Allah created everything by saying “Be” is what Muslims tell us. If this is true then we shouldn’t find any other way in the Qur’an that says Allah created something without saying “Be.” For instance, if Allah says “Be” and then creates by some other means would make saying “Be” meaningless.[1]
Allah should say “Be” and nothing else would be necessary in order for that object to be brought into existence. In the Qur’an there’s an ayat which speaks of the creation of the heavens in Surah al-Dhāriyāt.
The verse says in Arabic that Allah used his hands to create the heavens, the word (بِأَيْدٍ)bi-aydin means handsnot power as the translation above claims. Let’s take a look at all the deceptive translations in how they remove the word hands.
Sahih International: And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander.
Pickthall: We have built the heaven with might, and We it is Who make the vast extent (thereof).
Yusuf Ali: With power and skill did We construct the Firmament: for it is We Who create the vastness of pace.
Shakir: And the heaven, We raised it high with power, and most surely We are the makers of things ample.
Mohsin Khan: With power did We construct the heaven. Verily, We are Able to extend the vastness of space thereof.
Arberry: And heaven — We built it with might, and We extend it wide.
There’s one translation that I’ve seen which honestly translates the verse and uses the word “hands.”
Taking a look at the Arabic grammar, syntax and morphology for this verse on Qur’an Corpus.com shows how deceptive the translators are in trying to hide the word hands.
This is where gets Allah busted! The Arabic word once again in the text is بِأَيْدٍbi-aydin. Copy this word and place it into Google Translate and see what comes up for you, this is what I get when pasting it into Google Translate.
Google Translate
I also took the liberty of placing بِأَيْدٍbi-aydin into the Arabic dictionary to see how the word is used, notice there’s no entry for the words strength, power or might. But we do indeed find the entry for hands.
There you have it, Allah didn’t use the word “Be” to create the heavens, instead he used his hands the same way he used his hands in creating Adam.[2] Muslims have the audacity to claim Christians worship a creation, that’s a big fat lie!
We believe that God came in the form of a Man, namely the Lord Jesus Christ. We do not believe that man has become god, there’s a major difference between the two. Here we have Allah using his hands to create the heaven, but Abdoools say Allah says “Be and it is.” This means Allah cannot be god, he had to use his hands in creating the heaven he never said “Be.”
Conclusion
Muslims are so against the notion that Allah cannot enter creation and is nothing like his creation.[3] Yet we see Allah using his hands in making the heavens 51:47. So the question for Muslims is how is it you reject Jesus Christ as God, because He’s a Man. Yet Allah has hands, a foot, face, and a harsh (throne).
For Christians we don’t have this problem because we know that Yahweh can do anything, even coming in the form of a man (Jesus Christ). And we see this all through the scriptures that God spake to Moses from a burning bush in Exodus 3:2, we also know of the story of God appearing to Abraham in Mamre Genesis 18:1, He also wrestled with Jacob Genesis 32:25-32.
We don’t have a problem with this but Muslims do because Allah is not a personal god and doesn’t have relationships. Thank the LORD the true God of Israel found in the Holy Bible. He loves us and wants a personal relationship with us that He would persue us by coming into the world as the Lord Jesus Christ.
Footnotes
[1] [2:117] Originator of the heavens and the earth. When He decrees a matter, He only says to it, “Be,” and it is.
[2] (And man is ever hasty.) Salman Al-Farisi and Ibn `Abbas mentioned the story of Adam, when he wanted to get up before his soul reached his feet. When his soul was breathed into him, it entered his body from his head downwards. When it reached his brain he sneezed, and said, “Al-Hamdu Lillah” (praise be to Allah), and Allah said, “May your Lord have mercy on you, O Adam.” When it reached his eyes, he opened them, and when it reached his body and limbs he started to stare at them in wonder. He wanted to get up before it reached his feet, but he could not. He said, “O Lord, make it happen before night comes.” Alim.org. Ibn-Kathir Al-Qur’an Tafsir Surah 17. Al-Israa . Ayah 11. Retrieved from https://www.alim.org/quran/tafsir/ibn-kathir/surah/17/11/
[3] Among the firmly established principles in the Quran is that Allah Almighty is One, and that nothing of His creation resembles Him, as in Surah Al-Ikhlas [Quran 112], which equals one-third of the Quran, and in other Chapters. Islamweb.net (2018, October 2). Allah Is Free From Deficiency and Nothing Is Like Unto Him. Retrieved from https://www.islamweb.net/en/fatwa/384256/allah-is-free-from-deficiency-and-nothing-is-like-unto-him
Is the Qur’an is perfectly preserved as the follower of Islam claims? Is every letter perfectly preserved? I’m here to exhibit this cannot be the case according to the Qur’an itself.[1]
The personal name of the god of Islam is Allah (highlighted in both the Arabic and English text), the name Allah is composed of an Alif (ا) the 1st letter of the two-syllable word, a Double Lam (ﻝﻝ), He (ه), and a small diacritical mark above the double lam called a ‘shadda together we get الله.
This name Allah is specifically used only for the god of Islam, Islamicity expresses this in the following quote.
The word God in English is not a name of the one God like Allah or YHVH. It is the generic term used for any and every deity, … When Muslims use the word Allah they mean the one God they worship and adore; … This Allah is the same Allah that the holy Qur’an refers to. Neither Jews nor Christians connect to God in this very universal way.
Make no mistake Allah الله is a name, according to Islamic sites such as getquranic.com states is this way confirming Allah is a name, not a title.
According to Muslim scholars and theologians, the name Allah is better defined as “the proper name of the One who is necessarily existent in himself and who deserves all praises.” This dense definition encapsulates several of the most important attributes of the Creator and nuances the term to mean so much more than just ‘god.’ Furthermore, it appears that the name has its root in Semitic languages, with variations on the divine name for god being il, el, or eloah.
We’ve established Allah is a name now to simplify this concept, let’s use the name, Muhammad. Removing a letter from this name would alter it. Here’s a simple illustration.
Does Muhammad = Uhammad?
Would Muslims agree Uhammad still means Muhammad? No! They would not if they were honest, can you see the problem? In the following verse 1:2 Allah’s name is missing a letter, notice the missing alif (ا).[2]
Yet they still render it, Allah, as if there hasn’t been a change, this is the level of deception we face with Islam. This is not the only verse where their god’s name is missing a letter, go to an online Qur’an and type in Arabic ( لِلَّهِ) and see how many verses in which the Arabic text has a missing alif.[3]
Conclusion
Let’s not forget that this problem in the Qur’an is not the same as taking a word(s) from one language and translating them, neither is this a case of bad transliteration. We’re still in the original text (Arabic) and the name Allah is missing a letter altering the name of thier god.
Muslims need to answer why letters are dropping out of the name of their god? If their Qur’an is preserved as claimed then why are they translating changed names in the Arabic text the same?
Footnotes
[1] However, it should be clear from the discussion above that while the Tanakh and the New Testament (hence the entire Bible) have a dubious history, the same cannot be said about the Quran. The preservation of the latter is a fact of history, and was a fulfillment of Allah’s promise: The Quran and Bible Blog (2014, February 9). The History of the Bible and the Quran [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://quranandbibleblog.com/2014/02/09/the-history-of-the-bible-and-the-quran/
[2] Al-Azami asserts that this convention is one of shorthand abbreviation, believing there to have been an accompanying oral tradition to clarify the correct pronunciation and grammar. He states that the alifs were originally present, then dropped for abbreviation, and then reinstated in the reforms of Ubaydullāh b. Ziyād in the time of al-Ḥajjāj, circa the eighth/late first century. Noja-Noseda also suggests omitting alifs may represent an example of abbreviation to save space on an expensive piece of parchment. Intentional abbreviation of an understood pronunciation is a valid hypothesis for the omission, but there are some issues that need to be explored. First, there is no written evidence of a more fully written prior text that was then abbreviated. Instead, the earliest available manuscripts have the alifs missing. It seems a simpler explanation that omitting the alif was a normal convention within a flexible orthography that was later standardized, than that there was a fixed longer text that was abbreviated for economic or practical reasons. Small, Keith E.. Textual Criticism and Qur’an Manuscripts, Lexington Books/Fortress Academic, 2011. pg42
If you’d ask a Muslim what is the word Marriage in Arabic, you may get the response “the word for marriage is Nikah” but is this true? Or have our Muslim friends been feed lies from their scholars once again? There’s a verse in the Qur’an which says that if any Muslima (any believing woman) wants to give herself to Muhammad she can do so.
The words of interest here are “offers herself to the Prophet” this phrase means a woman that’s willing to have sexual intercourse with Muhammad. This is a privilege given only to Muhammad according to Qur’an, all cult leaders have the same desires. They want to build a following, receive money from their members and take all the pretty women for themself. This is nothing new when it comes to cults, a quick research into this would prove this to be true.
More text to take notice of, the women spoken of in this verse are Muslim women. Yusuf Ali renders the ayat “any believing woman” this means any Muslim woman even if she has a husband. Because if the eyes of Muhammad falls on a woman, meaning if Muhammad falls in love with a woman and has a husband, she has to divorce her husband so that Muhammad can have sex with her.
Let’s prove the point further, now Muslims always say the Arabic takes precedence over the English translation. The highlighted Arabic word is nafsahā.
If you take this word you’ll see what the verse is truly saying and I think you’ll be shocked! Copy and paste this word into Google Translate and here’s what you’ll get. Let me first preface and apologise for the wording that will follow, unfortunately when speaking about Satan’s religion called Islam we’re going to run into distasteful language at times.
Therefore, continue on at your own risk, I took certain steps to try to “clean up” the language a bit. My apologies, but when dealing with Islam this is what we get when we look at Muslim sources. The highlighted word (يَسْتَنْكِحَهَا) yastankiḥahā literally means…
Yes, you read that right it’s the F Word, it doesn’t mean marriage at all. This is the deception of Islam they hide words in the English Translation from what the Arabic actually says. There are thousands of Muslims who will say the word means marriage, that’s a complete farce!
The following quote was pulled from Al-Islam.org an Islamic website[1] So let it be known that this is not from a Christian website.
In Islam, marriage is not restricted to a platonic relationship between husband and wife, nor is it solely for procreation. The Islamic term for marriage, “nikah” literally means sexual intercourse.
Islam is a filthy religion when you don’t listen to the lies of Muslims but dig into the Islamic sources you’ll come up with a bunch of rubbish and filth. Why are the Muslim translators burying the true meaning of the Arabic words, it’s because they know if they tell the truth then many people would leave Islam. They don’t want Muslims to ask questions if you start asking questions it starts to fall apart.[2]
Muhammad gave himself the privilege to take any woman he wants, he took his adopted son’s wife. You can read about that in a previous post Muhammad’s Flirts with his Daughter In Law Zaynab Bint Jahsh. If Muhammad is a prophet of god what does his sexual relationships have to do with god? Allah seems to be there to only serve Muhammad’s sexual desires, Aisha his child bride even mentions this.[3]
Footnotes
[1]“Welcome to Al-Islam.org. We invite you to begin a journey of clicks to explore this site thoroughly. We hope that this journey is a source of education and enlightenment. If you are not a Muslim, then let this site serve as a means of introducing Islam to you, and provide you with options for exploring the beauty of this religion further. If you are a Muslim, then let this site serve as a repository for advancing your knowledge about Islam further.” Al-Islam.org (1995-2023). About Us. Retrieved from https://www.al-islam.org/about-us
[2][5:101]O ye who believe! Ask not questions about things which, if made plain to you, may cause you trouble. But if ye ask about things when the Qur’an is being revealed, they will be made plain to you, Allah will forgive those: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Forbearing.
[3] ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: I felt jealous of the women who offered themselves to Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) and said: Then when Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, revealed this:” You may defer any one of them you wish, and take to yourself any you wish; and if you desire any you have set aside (no sin is chargeable to you)” (xxxiii. 51), I (‘A’isha.) said: It seems to me that your Lord hastens to satisfy your desire. [Sahih Muslim 1464a]
According to Islam Allah sent 124,000 prophets, we do not know who these prophets are because the Qur’an only mentions those which are mentioned in the Bible. The Qur’an says each prophet came with the same message in the language of his (the particular prophet) language.
And here’s the interpretation from the Islamic scholar al-Jalalayn who agrees with the above statement.
And We have not sent any Messenger except with the tongue with the language of his people that he might make the Message clear to them that he might make them understand what he brings to them; God then sends astray whomever He will and He guides whomever He will; and He is the Mighty in His kingdom the Wise in His actions.
These are not Christian interpretations this is straight from Muslim sources, we’re building our case for the main topic at hand. Here’s another interpretation from Ibn-Abbas the cousin of Muhammad, if anyone would understand the Qur’an he certainly should be qualified to give the interpretation. It’s funny because if the Qur’an is “clear” or “easy to understand”[1][54:17]why do they have all these interpretations?
(And We never sent a messenger save with the language of his folk, that he might make (the message) clear for them) in their own language what they have been commanded with and prohibited from; it is also said that this means: in a language through which it is possible for them to learn. (Then Allah sendeth whom He will astray) from His religion, (and guideth) to His religion (whom He will) whoever deserves to be guided. (He is the Mighty) in His kingdom and sovereignty; it is also said that this means: the Mighty in His retribution against those who do not believe, (the Wise) in His command and decree; it is also said that this means: the Wise in guiding some and misguiding others.
Isa the prophet of Allah was given the Injil, follow the logic here. Isa was sent to the children of Israel.[2] Then why did Allah give Isa the wrong book as the word Injil derives from the Greek language? Shouldn’t Allah have given Isa a book that was in the language of the Jews, namely Hebrew or Aramaic for the time of Jesus?
