friends continuously say that Jesus Christ cannot be God. Is this what the Qur’ān teaches let’s examine sūrat l-tawbah (The Repentance). Translations from the likes of Sahih International, Pickthall, Yusuf Ali, Shakir, Muhammad Sarwar, Mohsin Khan, Arberry are the ones most are familiar with among other less known translations like say Maududi.
This translation is from Pickthall, the highlighted portions are of importance for the purposes of this article. In his translation, he deliberately separates the word Allah from Messiah. Insinuating the Jews and Christians have taken their Rabbis, Monks and the Messiah as Lord or God. This is a false understanding of the Trinity.
Taking a closer look you can see that the Arabic text doesn’t read the same. Our Muslim friends tell us the Arabic Qur’ān always takes precedence over the English translation. Ok, we’ll go with them, take note that in the Arabic text there’s a conjunction. The words Allah and the Messiah are spoken of as being Lord or better yet as God, I’ve taken the liberty of pasting اللَّهِ وَالْمَسِيحَ into Google Translate which exposes the lies of Islam.
Below I’ve also provided proof from the Muslim website Qur’ān Corpus, thanks again to the Muslims for making it easy for us to expose their lies. The words اللَّهِ وَالْمَسِيحَ form a textual conjunction, notice the “وَ” (wa) also known as “and” means Allah AND the Messiah are God as that’s the subject of the verse.
We can further bust the Abdoools by going to their tafsir[1] for this verse and get the context of what’s being spoken of here. Let’s see what Ibn Abbas the ink of the Qur’ān says about this ayat.
It’s clear from Ibn Abbas that he’s trying to refute the idea that anyone besides Allah can be god, yet the Qur’ān says both Allah AND the Messiah are God according to the Arabic text. Muslims cannot get around this without denying their own book.
To end this article there’s one translation which exposes all the other English translations. Sometimes honestly slips through when Abdoools aren’t aware. The same verse from Sahih International look at how they unknowingly told the truth.
They translated the Arabic text correctly and when they did so it shows how deceptive the other translators were, both Allah and Jesus Christ are spoken of as being Lord according to the Sahih International translation.
Conclusion
What have we learned today? That the English translators of the Qur’ān are deceptive and try to hide the fact that Jesus Christ is God by changing what the text says. The Arabic text reads differently and 9:31 places Allah and the Messiah as god. Lastly, Ibn Abbas the cousin of Muhammad who is called the ink of the Qur’ān argues for God being a solitary one, but he’s against what the text of the Qur’ān says.
Muslims come out of the false religion called Islam, there’s no hope of salvation by following a false prophet. Come to Jesus Christ who is God, eternal life is only found in the Son of God.
Footnotes
[1] Tafsir al-Jalalayn: They have taken their rabbis the scholars among the Jews and their monks the devout among the Christians as lords beside God — following them in making lawful what God has made unlawful and making unlawful what He has made lawful — and the Messiah son of Mary when they were not commanded in the Torah and the Gospel except to worship One God there is no god except Him; glory be to Him as an affirmation of His transcendence high above what they associate with Him. Royal Aal al-Bayt Institute for Islamic Thought (2021). How and when to reference. Retrieved from https://www.altafsir.com/
Islam the religion of contradiction is at it again, since Muslims are stuck in between a rock and a hard place, it’s on us Christians to show our friends the truth. As we know their Imams are lying to them in order to keep them in Islam.
How many times have we heard Muslims say Islam is based on logic? Let’s see if this is a fact or fiction according to the man who knows Qur’ān best Muhammad the mutah prophet. If you ever used a map regardless if it was a hardcopy map or an application on your phone. We know there are 4 main directions North, East, South and West also known as the Cardinal direction.
Within the 4 directions, there are combinations called ordinal directions or intercardinal directions for instance Northeast (NE). Now let’s see what the Qur’ān says.
55:17 sūrat l-raḥmān (The Most Gracious)
55:17 (He is) the Lord of the two easts (places of sunrise during early summer and early winter) and the Lord of the two wests (places of sunset during early summer and early winter).