This means the Injil is a Greek book, which Allah gave Isa to take to the Jews. Arthur Jeffery holds a theological degree from the University of Melbourne and advanced degrees from the University of Edinburgh. He chaired the Department of Near and Middle East Languages at Columbia and contributed to the field of Qurānic studies. In his book The Foreign Vocabulary of the Qur’ān he says:
“Gospel. It is used always of the Christian revelation, is particularly associated with Jesus, and occurs only in Madinan passages. Some of the early authorities tried to find an Arabic origin for it, making it a form, but this theory is rejected with some contempt by the commentators Zam. and Baid. both on general grounds, and because of al-Hasan’s reading, which clearly is not an Arabic form. So also the Lexicons LA , xiv, 171; TA , viii, 128; and al-Jawālīqī, 17 (al-Khafājī, 11), give it as a foreign word derived from either Hebrew or Syriac (cf. Ibn al-Athīr, Nihāya , iv, 136). Obviously, it is the Gk. ἐυαγγέλιον, and both Marracci and Fraenkel have thought that it came directly into Arabic from the Greek.”
Jeffery, Arthur. The Foreign Vocabulary of the Qur’ān, BRILL, 2007
If Allah gave Isa a Greek book to bring to guide the Jews this would mean Allah cannot be God, he should have known that the language of the Jews was Hebrew or Aramaic, not Greek! Injil or Injeel has Greek etymological roots.[3]
“The word Injil is generally held by non-Muslim historians to be an abbreviation of the Greek word Ευαγγέλιον”
Notice T.M. Guiapar just as most Muslims, even if you provide solid evidence which goes against the Islamic belief they will deflect and change the topic. In the green, he resorts to “do you know Arabic” as if he does which he doesn’t, and then he says the Injil was written in Arabic without a lick of evidence.
Highlighted words in red is where he deflects and instead of giving evidence that the Injil was written in Arabic, he asks if Jesus preached from the Gospels of the New Testament. The Gospels were written after the Lord Jesus Christ entered heaven, so this wouldn’t make sense. The Gospel writers are telling us about Jesus Christ and what He has spoken, Christians never claimed Jesus had a book given to Him, that’s an Islamic belief and has no roots in Christianity.
To answer the Abdoools question did Jesus Christ and His disciples know Greek, the answer is an emphatic yes! The Jews in Jerusalem were submerged in a multilingual culture, there were Romans, Greeks and Jews living in close quarters. Christ spoke with Greeks as they came to see Him (John 12:20). Many verses recorded that Christ spoke with Pontius Pilate, a Roman and Pilot who spoke to a crowd of Jews (Matthew 27:13, Matthew 27:17, 22).
We also know there were 3 languages written on the cross of Jesus Christ, Hebrew, Latin and Greek (Luke 23:38, John 19:20). This signifies that people in Jerusalem spoke different languages proving they were able to communicate with each other. To think Jesus only spoke Aramaic is absurd!
Conclusion
It’s painfully obvious that Allah gave the Islamic Jesus (Isa) the wrong book to bring to the Jews, just as the Qur’an says in 14:4 that each prophet would come in the language of the people so that they would be able to easily understand the message. Muslims run away fast from the false prophet Muhammad who’s leading them down the wrong path to hell. There’s no hope in Islam, without lies Islam dies and that’s a fact!
Footnotes
[1]54:17And We have indeed made the Quran easy to understand and remember, then is there any that will remember (or receive admonition)?
[2] ‘Isa ibn Maryam is the slave of Allah and His messenger. Allah sent him to guide the Children of Israel and to call them to worship Allah Alone, as Allah says to the Jews and Christians IsalamQA (2001, February 22). Jesus in Islam. Retrieved from https://islamqa.info/en/answers/10277/jesus-in-islam
[3] Etymology Definition: the history of a linguistic form (such as a word) shown by tracing its development since its earliest recorded occurrence in the language where it is found, by tracing its transmission from one language to another, by analyzing it into its component parts, by identifying its cognates in other languages, or by tracing it and its cognates to a common ancestral form in an ancestral language “Etymology.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/etymology
Tawhid is Islam’s central belief (one of the 5 pillars). The true meaning of Tawhid means unification, not oneness as Muslims claim, but let’s go with their meaning. Looking at the Qur’an in light of this understanding, let’s determine if the Qur’an teaches Allah is the only god?
In the Bible when God talks He speaks in the first person, words such as “I am the LORD,” “I the LORD,” “I AM THAT I AM,” “I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour” etc.
In the Qur’an we don’t have the same, in fact, Allah is the one speaking yet he refers to someone else by using 3rd personal expressions saying “He it is” or “it is He”
This question asked was: “Allah is saying “it is He”, “that He will cause it to prevail”, who is Allah speaking to if these are the words of Allah? Is Allah speaking to another Allah saying “it is He?””
Here’s a Muslim’s response to this question, watch how quickly it goes downhill.
This Muslim said that because Gabriel (Jibril) came to Muhammad to deliver Qur’an therefore, Jibril used the word “he.” Is Legendarygames4687 claiming that Jibril changed the words of the Qur’an upon delivering them to Muhammad? That cannot be right, no Muslim would claim that Allah’s words were changed, or would they?!
The words of the Qur’an are not Allah’s words according to Legendarygames4687 they are angel Jibril’s words, not Allah’s. This means the Qur’an is corrupted if Jibril switched out certain words.
According to Legendarygames4687 when Allah gave his words to Jibril to deliver to Muhammad, Jibril chose which words to convey and which not? That means Jibril decided what went into the Qur’an Muslims read today.
Legendarygames4687 said the words Jibril repeated to Muhammad are Allah’s words.
In the next comment, he discredits himself saying Jibril “replaced” words, confirming that according to legendarygames4687 Jibril changed words in the Qur’an.
This completely destroys the idea of perfect preservation of the Qur’an. If Allah used the word “I” and Jibril replaced it with the word “He” means the Qur’an is corrupted. And if this is not the case then who is Allah speaking with when he uses the 3rd personal pronoun? It only makes sense if he’s talking about someone else, another god besides himself.
Legendarygames4687 is the Muslim the burden is on him to explain why Allah is talking to another god by saying “He.” Allah even says he’s the best of the creators, which means he’s not the only creator [Surah 23:12-14] according to Allah himself.
Because he has no answers he defaults to the “Hadiths is the work of humans” and can have errors. The problem is that Sunni Muslims pray 5 times a day because of the Hadith, the Qur’an only gives 3 times a day of prayer. So why are Muslims following the work of man when they follow the Hadiths which add another 2 prayers making it 5 in total?
Conclusion
It’s obvious that Muslims cannot defend Islam as things like a god who says “He it is” cannot be referring to himself but someone else. A god who thinks the sun sets in muddy water.[1]
And has to come down to the lowest heaven to hear the prayers of Muslims[2] otherwise he doesn’t know who prayed. This shows Allah is not powerful and cannot be god because like Muslims always bring up the argument that Jesus doesn’t know the hour in Mark 13:32, then by that same rule Allah cannot be god.
Muslims contradict themselves all the time, they say in one breath there’s only one Qur’an and it’s preserved, but on the other hand, we found to day 40 different Arabic Qur’ans (Hafs, Warsh, Doori etc.) with different words, diacritical marks and variations in the meaning of verses. And now Jibril has made the decision on which words he gave to Muhammad when he gave him Qur’an.
Muslims come to the real Word of God, the Lord Jesus Christ for He never changes[3] because He’s your Creator, the Almighty God in flesh.
Footnotes
[1] Until, when he reached the setting place of the sun, he found it setting in a spring of black muddy (or hot) water. And he found near it a people. We (Allah) said (by inspiration): “O Dhul-Qarnain! Either you punish them, or treat them with kindness.” Sūrat al-kahf (The Cave) 18:86
[2] It was narrated from Abu Hurairah that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: “Our Lord, the Blessed and Exalted, descends when one third of the night remains, every night and He says: ‘Who will ask of Me, that I may give him? Who will call upon Me, that I may answer him? Who will ask My forgiveness, that I may forgive him?’ until dawn comes.” Hence they used to prefer voluntary prayers at the end of the night rather than at the beginning. [Sunan Ibn Majah 1366 Grade: Sahih (Darussalam)]
[3]Hebrews 13:8 Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.
Muslims worship a man who called himself Muhammad which means “the praised one,” they place Muhammad on a pedestal saying he was the best of all mankind. If this is true then looking into the poster boy of Islam would prove this to be fact, if it’s indeed true. Upon examining his life we see another picture portrayed, a life riddled with adultery, murder, deceit, lies and every other sin imaginable to the imagination.
A Muslim engaging with a Christian was frustrated because a Christian woman on a video who debated Zakir Naik and was exposing him was getting under his skin. He began to mock the woman and poster of the content, here’s his comment.
Muslims don’t like when they are exposed, therefore, they run to the Bible to get away from the madness of the Qur’an, Allah and Muhammad. Once they are triggered a majority will engage in name-calling believing that somehow this proves their point. Here’s the main comment I would like to focus on.
According to this Muslim’s comment, he clearly believes mental instability is bad, and started to verbally abuse others. Salrathor1 was asked the question if Muhammad was mentally unstable, his reply was…
He was then asked if a person tries to commit suicide is that a sign of mental instability?
Notice the hypocrisy of Muslims. First, he mentioned being in a mentally unstable position is bad, using it as an insult against someone else. Then when he was asked about the same situation in reference to his prophet, he changed his position and started defending it.
Let’s see if Muhammad was mentally unstable according to the Muslim sources? First, let’s define mental instability means.
A mental illness is a condition that affects a person’s thinking, feeling, behavior or mood. These conditions deeply impact day-to-day living and may also affect the ability to relate to others.
According to NAMI, the development of mental instability is the result of multiple factors ranging from genetics to one’s living conditions, another component can also be trauma. One singular event is not part of the cause, but a series of traumatic events do play a role in developing mental illness.
Muhammad the prophet of Islam fits the criteria of someone who suffered from mental illness. There’s a story in the Islamic sources which states that Muhammad became very depressed when “inspiration” from Allah stopped. the prophet of Islam would go to a mountain top seeking to commit suicide by throwing himself from the mountain.
This is an authentic Sahih Hadith from al-Bukhari proving Muhammad was mentally unstable. The Muslim salrathor1 was mocking and insinuating mental illness was not good, but the prophet of Islam was mentally disturbed, we will provide the link to Sunnah.com where you can find the Hadith.
The Hadith says that Waraqa bin Naufal died, he was supposedly a Christian whom Muhammad would learn from, notice, what does divine inspiration has to do with Waraqa’s death, was Waraqa a prophet delivering Qur’an to Muhammad? This Hadith says Muhammad tried multiple times to kill himself and Gabriel (Jibril) would have to keep telling Muhammad that he’s a messenger of Allah.[1]This carries severe implications as Muhammad doubted he was Allah’s prophet!
Suicide itself is not a mental disorder, but one of the most important causes of suicide is mental illness – most often Depression, Bipolar Disorder (Manic Depression), Schizophrenia, and Substance Use Disorders.
This is a telling sign that Muhammad was a mentally ill person. When our Muslim friend suggested that W-Masih should seek professional counselling as in sitting down with a psychiatrist, would he make the same recommendation to his prophet?
Conclusion
If Muslims agree that being mentally unstable is not good then how is it they follow a mentally unstable man called Muhammad. Who attempted multiple times to take his own life by committing suicide? These are not the marks of a prophet of God, this is someone who needed psychiatric care.
Christians never have to worry when it comes to Jesus Christ, He was always in His right mind and never tried killing Himself. Wicked men took the Lord of Glory and crucified Him, and Christ allowed them to do it because He came to procure salvation for those who would appreciate His wonderful sacrifice. The Good Shepherd lays down His life for His sheep.
There was a divine purpose for the Lord Jesus laying down His life, being the most sacrificial action ever done in the history of mankind, to save others from eternal judgement. Muhammad had selfish ambitions, he wanted to be a prophet and thought to kill himself because he wasn’t getting revelations. Jesus Christ far superseded Muhammad in every aspect of His life. Wake up Muslims the real Jesus Christ who is God loves you and calls you to Himself for salvation.
Footnotes
[1] Ibn Ishaq, p. 106—[Muhammad said,] “So I read it, and he departed from me. And I awoke from my sleep, and it was as though these words were written on my heart. (T. Now none of God’s creatures was more hateful to me than an (ecstatic) poet or a man possessed: I could not even look at them. I thought, Woe is me poet or possessed—Never shall Quraysh say this of me! I will go to the top of the mountain and throw myself down that I may kill myself and gain rest. So I went forth to do so and then) when I was midway on the mountain, I heard a voice from heaven saying, “O Muhammad! thou art the apostle of God and I am Gabriel.” Ibn Isḥāq Muḥammad, and Alfred Guillaume. The Life of Muhammad : A Translation of Isḥāq’s Sīrat Rasū L Allāh. Oxford University Press, 1996.
In everyday conversations between Abdools and Christians, you find all sorts of lies and deception from Muslims if they think you know nothing about Islam. This particular son of mutah was obsessed with skin colour, claiming Christians are “white supremacists.” In other words, he thinks we proclaim Jesus Christ is blonde with blue eyes 🤣
You can’t blame Muslims for being confused, they have fallen for the lies propagated in the world, and to be honest, it’s partly our fault. As Christians we need to teach the public through our life’s personal testimony, some of these things shouldn’t have to be mentioned. Unfortunately, we’ve had people out there who misrepresent what Christianity is, the likes of Joel Olsteen etc.
But that’s not what we talk about here, let’s focus on getting this Muslim busted. Dumber Everyday aka “Smarter Everyday” claims that Muhammad is not a white man.[1]
Mr. “Smarter Everyday” is either ignorant of his own Hadith’s or he’s lying, we’ll give him the benefit of the doubt and say it’s the latter. I would like for Smarter Everday to tell us why his prophet is described as a white man?[2] This Sahih Hadith tells us a man came on a camel looking for Muhammad in the Masjid.
In answering his question about John 17:3, Muslims always quote half the verse to try to disprove the deity of Christ, but the Lord Jesus is not excluding Himself as God by calling His Father the only true God. Muslims continue to misrepresent what Christians believe, the Trinity as found in the Bible is that God is 1 in being (what) and the one being of God consists of 3 distinct Persons (who) who collectively are co-eternal are the 1 God.
The Greek has a copulative kai meaning that the Father and Jesus Christ are the One true God in this verse. But for our purposes the English translation will suffice.
The man asked Muhammad’s companions which of them is Muhammad? They replied, “This white man who is reclining.” Why is Dumber Everyday claiming Muhammad’s not a white man when his own Islamic sources say that he is white?[3]
And we always give references here so that you can go and look these things up yourselves, Christians learn these sources so that you can answer Muslims from their own text. don’t allow yourself to be deceived by their Dawah. Let’s provide one more proof that Muhammad was a white man[4] who was obsessed with telling everyone his colour.
This particular Hadith says `Ali bin Abi Talib is describing Muhammad saying he has a white complexion. Either Smarter Everyday believes his Hadith in which he needs to confess that Muhammad is a white man.[5] Otherwise, he’s saying that Muslims put out a bunch of lies in their Islamic text, it’s his choice. To end this article we’ll show how Muhammad is racist against blacks.
The following Hadith describes how Allah created Adam, Allah struck his right shoulder and out came white offspring. Allah then struck his left shoulder and out came black offspring. These 2 offsprings are mankind coming from Adam, to the white offspring Allah says they go to Paradise, and to the black offspring Allah sends them to hell.
How racist is this cult! Why was their colour mentioned and depending on if they are white or black determines if they go to paradise or hell? This is why someone like “Smarter Everyday” is also obsessed with skin colour, Islam is riddled with this sort of racist text.
Conclusion
Today we learned that Muhammad according to their Sahih Hadith’s is a white man (not that it matters to us) but to a racist cult like Islam it does. And that Allah sends black people to hell while he sends white people to paradise. I wonder how all those Muslims in African countries feel about this? Can any Muslim comment on why their fellow Muhammadan is fabricating his own form of Islam saying Muhammad is not a white man when the Hadith explicitly says that he is?
Footnotes
[1] The narrator Anas added that the Prophet (ﷺ) raised his hands (during the invocation) to such an extent that the whiteness of his armpits was visible. Sahih al-Bukhari 1030
[2] Abu Juhaifa reported: I saw Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) that he had white complexion and had some white hair, and Hasan b. ‘Ali resembled him. Sahih Muslim 2343a
[3] Sa’id al-Jariri quoted Abu al-Tufail as saying: I saw the Messenger of Allah(ﷺ). I asked: How did you see him? He said: He was white, good-looking, and when he walked, it looked as if he was descending to a low ground. Sunan Abi Dawud 4864 Grade: Sahih (Al-Albani)
[4] It was narrated that ‘Abdullah said: “The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) used to say the salam to his right so that the whiteness of his cheek could be seen, and to his left so that the whiteness of his cheek could be seen.” Sunan an-Nasa’i 1323 Grade: Sahih (Darussalam)
[5] Narrated `Abdul `Aziz: Anas said, ‘When Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) invaded Khaibar, we offered the Fajr prayer there (early in the morning) when it was still dark. The Prophet (ﷺ) rode and Abu Talha rode too and I was riding behind Abu Talha. The Prophet (ﷺ) passed through the lane of Khaibar quickly and my knee was touching the thigh of the Prophet (ﷺ) . He uncovered his thigh and I saw the whiteness of the thigh of the Prophet. … Sahih al-Bukhari 371
Forcing anyone to engage in sexual activity is sinful and can be viewed as rape, no one should feel compelled to be intimate with anyone. If someone tricks, threatens or manipulates causing the person into sexual activity, these traits are not one which stems from love. Many Muslim women say the religion of Islam has “empowered women” and has “given them rights.” If we explore the Qur’ān will we find this to be true? There’s only one way to find out, let’s take a deep dive as Yasir Qadhi would say.
Here’s the definition of sexual coercion defined by OASH (Office on Women’s Health):
Sexual coercion is unwanted sexual activity that happens when you are pressured, tricked, threatened, or forced in a nonphysical way. Coercion can make you think you owe sex to someone. It might be from someone who has power over you, like a teacher, landlord, or a boss. No person is ever required to have sex with someone else.
In Surah al-baqarah (The Cow) also known as the Hindu chapter, the longest in the Qur’ān with 286 ayats. In ayat 223 reads that a man can go into his wife as he pleases as he would till a field.
Other renderings of the same verse by their Muslim scholars.
[Sahih International:] Your wives are a place of sowing of seed for you, so come to your place of cultivation however you wish and put forth [righteousness] for yourselves. And fear Allah and know that you will meet Him. And give good tidings to the believers.
Surah al-baqarah (The Cow)
[Muhammad Sarwar:] Your wives are as fields for you. You may enter your fields from any place you want. Reserve something good for your souls (for the life hereafter). Have fear of God and know that you are going to meet Him. (Muhammad) give the glad news to the believers.
Surah al-baqarah (The Cow)
In Islam men can abuse women in whatever way he pleases according to the Qur’ān, to substantiate this fact we go to the scholars and the Tafsir for the interpretation. Let’s see if you’ve ever read a more unloving and deplorable description of what Islam teaches. I apologise in advance for what you’ll read but if we’re to be truthful as Christians we must expose darkness with light. Continue at your own risk!
Islam is really a sex cult, why the graphic detail and the teachings of abusing women? In contrast to the Qur’ān we read in the Bible men are to love their wives as Christ loved us.
Other verses teaching husbands to love thier wifes are (Eph 5:28-29, 33, Col 3:19). Women should be treated with gentleness, kindness and love, they’re to be cherished and protected not abused as sexual objects.
Angels Will Curse Her For Not Having Sex?
This Hadith which is the saying of Muhammad (Sunnah) uses threats towards women to scare them into having sex.[1] Why in the world would angels care about the sexual relationship of a husband and wife to the point of cursing the woman? This was how Muhammad manipulated religion so men could have their way with women, below is the Sahih (Authentic) Hadith in question.
Muslim women do not have the right to deny their husband sex, otherwise, the angels according to this Hadith will curse her all night until morning. It’s things like this in Islam which causes women to feel trapped, this is not love but lust! Women are completely degraded by the false prophet Muhammad, why there are women caught up in this chauvinistic[2] man made religion?
They’re afraid to leave for fear of being ostracised by their families, friends and community. A quick search will bring up plenty of stories of women who have doubts and are trying to escape from Islam. One Muslima wrote an article asking questions, she prefaced the piece by saying her faith is “strong” and that “islamophobes will extrapolate what could be considered useful for their agenda.” Instead of being real and saying she doesn’t like certain things Islam teaches, this is the brainwashing effect Islam has on women.
Questions she asked were:
(1) “Why can a man marry a non-Muslim, or rather why can’t women too?…Why does the divine command not extend to women?” (2) “Why can’t I divorce my husband? … Why do I not have the same authority as a man in my relationship when it comes to authorising a divorce?” (3) “Why do women only get half the inheritance?” (4) “Traveling by myself as a Muslim woman” (5) “Why can I not beautify myself…for myself?” (6) “Why can’t I pray and fast during my period? … the wide-reaching repercussions of being exempt from certain times of worship, for example, hajj, umrah, and not attending virtuous nights in the mosque, leads me to can’t help but feel I am being denied by Allah” (7) “Why I can’t attend a burial?” (8) “Why is a women’s testimony not enough on her own?” (9) “Why are the only Prophets mentioned men?” (10) “Why can’t I lead prayer?” (11) “Why do I have to cover my hair while men are not obliged?” (12) “Hoor Al-Ayn – Need I say more? … I feel objectified as a woman, that we, of all species, are objects for the pleasure of men. ”
Does this sound like a religion that values women or degrades them, treating them as sex objects, even saying they’re less intelligent than men?! There are cases of Muslim women who want to get out of abusive relationships but are not allowed to, they are being denied and controlled by their Imams.[3]
Let’s answer some of these questions above for her using her own Islamic sources.
Why Can A Man Marry A Non-Muslim, Or Rather Why Can’t Women Too?
According to Islam, only Muslim men can marry outside of Islam, more specifically they’re allowed to marry Jewish or Christian women. But it’s not allowed for them to marry Hindu’s or Buddhist. Muslim women are not permitted under any circumstance to marry any non-Muslim. The teaching in Islam is that men are allowed to marry women who are Jewish or Christian due to this verse in Surah al-Maidah 5:5.
Surah al-māidah gives Muslim men permission to marry non-Muslim women, but there’s a contradiction because Muslims claim that Christians are mushriks meaning they call us idol-worshippers because we worship the Lord Jesus Christ. This exposes the hypocrisy of Islam in Surah al-Baqarah 2:221 they’re prohibited from marrying idol-worshippers.
All Christian women worship Jesus Christ, and Muslims claim that’s idolatry yet Surah al-maidah contradicts this verse saying men can marry Christian women. On Islam Q&A someone asked “What is the difference between mushrikeen and kuffaar? Are the Jews and Christians mushrikeen or kuffaar?” here’s their answer:
The kaafir is the one who denies and conceals the truth. The basic meaning of the word kufr in Arabic is concealment. Shirk means devoting worship to anyone or anything other than Allaah. Kufr may take the form of denying and rejecting, but the mushrik may also believe in Allaah. This is the difference between the mushrik and the kaafir. Each word may also carry the meaning of the other, so the word kufr may be used in the sense of shirk, and the word shirk may be used in the sense of kufr. Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: Kufr and shirk may carry the same meaning, which is disbelief in Allaah, may He be exalted, or they may be used separately, whereby shirk refers to the worship of idols and other created beings, whilst also acknowledging Allaah, as the kuffaar of Quraysh did, and kufr may have a more general meaning than shirk. End quote.
So how can these men marry women who are considered an idolatress (mushrik) and is accused of committing the unforgivable sin shirk? Then when it comes to women Islam Q&A said: “It is not permissible for a Muslim woman to marry a non-Muslim man from any other religion, whether from among the Jews or Christians, or any other kafir religion. It is not permissible for her to marry a Jew, a Christian, a Magian, a communist, an idol-worshipper, etc.” this is found in the same verse 2:221.
Why Can’t I Divorce My Husband?
The Bible gives 2 allowances for divorce, but for Christians, divorce is the absolute last resort as the God of the Bible (Yahweh) hates divorce. If a spouse commits adultery or is abusive to their spouse divorce is possible. But look at what Islam teaches if a woman wants to divorce, this following quote is from Islam Q&A.
A woman does not have the power to divorce (talaaq) her husband; rather divorce is in the hand of the man, because the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “(The right of divorce) belongs to the one who takes hold of the calf [i.e., her husband].” Classed as hasan by al-Albaani in Saheeh Ibn Maajah
In addition, the man can have multiple wives, up to 4 at a time, but the wife cannot have multiple husbands and she cannot divorce. This is just all around wrong how is it Islam gives women more rights?
Islam puts the blame on the woman and never the man it seems, here’s another quote from an article on the website Al-Islam. Ayatullah Ibrahim Amini try to detect where he seems to be putting the blame should a husband divorce his wife.
One influential factor for divorce is the disheartenment of a husband for his legitimate wife and his fondness and affection towards non-mahram women. The chief instrument for this is lack of adequate Hijab among women and leering in men. When a man looks upon a woman who is more beautiful and attractive than his own wife he may become infatuated with her and become disheartened with his wife. Little by little he makes familial life bitter by finding faults, seeking excuses, and picking quarrels, which might ultimately lead to divorce.
Here a perfect example of abuse in Islamic marriages, a woman who was married to a man who was beating her left bruises on her. She went to Aisha for help in which they came before Muhammad asking for help. Aisha complained saying the lady’s skin was green from all the beatings she received. The lady told Muhammad that her husband `AbdurRahman was not able to perform in bed, `AbdurRahman accused her of lying. Muhammad then tells the woman if she wants to leave `AbdurRahman and go back to her previous husband Rifa`a she must let `AbdurRahman have sex with her. Another Hadith says that she must let him taste her juices. The pimp prophet Muhammad is advocating for wife swapping, how can this be a messenger of God?!
Islam teaches women are not intelligent enough to testify on their own, this is the reason another woman is needed to make up for her deficiency (stupidity). Women are stupid according to Islam, we challenge any Muslim to point to any text in the Bible which says anything remotely close to this. You won’t find anything in our scriptures which degrades women.
Conclusion
It’s fair to say after going through the Qur’ān and Hadith that women in Islam are not valued. In the Bible women are equal to men, husbands are encouraged to love their wives. In fact in the book of Proverbs chapter 31:10-12 states that a virtuous woman has more worth far above rubies. Christians certainly do not believe women are less than men, we believe women are equal to men the only difference is that men and women have different roles.