Here’s the Arabic Syntax from Corpus Qur’ān for 55:17, let’s thank the Muslims for providing this valuable website which gets them busted every time. The word l-mashriqayni and underneath it the translation “(of) the two East” (الْمَشْرِقَيْنِ). Likewise for the word l-maghribayni and its translation “(of) the two Wests” (الْمَغْرِبَيْنِ).
Arabic Syntax and morphology
Even though the words in Arabic are above for your viewing, let’s take a closer look at how they try to fix this in English Translations.
55:17 English Translations
The majority of English Translations will translate the Arabic “two East and two West” (Pickthall, Yusuf Ali, Shakir, Arberry), but this is not the case when it comes to others.
Look at the deception from Sahih International they translate it as “two sunrises and two sunsets”, this is of course false as there’s only 1 sunrise and sunset. A challenge to any Abdoool to provide proof there’s more than 1 sunrise/sunset.
Shakir changed the plural word for two East and West and made it singular “the East … the West”, this is a clear contradiction to Sahih International’s translation above.
Muhammad Sarwar translation tried to fix the problem by saying “the East and West through all seasons”, notice how he changed it to singular instead of plural as the others translate it, he also adds the words “through all seasons.” These words do not appear in Arabic but because they are desperate to save their Qur’ān they use deceptive tactics and lie.
Mohsin Khan in his translation gives tafsir to explain away the contradiction, he tries to say there are two sunrises/sunsets one in the summer and the other in the winter. This goes against the Qur’ānic verses that say the Qur’ān is “explained in detail” (6,114; 7,52; 41,3 & 7,174), “a full explanation of the Book” (10,37), “the Book explaining all things” (16,89), “a detailed exposition of all things” (12,111), “the manifest Book (this Quran) that makes things clear” (44,2) “a Book are perfected its Verses moreover, explained in detail” (11,1) and in which “nothing has been neglected” (6,38).
If the Qur’ān perfectly explains things in detail why does Mohsin Khan have to add tafsir into the verse in order to explain? This alone proves the Qur’ān to be a false book.
Muhammad thought that because he saw the sunset in a different location he concluded that there are two East and two West. Really Muslims? Is this revelation from god? What kind of god doesn’t know there’s 1 East and West?
How about places that don’t have sunset like the Artic Circle, it’s common knowledge that there are communities that will have constant sunlight or plunged into darkness. Since these places don’t have sunset, shouldn’t Allah be aware of this if he created the world?[1]
Conclusion
It’s abundantly clear that Allah cannot be god neither can the Qur’ān be divine revelation from god as there’s no such thing as two East or West. And if Abdoools want to say that North is 1 and Northeast is another and Northwest another this would still prove the Qur’ān wrong as that would be more than two.
Nowhere in the Qur’ān does it mention intercardinal directions as this wouldn’t be purely North or West. Muslims need to face the fact that Muhammad was a false prophet who said many crazy things as he himself was a crazy man.
Footnotes
[1] During the summer, the sun does not set above the Arctic Circle. In fact, this phenomenon is what helps to define the Arctic Circle. Like the equator, the Arctic Circle is an imaginary line. It’s defined as the latitude above which the sun does not set on the day of the summer solstice (usually around June 21). wonderopolis.org (2014–2022). Where Does the Sun Never Set? Retrieved from https://www.wonderopolis.org/wonder/where-does-the-sun-never-set/
The purpose of this blog is to (1) reach out to Muslims who are stuck in the cult of Islam, to show them that only through Jesus Christ can they have salvation. As Jesus Himself said there’s no other way to heaven except through Himself (John 14:6). And (2) to inform Christians on how to respond to the Muslim claims against Christianity as there are unfortunately many Christians who are ignorant of the teachings of Islam.
This video shows such an intercation between a Christian woman and the Abdoools of Madinah Van who had to gang up on a woman. But they don’t dare to debate a Christian who has knowledge of what their Qur’an teaches. You can view the weak attempt from Medinah Van here and see how we destroy their silly arguments against the Bible.
Muslims typically claim that Jesus was only sent to Israel, this is not true. If they knew the context of scripture they wouldn’t make this mistake. Christ was sent to Israel first and then the Gentiles. He came to bring salvation to the entire world not only Israel, the following verses prove this point.