Women are just as intelligent than men, and her testimony is good on her own. Christian women are not cursed by angels for not being in the mood to be sexually intimate with their husband, lastly they are not sex objects to be used and abused. If you’re a Muslim woman know that in Islam you’re looked down upon for be created as a woman. How is it Allah is against women yet he supposedly created you? That makes no sense!
In the Bible both male and female have been created in the image of God, therefore, you have immense value. I would implore you to come to Jesus Christ for salvation and start living a meaningful life for the true God who loves you and gave Himself on the cross for you for you to have salvation.
Footnotes
[1] Anyone, including friends, co-workers, bosses, landlords, dates, partners, family members, and strangers, can use coercion. Sexual coercion is most likely to happen with someone you already have some type of relationship with. Sexual activity should always happen with your consent. If you are being pressured or coerced into sexual activity, that may be a type of sexual assault and it may be against the law. Office on Women’s Health (2021, February 15). Sexual coercion. Retrieved from https://www.womenshealth.gov/relationships-and-safety/other-types/sexual-coercion
[2]Definition of chauvinism: an attitude of superiority toward members of the opposite sex male chauvinism also: behavior expressive of such an attitude “Chauvinism.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/chauvinism. Accessed 4 Nov. 2022.
One of the polemic arguments Muslims pose to Christians is that Jesus Christ “prayed like a Muslim” if you’ve never heard this assertion you might become confused. Well, fret not because we’re going to prove without a shadow of a doubt that the Lord Jesus Christ was not a Muslim.
The 1st argument is that Jesus Christ while praying fell on His face, Muslims believe this is evidence that Christ is a Muslim. They read the words “fell on his face” and automatically believe Jesus Christ and others found in the Bible prayed like Muslims.[1]
A few things to point out in this verse, when the Bible speaks of falling on their face it refers to a person laying face down on their stomach, not praying in the same prostration Muslims perform. Another point is in Matthew 26:39 and other verses Jesus Christ is calling God His Father, while Muslims are not allowed to call Allah father. Here are some verses in the Qur’ān which prove that Allah is father to no one.
When Christians pray we call God Father because through the new birth according to the Lord Jesus we’re made children of God (Matthew 5:9, Luke 20:36, John 11:52). The apostle Paul following in the steps of Christ also said we’re the children of God (Romans 8:16, Romans 8:21, Galatians 3:26), additionally, the apostle John also proclaimed that believers in Christ Jesus are children of God (1 John 3:10, 1 John 5:2).
Christians also pray in many ways, we also fall on our face (lay face down), get on our knees, look up to heaven and even pray sitting down. The importance is not on how you pray but just that you do pray. The fact that we call God Father distinguishes us from Muslims.
2nd point is Jesus Christ prayed “looking up to heaven” this destroys the claim that Christ was a Muslim as there are Hadiths which say your eyes will be snatched out if we look toward the sky during prayer.
If this Hadith is authentic, why weren’t the eyes of Jesus Christ snatched away when He prayed looking up to heaven? Many Christians including myself have on multiple occasions looked up to heaven while praying, and what do you know we still have our eyes.
Here we have 3 verses which speak of the Lord Jesus Christ looking up to heaven while He’s praying, Muslims don’t look to heaven when praying. This is solid evidence that Jesus was not a Muslim.
Conclusion
When we examine the Muslim claim against what the Bible says we see that all the lies of Islam die, without lies Islam dies. Jesus Christ called God Father, and the Qur’ān prohibits anyone from calling Allah, father. The Lord Jesus also gazed heavenward while praying this is something Muslims do not do while praying.
Footnotes
[1] The remainder of this article will examine passages from various books of the Bible and compare them to the way Muslims pray. The most recognisable posture in the Muslim prayer is touching the forehead to the ground. It is the apex of a person’s prayer and it is mentioned in the authentic traditions of Prophet Muhammad as the position in which a believer is as close to God as it is possible to be. “The nearest one comes to his Lord is when he is kowtowing.” Consider the following verses from the Bible. “And he (Jesus) went a little further, and fell on his face, and prayed…” (Matthew 26:39) Aisha Stacey (2014, September 15). MUSLIM PRAYER POSTURES FOUND IN THE BIBLE. Retrieved from https://www.islamreligion.com/
The majority of human civilisation agrees that a 54-year-old man shouldn’t have sexual relations with minors. Most countries have strict laws against child paedophilia and surprisingly there are countries which have no laws against child paedophilia.[1]
Ever wondered what certain groups thought of when it came to adults having intimate relations with young children? What would you think if there were a religion which believed child paedophilia was proper? Even more so, how would you perceive this “religion” if their “Holy Book” actually taught such practices?
Well, my friend, it might shock you, but Islam is the second-largest religion in the world behind Christianity. And their Qur’an teaches paedophilia [2] don’t believe me? No problem, We’ll provide the references for you to go research yourself, if you have an Imam perhaps you can ask him to explain these verses in the Qur’an?
The first verse we’ll look at is Surah 65 sūrat l-ṭalāq (The Divorce) in this verse there are 3 types of females in view, (1) women who are experiencing menopause, therefore, they no longer expect menstruation (2)those who have not menstruated this group 2 will be the main focus, and (3) those who are pregnant.
Another rendition of this same ayat (verse/sign) by Yusuf Ali reads:
[Yusuf Ali] Such of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the prescribed period, if ye have any doubts, is three months, and for those who have no courses (it is the same): for those who carry (life within their wombs), their period is until they deliver their burdens: and for those who fear Allah, He will make their path easy.
Surah 65:4
It goes without saying that if a woman is menopausal then it’s safe to say she’s experienced menstruation before, even though she no longer receives her monthly period. As for the women who are pregnant it’s obvious they’ve had that time of the month otherwise they wouldn’t be pregnant. The second group is surprising as this group never had any menstruation before and the chapter this verse is found in is called “The Divorce” which means this group was married.
This is the Surah which teaches Muslim men what they’re to do if they are looking to divorce their wife(s) but have to wait for a 3-month period in order to make sure the wife is not pregnant. In Islam, this is called the Iddah, known as the waiting period.
Muslim websites such as Islam.QA agrees when it comes to the waiting period between a Muslim man and a woman to make certain she’s pregnant or not is 3 months. I’ve extrapolated the most relevant portion, I’ve provided a link to the article as they went into multiple waiting periods.
According to Surat l-aḥzāb (The Combined Forces) 33:49, it states that if a man divorces his wife before having sexual intimacy with her then there’s no waiting period, in other words, there’s no Iddah. This agrees with the above quote from Islam.QA.
33:49 … you have no period to reckon against them; …
In the word-for-word Arabic grammar and syntax for this verse, the word ʿiddatin (عِدَّةٍ) translates to “waiting period.”
Now here’s the shocker! Early Muslim scholars that lived closer to the time of Muhammad would know how these verses are to be understood. What’s their interpretation for verse 65:4 in regards to the second group who never had menstruation, in verse 65:4? Well, their scholars tell us about this group (please remember this is from the official website of the kingdom of Jordan; this is a Muslim site). You can read the interpretations for yourself below, links are provided if you want to visit the site.
Both Ibn Abbas and al-Jalalayn said this group cannot have menstruation because of their young age. Those who are young are to also observe the 3-month waiting period, which means the Muslim man had sex with this young girl and must wait to see if she’s pregnant. This is what Islam teaches child paedophilia.
According to their own laws in Sharia known as Fiqh we have the general consensus or ruling on men having sexual intercourse with young girls. Once again this is an Islamic website here’s what they say.
If we’re to judge Islam it’s only fair to judge from the source, which would be their own prophet who according to the Sunnah (sayings of the prophet) married a 6-year-old Aisha and consummated the marriage when she was 9 years old. Also, note how the Muslims try to hide this fact, look at how they worded it above in the blue text, they never mention the words “consummated the marriage.”
“Second: From the Sunnah on the authority of Aisha, may God be pleased with her: ((The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, married her when she was a girl of six years, and she was married to him when she was the daughter of nine, and she stayed with him for nine years.))”
No matter how hard Muslims try to hide these disgusting facts concerning their prophet, the truth will come out exposing Muhammad and his ungodly teachings. Light and darkness cannot exist in the same place, light always shines out the darkness. If you’re a Muslim reading this for the first time we would love for you to leave a comment. Have you heard of this before, does your Imam hide this from you, have you asked your Imam questions about this? If not I would encourage you to look into this for yourself, this concerns your own eternity.
The Lord Jesus Christ is always willing to receive you as He loves you and offers the free gift of eternal life to you. Come to trust in the Son of God who was crucified, buried and rose from the dead. He’s alive and seated at the right hand of the Father. Believe in Christ Jesus the Saviour of sinners.
Footnotes
[1] Daily Star Online can reveal perverts can legally have sex with children as young as 12 in the likes of the Philippines and Mexico. But deliberately vague laws in other countries – such as Saudi Arabia and Yemen – put children of ANY AGE at risk of rape. Dailystar (20, July 2019). REVEALED: Shocking list of countries where child sex is legal. Retrieved from https://www.dailystar.co.uk/
[2] Moroccan activist Najia Adib has made a controversial claim, arguing that pedophilia and the sexual abuse of children are more “prevalent in Arab and Muslim countries” than others. During her participation in a recent Hespress seminar on “pedophilia and the enforcement of the death penalty,” Adib defended calls for the death penalty as punishment for perpetrators of sexual assault against children. The news outlet held a seminar to discuss the issue of pedophilia following the murder and rape of Adnane Bouchouf, an 11-year-old boy from Tangier. On September 11, Moroccan police found the remains of Adnane, who had been missing since September 7. A 24-year-old man murdered Adnane in cold blood after kidnapping and raping him in his apartment, not far from the victim’s home. Safaa Kasraoui (2020, September 14). Moroccan Activist Claims Pedophilia More Prevalent in Muslim Countries. Retrieved from https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/
One trend you’ll find among Muslims is pretending to be Christian, saying they “reverted” (converted) to Islam, in order to dupe people into believing in Islam. Once you start to examine if this is true you’ll soon realise that it’s a farce. Susie Brackenborough is one such person who’s written an article for Islamonline.net claiming to have been a follower of Christ only to leave and become a Muslim. Either she’s being deceptive or just really ignorant of what true Christianity is, you can be the judge.
I Couldn’t Actually Say Why I Was Christian?
Being a practicing Christian for almost 16 of my 22 years of life, it may seem strange as to why I have turned to Islam. Not so I say! I was asked one day to “prove Christianity and why you are a Christian and not a Muslim” by a Muslim friend at university. I thought that this was going to be an easy task, but I couldn’t actually say why I was Christian, only this is the way that I had been brought up by my family. My research needed extensive reading and questioning. I would say to everyone who reads this whether Muslim or not – ‘ASK YOURSELF WHY YOU BELIEVE WHAT YOU DO.’
There’s a huge red flag, Susie said she was a “Christian” for 16 years, yet she was only “Christian” by name being brought up by her family. This is not what constitutes being a Christian, being born into a family which professes to be Christian doesn’t make a person Christian. It’s like saying sleeping in an air hanger would make someone an aeroplane. It’s quite telling that someone who would make this statement knows absolutely nothing about Christianity.
To answer her question of why I believe what I do, is that the Death, Burial and Resurrection of Jesus Christ is the best historically attested event which stands against every criticism. There’s no one who has been able to debunk the Death and Resurrection of Christ.
The next few quotes from Susie prove she has no idea what Christianity teaches about Jesus Christ or any of the fundamental doctrines we hold.
So why wasn’t I satisfied with Christianity? Anybody who is going to really believe in something must know something about it. If I said to someone that a Porsche could go faster than a Skoda, for them to accept that fully they must have knowledge of what a Porsche and a Skoda are, otherwise if they accept what I say without knowledge they are living a life of ignorance and/or arrogance. Anybody who wanted to know the truth and why they agree to or follow a particular way would seek out why. So for me to accept Christianity I needed the knowledge about the fundamentals – the belief that Jesus (AS) was the son of God and that the Trinity existed are two fundamental points. It is not good enough just to accept this, as you believe what has been taught to you. For someone without knowledge about cars, the Porsche may indeed go faster than the Skoda in reality, but if I was a so called knowledgeable and respected person and I taught them that the Skoda is faster than the Porsche, then I would be believed by people who have not questioned what these two cars are really like and they take my word as they think that I have knowledge. But they would not be believing the truth.
She admits she lacks knowledge about the Lord Jesus or the Trinity, these are the 2 biggest points of contention when Christians engage with Muslims. The issue is that the Qur’ān gets both wrong here are past articles that explain how Islam gets it wrong.
We’re going to clear up Susie’s confusion starting with her first question.
The Son Of God And The Trinity … Is It Not Made Explicitly Clear In The Bible?
I believe that religion is not here to confuse us in any way and the message of Allah (SWT) is very clear; so my first question is – if Jesus (AS) is the son of God and the Trinity was what Christian people believe it to be, why is it not made explicitly clear in the Bible?
While the word Trinity is not in the Bible, the word Tawhid is not in the Qur’ān, but the teachings/concept of the Trinity is certainly in the Bible. In the Gospel of Matthew chapter 3 John the Baptist was asked by Jesus Christ to baptise Him. John shocked by the request immediately says “I need to be baptized by you, and do you come to me?” (Matthew 3:14).
Jesus tells Him that it’s necessary to fulfill all righteousness (Matthew 3:15), John then baptises Him and we’re introduced to the Trinity.
Notice in one moment in time we have all 3 Persons of the Trinity present (1), Jesus Christ, in the water (2) the Spirit of God also known as the Holy Spirit (3) a voice from heaven which is God the Father. How can Susie claim to have been a Christian for 16 years have she never seen this passage before? There are others, but let’s go to the Qur’ān to further prove our point.
In the Qur’ān we have a Trinity a false one but 3 nonetheless who are creators. Muslims agree that Allah is the creator, but what do they say to the fact that Allah admits he’s not the only creator.
23:14 sūrat l-mu’minūn (The Believers)
This verse according to their own book claims that Allah is not the only creator, what do I mean by creator? Just to make it clear we’re not talking about someone making a painting or building a table etc. Muslims try to claim Allah is comparing himself to humans as “creators”. No! This is not what’s being spoken of here in this ayat. Allah is saying there are other creators (gods) but Allah is the best of all the other gods.
Additionally, the word l-khāliqīna as a genitive masculine noun showing possession. The genitive case focuses on the active participle “of” is what’s important, in this context Allah being the best of the creators.
23:14 Arabic grammar, syntax and morphology
So this means Susie’s god is not the only god according to the confession of Allah which makes Islam a polytheistic religion.
Was Jesus The Only Begotten Son Of God?
Was Jesus (AS) the only begotten son of God? No, quite clearly not. Long before Jesus (AS) was born, David (AS) said in Psalm 2:7, ‘I will declare the decree, the Lord hath said unto me, Thou are my Son; this day have I begotten thee.’ So, David (AS) is also God’s begotten son??!!!
David is not “the only begotten son of God” and neither was anyone else called the Only begotten Son of God as Jesus Christ is. Just for your own perusal, these are some translations of Psalm 2:7 and in none of these translations will you see the word “only”.
I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. (KJV)
“I will declare the decree: The LORD has said to Me, ‘You are My Son, Today I have begotten You. (NKJV)
The king proclaims the LORD’s decree: “The LORD said to me, ‘You are my son. Today I have become your Father. (NLT)
I will proclaim the LORD’s decree: He said to me, “You are my son; today I have become your father. (NIV)
I will tell of the decree: The LORD said to me, “You are my Son; today I have begotten you. (ESV)
I will declare the LORD’s decree. He said to me, “You are my Son;[fn] today I have become your Father. (CSB)
Notice in none of the translations provided will you find the words “the only begotten son of God” in Psalm 2:7. But the Bible does say about Jesus Christ that He alone is the only begotten son of God. These are the relevant verses.
The Greek used for Jesus is τοῦ μονογενοῦς υἱοῦ τοῦ θεοῦ let’s break it down. The word τοῦ is a variation of the article and is a genitive singular masculine which means (of the) showing possession. The following word μονογενοῦς is also an adjective genitive singular masculine word which means (only begotten). We then have υἱοῦ a noun genitive singular masculine and means (Son), lastly, we have θεοῦ which is in the genitive case and means God.
The two following verses also say Jesus is the only begotten Son of God, so where is Susie getting her information from? It’s certainly not from the Bible.
Seems like Susie either never read the Bible or she lied claiming that there were others called the only begotten Son of God. But we’ve just proven that her statement is untrue.
He’s not the Son of God?
What is this?!! Jesus (AS) himself made clear that he is not the son of God. For example, Matthew 5:48, ‘Be ye therefore perfect, even as your father which is in heaven is perfect.’ So God is everyone’s father. Luke 4:41, ‘And devils also came out of many, crying out, and saying, Thou art Christ the Son of God. And he rebuking them suffered not to speak for they knew that he was Christ.’ Luke 9:20-21, Jesus (AS) said to his disciples, ‘But whom say ye that I am? Peter answering said, “The Christ of God! And he straightly charged them, and commanded them to tell no man that thing.’ If Jesus (AS) was the son of God, then why should he tell his disciples not to tell anyone this if everyone is to know and learn and believe this? The only explanation is that they were wrong to call him this and he was telling them so.
Seems like Susie is going against the Qur’ān using Matthew 5:48 to say that God is everyone’s Father. According to her Qur’ān, it says Allah is not the father of anyone, we can find this in Surah 19:88-93; 112:3
Why did she say Allah is everyone’s father when the Qur’ān says he’s not father to anyone is it out of ignorance or deception? Also, Jesus said He came down from heaven and He’s the Son which speaks of the deity of Christ.
Susie makes the claim that Jesus was telling the disciples not to tell people He’s the Son of God, but that’s not true. Jesus was saying not to let people know because it was not His time to come as King even though He already was. Jesus knew He had to come as the Lamb of God who would give His life on the cross for the sins of the world, that was His main purpose for His first advent.
If the people knew He was the Christ (Messiah) they wouldn’t have crucified Him. And if He was not crucified then there would be no salvation for anyone. The second point is that if the disciples were wrong according to Susie, then Allah’s message was corrupted. Let’s not forget the Qur’ān says the followers of Jesus would be superior until the day of judgement. If the message of Jesus was corrupted then Allah failed in making the believers of Jesus superior until the day of judgement as 3:52-55 says.
In the words of Jesus Christ, He said that He’s the Son of God, read and laugh Abdoola. Why did she not read this verse, I thought she was a Christian for 16 years and she never read these verses?
Secondly the concept of the Trinity. Associating others with God, i.e. to believe in the Trinity has no foundation whatsoever in Islam. In Mark 12:29 Jesus (AS) himself said, The first of all Commandments is, Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord.’ 1 Corinthians 8:4 ‘there is none other God but one.’ The truth about this mater is that the word ‘Trinity’ is not Biblical at all. The Canon’s answer was as follows: ‘The New Testament writers did not create the doctrine of the Trinity. It is an attempt, admittedly human (how could it be otherwise?), to express in words something of the inexpressible.’ This just sums it up. A human attempt to describe something inexpressible because it doesn’t exist!! Perhaps the clearest indication we have that Jesus (AS) and God are not equal, and therefore not one and the same, comes from John 14:28 when Jesus (AS) is quoted as saying: “My Father is greater than I.” When someone referred to him as good master in Luke 18:19 Jesus (AS) responded, “Why callest thou me good? There is none good but one, that is God.” Furthermore, Jesus (AS) drew clear distinctions between himself and God when he is quoted to have said, John 8:42 “I proceeded forth and came from God, neither came I of myself but He sent me.’ Jesus (AS) gave clear evidence of his subordination to God, rather than his equality with God, when he said in Luke 22:42, “not my will but Thine be one” and in John 5:30, ” I seek not mine own will but the will of the Father which has sent me.” That Jesus (AS) would admit that he did not come into the world on his own initiative but was directed to do so, that he would acknowledge another being as greater than himself, that he would negate his own will in deference to affirming the will of another gives clear proof that Jesus (AS) is not the Supreme One and therefore Jesus (AS) is not equal to or even God.
It’s sad these arguments Brackenborough is spouting are the same weak arguments from dawah missionaries. Let us go through each to show how flawed Islam is.
Christians believe in 1 God (Deuteronomy 6:4) not 3 as Muslims set up Red Herrings and bring fallacious arguments, all Christians affirm belief in 1 God. All 3 Persons (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) are the 1 God as they are of the one essence of God. They are co-equal in Genesis the word Elohim (אֱלֹהִים) which is a plural word.
We’re in agreement that God created the world spoken of in the first verse of Genesis, in the second verse the Holy Spirit was also involved in the making of creation “the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters” (Genesis 1:2). Lastly in John 1:1 the Word (Jesus Christ) also created the world, the proof is in verse 3 “All things were made by him” that is all things were made by Jesus Christ. All 3 were involved in the creation of the world.
We substantiate that Jesus is the Word of Allah in the Qur’ān [4:171] “The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah and His word”.
sūrat l-nisāa 4:171
There you go the Qur’ān says Jesus is the Word of Allah, Muhammad copied this from the Bible without knowing what the Word of God meant.
She mentioned 1 Corinthians 8:4, let’s point out her hypocrisy. This goes against the Muslim belief as they claim that Paul was a liar, saying he changed the teachings of Jesus Christ.[1] Yet here she’s taking one of Paul’s writings and saying she agrees with Paul that God is one. This is what Paul said, that is the height of hypocrisy.
Muslims say that Paul is the one who created Christianity and made up a lie about Jesus being God, but this Muslima is using Paul to claim what he’s teaching is correct.
John 14:28 “my Father is greater than I” Muslims love this quote but fail to understand it, Jesus Christ is God in the flesh, He became a real Man who was surrounded by people who were trying to kill Him. This verse is not speaking of the deity of Christ as being “lesser” than the Father.
The Father was in heaven, therefore, technically speaking the Father was in a greater position than the Son as He (the Father) is untouchable in heaven. While Jesus was on Earth as a real Man surrounded by enimies and subjected Himself to everything humans would be subjected to.
She then assumes in Luke 18:19 that Jesus Christ is saying He’s not good? Talk about not knowing the scriptures, if you read again Christ is asking the rich young ruler a question. In essence He’s asking the rich young ruler a rhetorical question “are you calling me God because only God is good”[2]
This verse actually goes against the Islamic claim and rejection of the deity of Christ, even though in their own Qur’ān Jesus can do things only Allah can do. First, Jesus is called pure in other words he’s Holy, in the Arberry translation he translates it “a boy most pure”.
In case there’s any doubt that this is what the verse says here’s the word for word syntax of this particular verse. Notice it says speaking of Isa “a son pure”.
So Jesus is pure and Holy, additionally he was able to speak from the cradle in the Qur’ān, no one else was able to accomplish this, the verse I’m referring to is Chapter 3 sūrat āl ʿim’rān. Not only is he pure, Holy and will speak from the cradle but he’s also called righteous.
Unfortunately, Muhammad is never spoken of in the same way as Jesus even in the Qur’ān. Let’s not forget that Jesus in the Qur’ān is the word of Allah, a spirit from Allah, Muslims cannot give an answer for 4:171 as Jesus is a spirit from Allah and his word. There’s also a verse that says Jesus heals the blind and lepers and is raising people from the dead.
That’s not all he also knows the unseen and can tell you what you hide in your house. This means Jesus has the same ability as Allah as in verse 2:33 Allah sees the unseen.
How is it Isa knows the unseen just like Allah, Isa can create life like Allah, he’s a word and spirit from Allah, and has the ability to speak from the cradle and is called Holy. These are all traits or attrubutes of God.
In John 8:42 Jesus Christ says He came from God, meaning He (Jesus) came from heaven, this corresponds to 4:171 in the Qur’ān which says Jesus is a spirit from Allah. Even though we don’t believe Isa is the true Jesus but Muhammad didn’t know what he was saying.
sūrat l-nisāa 4:171
The Qur’ān says Jesus is a spirit from Allah, and he is a word from Allah sent to Mary, some of the other Muslim translations read:
Sahih International “His word which He directed to Mary”
Pickthall “His word which He conveyed unto Mary”
Yusuf Ali “His Word, which He bestowed on Mary”
Shakir “His Word which He communicated to Marium”
Muhammad Sarwar “His Word, and a spirit from Him whom He conveyed to Mary.”
Mohsin Khan “His Word, which He bestowed on Maryam”
Arberry “His Word that He committed to Mary”
Here’s the verse in John where Christ says He came from God, providing evidence that Jesus Christ is eternal. No one else can make this same claim.
This ties in with another verses where the Lord Jesus said He came down from heaven. I wonder how Abdoools would respond to these words from Jesus Himself?
John 6:38 proves that Jesus preexisted His incarnation this is why He can say He existed before Abraham. It’s a hard pill for Muslims to swallow. She mentioned Luke 22:42 and misquoted it, the word is “done” not “one”. She assumes that because the Father sent the Son that this somehow discredits Jesus Christ being God.
Let’s think about this logically, if a father told his son to go to the store for him does this in anyway indicate that the son is no longer human because the father sent him? No! That would be insane and silly to claim such. This is what Muslims do, they think because Jesus was sent by the Father this means He’s not God. As we’ve just showed this has nothing to do with the deity of Christ.
She mentioned John 5:30 indicating that Christ sought the Father’s will. The will of the Father is not different from the will of the Son as they are the One God, they work in complete union together.
Therefore, it’s not strange for Christ to say He wants to do the will of the Father. Jesus Christ is not rebellious and never sinned and will do what He was sent to do. This verse corresponds with Luke 22:42.
The Bible is a collection of 66 Books
The Bible is a collection of 66 Books covering two thousand years of history written over nearly a thousand years. Inaccuracies and contradictions are likely to occur as it was not kept pure and the language changed. It could be said that the Bible is a book of ‘Chinese Whispers’ in that the message had been passed on, in some cases, from eyewitnesses to their associates. Original manuscripts can change as they are copied out. Existing original material is almost non-existent. No entire original documents have survived. The language is untranslatable as time has changed the language and so earlier languages of the Bible cannot fully be understood. All there are are copies of the Gospels written hundreds of years after the original writing.
It’s funny that Susie says the Bible has “inaccuracies and contradictions” yet her prophet said he believes in the Bible, which means Muhammad believes in the inaccuracies and contradictions according to her.
I would like her to answer when was the Bible corrupted, was it before Muhammad’s time or during his time? Her claim of corruption goes against Allah, as he said none can change his words, as the Torah and Injil according to the Qur’ān are Allah’s words.
Other verses which speak no one being able to change Allah’s words are surah 6:115, 10:64, which means Allah is incapable and not powerful enough to protect his books. Let’s not forget all of the contradictions found in the Qur’ān, I’ll link to some articles which lays this argument.
Just like every other Muslim Susie speaks of something she has no knowledge of, in order to change an ancient manuscript the process would be impossible as we would be able to detect where those “changes occurred”.
In order for this to happen they would have to gather all existing manuscripts in the entire world. Not an easy task as they were distributed to different churches (Antioch, Corinth, Ephesus, Thessalonica, Rome, Colosse) not to mention any other place not recorded.