The Gospel of John chapter 3 verse 15 says that anyone (whosoever) believes in Jesus Christ will have eternal life. If language is how we are to communicate then the word whosoever (πᾶς) means exactly what it means anyone regardless if they are a Jew or Gentile.
πᾶς (pas)
If we parsed πᾶς so that we know how the word functions in John 3:15 we’d get:
After parsing the word we know the subject (Nominative) is personal in Number (Singular) meaning anyone willing to trust in Christ can come to Him for salvation. It’s personal, between you and your Creator.
The following verse 1 John 4:9 explains that God sent the Lord Jesus into the world (κόσμον) for us that we would live through Christ. The world doesn’t encompass the Jews only, in fact, the Jews are a very small minority when compared to all the other nations in the world.
Jesus came for all mankind including Muslims who are willing to place their faith in the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Only those who do so will make it to heaven, the others who deceive and reject the salvation Jesus offers will find themselves in grave trouble on the day of judgement. As they will face Jesus as their judge, not their Saviour.
We then have the teachings of Paul in which the Abdoool on the video claimed apostle Paul taught contrary to Jesus Christ. Here we have in 2 Corinthians 5:19 Paul said Christ was reconciling the world to Himself. This is in line with the 2 verses above.
To reconcile (καταλλάσσων) is to bring onto Himself, and that’s what Christ did at the cross of Calvary, He was atoning for the sins of the world. That’s the wonderful message that He gave Himself for the sins of the world (1 John 2:2).
Once again Paul who taught the same as the Messiah said Jesus Christ came into the world to save sinners (ἁμαρτωλοὺς). Muslims are sinners, and so is Muhammad, unfortunately their prophet is suffering in hell for rejecting the salvation only Jesus can provide.
The Lord Jesus Christ was the one who brought not “a” truth but the Truth, He is that truth! In John 14:6 Christ authoritatively declared this to those who were around.
It’s wonderful that we have the New Testament in the original language and if you’re capable of reading Greek would know that the word ἡ ἀλήθεια has the article which means The Truth. If Jesus Christ is the source of all truth then this would be a claim of deity as only God is absolute truth. We find in the Qur’an that Allah is called the truth, this is not looking good for the Muslims.
If we take the words of Jesus Christ with what the Qur’an is saying this means Jesus claimed to be Allah, but we already know that Allah of the Qur’an doesn’t exist. If we take a look at the Arabic text and review the nouns used in this verse we’d see.
Arabic Syntax and morphology
The accusative word l-laha is an accusative noun pointing to Allah and the nominative masculine word l-ḥaqu is the subject of the verse. The same as in John 14:6 Jesus is the subject of the verse ὁ Ἰησοῦς (nominative masculine). What in the world are the mutah boys of Dawah Van going to do with this one?
Clearly, the Qur’an says objectively states God is the truth and Jesus in the Bible (John 14:6) which was written hundreds of years before the Qur’an says Jesus Christ is The Truth. This destroys the Islamic claim in which Muslims reject Jesus as God.
The Comforter is Muhammad?
“If I don’t go the comforter will not come and when the comforter comes He’ll mention of me He’ll tell you many things to come and we believe that comforter is prophet Muhammad”
This claim from Abdoools is beyond silly when they claim Muhammad is the comforter they are essentially saying Muhammad is their god. In the same chapter in which Christ says He’s The Truth an attribute only God possesses. Now He tells us who the Comforter, the Holy Spirit is.
Notice in the same verse Christ identifies who the Comforter is saying He’s the Holy Ghost who the Father will send in the name of Jesus Christ (“my name”). Do Muslims believe Muhammad came in the name of Jesus Christ? No they do not, but they do believe Allah sent him (John 14:6). Additionally, in Islam Muslims claim the “holy spirit” is Jibril.
If the Comforter is another name for the Holy Spirit how can Muhammad be the comforter? Let’s prove this nonsense and get them busted. According to one of their trusted websites, Islamqa here’s what they say about Muhammad being supposedly found in the Bible.