We’re talking about thousands upon thousands of manuscripts. Then in order to change the text, a pumice stone would be used. Using a pumice stone would cause damage to the manuscript itself. Lastly, we would be able to make out what text was laid down before the pumice stone was used. It’s just not physically possible.[3]
The nail in the coffin is that the Qur’ān was the book not preserved, we have up to 40 different Arabic Qur’āns with different words and meanings. Plus there are missing verses in the Qur’ān like the breastfeeding verse eaten by a goat. Here’s the article speaking of the unpreserved Qur’ān.
Here’s the sum Susie Brackenborough has no clue what she’s talking about just like every Muslim. She has learned these nonsensical arguments and is parroting them. According to what we learned she was never a born-again Christian. While the word Trinity is not found in the bible the teaching is, but the word Tawhid is not found in the Qur’an.
The Lord Jesus is the ONLY Begotten Son of God and He is the Son of God. He’s called the Word of God found in both the Bible and Qur’an meaning He’s eternal. And the Bible has been preserved as we have plenty of manuscript evidence while the Qur’an has none! We’re calling Susie to come to Jesus Christ for salvation as He is the Living Word of God.
Footnotes
[1] Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said: The first one to introduce the innovated view that ‘Ali was infallible and that he should have been the caliph on the basis of religious texts was the leader of these hypocrites, ‘Abdullah ibn Saba’, who was originally Jewish, then pretended to be Muslim and aimed to corrupt the Islamic religion as Paul had corrupted the Christian religion.
[2] Ironically, Jesus withholds the anticipated answer. Does Jesus sense that the questioner, like the Pharisee in the previous parable (18:11-12), is overconfident or disingenuous? “Why do you call me good?” responds Jesus. “No one is good — except God alone.” The Greek me (v. 19, “me”) in the rhetorical question is positioned emphatically at the front of the sentence, “Why do you call me good?” Plummer calls the ruler’s address of Jesus “extraordinary,” for in Judaism God or Torah are rightly called good, but not rabbis. Jesus does not affirm his goodness but implies that his goodness is the goodness of God, the source of all goodness, working in him: “The Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees the Father doing” (John 5:19). Given Jesus’ servant posture and reticence regarding his messianic status, he directs the ruler unambiguously to God. “No one is good — except God alone” could also be translated “except the one God,” thus directing the ruler to the Shema (Deut 6:4). Edwards, James R. The Gospel According to Luke. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company/Apollos, 2015.
[3] To begin, we must emphasize that out of these 150,000 variants, 99 percent hold virtually no significance whatsoever. Many of these variants simply involve a missing letter in a word; some involve reversing the order of two words (such as “Christ Jesus” instead of “Jesus Christ”); some may involve the absence of one or more insignificant words. Really, when all the facts are put on the table, only about 50 of the variants have any real significance– and even then, no doctrine of the Christian faith or any moral commandment is effected by them. For more than ninety-nine percent of the cases the original text can be reconstructed to a practical certainty. Ron Rhodes (2022). Manuscript Evidence for the Bible’s Reliability. Retrieved from https://www.ronrhodes.org/manuscript-support-for-the-bible-s-relia
The single most important doctrine of Islam is that Allah is one, he has no partners and, therefore, our Muslim friends continuously say that Jesus Christ cannot be God. Is this what the Qur’ān teaches let’s examine sūrat l-tawbah (The Repentance). Translations from the likes of Sahih International, Pickthall, Yusuf Ali, Shakir, Muhammad Sarwar, Mohsin Khan, Arberry are the ones most are familiar with among other less known translations like say Maududi.
This translation is from Pickthall, the highlighted portions are of importance for the purposes of this article. In his translation, he deliberately separates the word Allah from Messiah. Insinuating the Jews and Christians have taken their Rabbis, Monks and the Messiah as Lord or God. This is a false understanding of the Trinity.
Taking a closer look you can see that the Arabic text doesn’t read the same. Our Muslim friends tell us the Arabic Qur’ān always takes precedence over the English translation. Ok, we’ll go with them, take note that in the Arabic text there’s a conjunction. The words Allah and the Messiah are spoken of as being Lord or better yet as God, I’ve taken the liberty of pasting اللَّهِ وَالْمَسِيحَ into Google Translate which exposes the lies of Islam.
Below I’ve also provided proof from the Muslim website Qur’ān Corpus, thanks again to the Muslims for making it easy for us to expose their lies. The words اللَّهِ وَالْمَسِيحَ form a textual conjunction, notice the “وَ” (wa) also known as “and” means Allah AND the Messiah are God as that’s the subject of the verse.
We can further bust the Abdoools by going to their tafsir[1] for this verse and get the context of what’s being spoken of here. Let’s see what Ibn Abbas the ink of the Qur’ān says about this ayat.
It’s clear from Ibn Abbas that he’s trying to refute the idea that anyone besides Allah can be god, yet the Qur’ān says both Allah AND the Messiah are God according to the Arabic text. Muslims cannot get around this without denying their own book.
To end this article there’s one translation which exposes all the other English translations. Sometimes honestly slips through when Abdoools aren’t aware. The same verse from Sahih International look at how they unknowingly told the truth.
They translated the Arabic text correctly and when they did so it shows how deceptive the other translators were, both Allah and Jesus Christ are spoken of as being Lord according to the Sahih International translation.
Conclusion
What have we learned today? That the English translators of the Qur’ān are deceptive and try to hide the fact that Jesus Christ is God by changing what the text says. The Arabic text reads differently and 9:31 places Allah and the Messiah as god. Lastly, Ibn Abbas the cousin of Muhammad who is called the ink of the Qur’ān argues for God being a solitary one, but he’s against what the text of the Qur’ān says.
Muslims come out of the false religion called Islam, there’s no hope of salvation by following a false prophet. Come to Jesus Christ who is God, eternal life is only found in the Son of God.
Footnotes
[1] Tafsir al-Jalalayn: They have taken their rabbis the scholars among the Jews and their monks the devout among the Christians as lords beside God — following them in making lawful what God has made unlawful and making unlawful what He has made lawful — and the Messiah son of Mary when they were not commanded in the Torah and the Gospel except to worship One God there is no god except Him; glory be to Him as an affirmation of His transcendence high above what they associate with Him. Royal Aal al-Bayt Institute for Islamic Thought (2021). How and when to reference. Retrieved from https://www.altafsir.com/
Islam the religion of contradiction is at it again, since Muslims are stuck in between a rock and a hard place, it’s on us Christians to show our friends the truth. As we know their Imams are lying to them in order to keep them in Islam.
How many times have we heard Muslims say Islam is based on logic? Let’s see if this is a fact or fiction according to the man who knows Qur’ān best Muhammad the mutah prophet. If you ever used a map regardless if it was a hardcopy map or an application on your phone. We know there are 4 main directions North, East, South and West also known as the Cardinal direction.
Within the 4 directions, there are combinations called ordinal directions or intercardinal directions for instance Northeast (NE). Now let’s see what the Qur’ān says.
55:17 sūrat l-raḥmān (The Most Gracious)
55:17 (He is) the Lord of the two easts (places of sunrise during early summer and early winter) and the Lord of the two wests (places of sunset during early summer and early winter).
Here’s the Arabic Syntax from Corpus Qur’ān for 55:17, let’s thank the Muslims for providing this valuable website which gets them busted every time. The word l-mashriqayni and underneath it the translation “(of) the two East” (الْمَشْرِقَيْنِ). Likewise for the word l-maghribayni and its translation “(of) the two Wests” (الْمَغْرِبَيْنِ).
Arabic Syntax and morphology
Even though the words in Arabic are above for your viewing, let’s take a closer look at how they try to fix this in English Translations.
55:17 English Translations
The majority of English Translations will translate the Arabic “two East and two West” (Pickthall, Yusuf Ali, Shakir, Arberry), but this is not the case when it comes to others.
Look at the deception from Sahih International they translate it as “two sunrises and two sunsets”, this is of course false as there’s only 1 sunrise and sunset. A challenge to any Abdoool to provide proof there’s more than 1 sunrise/sunset.
Shakir changed the plural word for two East and West and made it singular “the East … the West”, this is a clear contradiction to Sahih International’s translation above.
Muhammad Sarwar translation tried to fix the problem by saying “the East and West through all seasons”, notice how he changed it to singular instead of plural as the others translate it, he also adds the words “through all seasons.” These words do not appear in Arabic but because they are desperate to save their Qur’ān they use deceptive tactics and lie.
Mohsin Khan in his translation gives tafsir to explain away the contradiction, he tries to say there are two sunrises/sunsets one in the summer and the other in the winter. This goes against the Qur’ānic verses that say the Qur’ān is “explained in detail” (6,114; 7,52; 41,3 & 7,174), “a full explanation of the Book” (10,37), “the Book explaining all things” (16,89), “a detailed exposition of all things” (12,111), “the manifest Book (this Quran) that makes things clear” (44,2) “a Book are perfected its Verses moreover, explained in detail” (11,1) and in which “nothing has been neglected” (6,38).
If the Qur’ān perfectly explains things in detail why does Mohsin Khan have to add tafsir into the verse in order to explain? This alone proves the Qur’ān to be a false book.
Muhammad thought that because he saw the sunset in a different location he concluded that there are two East and two West. Really Muslims? Is this revelation from god? What kind of god doesn’t know there’s 1 East and West?
How about places that don’t have sunset like the Artic Circle, it’s common knowledge that there are communities that will have constant sunlight or plunged into darkness. Since these places don’t have sunset, shouldn’t Allah be aware of this if he created the world?[1]
Conclusion
It’s abundantly clear that Allah cannot be god neither can the Qur’ān be divine revelation from god as there’s no such thing as two East or West. And if Abdoools want to say that North is 1 and Northeast is another and Northwest another this would still prove the Qur’ān wrong as that would be more than two.
Nowhere in the Qur’ān does it mention intercardinal directions as this wouldn’t be purely North or West. Muslims need to face the fact that Muhammad was a false prophet who said many crazy things as he himself was a crazy man.
Footnotes
[1] During the summer, the sun does not set above the Arctic Circle. In fact, this phenomenon is what helps to define the Arctic Circle. Like the equator, the Arctic Circle is an imaginary line. It’s defined as the latitude above which the sun does not set on the day of the summer solstice (usually around June 21). wonderopolis.org (2014–2022). Where Does the Sun Never Set? Retrieved from https://www.wonderopolis.org/wonder/where-does-the-sun-never-set/
Have you ever come across comments from Muslims as they say the most insane lies against the Bible? Well, we’re going to start showcasing these comments here and responding to them. The first is from a Muslim who rejects there was ever a verse in the Qur’ān for breastfeeding adults.
This Muslim is unaware of the verse Aisha had with her under her pillow, this was after Muhammad’s death and is recorded in Sunan ibn Majah 1944 and is graded Hasan which means it’s a good reliable hadith. Here’s the chain of narrators in case Muslims claim this is a “weak hadith” even though is graded, Hasan.
Here’s the chain: Abu Salama, Yahya ibn Khalef, told us, Abd al -Alali, on the authority of Muhammad ibn Ishaq, on the authority of Abdullah ibn Abu al-Bakr.
It’s clear in the hadith Aisha says it was a verse revealed from Allah to Muhammad about breastfeeding and adult 10 times. But the Abdool in the above comment said: “What? Recite the verse for adult breastfeeding? I am not surprised why the Christians dont know what it means verse. Sunnah is not verse..”
His claim is that because this is a Sunnah that it’s not a verse, he contradicts his prophet because Sunnah is the sayings of Muhammad. And the Hadith right before your eyes says “The verse” which means at one time in Muhammad’s life this verse was revealed and should be in the Qur’ān but it’s nowhere to be found.
There goes the Qur’ān’s perfect preservation theory. He then runs from the embarrassment of his prophet to the Bible and wrenches verses out of their context without understanding the verse. We love spanking Abdoools with the truth, therefore, let’s dive into the 2 verses he brought up.
1 Corinthians 5:1-3
The background to Corinthians was the church which was established in Corinth was committing acts contrary to what the apostles taught. Paul heard what was happening at the assembly there and sent them a letter rebuking the practises they were indulging in, in this verse namely fornication and contentedness with sin.
Paul in this verse was saying the fornication which is happening among you is so horrible that not even unbelieving Gentiles are committing such acts. This was a strong rebuke, but T.M. Guiapar would like to believe this was a teaching condoned in the Bible. He obviously didn’t read the verse or the surrounding text on purpose, this is the typical tactic Muslims employ.
If he would have read the next 2 following verses he would have seen Paul was against the fornication of this man and told the believers in Corinth to have him excommunicated.
Paul says they are “puffed up” he then says this person needs to “be taken away from among you”. In verse 3 Paul says he has already judged this man concerning this deed he committed. Why didn’t T.M. Guiapar look at these verses? It’s because Muslims like to lie just like their prophet Muhammad.
Genesis 19:32
Here’s another verse Muslims run to claiming the Bible teaches incest, anyone who reads the Bible knows that it records that mankind sins. None of the prophets was sinless as Islam teaches, and therefore, while God used broken men to deliver His message these men and women were sinners just like you and me.
The unfortunate story of Lot and his daughters was a direct result of sin, the result of this sin was the birth of two rival nations (Moab, Ammon) of Israel. It’s not a teaching but a learning lesson of what we are not to do.
God never wanted Lot’s daughters to have intercourse with their father, unlike Allah who had his “prophet” Muhammad have intercourse with a 9-year-old girl (Aisha). As well as the teachings of the Qur’ān which say it’s ok to have intercourse with prepubescent girls.
According to their scholars, this verse has 3 groups of women in view, the context is of making certain that when a Muslim man divorces his wife that she’s not pregnant. He has to wait 3 months before he can leave her.
Notice the words “because of their young age” these are little girls who aren’t getting their period yet. Even the scholars of Islam expose the false prophet Muhammad, how can anyone follow a child paedophile who teaches sexual intercourse with minors?
Conclusion
Our friend T.M. Guiapar is severely deceived and is in dire need of salvation. We can only pray for him and other Muslims that they realise the evil man they believe in is leading them to hell and not paradise. May the grace of God open their eyes and they come in droves to Jesus Christ the One who never sinned and is Perfect because He is God in the flesh.
Footnotes
[1] The denouement of the Lot story is inglorious, to say the least. At the end we feel that Sodom had no righteous citizens whatever! The Yahwist uses the departure of Lot and his daughters from the stage as an occasion to besmirch the origins of two of the peoples whose territories bordered the kingdom of David and Solomon on the east. As in the case of Ham, the father of Canaan (9:20-27), drunkenness and illicit sex are the media of contempt. After this tale, Lot and his daughters play no further role in the history of salvation. Ironies abound in this story. Lot’s two daughters, apparently unworthy even to be introduced by name, are worried that they will never find a suitable man and never bear children. So they do unto their father that which he was prepared to have them do with strangers (see 19:8). They rape their father on two successive nights, and they both become pregnant. Towner, W. S. (2001). Genesis (1st ed., Ser. Westminster bible companion). Westminster John Knox Press.
“Allah created four things with His hands Allah, may He be exalted, singled out Adam (peace be upon him) to create him with His hands, as He has told us, and He did not create any other animate being with His hands.”
During talks with Muslims, the subject of Jesus being worshipped as God comes up and the Abdools are obsessed with that topic. But no worries we love talking about the Lord. They’ll claim that Isa (the Islamic version of Jesus) was created the same as Adam.
Creation of Adam
According to the Qur’ān Adam was created from clay/mud and Allah used his hands to create him.[1] Don’t forget the above quote which says Allah didn’t create anyone else in the same way (ie his hands).
Why does Allah say “We created” when Muslims claim Allah is 1 god? Strange that he always refers to himself in the plural, like he’s talking with another Allah and says weird things like “May Allah forgive you”[2] (عَفَا ٱللَّهُ عَنكَ).
Surah 17:11 speaks about the creation of man, that he’s hasty. Ibn Kathir in his Tafsir links this to the creation of Adam. Not only was Adam created from clay, but Allah took his sweet time creating him so much so that Adam became impatient asking Allah to finish him before the night came. Allah never said “Be” when he created Adam.
Here’s a Sahih Hadith from Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2134 which tells us that Musa (Moses) argued with Adam saying Allah created Adam with his hand. Isa is never spoken of being created by Allah’s hand. Here’s the commentary from Kathir it’s in reference to Surah Al-Isra 17:11.
As you can see Adam was created in a very specific way Adam’s soul was breathed into him and was made from clay. Does the Qur’ān say Jesus was created the same way?
Creation of Isa (Jesus)
We’re asking Muslims to bring evidence that Isa was created the same as Adam. Muslims want us to believe they were but does the Qur’ān teach that?
Here in Surah 3:59 it says that Jesus was made the same as Adam, remember the above quote, no one other than Adam was created by the hands of Allah. Also, Allah never said, “Be” in creating Adam. And lastly, Jesus is not created from clay he was born from the Virgin Mary (Maryam) without a father.
Notice Kathir says that Adam was created without a father or mother, but Isa had a mother called Maryam, therefore, he was created by a woman that’s not the same as Adam. In one tafsir we’ve just busted their prophet. If the Qur’an claims they are made the same then Isa shouldn’t have a mother but he indeed does.
“[Allah] said, ‘O Iblees, what prevented you from prostrating to that which I created with My hands?” (meaning Adam) in Saad 38:75.
“Imam ad-Daarimi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Allah created Adam with His hand directly; He did not create any other animate being with His hands. Thus He singled him out, favoured him and honoured him with that renown.”
Imam ad-Daarimi agrees that only Adam was created in that distinct way, this would exclude Isa from being created the same as Adam. This is a contradiction in the Qur’ān as Isa and Adam were not made the same. Their own scholars agree that Allah made 4 things with his own hands.[3]
Conclusion
We looked at Surah 15:26, 17:11, 3:59 and 38:75, none of which has any evidence of Adam and Isa having been made in the same fashion by Allah. We challenge the Abdools to bring proof Adam and Isa (Jesus) were created the same way, if they cannot bring any then they must admit that the Qur’ān is a false book, they should leave Islam and come to the true God Jesus Christ who is the Messiah.
Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
[1] “These are the four things that Allah created with His hand: the Throne, the Pen, the garden of Eden, and Adam. As for all other created beings, they were created by the word “Be,” and they were.” Islamqa.com (2018, March 10) APA citation. Allah created four things with His hands. Retrieved from https://islamqa.info/en/answers/89966/allah-created-four-things-with-his-hands
[2] [9:43] May Allah forgive you (O Muhammad SAW). Why did you grant them leave (for remaining behind, you should have persisted as regards your order to them to proceed on Jihad), until those who told the truth were seen by you in a clear light, and you had known the liars? Quran.com (2022) APA citation. Surah At-Tawbah. Retrieved from https://quran.com/9?startingVerse=43
[3] “Ad-Daarimi, al-Laalkaa’i, al-Aajurri and others narrated with a saheeh isnad from Ibn ‘Umar that he said: Allah created four things with His hand: the Throne, the Pen, Eden and Adam. Then He said to the rest of creation: “Be,” and it was.” Islamqa.com (2018, March 10) APA citation. Allah created four things with His hands. Retrieved from https://islamqa.info/en/answers/89966/allah-created-four-things-with-his-hands
The teachings of Islam reject the idea that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, Muslims say Jesus is only a man and not God. If we’re to follow the path that leads to the truth we must scrutinize all until we can come to a conclusion.
Does the Qur’ān and Hadith reject the idea that Jesus is God? All Sunni Muslims accept both the Qur’ān and Sunnah of Muhammad. The following passages oppose the Islamic idea of who Jesus Christ is.
Jesus is Holy (Pure)
There’s not a single person on earth who is Holy, the Arabic says that Allah would give a pure son (لَكِ غُلَـٰمًۭا زَكِيًّۭا). God is the only one who can be pure and holy, we all are sinners and are in need of God. Here Jesus is called Holy and Pure,1 if He’s only a man like us all how can he be free from sin? Unlike Muhammad who is called a sinner in Qur’ān 47:19; 48:2.
Jesus is a Creator
In Islam one of the five pillars is that there’s only one God, this is also known as the Shahada.
The belief in one Allah is the central tenet of the Islamic faith, around which all else revolves. Muslims are continuously reminded of this foundational belief, in the recital of the Shahada(shahadah) during each of the five daily prayers, as well as many more pivotal moments of a Muslim’s life.
The problem is that God should be the only Creator, yet in the Qur’ān we read that Jesus is also a Creator even if Allah granted it to him. In Qur’ān 23:12-14 Allah confirms this saying he’s “the best of the creators” meaning he’s not the only creator. This is problematic because Allah is causing people to believe that Jesus is God as he can create life from nothing, only something God can do.
3:49 “… I design for you from clay [that which is] like the form of a bird, then I breathe into it and it becomes a bird by permission of Allah. And I cure the blind and the leper, and I give life to the dead … And I inform you of what you eat and what you store in your houses. …”
Notice Jesus says “I” (personal pronoun) will design a bird from clay and he breathed life into the bird, not only that but he has the ability to cure blindness, lepers and raise the dead back to life. He also knows what you have in your homes and can tell you what you eat without being there. That’s called being omniscient which is the state of knowing everything, only God can know everything.2
According to merriam-webster.com the definition of omniscient:
1) having infinite awareness, understanding, and insight
2) possessed of universal or complete knowledge
Dajjal Compared to Messiah
For Muslim’s Allah alone is their Lord but here in the Hadith we have Muhammad warning Muslims of the Dajjal who is the false messiah. Muhammad goes on to describe him and compares him to the real Messiah (Isa) and making the distinction that the Dajjal has one eye while the true Messiah has more than one eye.
This is the only difference between the two, this is why Muhammad says “if you are confused about him” this is how you can distinguish between the two by their eyes. The problem is Muhammad says the Muslims Lord is not one eyed.3
If Allah is not a man then why does Muhammad compare him to the Dajjal? This can only mean he’s calling Isa the messiah God as only God is Lord.
Conclusion
Even in their own Islamic books we have evidence of the deity of Christ, the Qur’ān says he’s pure, can heal sickness and create life. And last but not least is called Lord in their Hadith. In contrast Muhammad who Muslims claim is the seal/greatest of the prophets is never called pure, has no miracles and cannot create life like Jesus can. It’s obvious that the truth of Jesus cannot be kepted from going forth, even when it comes to a satanic religion like Islam.
We love Muslims and want them to come to know the real Jesus Christ of the Bible. He offers eternal life to anyone who’s willing to humble themselves, may their eyes be opened to the truth.
Footnotes
1 “A second account of the Annunciation also can be found in sura 3:37– 47: “Recall when the angel said, ‘Oh Mary, God has chosen you and purified you, and chosen you above the women of the world.’” And “Oh Mary, be obedient to your Lord, prostrate yourself, and bow to those who bow.” And a little later in sura 3: “Remember when the angel said, ‘God gave you tidings of a word from himself whose name is Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, a famous one in this world and the next. One of those brought near to God.’” In the same sura, there are a number of other verses related to Mary and Jesus: “And he will speak to the people in the cradle, and as a grown man. One of the righteous shall he be.”” Vicchio, S., & Birch, B. C. (2008). Biblical figures in the islamic faith. Wipf & Stock Pub. p. 133
2 “Then Jesus turned twelve. The first miracle of his witnessed by people occurred when his mother was staying at the home of an Egyptian dignitary. A treasure was stolen from him while only poor people were living in his house, yet he did not accuse them. Mary was saddened by that dignitary’s misfortune. When Jesus noticed his mother’s sadness at the misfortune of their host, he asked her, ‘Oh mother, would you like me to guide him to his property?’ She said, ‘Yes, my son.’ He then said, ‘Tell him to assemble the poor men of his home;’ whereupon Mary told the dignitary, and he assembled them. When they were assembled, Jesus approached two of them, one blind, the other crippled. He put the cripple on the shoulder of the blind man and said to him, ‘Stand up with him.’ The blind man said, ‘I am too weak.’ Jesus replied, ‘How then were you able to do that yesterday?’ When they heard his words, they forced the blind man to get up with the cripple. When he stood up carrying the other, the cripple plunged to the window of the treasury. Jesus said, ‘This is how they cheated the landlord yesterday; the blind man used his strength, and the cripple his eyes.’ The cripple and the blind said, ‘He is right.’ And they returned the property to the dignitary.” Barker, G. A., & Gregg, S. E. (2010). Jesus beyond Christianity: the classic texts. Oxford University Press. pp. 104, 105
3 This is what the Muslims believe about the Messiah ‘Eesa ibn Maryam (peace be upon him). Al-Bukhaari (3435) and Muslim (28) narrated from ‘Ubaadah (may Allaah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever bears witness that there is no god but Allaah alone, with no partner or associate, and that Muhammad is His slave and Messenger, and that ‘Eesa is His slave and Messenger, a word which Allaah bestowed upon Maryam and a spirit created by Him, and that Paradise is real, and Hell is real, Allaah will admit him through whichever of the eight gates of Paradise he wishes.” islamqa.info (2003, May 24) APA citation. The Muslims’ Beliefs Concerning the Messiah ‘Eesa ibn Maryam. Retrieved from https://islamqa.info/en/answers/43148/the-muslims-beliefs-concerning-the-messiah-eesa-ibn-maryam
Here we love Muslims and want them to know the truth about what Islam teaches. We challenge them to go and check the sources for themselves, this is your eternal salvation that’s at stake. It’s understandable if you have been born into a Muslim family, and all your friends are Muslims, therefore, you don’t want to make them upset. But where you’ll spend eternity should be more important to you than if someone will be upset if you decide to leave Islam.
In this article, we’ll take a look at another contradiction in the Qur’ān. If Allah is supposed to be the one who guides then why does he also lead people astray?
Allah in Qur’ān
How can anyone believe in a “god” who leads people astray and decrees for people to commit sin? If Allah leads people away from the correct path or direction then every single Muslim on earth cannot have any assurance of entering Jannah because how do they know if Allah is not making them think they are on the right path, but in reality is leading them astray? They cannot know and won’t until they pass from this life.
Surah 2:26 says Allah’s intention is to mislead many people and guide many. The god of Islam is very finicky, how is Allah any different from Shaytan? He’s not! Satan’s job is to lead people astray, then why even have Satan, Allah is doing a better job![1]
Islam is a pagan religion that extols a man called Muhammad to god-like status, Muhammad is the one Muslims worship as they associate partners with Allah. The proof comes from their own scholars these are from their own sources.[2]
Surah 35:8“Verily, Allah sends astray whom He wills, and guides whom He wills.” again we read that it’s Allah who leads people astray. Ibn Kathir says the ultimate destiny Iblis is blazing fire, that those who disbelieve will be punished by Allah. Excuse me but isn’t it Allah’s decree which determines if a person will be a disbeliever or not? Why is it their fault if they followed Shaytan, it would be Allah’s decree before they were born to follow Shaytan.[3]
Shaytan in Qur’ān
If the Qur’ānic verses above tell us that Allah sends people astray, then what are Muslims to do when the same book says Shaytan is the one who leads people astray? The only way to reconcile the ayats are to believe Allah is Satan.