These two verses [1] indicate that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is mentioned in the Torah and the Gospel (the Bible), no matter how much the Jews and Christians claim that he is not, for the word of Allaah is the best and most truthful of words.
They then quoted a few verses from the Bible for the proof of Muhammad’s existence in the Bible one of those being the Gospel of John 16:6-8, 12-13. These same verses refute the claim of Muhammad being the comforter as the comforter is sent by Jesus Christ notice the words “I will send him unto you”.
But in Islam Muhammad is sent by Allah, how can Abdoool reconcile this other than admitting Jesus Christ is Allah. They also claim Muhammad is “the Spirit of truth” the problem is the Spirit of truth is going to glorify Jesus. Again notice the words “He shall glorify me” in verse 14 this is Jesus speaking.
This is not looking good for the guys at Dawah Van, in the video, the Abdoool said Jesus never called Himself the Son of God. The term Son of God was mostly used by others declaring that Christ is the Son of God, and Jesus Christ never rejected this He always accepted this title. Here we have Christ referring to Himself as the Son of God in John 5:24-26.
The Lord Jesus is the one speaking in this passage, notice the personal pronouns “I”, and “my”, went as far to say those who are dead would hear Jesus’ voice and come out of the graves. This can only mean that Christ by the power of His word/speech can bring people back from the dead. This is a claim of deity as there is no one else who can do this.
Again Jesus in speaking to the blind man, He gave him sight mentioned if the blind name believed on Christ as the Son of God. This was after the Pharisees banned the no longer blind man from worshipping in the temple.
We easily demolish Muslim arguments here on this blog, they don’t stand a chance against God’s true word the Bible. Here’s the nail in the coffin of the Dawah Van mutah boys, in John 10:36 there’s a great discourse between the religious rulers and Jesus Christ.
In John 10:30 Jesus made this statement which caused the Jews to have a meltdown saying “I and my Father are one.” The reaction from the Jews says it all as they picked up stones to kill Jesus as they knew He was claiming equality with God the Father, that’s why they said He’s making Himself God.[2]
Jesus said that His anything the Father can do Jesus Christ can do, in plain terms anything God can do Jesus can do because He’s God. Notice the Jews accused Christ of blasphemy and Jesus said how can that be because He (Jesus) said He’s the Son of God. So why are Dawah Abdoools lying when they said Jesus never said He’s the Son of God? That’s because Islam teaches you can lie.
Conclusion
Here we back up our claims with proof but if you notice as you watch their video they jump over important points. They love to quote John 17:3 which actually proves once again Jesus is God because this verse is saying that Jesus along with the Father is the one true God. It’s a conjunction bringing the two objects of the verse together (ἀληθινὸν θεὸνκαὶ ὃν ἀπέστειλας Ἰησοῦν Χριστόν). I’ve bolded the καὶ which is the conjunctive word and both θεὸν and Ἰησοῦν Χριστόν are in the accusative singular.
[2] (10:31-9) The evangelist continues to stress that Jesus is God’s Son. w. 31-3, first in v. 33 the Jews indicate blasphemy as the reason why they want to stone Jesus (cf. Lev 24:16). As in 8:59 it is an attempt to kill him without official trial. In the synoptic tradition Jesus is accused of blasphemy when he forgives sins (Mk 2:5-7 Par), and when he speaks of the coming Son of Man seated at the right hand of the Power (Mk 14:62— 4 par.). Probably all propositions that questioned God’s uniqueness were considered as blasphemy in Jesus’ time (cf. 5:18). Ironically the Jews speak the truth: for the evangelist Jesus is in a certain sense ‘God’. ‘Good’ is used in 2:10 of the wine, and in 10:11,14 in reference to the shepherd. The good shepherd is sent by the Father, and therefore his work exhibits the Father’s goodness (cf. v. 25). w. 34-6, Jesus uses an argument afortiori: if the Scripture refers to those who received the word of God as ‘gods’, the one whom God has sanctified cannot blaspheme when he says that he is God’s Son. Barton, J., & Muddiman, J. (Eds.). (2013). The oxford bible commentary. Oxford University Press, Incorporated.
Whatsoever Things Are True 