In the above verses, Shaytan who is of the Jinn says “I will take an appointed portion of your servants” and Allah curses him because of leading them from the true path.[4]
Surah 4:118-119“And he [Shaytan] said: “I will take an appointed portion of your servants.” “Verily, I will mislead them, and surely, I will arouse in them false desires;” in this ayat, it’s Shaytan doing the leading astray.
Conclusion
I’m interested to see if there are any Muslims who can bring any evidence against what their own Qur’ān and scholars say about Allah and Shaytan. From reading the verses at face value nothing distinguishes Allah from Satan. We implore Muslims to leave the satanic cult of Islam and come into the arms of Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour. Only with Christ is your eternal salvation fully assured, and you can know for certain when you pass from this life you’ll make it into heaven.
With Muhammad the bewitched prophet and Allah there is no salvation, we challenge Muslims to prove that Allah is not Satan. Let’s see if any will bring proof? Until next time God bless.
Footnotes
[1] God then responds to them saying Thereby that is by this similitude He leads many astray from the truth on account of their disbelieving in it and thereby He guides many believers on account of their belief in it; and thereby He leads none astray except the wicked those that reject obedience to Him. altafsir.com (2021) APA citation. Surah Al-Baqarah 2:26, Tafsir al-Jalalayn. Retrieved from https://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=2&tAyahNo=26&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2
[2] (Those who believe) in Muhammad and the Qur’ān (know that it), the simile, (is the Truth from their Lord; but those who disbelieve), in Muhammad and the Qur’ān, (say: What doth Allah wish (to teach) by such similitude?) say: O Muhammad! What Allah wishes by such simile is that (He misleadeth many thereby) of the Jews from the true Religion, (and He guideth many thereby) of the believers, (and He misleadeth thereby), by such similes, (only miscreants), the Jews. altafsir.com (2021) APA citation. Surah Al-Baqarah 2:26, Tafsir Ibn ‘Abbas. Retrieved from https://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=2&tAyahNo=26&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2
[3] Having stated that the ultimate destiny of the followers of Iblis will be the blazing Fire, Allah then tells us that for those who disbelieve there will be a severe punishment. This is because they obeyed the Shaytan and disobeyed Ar-Rahman. And He tells us that those who believed in Allah and His Messengers…(Verily, Allah sends astray whom He wills and guides whom He wills.) means according to His decree. (So destroy not yourself in sorrow for them.) means, do not grieve about that, for Allah is Wise in His decree and He leaves astray whomsoever He leaves astray, and He guides whomsoever He guides, and in doing so He has perfect knowledge and wisdom. wordofallah.com (2017, January 25) APA citation. Surah Sad 35:8, Tafsir Ibn Kathir. Retrieved from https://www.wordofallah.com/tafseer
The start of Islam began when Muhammad received Qur’ān in the cave Hira, the traditional Islamic sources tell us that it was an angel who visited Muhammad and delivered the verses of Qur’ān. But did the “angel” ever reveal himself as such?
Certainly, if we apply the same stipulation when it comes to the Bible we’re told that the angel (ἄγγελος) Gabriel (Γαβριὴλ) came to Mary announcing Mary would give birth to Jesus. Therefore we can be certain who this angel was that appeared to Mary.
Notice the scripture says the angel Gabriel was sent from God (θεοῦ), Mary who is the virgin visited by the angel is then greeted by him as he said, Hail (Χαῖρε). Looking at the Greek confirms what we have in our Bible.
In the Qur’ān, we find the same story in Surah Maryam with the exclusion of the angel identifying himself to her. He tells her that she will have a pure boy, this is of course Isa (the Islamic version of Jesus).
Even Mary gets more respect than Muhammad, this angel who Muslims agree it’s Jibril (Gabriel) didn’t squeeze Mary the way Muhammad was pressed like a grapefruit. In Surah 96:1-5 we have the story of “Jibril” coming to Muhammad and violently pressing or squeezing him 3 times.
The Islamic scholar Ibn Kathir in his tafsir tells us that Muhammad could no longer bear it being squeezed by this angel who never said who he was, if the angel never said he was Jibril then how can Muslims tell us it was Jibril?
Kathir tells us that Muhammad would go to cave Hira to worship, this brings up a good question if Muhammad didn’t receive Qur’ān at this point who was Muhammad worshipping? He couldn’t have known who Allah was, this confirms that Muhammad was a pagan just as Shaykh Uthman ibn Farooq said: Muhammed didn’t come from an Abrahamic faith but was a pagan who didn’t know Jibril.
According to Kathir, the revelation came to Muhammad suddenly in cave Hira, the angel said “Read” seizing Muhammad and pressed him multiple times until he could no longer bear it. Afterwards, Muhammad was afraid and ran to his wife Khadijah. In the following explanation from Kathir we’re told that Khadijah took Muhammad to see her cousin Waraqah bin Nawfal who according to Islamic tradition was a Christian, truth is he was not a Christian he was a Nasara. and it was these two who convinced Muhammad that the angel was Jibril.
Neither Khadijah or Waraqah bin Nawfal were there with Muhammad in the cave, how can they with surety say this was an angel and not a demon. Kathir then tells us about the mental state of Muhammad, when Waraqah bin Nawfal died and the “revelations” stopped Muhammad became depressed and tried killing himself multiple times by tossing himself off a mountain.
Confirming what Kathir tells us in the tafsir we will now turn to an authentic Hadith from Sahih al-Bukhari which corroborates this story.
Sahih al-Bukhari 3392 states the prophet returned to his wife Khadija in fear of what he just experienced. Khadija takes Muhammad to visit her cousin Waraqa bin Naufal and he tells Muhammad that what he experienced was an angel. As we see here it was Waraqa who claimed Muhammad saw an angel. No account in the Qur’ān ever mentions this was an angel from Allah.
Additionally, we also have the account of Khadija giving Muhammad a lap dance found in The Life of Muhammad by Ibn Isḥāq on page 107. Here she puts the “Jibril” to a test asking the prophet to sit on her lap asking Muhammad if he still sees him, in-which Muhammad responds by saying yes. Once she gets undressed this entity departs and Khadija then tells Muhammad this is an angel of God.
Muhammad’s entire prophethood rest on top of these 2 people Waraqa bin Naufal and his wife Khadija. When Muhammad was in the cave this being never revealed himself stating that he was Jibril. Where do Muslims get this fabricated idea from because it’s not in the Qur’ān? As we saw in this article Muhammad had no witnesses to his experience in the cave, the “angel” never gave Muhammad a name and lastly Muhammad didn’t know he was a prophet, it was Waraqa and Khadija who claimed Muhammad was a prophet.
It’s not difficult to see that Muhammad never received revelations from God, all of the Qur’ān is made up of fabricated stories from a man who’s mentally ill.
The popular Muslim website Islamqa is a da‘wah site supervised by Shaykh Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid. They provide “answers” for Muslims who write in asking questions about Islam. This article focuses on magic in Islam. Is magic viewed as something evil or good? A Muslim wrote asking:
“I am Muslim and I am from India. I grew up reading fairy tales and fantasies, but now after all these years I am being told everywhere that there is no good magic in Islam and there is only witchcraft. Now I am desperately looking for answers to my “CHILDHOOD FANTASIES”.I hope you would clear my doubt.”
(1) The way in which it is attained, through which the practitioner of magic or witchcraft seeks help from the realm of the jinn and shayaateen (devils) to achieve his magic. This is a way that is filled with things that undermine one’s religious commitment and involves resorting to haraam things and – in many cases – falling into disbelief and apostasy. That is done is done to please the devils to meet the needs of that unknown realm which seeks to deceive the sons of Adam.
(2) The aim of Islam is to close this door altogether and block the means that usually lead to spreading evil among the people and causing trouble among them. That is because most of the deeds that the practitioners of magic commit only result in causing evil and harm to people. Hence it is reasonable and acceptable to say that a complete prohibition is the only way to block this evil and to rid the land and community of those evil deeds and of the illusions and myths that are connected to them, by ridding societies of witchcraft and its practitioners. This obviously serves a great purpose.
In Surah Al-Baqarah we have a story of 2 angels Allah sent called Hārūt and Mārūt, these 2 angels taught the people magic in Babylon.
If Allah decrees everything which happens then he decreed for Hārūt and Mārūt to teach black magic, which means Allah is the source of evil. As Islamqa stated, “According to Islamic teaching, all magic is evil”. If all magic is evil just as they said then the conclusion is that black magic comes from Allah.
To further prove this point Islamqa answered another question about Is man’s fate pre-destined or does he have freedom of will? In which they made statements such as: “Belief in al-qadar (the divine will and decree) is one of the pillars of faith…What is meant by al-qadar is that Allaah has decreed all things from eternity and knows that they will happen at times that are known to Him, and in specific ways, and that He has written that and willed it, and they happen according to what He has decreed.”
It’s a pillar of Islam to believe that all comes from Allah, there is no free will in Islam. We can further illustrate this by going to the Sahih Hadith’s. In this Hadith, we have an argument between Adam and Moses. How Moses and Adam are arguing is another mistake as they didn’t exist at the same time while on earth, and if this happened in Jannah how could that be because they would have been kicked out of Jannah before having this discussion.
As you’ve read this Sahih Hadith, Moses blamed Adam saying he deprived us and caused all of humanity to be kicked out of Paradise. Adam refutes Moses saying how can he be blamed for something Allah decreed 40 years before Adam was created?
Where’s the free will here? Adam didn’t have free will in fact Allah is the one responsible for decreeing that Adam would disobey and eat from the tree. The same way Allah decreed for Hārūt and Mārūt to teach black magic to the people.
And what exactly was the purpose for them to teach black magic? According to the Islamic sources, Hārūt and Mārūt taught people how to separate from their spouses (divorce) through the use of magic. How evil is that?! According to Islamic scholar Ibn-Kathir we read:
Ibn-Kathir tells us these angels came to Babylon saying they didn’t teach anyone till they had said “We are for a trial, so disbelieve not” in other words this was a test and by learning this magic the people would be disbelieving by doing so. Is this a joke or what? Allah sends angels to teach the people black magic meaning Allah is tempting the people by doing so.
Here we’re told the people indulged in evil by learning black magic from these 2 angels, as the magic was causing separation between spouses. Kathir goes as far as to say this was a work of Satan, and we couldn’t agree more!
Here we have Satan and the closet person to him causes the most Fitnah (Arabic: فتنة ,فتن: “temptation, trial; sedition, civil strife, conflict”). Iblis (Satan) embraces the shaitan who was successful in causing separation between a husband and wife. More evidence that Allah can only be Satan himself.
The God of the Bible never causes anyone to separate from their spouse, God never condones divorce solidifying the fact Allah cannot be Yahweh as they are not remotely the same. Here are a few verses from the Bible, proving this fact.
As you can see in the Torah God says a man and women come together and become one flesh. Jesus Christ also quotes the same verse from Genesis and says let not man put asunder. And the Muslims favourite Paul the apostle teaches the same Jesus did, yet Muslims always try to blame Paul for teaching something different.
Our purpose here is not to hate Muslims but to love them by bringing the truth, that their eyes and heart would be open. In hopes, they would have salvation by coming to Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of their sins.
One of the better known Muslim sites islamqa.info had this to say in the case of Mut’a “Whatever the case, marrying with the intention of getting divorced is haraam, and it may be either invalid in and of itself like mut’ah, or haraam because of the deceit and betrayal involved.” How can Sunni Muslims say Mut’a is haram when Allah prescribed it for them? This is found in the Qur’an itself.
In Surah 4:24 Allah gave Muslims the right to practise Mut’a, Sunni Muslims would deny this but Shia Muslims still have this as a practice today. Does anyone including a messenger of God have the right to change a command from God if God never gave a command to change it? This is what Muhammad did, he deliberately changed it saying not to practice Mut’a in the following Hadith.
In Sunan an-Nasa’i Muhammad forbids “temporary marriage” (there’s no such thing as marriage in Islam to prove this read the article Does The Word Nikah Mean Marriage In Islam?) otherwise known as Mut’a. How is it that the god of Islam gives the command for Muslims to indulge in prostitution yet Muhammad is able to abrogate a command from god? Who’s the real god in Islam? How can man abrogate the command of god unless Muhammad is secretly Allah? This is further proof that the Qur’an is a man-made book from a deranged man called Muhammad.
Again the false translation from Muslims anytime you see words in brackets that means those words are not found in Arabic. They are trying to deceive people into thinking marriage is practised in Islam but Nikah doesn’t mean marriage. Again read the above-suggested article for more information on the word Nikah. Notice Muhammad says “their marriage should last for 3 nights, and if they like to continue”, what kind of marriage is this?
This is more proof that Mut’a was practised as seen in Sahih al-Bukhari 5119.
Lastly, in Sahih Muslim 1406d we read that this “marriage” is a “temporary marriage” meaning a Muslim man is allowed to do Mut’a and pay a Muslim woman for sex. In this same Hadith Muhammad says Allah forbids Mut’a, but the Qur’an says nothing about Allah forbidding the practice, there’s no verse that tells Muslim they cannot do Mut’a anymore.
How can Muhammad cancel Qur’an if Allah never gave a verse to Muhammad saying to stop Mut’a? As you can see Islam doesn’t have any concept of marriage only paying for sex is allowed. This is why any Muslim who rejects it is going against their own Qur’an.
Whatsoever Things Are True 